Traumatic brain injury (TBIs) necessitates a rapid and comprehensive medical response to minimize secondary brain injury and reduce mortality. Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians serve a critical role in the management of prehospital TBI, responding during an initial phase of care with significant impact on patient outcomes. We used versions two and three of the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) Prehospital Guidelines for the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury and the NASEMSO National Model Clinical Guidelines to determine key elements for a TBI prehospital protocol and included common factors across sources such as recommendations concerning patient monitoring, hypoxia, hypotension, hyperventilation, cerebral herniation, airway management, hyperosmolar therapy, and transport destination. We then conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of publicly available statewide EMS clinical protocols in the US to determine the degree of alignment with national guidelines. We calculated descriptive statistics for each factor in the state protocols. Despite adoption of some evidence-based recommendations for a standard approach to the prehospital management of patients with TBI, we found significant variability in statewide EMS treatment protocols for management of severe TBI, especially in the recommended frequency of patient reassessment and for the management of suspected herniation. Most statewide protocols provided guidance regarding oxygenation, ventilation, and blood pressure management that aligned with evidence-based guidelines. While most protocols did address management of oxygenation and ventilation, one in four protocols had no specific guidance for managing hypoxia and only 31% of protocols recommended avoiding hyperventilation. For the management of suspected cerebral herniation, over half of statewide protocols recommended hyperventilation, whereas only 31% explicitly advised against hyperventilation regardless of TBI severity. Interestingly, 94% of protocols do not mention the use of hyperosmolar therapy for TBI patients, neither recommending use or avoidance of hyperosmolar therapy. In conclusion, we found inconsistent adoption of national recommendations in available statewide protocols for prehospital TBI management. We identified significant gaps and variation in statewide protocols regarding patient monitoring and reassessment, as well as in several key areas of severe TBI management.

OBJECTIVE: To study trends in incidence and outcome of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in the Netherlands before, during and after implementation of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS®) and Pre-Hospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS®)- Spinal Motion Restriction(SMR) protocol.
METHODS: In an observational database we studied national hospital admission and emergency department databases to analyse incidence rates and outcome of traumatic spinal cord injury and spinal fractures in the emergency department and in admittances in The Netherlands between 1986 and 2021.
RESULTS: A significant increase of 39% in TSCI in admitted patients with spinal fractures over the past 35 years (p < 0.001). This increase was especially prevalent in cervical spinal fractures (132%), while thoracic and lumbosacral spinal fractures showed a decrease in accompanied TSCI (64% and 88% respectively). The overall increase in spinal fractures was not significant. The duration of hospital admission decreased for spinal fractures without TSCI and with TSCI (66% and 56% respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Since implementation of the SMR-protocol was aiming to limit TSCI in patients who suffered a spinal fracture, the increase in TSCI is an unexpected finding. Exact explanation for this increase is unclear and the contribution of the SMR-protocol is not fully understood due to confounders in the used datasets. Either way, the scientific evidence supporting this costly time- and labor-intensive SMR-protocol remains debated, along with evidence contradicting it. Therefore it stresses the need for clear, evidencebased reasoning for spinal immobilization according to ATLS, as this is currently lacking.

BACKGROUND: Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) operate in environments that challenge patient care, especially trauma. Military personnel often find themselves in remote settings without conventional healthcare facilities. Treating traumatic injuries, particularly hemorrhagic shock, often necessitates prehospital blood transfusion. This study aims to present an overview of the current CAF prehospital transfusion practices. Furthermore, the study compared current and developing protocols against expert-recommended guidelines.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey design was employed to describe and compare CAF prehospital blood transfusion practices and protocols against expert recommendations. Topics included protocols, equipment, and procedures. An online survey targeted medical leadership and providers within CAF, with data collected from August 15 to December 15, 2023. Results were summarized descriptively. This study received approval from the Unity Health Toronto Research Ethics Board (REB 23-087).
RESULTS: Units and teams with prehospital blood transfusion capabilities were contacted, achieving a 100 % response rate. Within CAF, Canadian Special Operations Forces Command (CANSOFCOM), Mobile Surgical Resuscitation Team (MSRT), and Canadian Medical Emergency Response Team (CMERT) possess these capabilities, established between 2013 and 2018. These programs are crucial for military operations. CAF has access to standard blood components, cold Leuko-Reduced Whole Blood (LrWB), and factor concentrates from Canadian Blood Services (CBS), available for both domestic and international missions given adequate planning and favorable conditions. Key findings indicate high adherence to recommended practices, some variability in the transfusion process, and potential benefits of standardizing prehospital transfusion practices.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provided insights into CAF\'s implementation of prehospital transfusion practices, highlighting high adherence to national expert recommendations and the importance of structured protocols in military prehospital trauma management.
CONCLUSIONS: CAF\'s approach and adoption of prehospital transfusion protocols lay a strong foundation for managing trauma patients in remote settings and for expanding prehospital transfusion capabilities across CFHS deployed assets. Further research is needed to advance military trauma care by adapting prehospital blood transfusion to dynamic tactical landscapes and evolving technologies.

How prehospital medication predicts patient outcomes is unclear. The aim of this work was to unveil the association between medication burden administration in prehospital care and short, mid, and long-term mortality (2, 30, and 365 day) in unselected acute diseases and to assess the potential of the number of medications administered for short, mid, and long-term mortality prediction. A prospective, multicenter, ambulance-based, cohort study was carried out in adults with unselected acute diseases managed by emergency medical services (EMS). The study was carried out in Spain with 44 ambulances and four hospitals. The principal outcome was cumulative mortality at 2, 30, and 365 days. Epidemiological variables, vital signs, and prehospital medications were collected. Patients were classified into four categories: no medication dispensed in prehospital care, one to two medications, three to four medications, and five or more medications. A total of 6401 patients were selected. The 2-day mortality associated with each group was 0.5%, 1.8%, 6.5%, and 18.8%. The 30-day mortality associated with each group was 3.8%, 6.2%, 13.5%, and 31.9%. The 365-day mortality associated with each group was 11%, 15.3%, 25.2%, and 45.7%. The predictive validity of the number of drugs administered, measured by the area under the curve, was 0.808, 0.720, and 0.660 for 2-, 30-, and 365-day mortality, respectively. Our results showed that prehospital drugs could provide relevant information regarding the mortality prediction of patients. The incorporation of this score could improve the management of high-risk patients by the EMS.

UNASSIGNED: Emergency medical services (EMS) provide health care in situations with limited time and resources. Challenges arise when introducing novel medications, treatments, or technologies or modifying existing practices in these settings. Effective implementation strategies are pivotal for their success. This study aims to identify and categorize potential facilitators and barriers in the implementation of prehospital EMS through a review of relevant research articles.
UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed and EMbase to identify studies published before December 2023, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for our search strategy and scoping review. We included original articles written in English that report on the factors that influence the implementation in prehospital settings. We extracted and categorized the factors into different themes.
UNASSIGNED: Out of the 371 retrieved papers, we selected 19 (5%) for inclusion in this review. We extracted 46 influencing factors from the selected articles and categorized them into ten themes: (1) Outer system, (2) Inner system, (3) Practitioner characteristics, (4) Resources, (5) Communication and collaboration, (6) Patient factors, (7) Intervention characteristics, (8) De-implementation of prior practices, (9) Logistical issues, and (10) Quality improvement.
UNASSIGNED: This study examined the literature on EMS implementation factors and proposed a 10-theme EMS model framework. Key factors include training/education, equipment/tools, communication with hospitals, and practitioners\' attitudes.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing burden on healthcare resources, despite improvements in prevention and management. AF is a common cause of hospitalisation, and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) use. However, there is a paucity of data describing the burden of AF on EMS. We aimed to determine the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of patients presenting with AF to EMS using a large population-based sample.
METHODS: Consecutive attendances for AF in Victoria, Australia (January 2015-June 2019) were included if patients had a diagnosis of \"AF\" or \"arrhythmia\" with AF on electrocardiogram. Data were individually linked to emergency, hospital, and mortality records.
RESULTS: Of 2,613,056 EMS attendances, 16,525 were a first attendance for AF and linked to hospital records. Median (IQR) age was 76 (67,84) years (43% female). Seventy-eight percent had high thromboembolic risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2), and 72% had a heart rate ≥ 100 bpm. Forty-two percent of patients received no treatment by paramedics and 99.4% were transported to hospital. Fifty-three percent were discharged from ED. Median length of hospital stay was 2 days. Of 2542 cases reattended for AF, 19% occurred within 30 days, with increased odds for females and those of low socioeconomic status. Overall, 24% died during the study period, 12% within 30 days. Increasing age, heart failure, stroke, COPD, and low socioeconomic status increased the odds of 30-day mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: EMS utilisation for AF is common and associated with frequent reattendance. Further studies are required to investigate novel pathways of care to reduce AF burden on healthcare systems.

UNASSIGNED: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the western world. Classic angina pectoris (AP) is a common reason to request prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). Nevertheless, data on diagnostic accuracy and common misdiagnoses are scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the amount and variety of misdiagnoses and assess discriminating features.
UNASSIGNED: For this retrospective cohort study, all patients requiring EMS for suspected ACS in the city of Bonn (Germany) during 2018 were investigated. Prehospital and hospital medical records were reviewed regarding medical history, presenting signs and symptoms, as well as final diagnosis.
UNASSIGNED: Out of 740 analyzed patients with prehospital suspected ACS, 283 (38.2%) were ultimately diagnosed with ACS (ACS group). Common diagnoses in the cohort with non-confirmed ACS (nACS group) consisted of unspecific pain syndromes, arrhythmias, hypertensive crises, and heart failure. ST segment elevation (adjusted odds-ratios [adj. OR] 2.70), male sex (adj. OR 1.71), T wave changes (adj. OR 1.27), angina pectoris (adj. OR 1.15) as well as syncope (adj. OR 0.63) were identified among others as informative predictors in a multivariable analysis using the lasso technique for data-driven variable selection.
UNASSIGNED: Misdiagnosed ACS is as common as 61.8% in this cohort and analyses point to a complex of conditions and symptoms (i.e., male sex, electrocardiographic (ECG) changes, AP) for correct ACS diagnosis while neurological symptoms were observed significantly more often in the nACS group (e.g., Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 15, p = 0.03). To ensure adequate and timely therapy for a potentially critical disease as ACS a profound prehospital examination and patient history is indispensable.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is steadily growing in use in prehospital emergency medicine. While currently used primarily by emergency physicians, POCUS could also be employed by paramedics to support diagnosis and decision-making. Yet to date, no paramedicine-targeted POCUS curricula exist in Germany. Furthermore, given time and resource constraints in paramedic training, it is unclear whether paramedics could feasibly learn POCUS for prehospital deployment. Hence, this study outlines the development and implementation of a comprehensive POCUS curriculum for paramedics. Through this curriculum, we investigate whether paramedics can attain proficiency in POCUS comparable to other user groups.
METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we first developed a blended learning-based POCUS curriculum specifically for paramedics, focusing on basic principles, the RUSH-Protocol and ultrasound guided procedures. Participants underwent digital tests to measure their theoretical competence before (T1) and after the digital preparation phase (T2), as well as at the end of the on-site phase (T3). At time point T3, we additionally measured practical competence using healthy subjects and simulators. We compared the theoretical competence and the practical competence on a simulator with those of physicians and medical students who had also completed ultrasound training. Furthermore, we carried out self-assessment evaluations, as well as evaluations of motivation and curriculum satisfaction.
RESULTS: The paramedic study group comprised n = 72 participants. In the theoretical test, the group showed significant improvement between T1 and T2 (p < 0.001) and between T2 and T3 (p < 0.001). In the practical test on healthy subjects at T3, the group achieved high results (87.0% ± 5.6). In the practical test on a simulator at T3, paramedics (83.8% ± 6.6) achieved a lower result than physicians (p < 0.001), but a comparable result to medical students (p = 0.18). The results of the study group\'s theoretical tests (82.9% ± 9.2) at time point T3 were comparable to that of physicians (p = 0.18) and better than that of medical students (p < 0.01). The motivation and attitude of paramedics towards the prehospital use of POCUS as well as their self-assessment significantly improved from T1 to T3 (p < 0.001). The overall assessment of the curriculum was positive (92.1 ± 8.5).
CONCLUSIONS: With our tailored curriculum, German paramedics were able to develop skills in POCUS comparable to those of other POCUS learners. Integration of POCUS into paramedics\' training curricula offers opportunities and should be further studied.

UNASSIGNED: Prehospital electrocardiogram (PHECG) shortens door-to-balloon time in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. However, it may increase the prehospital service time, thus offsetting the benefits gained. The performance of PHECG could be influenced by the proficiency of the emergency medical technicians (EMTs).
UNASSIGNED: To investigate whether there are differences in the performance of PHECG between EMT-II and EMT-paramedics (EMT-P).
UNASSIGNED: This prospectively designed, retrospectively analyzed study of PHECG was conducted in Taipei from February 2019 to April 2021. Comparisons were made between EMT-II and EMT-P teams. The primary outcomes were the acceptance of PHECG suggestions and prehospital service time. The secondary outcomes were gender disparities in the primary outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 2,991 patients were included, of whom 2,617 received PHECG. For the primary outcomes, the acceptance of PHECG was higher in those approached by EMT-P (99.6% vs. 71.5%, p < 0.001). The scene time and scene-to-hospital time showed no significant differences. For gender disparities, the acceptance of PHECG in female patients was significantly lower in those approached by EMT-II (59.3% vs. 99.2%, p < 0.001). The scene time and scene-to-hospital time were generally longer in the female patients, especially in the younger and middle age groups. Compared to EMT-P, both were significantly longer in the female patients approached by EMT-II.
UNASSIGNED: The acceptance of PHECG was lower in those approached by EMT-II, especially in females. Although there were generally no significant differences between EMT-II and EMT-P, the scene time and scene-to-hospital time were significantly longer in female patients, especially in those aged < 75 years approached by EMT-II.

UNASSIGNED: The prehospital prediction of the radiographic diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in hemorrhagic shock patients has the potential to promote early therapeutic interventions. However, the identification of TBI is often challenging and prehospital tools remain limited. While the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score is frequently used to assess the extent of impaired consciousness after injury, the utility of the GCS scores in the early prehospital phase of care to predict TBI in patients with severe injury and concomitant shock is poorly understood.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a post-hoc, secondary analysis utilizing data derived from three randomized prehospital clinical trials: the Prehospital Air Medical Plasma trial (PAMPER), the Study of Tranexamic Acid During Air Medical and Ground Prehospital Transport trial (STAAMP), and the Pragmatic Prehospital Type O Whole Blood Early Resuscitation (PPOWER) trial. Patients were dichotomized into two cohorts based on the presence of TBI and then further stratified into three groups based on prehospital GCS score: GCS 3, GCS 4-12, and GCS 13-15. The association between prehospital GCS score and clinical documentation of TBI was assessed.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1,490 enrolled patients were included in this analysis. The percentage of patients with documented TBI in those with a GCS 3 was 59.5, 42.4% in those with a GCS 4-12, and 11.8% in those with a GCS 13-15. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the prehospital GCS score for the diagnosis of TBI is low, with a GCS of 3 having only a 60% PPV. Hypotension and prehospital intubation are independent predictors of a low prehospital GCS. Decreasing prehospital GCS is strongly associated with higher incidence or mortality over time, irrespective of the diagnosis of TBI.
UNASSIGNED: The ability to accurately predict the presence of TBI in the prehospital phase of care is essential. The utility of the GCS scores in the early prehospital phase of care to predict TBI in patients with severe injury and concomitant shock is limited. The use of novel scoring systems and improved technology are needed to promote the accurate early diagnosis of TBI.