Professional Practice

专业实践
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们检查新的医生和护士从培训过渡到实践作为卫生专业人员的经验,借鉴极限的概念。局限性是一个“中间性”的阶段,涉及不确定性和模糊性,因为人们离开一个社会环境,重新融入一个新的社会环境。令人惊讶的是,很少有研究探索新的卫生专业人员在角色和职业转变过程中的边缘体验,特别是在不稳定和资源有限的环境中。借鉴146次定性访谈和7个焦点小组,涉及121名新毕业的医生和护士,通过在肯尼亚的实习培训过渡,我们描述了极限的三个方面。首先,边缘专业实践,实习生意识到,在医疗和护理学校学到的最佳做法往往不可能在资源有限的医疗保健环境中实施;相反,他们学习解决方法和实践规范。第二,边缘关系身份,实习生离开学生,并在预先存在的专业地位和专业知识等级中采用合格专业人员的身份和责任。我们解释了这些新医生和研究生护士如何谈判他们的边缘地位,包括更有经验但不太合格的专业同事。我们还讨论了实习生如何应对由于高级同事的失望和监督不足以及角色建模而导致的局限性,然后找到同伴支持及其在自己专业中的位置。最后,我们讨论了新的医生和护士如何在资源有限的卫生系统中工作,放弃对安全的期望,永久就业和职业,接受极限职业生涯的现实。我们解释了所有三种形式的门槛如何影响专业人员的发展实践,身份,和职业。我们呼吁以特定的边缘视角进行进一步的研究,以探索卫生工作者职业生涯的这一关键时期,为应对全球医疗专业和实践变革的政策和实践提供信息。
    We examine new doctors\' and nurses\' experiences of transitioning from training to practising as health professionals, drawing on the concept of liminality. Liminality is a stage of \'in-betweenness\', involving uncertainty and ambiguity as people leave one social context and reintegrate into a new one. Surprisingly little research has explored new health professionals\' experiences of liminality during role and career transitions, particularly in precarious and resource-constrained settings. Drawing on 146 qualitative interviews and seven focus groups, involving 121 new graduate medical doctors and nurses transitioning through internship training in Kenya, we describe three aspects of liminality. First, liminal professional practice, where interns realise that best practices learned during medical and nursing schools are often impossible to implement in resource constrained health care settings; instead they learn workarounds and practical norms. Second, liminal relational identities, where interns leave behind being students and adopt the identities and responsibilities of qualified professionals within pre-existing professional hierarchies of status and expertise. We explain how these new doctors and graduate nurses negotiate their liminal status, including in relation to more experienced but less qualified professional colleagues. We also discuss how interns cope with liminality due to disappointing and inadequate supervision and role modelling from senior colleagues but then find peer support and their place within their own professions. Finally, we discuss how new doctors and nurses come to terms with the precarity of working in resource constrained health systems, abandon expectations of secure, permanent employment and careers, and accept the realities of liminal professional careers. We explain how all three forms of liminality influence professionals\' developing practices, identities, and careers. We call for further studies with a specific liminality lens to explore this critical period in health workers\' careers, to inform policy and practice responding to global transformations in healthcare professions and practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对音乐治疗师的工作满意度的研究是职业发展所必需的,他们的发现可能有助于改善从业者的福祉。这项横断面调查的目的是探索音乐治疗师对其职业的满意度水平,并在研究该主题的几个国家/地区确定影响其工作满意度的因素(以色列,德国,西班牙,瑞士,捷克共和国,和奥地利)。通过对439名执业音乐治疗师进行的在线调查获得的数据的描述性和推断性统计数据发现,西班牙的工作满意度最高,德国的工作满意度最低。我们发现工作满意度之间存在显著的相关性,对音乐疗法培训的满意度,以及对职业地位的满意度。此外,参与者对“需要改变什么才能提高他们对职业的满意度”的看法分为3类(治疗师-自我,workplace,和国家)。参与者似乎对自己的职业非常满意,但对与其他团队成员的互动不太满意,以及音乐疗法专业的地位。所有国家(包括那些在法律上将音乐疗法确立为专业的国家)都需要在从业者的工作环境内外推广该专业。
    Studies on the job satisfaction of music therapists are needed for the growth of the profession and their findings may help to improve the well-being of practitioners. The aim of this cross-sectional survey was to explore the levels of satisfaction of music therapists with their profession and to identify the factors influencing their job satisfaction in several countries where this topic is under researched (Israel, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, Czech Republic, and Austria). Descriptive and inferential statistics of data obtained through an online survey of 439 practicing music therapists found the highest levels of job satisfaction were reported in Spain and the lowest levels were reported in Germany. We found significant correlations among job satisfaction, satisfaction with music therapy training, and satisfaction with the perceived status of the profession. Moreover, participants´ views on \"what would need to change to improve their satisfaction\" with their profession were divided into 3 categories (therapists-self, workplace, and country). Participants seemed to be highly satisfied with their profession, but less satisfied with interactions with other team members, and with the perceived status of the music therapy profession. There is an overarching need for all countries (including those where music therapy is legally established as a profession) to promote the profession inside and outside the practitioners´ work settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是测试专业护理实践环境评估量表(SEE-NursingPractice)的简化版本的有效性和可靠性。
    方法:这种方法,横断面研究于2022年9月至12月进行.SEE护理实践的原始版本以问卷形式在17家医院中进行。进行了探索性和验证性因素分析,以确定新的缩短版量表的相关项目并评估其结构效度。
    结果:该研究涉及来自葡萄牙各个地区的1713名注册护士。从探索性因素分析来看,SEE-护理实践浓缩为59个项目和3个分量表。在结构子尺度中,14个项目被删除,其余29个项目分布在四个因素上;在过程子表中,18个项目被删除,其余19个项目分为三个因素;在成果量表中,2个项目被删除,其余11个项目分布在两个因素上。三个分量表的Cronbachα超过0.90,表明可靠性高。验证性因子分析为59项模型的有效性提供了支持。
    结论:SEE护理实践的缩短版本显示出足够的有效性和可靠性,减少与更长版本相关的负担。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to test the validity and reliability of the shortened version of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE-Nursing Practice).
    METHODS: This methodological, cross-sectional study was conducted between September and December 2022. The original version of the SEE-Nursing Practice was administered in questionnaire format across 17 hospitals. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to identify relevant items for the new shortened version of the scale and evaluate its construct validity.
    RESULTS: The study involved 1713 registered nurses from various regions of Portugal. From the exploratory factor analysis, the SEE-Nursing Practice was condensed to 59 items and 3 subscales. In the structure subscale, 14 items were removed, and the remaining 29 items distributed over four factors; in the process subscale, 18 items were removed, and the remaining 19 items organized into three factors; in the outcome subscale, 2 items were removed, and the remaining 11 items distributed over two factors. The Cronbach\'s alpha for the three subscales exceeded 0.90, indicating high reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the validity of the 59-item model.
    CONCLUSIONS: The shortened version of the SEE-Nursing Practice shows adequate validity and reliability, reducing the burden associated with its longer version.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:法国允许深度镇静来缓解疼痛,但不是为了安乐死.预计家庭姑息治疗会增加,全科医生的角色是设计门诊姑息治疗服务的核心。本研究旨在描述知识,态度,以及法国大陆全科医生在姑息治疗和临终关怀方面的做法。
    方法:这是Sentinelles网络中的一项全国性描述性横断面研究。自我报告问卷在2020年11月至2021年11月期间分发给全科医生。进行了描述性分析。
    结果:在123名参与的全科医生中,84%的人接受过姑息治疗的学术培训(n=104)。虽然绝大多数(69%)在疼痛管理中表示舒适,只有四分之一(25%)的人表示他们有能力指示深度和持续的镇静来缓解疼痛.在家中住院等诊所附近的门诊姑息治疗机构的意识超过97%(n=117/120)。对医院设施的认识,包括医院病房和姑息治疗单位的确定的姑息治疗床,较低(75%(n=59/79)和86%(n=86/100),分别)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,法国全科医生对姑息治疗资源有合理的认识。然而,还有改进的空间,特别是在了解医院设施方面。此外,四分之一的全科医生对深度和持续镇静止痛表示不适,强调需要在姑息治疗和临终关怀这一具体方面加强培训。
    BACKGROUND: France allows deep sedation for pain relief, but not for euthanasia. In anticipation of an increase in home-based palliative care, the role of general practitioners is central to the design of outpatient palliative care services. This study aimed to describe the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of general practitioners in mainland France regarding palliative and end of life care.
    METHODS: This was a national descriptive cross-sectional study within the Sentinelles network. Self-report questionnaires were distributed to general practitioners between November 2020 and November 2021. A descriptive analysis was carried out.
    RESULTS: Out of the 123 participating general practitioners, 84% had received academic training in palliative care (n = 104). While a significant majority (69%) expressed comfort in pain management, only a quarter (25%) declared that they were competent at indicating deep and continuous sedation for pain relief. Awareness of outpatient palliative care facilities close to their place of practice such as hospitalization at home was over 97% (n = 117/120). Awareness of hospital facilities, including identified palliative care beds on hospital wards and palliative care units, was lower (75% (n = 59/79) and 86% (n = 86/100), respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that French general practitioners are reasonably aware of palliative care resources available. However, there is room for improvement, particularly in understanding hospital-based facilities. Furthermore, a quarter of the general practitioners expressed discomfort with deep and continuous sedation for pain relief, highlighting the need for increased training in this specific aspect of palliative and end of life care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生物医学科学家(BMS)的角色是建立在医疗保健,在实验室环境中工作,以提供诊断测试和监测对患者健康的治疗效果。该专业受几个专业标准的约束,这些标准强调了为患者和服务使用者的最大利益而工作的重要性。然而,生物医学科学家很少或没有病人接触。这项研究旨在确定生物医学科学家如何证明他们符合专业标准并支持患者预后的实现。
    本研究利用德尔菲法探索专业利益相关者的意见,以确定该专业团体如何为患者的预后做出贡献是否达成共识,并提供证据证明他们的工作符合患者的最佳利益。定性的第一轮研究包括焦点小组以及对BSc生物医学科学奖的教职员工和学生的访谈,专业,法定和监管机构(PSRB)代表和国家卫生服务(NHS)的生物医学科学家。使用主题分析对第一轮回答进行分析,然后生成态度陈述,参与者在第二轮中使用5分李克特量表进行评分。共识或意见分歧是根据每个参与者群体和总体的70%共识水平确定的。
    在分析第二轮数据之后,所有利益相关者都有意见分歧,生物医学科学家小组的共识率最高(72.7%的陈述达到70%的共识),其次是学生组(54.5%的陈述达成了70%的共识),在学术组中最低(40.9%的陈述达成了70%的共识).
    这表明了学术和学生群体的理论与实践的差距,这表明毕业生对他们的研究生角色准备不足。在讨论诸如生物医学科学家如何为患者护理做出贡献等主题时,这种差距尤其明显。专业注册并作为多学科团队(MDT)的一部分工作。确定生物医学科学家教育中的理论与实践差距是一个新颖的发现,这表明学生毕业时可能对生物医学科学家的角色了解不足。
    UNASSIGNED: The Biomedical Scientist (BMS) role is established in healthcare, working in laboratory environments to provide diagnostic testing and to monitor treatment effects on a patients\' health. The profession is subject to several professional standards which highlight the importance of working in the best interests of the patient and service user. However, Biomedical Scientists have little or no patient contact. This study aimed to determine how Biomedical Scientists evidence that they meet the professional standards and support the achievement of patient outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: This study utilised a Delphi method to explore the opinions of professional stakeholders to determine whether there was consensus for how this professional group contributes to patient outcomes and offers evidence that they are working in the best interests of the patient. The qualitative 1st round of the study consisted of focus groups and interviews with staff and students on the BSc Biomedical Science awards, Professional, Statutory and Regulatory body (PSRB) representatives and Biomedical Scientists from the National Health Service (NHS). The first-round responses were analysed using thematic analysis which then generated attitude statements which participants scored using a 5-point Likert scale in the 2nd round. Consensus or divergence of opinion was determined based upon a 70% consensus level within each participant group and overall.
    UNASSIGNED: Following analysis of the 2nd round data, there was divergence of opinion across all stakeholders, with consensus rates being highest in the Biomedical Scientist group (72.7% of statements reached 70% consensus), followed by the student group (54.5% of statements reached 70% consensus) and lowest in the academic group (40.9% of statements reached 70% consensus).
    UNASSIGNED: This demonstrates a theory-practice gap in both the academic and student groups, suggesting that graduates are insufficiently prepared for their post-graduate role. This gap was particularly evident when discussing topics such as how Biomedical Scientists contribute to patient care, professional registration and working as part of the multi-disciplinary team (MDT). The identification of a theory-practice gap in the education of Biomedical Scientists is a novel finding, indicating that students may graduate with insufficient understanding of the Biomedical Scientist role.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于国际上医疗保健服务性质的迅速变化以及需要规范先进的实践理疗,因此对先进的实践理疗的全球核心能力和能力框架的需求非常重要。
    确定拟议的国际核心能力和能力框架对高级实践物理治疗的重要性。
    我们对七个国家的高级实践物理治疗师进行了一项横断面在线调查。每个能力和能力的重要性都以五点协议李克特量表进行了评分。与会者来自联合王国,爱尔兰,澳大利亚,新西兰,加拿大,瑞士和阿根廷。
    共有99名参与者完成了调查,包括63%(57/90)的女性和33%(30/90)的男性。百分之六十,60%(54/90),有超过20年的经验。调查参与者代表了不同的地理分布,25%(23/90)来自澳大利亚,25%(23/90)来自加拿大,18%(6/90)来自新西兰,18%(6/90)来自英国。4%4%(4/90)来自爱尔兰,4%(4/90)来自其他国家(瑞士和阿根廷)。调查显示,参与者之间达成了强烈共识,所有能力和能力都排名很高,被认为对高级实践很重要。
    这项研究表明,七个国家的高级实践物理治疗师对拟议的能力和能力框架的重要性达成了共识。这些发现强调了在先进的物理治疗中需要一个全球标准,特别是考虑到快速变化的医疗环境。
    UNASSIGNED: The need for a global core competency and capability framework for advanced practice physiotherapy is important due to the rapidly changing nature of health care delivery internationally and the need to standardize advanced practice physiotherapy.
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the importance of a proposed international core competency and capability framework for advanced practice physiotherapy.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of advanced practice physiotherapists across seven countries. The importance of each competency and capability was rated on a five-point agreement Likert scale. Participants were from the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Switzerland and Argentina.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 99 participants completed the survey, comprising 63% (57/90) females and 33% (30/90) males. Sixty percent, 60% (54/90), had over 20 years of experience. The survey participants represented a diverse geographic distribution, with 25% (23/90) from Australia, 25% (23/90) from Canada, 18% (6/90) from New Zealand, and 18% (6/90) from the United Kingdom. Four percent 4% (4/90) from Ireland, and 4% (4/90) from other countries (Switzerland and Argentina). The survey revealed a strong consensus among participants, with all competencies and capabilities ranked as high and considered important to advanced practice.
    UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrates a consensus among advanced practice physiotherapists across seven countries on the importance of a proposed competency and capability framework. The findings highlight the need for a global standard in advanced practice physiotherapy, particularly in light of the rapidly changing healthcare landscape.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近几十年来,全科医学的格局经历了显著的转变,深刻影响全科医生的工作条件。这项研究旨在研究影响全科医生日常实践的最显著变化。通过对15名职业生涯末期全科医生的半结构化定性访谈,这项研究探讨了这些变化如何影响工作组织,设备,工作时间,工作与生活的平衡,工作满意度,培训,病人关系,和声誉。采访显示,这些变化被视为障碍,机遇,或两者在一般实践中的复杂相互作用。虽然接受采访的全科医生重视技术进步,并报告了工作条件的积极发展,挑战包括逐步减少任务范围,日益沉重的行政负担,对年轻医生的实践培训较少。其他变化,比如新的医患动态,从单身到团体练习的过渡,以及年轻一代不同的职业期望,被视为具有挑战性和加强一般实践。通过将这些因素和我们在过去几十年的研究中的职业生涯结束全科医生观察到的权衡与一般的社会变革相结合,我们为一般实践中未来框架条件的设计提供了想法,这些想法可能会增强该行业的吸引力。这些见解提供了关键的考虑因素,可以指导未来的一般实践和医学教育战略。
    The landscape of general practice has experienced notable transformations in recent decades, profoundly influencing the working conditions of general practitioners (GPs). This study aimed to examine the most salient changes affecting GPs\' daily practices. Through semi-structured qualitative interviews with 15 end-of-career GPs, the study explored how these changes affected work organization, equipment, working hours, work-life balance, job satisfaction, training, patient relationships, and reputation. The interviews revealed that these changes were perceived as barriers, opportunities, or a complex interplay of both for general practice. While the interviewed GPs valued technological advancements and reported positive developments in working conditions, challenges included a gradual reduction in the range of tasks, growing administrative burdens, and less practical training for young physicians. Other changes, such as new doctor-patient dynamics, the transition from single to group practice, and differing professional expectations of the younger generation, were seen as both challenging and strengthening for general practice. By combining these factors and trade-offs observed by end-of-career GPs in our study over the past few decades with general societal changes, we provide ideas for the design of future framework conditions in general practice that might enhance the attractiveness of the profession. These insights offer key considerations that can guide future strategies for general practice and medical education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鉴于不断发展的数字革命,技术和数字工具正变得与工作和日常职业密不可分。职业治疗从业者(OTP)专注于支持个人进行所需和所需的活动。许多这些日常活动(即,网上银行,购物,社交媒体,智能手机的使用)需要数字技能的增长速度,技术技能不足可能会使个人受到有限的参与和社会孤立。
    了解OTP对技术利用的态度。
    我们调查了109个OTP的态度,工作实践,以及解决客户数字技术功能的障碍。
    我们的研究结果表明,尽管OTP承认技术对其客户的重要性和潜在好处,在OTP的培训和技能方面存在明显的专业差距,以有效地支持其客户的数字功能并将技术集成到他们的实践中。
    需要改进和扩展OTP的数字技能和知识,以解决客户的数字功能和职业治疗实践中的技术实施。
    UNASSIGNED: Given the evolving digital revolution, technology and digital tools are becoming inseparable from work and daily occupations. Occupational therapy practitioners (OTPs) focus on supporting individuals in their desired and needed activities. Many of these daily activities (i.e., online banking, shopping, social media, smartphone use) require digital skills at a growing rate, and insufficient technological skills may subject individuals to limited engagement and social isolation.
    UNASSIGNED: To understand OTPs attitudes regarding technology utilization.
    UNASSIGNED: We surveyed 109 OTPs about their attitudes, work practices, and barriers to addressing their clients\' digital technological functioning.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings of our study suggest that while OTPs acknowledge the importance and potential benefit of technology for their clients, there is a notable professional gap in the training and skills of OTPs to support their clients\' digital functioning effectively and to integrate technology into their practice.
    UNASSIGNED: There is a need to improve and expand OTP\'s digital skills and knowledge regarding addressing clients\' digital functioning and technology implementation in occupational therapy practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于经验和考试的专业资格认证计划用于澄清与专业实践相关的范围和所需能力。在17个国家/地区开发的国家职业卫生(OH)证书已被国际职业卫生协会(IOHA)认可,以满足或超过模型认证计划的要求。迄今为止,在西班牙语地区,职业卫生员没有资格认证或认证计划。为了填补这个空白,成立了一个新的认证机构,名为伊比利亚美洲职业卫生委员会(JIHO)。作为发展职业认证考试的第一步,有必要确定对西班牙语职业卫生认证考试的兴趣,并澄清该行业最常见的工作实践。为了确定在西班牙语地区实践所需的职业卫生能力的适当考试权重,JIHO对以西班牙语为主要语言的国家的职业卫生专业实践进行了全面调查。向9个不同国家的456名职业卫生工作者发送了关于各种主题的调查。结果表明,79%的受访者认为需要西班牙语的OH认证考试非常重要或极其重要。在实践中使用的最常见和最重要的技术能力是(1)对危险物质的健康影响的认识,以做出关于工作场所活动和暴露的决定,(2)控件层次结构的应用,控制带,危险通信,培训员工和其他方法,以减少工人暴露和工作场所风险,(3)应用原则来识别和控制工作场所的生物危害。研究结果已用于指导JIHO考试中各种技术主题和规则的权重和重要性。这项研究的数据可用于认证考试的开发,为了提高行业的国际一致性,以及俄亥俄州教育计划的发展。
    Professional credentialing schemes based on experience and examination are used to clarify the scope and required competencies associated with the practice of a profession. National occupational hygiene (OH) credentials developed in 17 nations have been recognized by the International Occupational Hygiene Association (IOHA) to meet or exceed the requirements of a model certification program. To date, there is no credentialing or certification scheme for occupational hygienists in Spanish-speaking regions. To fill this void, a new credentialing body has been created named the Iberoamerican Board of Occupational Hygiene (JIHO). As a first step to the development of a certification exam for a profession, it is necessary to determine the interest in an occupational hygiene certification exam in Spanish and to clarify the most common work practices for those practicing the profession. To determine the proper exam weightings for occupational hygiene competencies needed to practice in Spanish-speaking regions JIHO conducted a comprehensive survey of professional practice of occupational hygiene in nations where Spanish is spoken as the primary language. Surveys were sent to 456 practicing occupational hygienists in nine different countries on a variety of topics. Results indicated that 79% of respondents felt the need for an OH certification exam in Spanish was very or extremely important. The most frequent and important technical competencies utilized in practice were (1) awareness about the health effects of hazardous agents to make decisions about workplace activities and exposures, (2) application of the hierarchy of controls, control banding, hazard communication, training of employees and other methods to reduce worker exposure and workplace risks, and (3) application of principles to recognize and control biohazards in the workplace. The study results have been used to guide the weighting and importance of various technical topics and rubrics on the JIHO exam. Data from this study can be used in the development of certification examinations, to improve international coherence in the profession, and the development of educational programs in OH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    精神智力的概念是在1997年根据哲学理论和神经学证据提出的,并作为终极智力被引入。精神智力已被认为是专业人士所需的技能之一,最近在护理实践中获得了牵引力。了解精神智力的作用及其与专业护理实践的联系对于在这一探究领域创造知识至关重要。
    确定精神智力水平的最佳可用证据及其与护士专业实践的相关性。
    根据PRISMA和MOOSE指南对观察性研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。该系统评价的方案已在PROSPERO注册,鉴定为CRD42021254881。
    十个电子英语和波斯语数据库[Cochrane图书馆,WebofScience,Scopus,PubMed,CINAHL,科学直接,Wiley在线图书馆,马吉兰,SID,伊朗医生]被搜索以确定合格的研究,2000年1月至2020年5月以英语和波斯语出版。
    使用了系统化的搜索策略,以包括合格的已发表和未发表的观察性研究,这些研究检查了护士的精神智力水平及其与专业实践的相关性。筛选,质量评估,数据提取,和分析是使用JoannaBriggs研究所的方法进行的,并由两名独立审稿人进行。
    35项研究,共有7301名护士,包括在内。29项研究和5853名护士的精神智力平均得分为0.63(95%CI:0.57-0.69,I2=99.97%)。精神智力自我报告清单是衡量精神智力最常用的工具。大多数专业护理结果与护士的精神智力呈正相关。精神智力与包括护理艺术在内的专业护理实践组成部分之间的集合正相关系数,能力,实践的属性,个人承诺为0.34(95%CI:0.24,0.43,I2=63.4%,5项研究),0.42(95%CI:0.25,0.56,I2=62.2%,2项研究),0.32(95%CI:0.11,0.50,I2=92.2%,5项研究)和0.41(95%CI:0.34,0.49,I2=74.3%,8项研究)分别。
    这项系统评价的结果表明,护士的精神智力水平相对较高,与专业护理实践中度相关。有必要实施策略来提高护士的精神智力水平。
    UNASSIGNED: The concept of spiritual intelligence was developed in 1997 based on philosophical theories and neurological evidence and introduced as the ultimate intelligence. Spiritual intelligence has been considered as one of the skills required by professionals and has recently gained traction within nursing practice. Understanding the role of spiritual intelligence and its association with professional nursing practice is crucial to creating knowledge in this area of inquiry.
    UNASSIGNED: To identify the best available evidence of the spiritual intelligence level and its correlation with professional practice among nurses.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies were reported according to the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. The protocol for this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO with the identification CRD42021254881.
    UNASSIGNED: Ten electronic English and Persian databases [Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, Science Direct, Wiley Online Library, Magiran, SID, IranDoc] were searched to identify eligible studies, published in the English and Persian languages from January 2000 to May 2020.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematized search strategy was used to include eligible published and unpublished observational studies that examined the spiritual intelligence level and its correlation with professional practice among nurses. Screening, quality assessments, data extractions, and analysis were undertaken using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and carried out by two independent reviewers.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-five studies, with a total of 7301 nurses, were included. The mean score for spiritual intelligence in 29 studies and 5853 nurses was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.57-0.69, I2 = 99.97%). The Spiritual Intelligence Self-Report Inventory was the most frequently used instrument to measure spiritual intelligence. Most of the professional nursing outcomes represented a positive association with nurses\' spiritual intelligence. The pooled positive correlation coefficients between spiritual intelligence and a professional nursing practice components including the art of nursing, competence, attributes of practice and, personal commitment were 0.34 (95% CI: 0.24, 0.43, I2 = 63.4%, 5 studies), 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25,0.56, I 2 = 62.2%, 2 studies), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.50, I 2 = 92.2%, 5 studies) and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.34, 0.49, I 2 = 74.3%, 8 studies) respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings of this systematic review indicated a relatively high level of spiritual intelligence among nurses that was moderately associated with professional nursing practice. implementing strategies to promote spiritual intelligence levels among nurses is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号