背景:远程医疗和远程医疗是重要的家庭护理服务,用于支持个人在家中更独立地生活。历史上,这些技术对问题做出了反应。然而,最近一直在努力更好地利用这些服务的数据,以促进更积极和预测性的护理。
目的:这篇综述旨在探索预测数据分析技术在家庭远程医疗和远程医疗中的应用方式。
方法:PRISMA-ScR(系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的荟萃分析扩展)清单与Arksey和O\'Malley的方法论框架一起遵循。在MEDLINE发表的英文论文,Embase,并考虑了2012年至2022年的社会科学保费收集,并根据纳入或排除标准对结果进行了筛选.
结果:总计,这篇综述包括86篇论文。本综述中的分析类型可以归类为异常检测(n=21),诊断(n=32),预测(n=22),和活动识别(n=11)。最常见的健康状况是帕金森病(n=12)和心血管疾病(n=11)。主要发现包括:缺乏使用常规收集的数据;诊断工具占主导地位;以及存在的障碍和机会,例如包括患者报告的结果,用于未来的远程医疗和远程医疗预测分析。
结论:这篇综述中的所有论文都是小规模的飞行员,因此,未来的研究应该寻求将这些预测技术应用到更大的试验中。此外,将常规收集的护理数据和患者报告的结局进一步整合到远程医疗和远程医疗的预测模型中,为改善正在进行的分析提供了重要的机会,应进一步探讨.使用的数据集必须具有合适的大小和多样性,确保模型可推广到更广泛的人群,并且可以进行适当的训练,已验证,和测试。
BACKGROUND: Telecare and telehealth are important care-at-home services used to support individuals to live more independently at home. Historically, these technologies have reactively responded to issues. However, there has been a recent drive to make better use of the data from these services to facilitate more proactive and predictive care.
OBJECTIVE: This review seeks to explore the ways in which predictive data analytics techniques have been applied in telecare and telehealth in at-home settings.
METHODS: The PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist was adhered to alongside Arksey and O\'Malley\'s methodological framework. English language papers published in MEDLINE, Embase, and Social Science Premium Collection between 2012 and 2022 were considered and results were screened against inclusion or exclusion criteria.
RESULTS: In total, 86 papers were included in this review. The types of analytics featuring in this review can be categorized as anomaly detection (n=21), diagnosis (n=32), prediction (n=22), and activity recognition (n=11). The most common health conditions represented were Parkinson disease (n=12) and cardiovascular conditions (n=11). The main findings include: a lack of use of routinely collected data; a dominance of diagnostic tools; and barriers and opportunities that exist, such as including patient-reported outcomes, for future predictive analytics in telecare and telehealth.
CONCLUSIONS: All papers in this review were small-scale pilots and, as such, future research should seek to apply these predictive techniques into larger trials. Additionally, further integration of routinely collected care data and patient-reported outcomes into predictive models in telecare and telehealth offer significant opportunities to improve the analytics being performed and should be explored further. Data sets used must be of suitable size and diversity, ensuring that models are generalizable to a wider population and can be appropriately trained, validated, and tested.