Posterior internal fixation

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    建立老年慢性骨质疏松性椎体骨折(COVF)后路内固定术后近端交界性脊柱后凸(PJK)预测评分系统。
    回顾性分析2013年1月至2017年12月在我院确诊为COVF并接受后路内固定术的88例患者的病历资料。根据患者术后是否发生PJK分为两组,即,PJK组25例,非PJK组63例。记录并分析了以下临床特征:年龄,性别,体重指数(BMI),骨矿物质密度(BMD),吸烟史,骨折段,近端连接角度,矢状椎体轴,骨盆发病率(PI)-腰椎前凸(LL),骨盆倾斜(PT),骶骨斜坡(SS),后韧带复合体(PLC)损伤,上器械椎骨,下部器械椎骨,和固定段的数量。评估了PJK组中这些临床特征的患病率,并采用logistic回归分析建立评分体系。评分系统的性能也得到了前瞻性验证。
    根据被证实为PJK的重要预测因子的五个临床特征,建立了预测评分系统。即,年龄>70岁,BMI>28kg/m2,BMD<-3.5SD,术前PI-LL>20°,PLC损伤。PJK的得分明显高于非PJK(7.80分vs.2.83分,t=9.556,P<0.001),评分系统的最佳临界值为5分。评分系统对术后PJK预测的敏感性和特异性分别为80.00%和88.89%,分别,在推导集中,在验证集中为75.00%和80.00%。
    预测评分系统对老年COVF患者后路内固定术后PJK的预测具有满意的敏感性和特异性。6-11分的患者术后发生PJK的风险较高,而0-5的分数很低。
    To establish a predictive scoring system for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) after posterior internal fixation in elderly patients with chronic osteoporotic vertebral fracture (COVF).
    The medical records of 88 patients who were diagnosed with COVF and underwent posterior internal fixation in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The included patients were divided into two groups according to whether they suffered PJK after surgery, namely, the PJK group (25 cases) and non-PJK group (63 cases). The following clinical characteristics were recorded and analyzed: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), bone mineral density (BMD), smoking history, fracture segment, proximal junction angle, sagittal vertebral axis, pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury, upper instrumented vertebra, lower instrumented vertebra, and the number of fixed segments. The prevalence of these clinical characteristics in the PJK group was evaluated, and the scoring system was established using logistic regression analysis. The performance of the scoring system was also prospectively validated.
    The predictive scoring system was established based on five clinical characteristics confirmed as significant predictors of PJK, namely, age > 70 years, BMI > 28 kg/m2, BMD < -3.5 SD, preoperative PI-LL > 20°, and PLC injury. PJK showed a significantly higher score than non-PJK (7.80 points vs. 2.83 points, t=9.556, P<0.001), and the optimal cutoff value for the scoring system was 5 points. The sensitivity and specificity of the scoring system for predicting postoperative PJK were 80.00% and 88.89%, respectively, in the derivation set and 75.00% and 80.00% in the validation set.
    The predictive scoring system was confirmed with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity in predicting PJK after posterior internal fixation in elderly COVF patients. The risk of postoperative PJK in patients with a score of 6-11 is high, while the score of 0-5 is low.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:后路内固定(PIF)通常用于治疗胸腰椎骨折(TLF),但是固定段数仍然没有标准。这项荟萃分析的目的是评估短节段(SS)的有效性和安全性,TLF固定中的中段(IS)和长段(LS)。
    方法:两位作者通过PubMed独立搜索,Embase,Cochrane图书馆和WebofScience用于后路内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的研究,直到2021年4月底才出版。根据基于贝叶斯定理的马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛(MCMC)方法,采用综合数据药物信息系统(ADDIS)软件进行数据评价。
    结果:共有19项研究纳入了970名患者,其中340个在SS组中,IS组中的429和LS组中的201。对于前椎体高度比(AVHR),IS有最高的AVHR,LS的AVHR排名第二。IS在降低视觉模拟量表(VAS)方面也排名第一,SS排名第二。对于矢状Cobb角(SCA),LS的SCA最低,IS的SCA第二低。在不良事件方面,IS的植入物失败率最低,LS的植入物失败率第二低。
    结论:IS可能是TLF减少SCA的最理想治疗选择,植入物故障率,VAS,改善AVHR。然而,需要更多的随机对照试验来验证这些结果.
    BACKGROUND: Posterior internal fixation (PIF) is commonly used in the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture (TLF), but there is still no standard for the number of fixed segments. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of short segment (SS), intermediate segment (IS) and long segment (LS) in the fixation of TLF.
    METHODS: Two authors independently searched through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science for studies of thoracolumbar fracture treated by posterior internal fixation, which were published until the end of April 2021. The Aggregate Data Drug Information System (ADDIS) software was used for data evaluation according to the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method based on the Bayesian theorem.
    RESULTS: Nineteen trials evaluating a total of 970 patients were enrolled in these studies, of which 340 in the SS group, 429 in the IS group and 201 in the LS group. For anterior vertebral height ratio (AVHR), IS had the highest AVHR, LS had the second highest AVHR. IS also ranked first in reducing visual analogue scale (VAS), SS ranked second. For sagittal Cobb\'s angle (SCA), LS had the lowest SCA and IS had the second lowest SCA. In terms of adverse events, IS had the lowest implant failure rate and LS had the second lowest implant failure rate.
    CONCLUSIONS: IS may be the most desirable treatment option for TLF in reducing SCA, implant failure rate, VAS, and improving AVHR. However, more randomized controlled trials are needed to verify these results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of a lateral mass fusion device combined with a three-dimensional-printed model in treatment of craniovertebral junction abnormalities.
    METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 56 patients with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation who underwent posterior fixation between January 2016 and December 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether or not cages were used-cage group and autograft group. Visual analog scale score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, health-related quality of life, American Spinal Injury Association spinal cord injury grade, atlas-dens interval, space available for the cord, cervicomedullary angle, and fusion rate were compared between groups.
    RESULTS: Medical follow-up was >1 year. There was no statistical difference between groups in preoperative visual analog scale score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey score, American Spinal Injury Association grade, atlas-dens interval, space available for the cord, and cervicomedullary angle, and these indexes significantly improved after surgery (P < 0.05). Visual analog scale score and atlas-dens interval were lower in the cage group than in the autograft group (P < 0.05). Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey score, space available for the cord, and cervicomedullary angle were significantly higher in the cage group than in the autograft group (P < 0.05). Fusion rate of the cage group 4-6 months after surgery was higher than that of the autograft group (P = 0.068). American Spinal Injury Association grade was significantly higher in the cage group than in the autograft group (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: During 1-year follow-up, neurological function improvement and atlantoaxial joint reduction were satisfactory. The lateral mass fusion device combined with a three-dimensional printed model may be a clinically useful technique.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The ideal management of thoracolumbar burst fracture (TLBF) remains controversial. We conducted this study to compare the effectiveness and safety of trans-Kambin triangle versus transpedicular bone grafting combined with posterior internal fixation (PIF) for TLBF.
    METHODS: Fifty-four patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into 2 groups: the observation group (PIF combined with bone grafting via the Kambin triangle, n = 28) and the control group (PIF combined with bone grafting via transpedicular, n = 26). The anterior vertebral height ratio, sagittal Cobb angle, visual analog scale score, Oswestry Disability Index, bone healing rate, and neurologic complications were measured.
    RESULTS: All patients were followed up regularly for a mean period of 17.94 months (12 - 24 months). The anterior vertebral height ratio in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (93.93 ± 2.92 vs. 89.90 ± 5.54%, P = 0.006), and the loss of correction was lower (1.59 ± 1.20 vs. 3.00 ± 1.98%, P = 0.008). The observation group had lower sagittal Cobb angle at final follow-up (8.68 ± 3.75 vs. 11.33 ± 4.77 degrees, P = 0.046) and less correction loss (1.96 ± 1.32 ± 1.15 vs. 3.90 ± 2.39 degrees, P = 0.002). The visual analog scale score and Oswestry Disability Index in the observation group were lower (0.61 ± 0.43 vs. 0.92 ± 0.38, P = 0.016; 15.86 ± 4.11 vs. 19.18 ± 4.04, P = 0.010), while the fracture healing rate showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). No internal fixation failure or neurologic complications occurred in both groups during the follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: Bone grafting via the Kambin triangle combined with PIF is a safe and effective technology for thoracolumbar burst fracture.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect of One-stage posterior debridement combined with lumbar-ilium fixation and bone graft fusion for the treatment of lumbosacral tuberculosis.
    METHODS: The clinical data of 31 patients with lumbosacral tuberculosis treated by one-stage posterior debridement combined with lumbar-ilium fixation and bone graft fusion from January 2013 to February 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 18 males and 13 females, aged from 18 to 77 years old with an average of (45.9±9.1) years. The lesion segment was form L4 to S2. The preoperative ASIA grading showed that 2 cases were grade B, 17 cases were grade C, 12 were grade D. Pre- and post-operative C reactive protein (CRP), visual analogue scale (VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), ASIA grade, lumbosacral angle and intervertebral space height were analyzed, the surgery complications, stability of internal fixation, bone fusion were observed.
    RESULTS: All the 31 patients were followed up for 10 to 24 months with an average of (16.0±3.1) months. One patient with local infection and subcutaneous hydrops was cured by dressing change. Other 30 cases got primary healing without sinus formation and no recurrence of spinal tuberculosis. All the patients were cured, no internal fixation loosening and breakage were found. All bone fusion was successful with an average fusion time of (4.7±1.1) months. At the final follow-up, ESR and CRP were normal, the VAS was decreased from (6.13±1.21) points preoperatively to (1.92±0.57) pioints, the ASIA grading showed that 2 cases were grade C, 6 cases were grade D, and 23 cases were grade E. The lumbosacral angle and intervertebral space height was increased from preoperative (21.42±3.75) °, (7.84±0.41) mm to (27.21±3.12) °, (9.80±0.38) mm at the final follow-up, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: One-stage posterior debridement combined with lumbar-ilium fixation and bone graft fusion is a practicable, effective and safe method for the treatment of lumbosacral tuberculosis. It can be recommended in clinical application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The current study compared clinical outcomes of two diverse therapeutic strategies for upper thoracic (T1-4) spinal tuberculosis with neurological deficits in elderly patients.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 18 cases undergoing single-stage posterior transpedicular decompression, debridement, interbody fusion, and instrumentation (Group A). Sixteen cases underwent single- or two-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting, and posterior instrumentation (Group B). The clinical and radiographic results for these patients were analyzed and compared.
    RESULTS: Patients were followed up for an average of 40.9 ± 4.0 months (range 36-48 months). Results demonstrated that the average operative duration, blood loss, hospital stays, and operative complication rate were lesser for Group A than for Group B. The average fusion time was 8.1 ± 1.5 months and 7.8 ± 2.9 months in Groups A and B, respectively (p>0.05). Cobb\'s angles were significantly corrected after surgical management, but loss of correction occurred in both groups. All patients had significant postoperative neurological improvement.
    CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage posterior transpedicular debridement, decompression, interbody fusion and instrumentation might be a better surgical treatment compared with combined posterior and anterior approaches. Such techniques may result in fewer complications and a better quality of life for elderly patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号