包皮环切术是一种常见的手术。最近,组织保留方法已经成为人们感兴趣的问题,并且在成人中描述了保留神经的方法。虽然割礼在实践中很常见,保留神经的方法尚未在儿科年龄组进行评估.
为了对包皮前组织学进行当代评估,挑战真正的神经保护方法的现象,并报告了一项前瞻性队列的结果,该队列将保留组织的精细解剖技术与儿童年龄组的常规袖状包皮环切术进行了对比。
共有20名7至12岁的健康儿童参加了这项研究。所有的割礼都是出于宗教目的,和任何解剖异常的孩子,皮肤损伤,研究中未包括或闭塞性神经鞘炎。前10名儿童接受了常规袖套包皮环切术,而后10名儿童接受了袖套技术的组织保留精细解剖修改。包皮环切术获得的所有材料都由一名病理学家检查,并对相关组织结构进行统计和组间比较。
两种技术在最终美容效果方面都令人满意,无明显并发症,比如出血,大量水肿,医源性Chordee,或不可接受的化妆品。除镇痛药和局部保湿面霜外,所有儿童均不需要再入院或医疗干预。保护所有神经系统结构,包括受体,由于触摸感受器的微米级深度,使用宏观解剖技术似乎是不可能的。神经干也位于小于1mm的深度。组织保留技术可以保留更多的血管结构,神经干,和Pacinian小体,这可能是进一步长期研究的问题。
对于现有技术,我们建议使用术语“保留组织”而不是“保留神经”。在我们的研究中,组织保留技术不影响临床结果和术后过程。然而,它在保存血管结构方面表现得更好,神经干,和PacinianCorpuscles.
Circumcision is a common procedure. Recently, tissue-sparing approaches have become a matter of interest, and a nerve-sparing approach is described in adults. Although circumcision is common in the practice, the nerve-sparing approach has not been evaluated in the pediatric age group.
To give a contemporary evaluation of the
preputium histology, challenge the phenomenon of a genuine nerve-sparing approach, and report the results of a prospective cohort contrasting the tissue-sparing fine dissection technique to the regular sleeve circumcision in the pediatric age group.
A total of 20 healthy children between 7 and 12 years of age were enrolled in the study. All circumcisions were carried out for religious purposes, and children with any anatomical anomaly, skin lesions, or Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans were not included in the study. The first 10 children underwent regular sleeve circumcision, while the latter 10 children underwent tissue-sparing fine dissection modification of the sleeve technique. All materials obtained from the circumcision were examined by a single pathologist, and relevant tissue structures were counted and compared between the groups.
Both techniques were satisfactory in terms of final cosmetic results, without significant complications, such as bleeding, massive edema, iatrogenic chordee, or unacceptable cosmetics. None of the children required readmission or medical intervention other than analgesics and topical moisturizing creams. Preservation of all nervous system structures, including the receptors, appeared to be not possible with macroscopic dissection techniques due to micrometer scale depth of the touch receptors. Nerve trunks were also located in less than 1-mm depth. The tissue-sparing technique could preserve significantly more vascular structures, nerve trunks, and Pacinian Corpuscles, which can be a matter of further long-term research.
We propose the term \"tissue-sparing\" instead of \"nerve-sparing\" for the available techniques. The tissue-sparing technique did not affect the clinical outcomes and the postoperative course in our study. However, it showed to be superior in terms of preserving the vascular structures, nerve trunks, and Pacinian Corpuscles.