Preschool

学前教育
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:形态句法问题是发展性语言障碍(DLD)的核心症状。在荷兰,患有(推测的)DLD的儿童可以在以语言为中心的治疗组中接受特殊照顾.这些群体的重点主要在于提高交际意向,词汇和语音。句法技能受到的关注较少。
    目的:作者开发了一种针对DLD幼儿形态句法技能的基于脚本组的干预措施。在这项研究中,测试了干预措施对患有(假定)DLD的学龄前儿童的形态句法技能的影响,并评估了对教学从业者(PPs)的可用性.
    方法:27名患有DLD的学龄前儿童(2岁;10-3岁;10[岁;月])参加了A-B组研究,其中通过形态句法任务和语言样本分析(LSA)监测语法结构的发展。使用贝叶斯混合效应模型检查了8周常规护理(UC)和8周形态句法干预期间的进展。在LSA,将靶向结构与对照结构进行比较.干预包括每周一次的基于脚本的小组会议,其中针对形态句法结构,以及重复这些目标结构的日常活动。干预由训练有素的PP提供,由言语治疗师指导。使用在线问卷评估了可用性和可行性的早期指标。
    结果:分析表明,在干预期间,形态句法技能得到了改善,有强有力的证据证明LSA中形态句法任务以及目标和控制结构上目标结构的生产增长,虽然几乎没有发现任何证据表明这些结构在UC中的使用有所增加。然而,目标结构和控制结构似乎以相同的速度发展。在UC和干预阶段,形态句法能力的一般测量均显示出改善。从业人员之间的评估表明,干预措施被认为是可用和可行的。
    结论:显示了干预期儿童形态句法技能的增长,但这不能证明与干预有关,因为干预期间目标和控制结构都得到了改善。这种增长可能是由于成熟而不是干预。然而,我们的研究表明,患有DLD的学龄前儿童的形态句法技能可以在8周内显示出相当大的改善。此外,我们的研究强调了在监测儿童形态句法发展时使用LSA措施的重要性,因为它们可能比标准化测试对变化更敏感。
    结论:关于该主题的已知内容大多数患有发育性语言障碍(DLD)的儿童在形态句法发育中遇到困难。在荷兰,患有DLD的学龄前儿童可以在以语言为中心的治疗组中接受特殊护理。这些群体主要集中在激发交际意图上,词汇和语音,但在刺激形态句法技能方面就更少了。这项研究的补充我们设计了一种新的基于小组的干预措施,针对DLD儿童的表达形态句法技能,检查了效果,并研究了可用性和可行性。尽管有强有力的证据表明形态学技能的增长,干预效果无法证明。从业人员之间的评估表明,干预措施被认为是可用和可行的。此外,这项研究表明,儿童的形态句法技能可以在相对较短的时间内提高,语言样本分析似乎对检测这些变化很敏感。这项工作的临床意义是什么?目前,很少有基于群体的形态句法干预(在荷兰)。由于从业者普遍对干预措施及其可用性和可行性持积极态度,拟议的干预措施可能有利于DLD儿童形态句法问题的治疗.
    BACKGROUND: Morphosyntactic problems are a core symptom of Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). In the Netherlands, children with (presumed) DLD can receive special care in language-focused treatment groups. The focus of these groups mainly lies in improving communicative intentions, vocabulary and phonology. Morphosyntactic skills receive less attention.
    OBJECTIVE: The authors developed a scripted group-based intervention targeting morphosyntactic skills in young children with DLD. In this study, the effect of the intervention on the morphosyntactic skills of preschoolers with (presumed) DLD was tested and the usability for pedagogical practitioners (PPs) was evaluated.
    METHODS: Twenty-seven preschoolers with DLD (aged 2;10-3;10 [years;months]) participated in an A-B group study in which the development of grammatical structures was monitored with a morphosyntactic task and language sample analyses (LSA). Progression during 8 weeks usual care (UC) and 8 weeks morphosyntactic intervention was examined using Bayesian mixed effects models. In LSA, structures that were targeted were compared to control structures. The intervention consisted of a weekly script-based group session in which morphosyntactic structures were targeted, and daily activities in which these target structures were repeated. The intervention was provided by trained PPs, who were coached by a speech-language therapist. An early indication of usability and feasibility was evaluated using an online questionnaire.
    RESULTS: The analyses show that morphosyntactic skills improved during the intervention period, with strong evidence for growth in the production of target structures on the morphosyntactic task and target and control structures in LSA, while barely any evidence was found for growth in the use of these structures in UC. However, target structures and control structures seem to develop at the same rate. General measures of morphosyntactic ability showed improvement both during UC and the intervention phase. Evaluation among practitioners suggested that the intervention is regarded as usable and feasible.
    CONCLUSIONS: Growth in morphosyntactic skills of children in the intervention period was demonstrated, but this could not be proven to be related to the intervention because both target and control structures improved during the intervention. This growth might be due to maturation instead of the intervention. Nevertheless, our study demonstrates that the morphosyntactic skills of preschoolers with DLD can show considerable improvement over a period of 8 weeks. Furthermore, our study underlines the importance of using LSA measures when monitoring the morphosyntactic development of children, as they might be more sensitive to change than standardised tests.
    CONCLUSIONS: What is already known on the subject Most children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) experience difficulties in their morphosyntactic development. In the Netherlands, preschoolers with DLD can receive special care in language-focused treatment groups. These groups mainly focus on stimulating communicative intentions, vocabulary and phonology, but less so on stimulating morphosyntactic skills. What this study adds We designed a new group-based intervention targeting the expressive morphosyntactic skills of children with DLD, examined the effect and investigated the usability and feasibility. Although there is strong evidence for growth in morphological skills, intervention effects could not be demonstrated. Evaluations among practitioners suggested that the intervention is regarded as usable and feasible. Furthermore, this study shows that children\'s morphosyntactic skills can improve over relatively short periods of time and language sample analyses seem to be sensitive to detect these changes. What are the clinical implications of this work? Currently, very few group-based morphosyntactic interventions exist (in the Netherlands). Since practitioners were generally positive about the intervention and its usability and feasibility, the proposed intervention might benefit the treatment of morphosyntactic problems in children with DLD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在确定学龄前儿童的屏幕观看时间(SVT)模式,行为或情感(DBE)问题,并确定其与社会情感发展的关系。
    这项横断面研究涉及0-5岁的儿童,他们因DBE问题被转诊到发育儿科诊所。家长填写了屏幕时间问卷,和Devereux儿童早期评估临床(DECA-C)问题,评估儿童的社会情绪能力。数据采用逻辑回归分析,相关分析和比较检验。
    在225名儿童中(平均年龄:32.4个月),平均每日SVT为138分钟。超过一半(51.1%)的儿童具有语言延迟的临床特征,而26.6%的人有暗示自闭症谱系障碍的特征。首次引入屏幕时间的平均年龄为13.8个月,32.4%的儿童先前经历过更高的SVT。与1岁后的SVT相比,前12个月的SVT主要是为了促进喂养(P<0.05)。过去SVT较高的儿童注意力较差,更多的侵略,行为担忧增加。有DBE问题的儿童比同龄同龄人有更多的屏幕时间。
    有DBE问题的儿童在很小的时候就暴露于SVT,并且比同龄人有更多的屏幕时间。引导父母在儿童早期减少SVT至关重要,尤其是在进餐时间。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to determine patterns of screen viewing time (SVT) in preschool children with developmental, behavioural or emotional (DBE) issues, and to identify its relationship with social-emotional development.
    UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional study involved children aged 0-5 years who were referred to a developmental paediatric clinic for DBE issues. Parents completed a screen time questionnaire, and the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment-Clinical (DECA-C) question-naire which assessed the social-emotional competence of the children. Data were analysed using logistic regression, correlational analyses and tests of comparison.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 225 children (mean age: 32.4 months), mean daily SVT was 138 minutes. More than half (51.1%) of the children had clinical features of language delay, while 26.6% had features suggestive of autism spectrum disorder. Screen time was first introduced at a mean age of 13.8 months, with 32.4% of children previously experiencing higher SVT. Compared to SVT introduction after 1 year of age, SVT in the first 12 months was primarily to facilitate feeding (P<0.05). Children with higher past SVT had poorer attention, more aggression, and increased behavioural concerns. Children with DBE issues have significantly more screen time than same-aged peers.
    UNASSIGNED: Children with DBE issues are exposed to SVT at a very young age and have significantly more screen time than their peers. It is crucial to guide parents to reduce SVT in early childhood, particularly around mealtimes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    乐观,高估积极结果和低估消极结果的偏见,可能会影响孩子们的学习方式,面对挑战,克服挫折。尽管大约80%的成年人持乐观态度,童年的乐观主义被低估了。在种族和社会经济上多样化的社区样本中,有152名三至六岁的儿童参加了两个实验(一个基于故事,一个基于数字概率的),当结果发生的可能性与最理想的结果匹配或相冲突时,评估事件结果的预期。结果系统地表明,儿童是乐观的,甚至比别人更乐观,随着年龄的增长,越来越多地将概率信息整合到他们的预测中。在来自不同社会经济背景和具有不同程度的抑郁症状的儿童中,乐观情绪存在差异。这些发现为儿童如何思考未来提供了深刻的见解,并阐明了影响儿童乐观预测的关键因素。
    Optimism, a bias to overestimate positive and underestimate negative outcomes, may shape how children learn, confront challenges, and overcome setbacks. Although approximately 80% of adults are optimistic, childhood optimism is understudied. A racially and socioeconomically diverse community sample of 152 three- to six-year-old children participated in two experiments (one story-based, one numeric probability-based) that assessed expectations of event outcomes when the likelihood of the outcome occurring either matched or conflicted with the most desirable outcome. The results systematically demonstrate that children are optimistic, even more optimistic for themselves than others, and increasingly integrate probabilistic information into their predictions with age. Differences in optimism were found in children from different socioeconomic backgrounds and those with different levels of depressive symptoms. These findings provide insight into how children reason about the future and elucidate key factors that impact optimistic predictions in childhood.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是一种影响注意力和行为的心理健康障碍。多动症患者经常在社交互动中遇到挑战,面对问题,比如社会排斥和人际关系的困难,由于他们的疏忽,冲动,和多动症。
    国家青年纵向调查(NLSY)数据库用于识别ADHD症状的模式。NLSY研究中1986年至2014年间女性所生的孩子也被包括在内。NLSY1979队列中共有1,847名儿童,他们在四岁时计算出多动/注意力不集中的得分,因此符合这项研究的条件。使用轨迹建模方法来评估轨迹类别。性,基线反社会得分,基线焦虑评分,并调整基线抑郁评分以构建轨迹模型。我们使用逐步多变量逻辑回归模型来选择识别轨迹的风险因素。
    轨迹分析确定了多动症的六个类别,包括(1)无标志类,(2)自从幼儿园是坚持班以来,几乎没有迹象,(3)在学龄前很少有迹象,但后来没有迹象,(4)在小学课堂上放大的学龄前标志很少,(5)学龄前儿童很少出现减少晚班的迹象,和(6)许多迹象,因为学龄前是坚持类。敏感性分析得出了类似的轨迹模式,除了自学龄前以来的一些迹象放大了后来的课程。儿童种族,母乳喂养状况,任性得分,不成熟的依赖分数,同伴冲突得分,母亲的教育水平,基线反社会得分,基线焦虑/抑郁评分,在儿童出生前12个月的吸烟状况被发现是ADHD轨迹分类中的危险因素。
    当前研究中获得的轨迹分类结果可以(a)帮助研究人员评估最能降低ADHD症状的长期影响的干预措施(或干预措施的组合)和(b)允许临床医生更好地评估患有ADHD的儿童属于哪个类别,以便可以采用适当的干预措施。
    UNASSIGNED: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a mental health disorder that affects attention and behavior. People with ADHD frequently encounter challenges in social interactions, facing issues, like social rejection and difficulties in interpersonal relationships, due to their inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity.
    UNASSIGNED: A National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) database was employed to identify patterns of ADHD symptoms. The children who were born to women in the NLSY study between 1986 and 2014 were included. A total of 1,847 children in the NLSY 1979 cohort whose hyperactivity/inattention score was calculated when they were four years old were eligible for this study. A trajectory modeling method was used to evaluate the trajectory classes. Sex, baseline antisocial score, baseline anxiety score, and baseline depression score were adjusted to build the trajectory model. We used stepwise multivariate logistic regression models to select the risk factors for the identified trajectories.
    UNASSIGNED: The trajectory analysis identified six classes for ADHD, including (1) no sign class, (2) few signs since preschool being persistent class, (3) few signs in preschool but no signs later class, (4) few signs in preschool that magnified in elementary school class, (5) few signs in preschool that diminished later class, and (6) many signs since preschool being persistent class. The sensitivity analysis resulted in a similar trajectory pattern, except for the few signs since preschool that magnified later class. Children\'s race, breastfeeding status, headstrong score, immature dependent score, peer conflict score, educational level of the mother, baseline antisocial score, baseline anxious/depressed score, and smoking status 12 months prior to the birth of the child were found to be risk factors in the ADHD trajectory classes.
    UNASSIGNED: The trajectory classes findings obtained in the current study can (a) assist a researcher in evaluating an intervention (or combination of interventions) that best decreases the long-term impact of ADHD symptoms and (b) allow clinicians to better assess as to which class a child with ADHD belongs so that appropriate intervention can be employed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    学龄前儿童的数学知识发展较早,差异很大。当前的研究集中在两种遗传早期出现的认知技能上,它们可能是后期数学技能的重要预测因子(即,几何和算术):儿童对对象和数量之间抽象关系的理解,这通过他们的图案化技能和近似数字系统(ANS)来证明。儿童的图案技能,ANS,算术,几何图形,非语言智力(IQ),在4岁时评估执行功能(EF)技能,一年后,在5岁时再次评估了他们的算术和几何知识(N=113)。超越儿童在算术和几何方面的初步知识,以及IQ和EF,4岁时的图案技能和ANS唯一地预测了5岁时儿童的几何知识,但只有4岁时的图案唯一地预测了5岁时的算术能力。因此,虽然图案和ANS是相关的,它们在后来的几何和算术知识中不同地解释了变化。讨论了结果对早期数学理论和研究的影响。
    Preschoolers\' mathematics knowledge develops early and varies substantially. The current study focused on two ontogenetically early emerging cognitive skills that may be important predictors of later math skills (i.e., geometry and numeracy): children\'s understanding of abstract relations between objects and quantities as evidenced by their patterning skills and the approximate number system (ANS). Children\'s patterning skills, the ANS, numeracy, geometry, nonverbal intelligence (IQ), and executive functioning (EF) skills were assessed at age 4 years, and their numeracy and geometry knowledge was assessed again a year later at age 5 (N = 113). Above and beyond children\'s initial knowledge in numeracy and geometry, as well as IQ and EF, patterning skills and the ANS at age 4 uniquely predicted children\'s geometry knowledge at age 5, but only age 4 patterning uniquely predicted age 5 numeracy. Thus, although patterning and the ANS are related, they differentially explain variation in later geometry and numeracy knowledge. Results are discussed in terms of implications for early mathematics theory and research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:30多年来,家长报告已被用于研究4岁以下儿童的词汇。探索父母清单作为衡量年龄较大儿童词汇量的研究非常有限。通常,父母检查表的作者报告了所开发的工具的可靠性,但没有探讨父母评估与儿童实际单词知识之间的一致性的有效性。
    目的:我们旨在探索父母检查表评估3至6岁儿童词汇的信度和效度。此外,我们的目的是评估儿童词汇的间接(父母检查表)和直接(图片命名和图片识别任务)评估之间的一致性。
    方法:一组94名年龄在3至6岁之间的单语波兰语儿童首先在现场直接测试图片命名和图片识别任务(跨语言词汇任务)。随后,参与者的父母完成了一份包含同一组128个项目的在线清单,并标记了他们在孩子的自发演讲中听到的所有单词。
    结果:父母检查表显示出非常高的内部一致性。父母检查表的得分和词汇任务的得分中等相关。我们比较了图片命名和图片识别任务中父母标记的单词总数和孩子正确识别的项目数。在图片命名中,我们发现孩子的分数和父母选择的单词数没有区别。然而,父母选择的单词明显少于在图片识别任务中正确识别的孩子。当在单个项目的层面上分析数据时(即,父母是否选择了与孩子正确回答的项目完全相同的项目),我们发现协议水平很低。认同水平与孩子的词汇量呈负相关;也就是说,孩子知道的话越多,直接措施和家长核对表之间的协议越低。
    结论:3至6岁的儿童应谨慎使用父母检查表,特别是如果被评估的孩子有一个大的词汇量和项目分析计划。这样的清单可能在年幼的儿童或词汇量有限的儿童中更有用。
    结论:本主题中已知的内容父母检查表通常用于评估4岁以下儿童的词汇量。先前的研究表明,父母清单在内部一致性方面是可靠的,在预测和收敛有效性方面是有效的。本文对现有知识的补充本研究介绍了父母检查表,该检查表旨在评估3至6岁的讲波兰语的单语儿童的词汇量。统计分析显示,虽然父母检查表具有很高的可靠性,清单上的分数与词汇的直接测量相关,家长报告和直接词汇测量之间的协议(即,有效性)明显较低,特别是在检查单个测试项目时。这项工作的临床意义是什么?这些发现强调了在3至6岁儿童使用父母词汇清单时谨慎行事的重要性。只有在需要一般/总分时,这些检查表才能替代直接词汇测试。然而,当特定的单词是感兴趣的主题时,家长报告可能不是有效的措施。
    BACKGROUND: For over 30 years, parental reports have been used to study the vocabulary of children under 4 years of age. Research exploring parental checklists as a measure of vocabulary in older children is very limited. Typically, authors of parental checklists report the reliability of the developed tools but do not explore validity in terms of the agreement between parental assessments and the children\'s actual word knowledge.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the reliability and validity of a parental checklist for assessing vocabulary in children aged between 3 and 6 years. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the agreement between indirect (parental checklist) and direct (picture naming and picture recognition tasks) assessments of children\'s vocabulary.
    METHODS: A group of 94 typically developing monolingual Polish-speaking children aged between 3 and 6 years were first directly tested onsite with picture naming and picture recognition tasks (Cross-Linguistic Lexical Tasks). Subsequently, the participants\' parents completed an online checklist containing the same set of 128 items and marked all the words that they had ever heard in their child\'s spontaneous speech.
    RESULTS: The parental checklist demonstrated very high internal consistency. The scores of the parental checklist and vocabulary tasks were moderately correlated. We compared the total number of words marked by parents and the number of items correctly identified by children in the picture naming and picture recognition tasks. In picture naming, we found no difference between the children\'s scores and the number of words selected by parents. However, parents selected significantly fewer words than children correctly recognised in the picture recognition task. When data were analysed at the level of individual items (i.e., whether parents selected exactly the same items that children answered correctly), we found that the level of agreement was low. The level of agreement correlated negatively with the children\'s vocabulary; that is, the more words a child knew, the lower the agreement between the direct measure and the parental checklist.
    CONCLUSIONS: Parental checklists should be used with caution in children aged between 3 and 6 years, especially if the assessed children have a large vocabulary and if item analysis is planned. Such checklists may be of more use in younger children or in children with limited vocabulary.
    CONCLUSIONS: What is already known on the subject Parental checklists are commonly used to assess the vocabulary of children younger than 4 years of age. Previous research has indicated that parental checklists are reliable in terms of internal consistency and valid in terms of predictive and convergent validity. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This study introduces a parental checklist designed for assessing the vocabulary of monolingual Polish-speaking children aged between 3 and 6 years. Statistical analyses reveal that while the parental checklist exhibits high reliability, and the scores on the checklist correlate with direct measures of vocabulary, the agreement between parental reports and direct vocabulary measures (i.e., validity) is notably low, particularly when examining individual test items. What are the clinical implications of this work? These findings underscore the importance of exercising caution when using parental vocabulary checklists with children aged between 3 and 6 years. These checklists can serve as a replacement for direct vocabulary tests only when the general/overall score is needed. However, when specific words are the subject of interest, parental reports may not be a valid measure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究调查了以幼儿教育者(ECE)为重点的体育活动电子学习课程对儿童身体活动和儿童保育中久坐时间的影响。
    方法:在伦敦的12个儿童保育中心进行了一项整群随机对照试验,安大略省,加拿大。共有145名学龄前儿童和42名ECE参加了这项研究。处于干预状态的ECE完成了与身体活动相关的5小时电子学习课程。结果是学龄前儿童进行中等强度到剧烈强度的体力活动,光强度的体力活动,和使用加速度计评估的久坐时间。
    结果:干预措施对中等至剧烈强度的体力活动没有显着影响(d<0.01,P=.984),光强度体力活动(d=-0.17,P=0.386),或从基线到干预后的久坐时间(d=0.07,P=.717)。对中等强度到剧烈强度的体力活动也没有明显的干预效果(d=0.27,P=0.260),光强度体力活动(d=-0.08,P=.740),或从基线到随访的久坐时间(d=-0.15,P=.520)。
    结论:通过e-Learning课程为ECE提供体育活动的在线培训可能不足以提高幼儿的体育活动水平。提供多成分干预措施以增加学龄前儿童对儿童保育中身体活动的参与可能是至关重要的。
    OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effectiveness of an early childhood educator (ECE)-focused physical activity e-Learning course on children\'s physical activity and sedentary time in childcare.
    METHODS: A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in 12 childcare centers in London, Ontario, Canada. A total of 145 preschoolers and 42 ECEs participated in this study. ECEs in the intervention condition completed a 5-hour e-Learning course related to physical activity. Outcomes were preschoolers\' minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity, light-intensity physical activity, and sedentary time assessed using accelerometers.
    RESULTS: The intervention did not have a significant effect on moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (d < 0.01, P = .984), light-intensity physical activity (d = -0.17, P = .386), or sedentary time (d = 0.07, P = .717) from baseline to postintervention. There was also no significant intervention effect on moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (d = 0.27, P = .260), light-intensity physical activity (d = -0.08, P = .740), or sedentary time (d = -0.15, P = .520) from baseline to follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: Providing ECEs with online training in physical activity through an e-Learning course may not be sufficient to increase physical activity levels among young children in their care. It may be essential to deliver multicomponent interventions to increase preschoolers\' engagement in physical activity in childcare.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行和由此产生的缓解措施导致儿童早期发育的脆弱性增加。然而,研究很少,也没有关于这些损失在幼儿大流行三年后持续存在的研究。为了填补这个空白,我们检查了乌拉圭学龄前儿童对学校准备情况进行的类似人口普查的评估。评估是在5名5岁儿童中进行的:在大流行之前(2018年,2019年)进行评估;在大流行期间(2020年,2021年);以及在乌拉圭的卫生紧急声明结束后(2022年)。总共包括180,984项教师评估,涵盖认知,运动和社会情感发展,以及对学习的态度。总的来说,我们发现,在2020年和2021年的大流行期间,儿童发育的大多数领域的得分都比之前有所下降。2022年,分数恢复到大流行前的水平。我们的研究结果表明,在经历了COVID-19大流行的轻度至中度影响的国家,幼儿园儿童队列中发育损失的恢复花了两年多的时间。
    The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting mitigation measures have led to increased vulnerabilities in early child development. However, research is scarce and there are no studies on the persistence of these losses three years into the pandemic among young children. To fill in this gap, we examined census-like evaluations of school readiness carried out among preschoolers in Uruguay. The assessments were carried out among 5 cohorts of 5-year-olds: who were assessed prior to the pandemic (2018, 2019); during the pandemic (2020, 2021); and after the health emergency declaration ended in Uruguay (2022). A total of 180,984 teacher evaluations were included covering cognitive, motor and socio-emotional development, as well as attitudes toward learning. Overall, we found that scores in most spheres of child development decreased from before to during the pandemic in 2020 and 2021. In 2022, scores returned to pre-pandemic levels. Our findings suggest the recovery of developmental losses among cohorts of children in kindergarten took more than two years in a country that experienced a mild-to-moderate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:学龄前儿童在即将接受麻醉和手术时变得焦虑,保证制定更适当和有效的干预措施。
    目的:探讨静态动画结合动态虚拟环境对学龄前手术患儿术前焦虑及麻醉诱导依从性的影响。
    方法:选择116名学龄前儿童并分配给该药物(n=37),干预(n=40),对照组(n=39)。所有患儿均接受常规术前检查和护理,然后于手术当天转入术前准备室。药物组接受0.5mg/kg咪达唑仑,干预组治疗由静态卡通片结合动态虚拟环境组成。对照组不进行干预。采用改良的耶鲁术前焦虑量表评估患儿术前(T0)焦虑水平,在离开术前准备室(T1)之前,当进入手术室(T2)时,和麻醉诱导(T3)。使用诱导依从性检查表(ICC)评估麻醉诱导(T3)期间的依从性。平均动脉压(MAP)的变化,心率(HR),并记录每个时间点的呼吸频率(RR)。
    结果:三组的焦虑评分在T1和T2时均有不同程度的升高。在T3时,药物组和干预组的焦虑评分相似,均低于对照组。在T1和T2,MAP,HR,三组的RR均升高。药物组和对照组在T2时的MAP和RR明显高于干预组。在T3,地图,HR,药物组的RR降低,并且显着低于对照组,但与干预组相当。药物组和干预组的ICC评分和麻醉诱导时间(T3)相似,两者均高于对照组。
    结论:将静态漫画与动态虚拟环境结合起来,与药物一样有效,特别是咪达唑仑,减少学龄前儿童术前焦虑和恐惧。这种方法还可以提高麻醉诱导期间的依从性,并有助于维持其稳定的生命体征。
    BACKGROUND: Preschoolers become anxious when they are about to undergo anesthesia and surgery, warranting the development of more appropriate and effective interventions.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of static cartoons combined with dynamic virtual environments on preoperative anxiety and anesthesia induction compliance in preschool-aged children undergoing surgery.
    METHODS: One hundred and sixteen preschool-aged children were selected and assigned to the drug (n = 37), intervention (n = 40), and control (n = 39) groups. All the children received routine preoperative checkups and nursing before being transferred to the preoperative preparation room on the day of the operation. The drug group received 0.5 mg/kg midazolam and the intervention group treatment consisting of static cartoons combined with dynamic virtual environments. The control group received no intervention. The modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale was used to evaluate the children\'s anxiety level on the day before surgery (T0), before leaving the preoperative preparation room (T1), when entering the operating room (T2), and at anesthesia induction (T3). Compliance during anesthesia induction (T3) was evaluated using the Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC). Changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and respiratory rate (RR) were also recorded at each time point.
    RESULTS: The anxiety scores of the three groups increased variously at T1 and T2. At T3, both the drug and intervention groups had similar anxiety scores, both of which were lower than those in the control group. At T1 and T2, MAP, HR, and RR of the three groups increased. The drug and control groups had significantly higher MAP and RR than the intervention group at T2. At T3, the MAP, HR, and RR of the drug group decreased and were significantly lower than those in the control group but were comparable to those in the intervention group. Both the drug and intervention groups had similar ICC scores and duration of anesthesia induction (T3), both of which were higher than those of the control group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combining static cartoons with dynamic virtual environments as effective as medication, specifically midazolam, in reducing preoperative anxiety and fear in preschool-aged children. This approach also improve their compliance during anesthesia induction and helped maintain their stable vital signs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号