Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:保留比率肺活量测定(PRISm)是一种异常的肺功能。PRISm和死亡率已经在一些研究中进行了探讨,但是对协会的综合评估是有限的。本研究旨在进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查PRISm患者的死亡率和心血管疾病。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,和WebofScience数据库,以及灰色文献来源,搜索了截至2023年9月7日发表的相关研究,没有语言限制。这篇综述包括所有已发表的观察性队列研究,这些研究调查了PRISm与普通人群死亡率的关系。以及吸烟者的亚组分析和支气管扩张前肺活量测定研究。感兴趣的结果是全因死亡率,心血管死亡率,与呼吸有关的死亡率。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。敏感性和亚组分析探讨了异质性和稳健性。发表偏倚用Egger和Begg测试进行评估。
    结果:总体而言,本荟萃分析纳入了8项研究.全因死亡率的合并HR为1.60(95%CI,1.48-1.74),CVD死亡率为1.68(95%CI,1.46-1.94),与正常组相比,PRISm组的呼吸相关死亡率为3.09(95%CI,1.42-6.71)。在亚组分析中,PRISm的参与者有更高的效果(HR,2.11;95%CI,1.74-2.54)吸烟者相对于肺活量正常的参与者的全因死亡率。此外,在多项敏感性分析中,PRISm与死亡风险之间的关联是一致的.
    结论:PRISm患者与全因死亡风险增加相关,CVD死亡率,与普通人群肺功能正常的人群相比,与呼吸相关的死亡率。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42023426872。
    BACKGROUND: Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) is a type of abnormal lung function. PRISm and mortality have been explored in several studies, but a comprehensive evaluation of the associations is limited. The current study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to investigate the mortality and cardiovascular diseases in patients with PRISm.
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, as well as gray literature sources, were searched for relevant studies published up to 7 September 2023 without language restrictions. This review included all published observational cohort studies that investigated the association of PRISm with mortality in the general population, as well as subgroup analyses in smokers and pre-bronchodilation spirometry studies. The outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and respiratory-related mortality. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale assessed study quality. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses explored heterogeneity and robustness. Publication bias was assessed with Egger\'s and Begg\'s tests.
    RESULTS: Overall, eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HR was 1.60 (95% CI, 1.48-1.74) for all-cause mortality, 1.68 (95% CI, 1.46-1.94) for CVD mortality, and 3.09 (95% CI, 1.42-6.71) for respiratory-related mortality in PRISm group compared to normal group. In the subgroup analysis, participants with PRISm had a higher effect (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.74-2.54) on all-cause mortality among smokers relative to participants with normal spirometry. Furthermore, the association between PRISm and mortality risk was consistent across several sensitivity analyses.
    CONCLUSIONS: People with PRISm were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, and respiratory-related mortality as compared to those with normal lung function in the general population.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42023426872.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    初始慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)药物治疗基于症状负担和加重史。仅建议有加重史的患者纳入吸入型皮质类固醇(ICS)。这份简短报告强调,在以前未被识别的COPD患者中,约有1/5有一个或多个恶化样事件,约有1/10在过去12个月内有两个或多个事件,无论他们是否自我报告伴随哮喘。密切关注先前的恶化样事件历史可能会导致更多的指导一致性护理。此外,还有另外两组有受损但非阻塞性肺活量测定,一些有显著呼吸道症状负担的患者发生加重样事件的频率与符合COPD肺活量测定标准的患者相似.迄今为止,我们对这些人的治疗几乎没有指导。
    Initial chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) pharmacotherapy is based on symptom burden and exacerbation history. Inclusion of inhaled cortico-steroids (ICS) is recommended only for those with a history of exacerbations. This brief report highlights that among individuals with previously unrecognized COPD about 1 in 5 have one or more exacerbation-like events and about 1 in 10 have two or more events in the prior 12 months whether or not they self-report concomitant asthma. Closer attention to prior exacerbation-like event history might lead to more guideline concordant care. In addition, there are two other groups that have impaired but non-obstructive spirometry, some with significant respiratory symptom burden who have frequencies of exacerbation-like events similar to those meeting COPD spirometry criteria. To date we have little guidance for treatment of these individuals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种异质性疾病。历史上,已经描述了两种COPD表型:慢性支气管炎和肺气肿。尽管这些表型可以提供疾病病理生理学的额外特征,它们的广泛性不足以反映COPD的异质性,并且没有提供指示特定治疗的颗粒分类,也许除了在慢性支气管炎患者中添加吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)。在这次审查中,我们描述了提供预后和/或指示特定治疗的COPD表型.我们还描述了COPD样表型,这些表型不一定符合当前的COPD诊断标准,但提供了额外的预后,可能是未来临床试验的目标。
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease. Historically, two COPD phenotypes have been described: chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Although these phenotypes may provide additional characterization of the pathophysiology of the disease, they are not extensive enough to reflect the heterogeneity of COPD and do not provide granular categorization that indicates specific treatment, perhaps with the exception of adding inhaled glucocorticoids (ICS) in patients with chronic bronchitis. In this review, we describe COPD phenotypes that provide prognostication and/or indicate specific treatment. We also describe COPD-like phenotypes that do not necessarily meet the current diagnostic criteria for COPD but provide additional prognostication and may be the targets for future clinical trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:肺癌筛查可能为肺活量测定检查提供有利机会,诊断患有未确诊的肺功能障碍的参与者,或鉴于预期的净收益,提高计算机断层扫描(CT)筛查强度的目标。
    UNASSIGNED:在德国肺癌筛查干预研究(LUSI)的CT筛查组(n=2,029)中进行了肺活量测定,该试验检查了年度CT筛查对肺癌死亡率的影响,50-69岁的长期吸烟者。参与者被分类为患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)[一秒钟内强制呼气(FEV1)/强制肺活量(FVC)<0.7],保留比率肺活量测定受损(PRISM;FEV1/FVC≥0.7,FEV1%预测值<80%),或者正常的肺活量测定.描述性统计用于检查COPD或PRISm与呼吸道症状的关联,以及自我报告的呼吸道和其他疾病的医学诊断。Logistic回归和比例风险回归用于检查COPD和PRISm的相关性。以及他们自我报告的医疗诊断,有肺癌和全因死亡的风险。
    UNASSIGNED:共有1,987名筛查组参与者(98%)提供了可解释的肺活量测量;其中,34.3%的肺活量测定模式与COPD(18.6%)或PRISm(15.7%)一致。三分之二的COPD或PRISm患者无症状,只有23%的人报告以前的医学诊断与COPD一致。报告诊断的参与者往往是当前和较重的吸烟者,更常出现呼吸道症状,心血管合并症,或更严重的肺功能损害。独立于吸烟史,中重度(GOLD2-4)COPD(OR=2.14;95%CI:1.54-2.98),和PRISm(OR=2.68;95%CI:1.61-4.40),与肺癌风险增加有关。PRISm较少的肺癌患者患有腺癌,更常见的是鳞状细胞或小细胞肿瘤,与正常肺活量测定的(n=45)相比,PRISm和COPD均与筛查癌症的晚期肺癌肿瘤分期相关.PRISm和COPD,取决于黄金阶段,还与总死亡率风险增加约2至4倍有关,87%的人有肺癌以外的原因。
    UASSIGNED:在德国,约三分之一符合肺癌筛查条件的吸烟者患有COPD或PRISm。由于这些情况与肺癌的检测有关,肺活量测定可能有助于识别肺癌或其他原因死亡的高危人群,和谁可能特别受益于CT筛查。
    UNASSIGNED: Lung cancer screening may provide a favorable opportunity for a spirometry examination, to diagnose participants with undiagnosed lung function impairments, or to improve targeting of computed tomography (CT) screening intensity in view of expected net benefit.
    UNASSIGNED: Spirometry was performed in the CT screening arm (n=2,029) of the German Lung Cancer Screening Intervention Study (LUSI)-a trial examining the effects of annual CT screening on lung cancer mortality, in 50-69-year-old long-term smokers. Participants were classified as having chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [forced expiration in one second (FEV1)/forced vital lung capacity (FVC) <0.7], preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm; FEV1/FVC ≥0.7 and FEV1% predicted <80%), or normal spirometry. Descriptive statistics were used to examine associations of COPD or PRISm with respiratory symptoms, and self-reported medical diagnoses of respiratory and other morbidities. Logistic regression and proportional hazards regression were used to examine associations of COPD and PRISm, as well as their self-reported medical diagnoses, with risks of lung cancer and all-cause mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 1,987 screening arm participants (98%) provided interpretable spirometry measurements; of these, 34.3% had spirometric patterns consistent with either COPD (18.6%) or PRISm (15.7%). Two thirds of participants with COPD or PRISm were asymptomatic, and only 23% reported a previous medical diagnosis concordant with COPD. Participants reporting a diagnosis tended to be more often current and heavier smokers, and more often had respiratory symptoms, cardiovascular comorbidities, or more severe lung function impairments. Independently of smoking history, moderate-to-severe (GOLD 2-4) COPD (OR =2.14; 95% CI: 1.54-2.98), and PRISm (OR =2.68; 95% CI: 1.61-4.40), were associated with increased lung cancer risk. Lung cancer patients with PRISm less frequently had adenocarcinomas, and more often squamous cell or small cell tumors, compared to those with normal spirometry (n=45), and both PRISm and COPD were associated with more advanced lung cancer tumor stage for screen-detected cancers. PRISm and COPD, depending on GOLD stage, were also associated with about 2- to 4-fold increases in risk of overall mortality, which to 87 percent had causes other than lung cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: About one third of smokers eligible for lung cancer screening in Germany have COPD or PRISm. As these conditions were associated with detection of lung cancer, spirometry may help identify populations at high risk for death of lung cancer or other causes, and who might particularly benefit from CT screening.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Rationale: Natural history of preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), often defined as FEV1/FVC ⩾lower limit of normal and FEV1 <80% of predicted value, is not well described. Objectives: To investigate the natural history and long-term prognosis of the following PRISm trajectories: persistent PRISm trajectory (individuals with PRISm both young and middle-aged), normal to PRISm trajectory (individuals developing PRISm from normal spirometry in young adulthood), and PRISm to normal trajectory (individuals recovering from PRISm in young adulthood by normalizing spirometry while middle-aged). Methods: We followed 1,160 individuals aged 20-40 years from the Copenhagen City Heart Study from 1976 to 1983 until 2001 to 2003 to determine their lung function trajectory; 72 had persistent PRISm trajectory, 76 had normal to PRISm trajectory, 155 had PRISm to normal trajectory, and 857 had normal trajectory. From 2001-2003 until 2018, we determined the risk of cardiopulmonary disease and death. Measurements and Main Results: We recorded 198 admissions for heart disease, 143 for pneumonia, and 64 for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as well as 171 deaths. Compared with individuals with normal trajectory, hazard ratios for individuals with persistent PRISm trajectory were 1.55 (95% confidence interval, 0.91-2.65) for heart disease admission, 2.86 (1.70-4.83) for pneumonia admission, 6.57 (3.41-12.66) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admission, and 3.68 (2.38-5.68) for all-cause mortality. Corresponding hazard ratios for individuals with normal to PRISm trajectory were 1.91 (1.24-2.95), 2.74 (1.70-4.42), 7.61 (4.21-13.72), and 2.96 (1.94-4.51), respectively. Prognosis of individuals with PRISm to normal trajectory did not differ from those with normal trajectory. Conclusions: PRISm in middle-aged individuals is associated with increased risk of cardiopulmonary disease and all-cause mortality, but individuals who recover from PRISm during their adult life are no longer at increased risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肺活量测定结果可以诊断出正常的气流,气流阻塞,或保留比率肺活量测定受损(PRISm),在保留的FEV1/FVC的设置中定义为减少的FEV1或FVC。先前的研究估计PRISm的患病率为7-12%。我们的目标是在肺活量测定数据库中检查PRISm的患病率,并确定与PRISm相关的因素。
    方法:我们对21,870个螺旋体进行了回顾性分析;由于数据缺失或年龄极端,排除了1,616个螺旋体,高度,或体重。我们计算了支气管扩张剂前和支气管扩张剂后肺功能检查中PRISm的患病率。随后,我们计算了不同年龄的PRISm患病率,种族,身体质量指数,和诊断类别,以及性别和吸烟者与非吸烟者。最后,在FEV1<正常下限的队列中,我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定与PRISm相关的因素.
    结果:我们确定了18,059个支气管扩张剂前螺旋体,其中22.3%的患者诊断为PRISm。这种患病率在支气管扩张剂后的肺活量中保持稳定(17.7%),在排除接受多项肺功能检查的受试者的早期肺功能检查后(支气管扩张剂前为20.7%,支气管扩张剂后为24.3%),当我们将分析限制在符合美国胸科学会标准的支气管扩张剂前肺活量时(20.6%).45-60岁受试者的PRISm患病率较高(24.4%),男性(23.7%)高于女性(17.9%)。患病率随着体重指数的增加而上升,转诊诊断为限制性肺病的患病率更高(50%)。种族和吸烟者与非吸烟者之间的PRISm患病率相似。在多变量分析中,预测FEV1的较高百分比(比值比1.51,95%CI1.42-1.60),体重指数(比值比1.52,95%CI1.39-1.68),限制性肺病(比值比4.32,95%CI2.54-7.57)与PRISm的诊断相关.吸烟与PRISm呈负相关(比值比0.55,95%CI0.46-0.65)。
    结论:在学术医学中心的肺活量测定数据库中,PRISm患病率为17-24%,比以前报道的要高。
    BACKGROUND: Spirometry results can yield a diagnosis of normal air flow, air flow obstruction, or preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), defined as a reduced FEV1 or FVC in the setting of preserved FEV1/FVC. Previous studies have estimated the prevalence of PRISm to be 7-12%. Our objective was to examine the prevalence of PRISm in a spirometry database and to identify factors associated with PRISm.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 21,870 spirometries; 1,616 were excluded because of missing data or extremes of age, height, or weight. We calculated the prevalence of PRISm in prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator pulmonary function tests. Subsequently, we calculated the prevalence of PRISm by various age, race, body mass index, and diagnosis categories, as well as by gender and smokers versus nonsmokers. Finally, in the subset of the cohort with FEV1 < lower limit of normal, we performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with PRISm.
    RESULTS: We identified 18,059 prebronchodilator spirometries, and 22.3% of these yielded a PRISm diagnosis. This prevalence remained stable in postbronchodilator spirometries (17.7%), after excluding earlier pulmonary function tests for subjects with multiple pulmonary function tests (20.7% in prebronchodilator and 24.3% in postbronchodilator), and when we limited the analysis to prebronchodilator spirometries that met American Thoracic Society criteria (20.6%). The PRISm prevalence was higher in subjects 45-60 y old (24.4%) and in males (23.7%) versus females (17.9%). The prevalence rose with body mass index and was higher for those with a referral diagnosis of restrictive lung disease (50%). PRISm prevalence was similar between races and smokers versus nonsmokers. In a multivariable analysis, higher % of predicted FEV1 (odds ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.42-1.60), body mass index (odds ratio 1.52, 95% CI 1.39-1.68), and restrictive lung disease (odds ratio 4.32, 95% CI 2.54-7.57) were associated with a diagnosis of PRISm. Smoking was inversely associated (odds ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.46-0.65) with PRISm.
    CONCLUSIONS: In a spirometry database at an academic medical center, the PRISm prevalence was 17-24%, which is higher than previously reported.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号