UNASSIGNED: To investigate whether there are differences in the performance of PHECG between EMT-II and EMT-paramedics (EMT-P).
UNASSIGNED: This prospectively designed, retrospectively analyzed study of PHECG was conducted in Taipei from February 2019 to April 2021. Comparisons were made between EMT-II and EMT-P teams. The primary outcomes were the acceptance of PHECG suggestions and prehospital service time. The secondary outcomes were gender disparities in the primary outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 2,991 patients were included, of whom 2,617 received PHECG. For the primary outcomes, the acceptance of PHECG was higher in those approached by EMT-P (99.6% vs. 71.5%, p < 0.001). The scene time and scene-to-hospital time showed no significant differences. For gender disparities, the acceptance of PHECG in female patients was significantly lower in those approached by EMT-II (59.3% vs. 99.2%, p < 0.001). The scene time and scene-to-hospital time were generally longer in the female patients, especially in the younger and middle age groups. Compared to EMT-P, both were significantly longer in the female patients approached by EMT-II.
UNASSIGNED: The acceptance of PHECG was lower in those approached by EMT-II, especially in females. Although there were generally no significant differences between EMT-II and EMT-P, the scene time and scene-to-hospital time were significantly longer in female patients, especially in those aged < 75 years approached by EMT-II.
■调查EMT-II和EMT-护理人员(EMT-P)之间的PHECG性能是否存在差异。
■这是前瞻性设计的,PHECG回顾性分析研究于2019年2月至2021年4月在台北进行.在EMT-II和EMT-P团队之间进行了比较。主要结果是接受PHECG建议和院前服务时间。次要结果是主要结果中的性别差异。
■共纳入2,991名患者,其中2,617人接受了PHECG。对于主要结果,在EMT-P接近的人群中,PHECG的接受度更高(99.6%vs.71.5%,p<0.001)。现场时间和现场到医院的时间没有显着差异。关于性别差异,EMT-II治疗的女性患者对PHECG的接受度明显较低(59.3%vs.99.2%,p<0.001)。女性患者的现场时间和现场到医院的时间普遍较长,尤其是年轻和中年群体。与EMT-P相比,在接受EMT-II治疗的女性患者中,两者均显著延长.
■在EMT-II接近的人群中,PHECG的接受度较低,尤其是女性。尽管EMT-II和EMT-P之间通常没有显着差异,女性患者的现场时间和现场到医院的时间明显更长,特别是在EMT-II接触的年龄<75岁的人群中。