背景:随着最近对髋骨关系的兴趣,股骨髋臼撞击(FAI)与腰椎-骨盆-股骨复合体(LPFC)之间的联系似乎是决定性的.本研究的目的是(1)比较骨盆版本,以及(2)两个健康受试者群体之间的LPFC的所有参数,将那些有FAI放射学征象的和没有FAI放射学征象的进行比较。最后(3)根据FAI的类型对LPFC参数进行评价。
目的:有FAI放射学征象的无症状受试者有上骨盆前倾。
方法:这项回顾性研究基于118名自愿无症状患者的前瞻性队列研究,其中包括62名男性(52.5%),平均年龄为25.6岁±4.4(1939)。以下参数:骨盆版本(PV),骨盆发病率(PI),腰椎前凸(LL),骶骨斜坡(SS),髋关节屈曲,在参考站立位置和弓步位置使用EOSimaging™测量内在(IER)和外在(EER)伸展储备。FAI的放射学征象(凸轮,钳子,混合)在这些收购中进行鉴定,然后分为2组。第一组是呈现FAI(FAI+)的一个或多个图像的组,第二组没有FAI(FAI-)的图像。
结果:FAI+组143髋,FAI-组93髋。有36.4%的凸轮和45%的钳子。平均值为9.08°±7.81(-11.0;27.0),平均值为12.33°±8.94(-5.0;55.0),与FAI-组相比,FAI+组的PV显著降低(p=0.022).对主要结果(PV)的事后功率分析证实了足够的功率(1-β=0.809)。与FAI-组相比,凸轮组的IER和EER显著较低(分别为p=0.014和p=0.047).FAI-组和钳子组之间的比较分析发现PI存在显着差异(p=0.001),PV(p<0.001),IER(p=0.017)和髋关节屈曲(p<0.001),弓步位置的SS(p=0.031)和EER(p=0.039)。
结论:有FAI影像学征象的无症状受试者站立时表现为骨盆虚弱。这种骨盆过度前倾主要是在放射性钳征时发现的。
方法:III,回顾性比较研究。
BACKGROUND: With the recent interest in hip-spine relationship, the link between femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and the lumbar-pelvic-femoral complex (LPFC) appears decisive. The objectives of this study were (1) to compare the pelvic version, as well as (2) all the parameters of the LPFC between two populations of healthy subjects, comparing those with radiological signs of FAI to those without and finally, (3) to evaluate the LPFC parameters according to the type of FAI.
OBJECTIVE: Asymptomatic subjects with radiological signs of FAI had superior pelvic anteversion.
METHODS: This retrospective study was based on a prospective cohort of 118 voluntary asymptomatic patients including 62 men (52.5%) with a mean age of 25.6 years±4.4 (19-39). The following parameters: pelvic version (PV), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), hip flexion, intrinsic (IER) and extrinsic (EER) extension reserve were measured using EOS imaging™ in the reference standing position and the lunge position. The radiological signs of FAI (cam,
pincer, mixed) were identified on these acquisitions then separated into 2 groups. The first was the group presenting with one or more images of FAI (FAI+) and the second group with no images of FAI (FAI-).
RESULTS: There were 143 hips in the FAI+ group compared to 93 hips in the FAI- group. There were 36.4% cams and 45% pincers. With an average of 9.08°±7.81 (-11.0; 27.0) versus 12.33°±8.94 (-5.0; 55.0), the PV was significantly lower (p=0.022) in the FAI+ group compared to the FAI- group. A post-hoc power analysis on the primary outcome (PV) confirmed sufficient power (1-β=0.809). Compared to the FAI- group, the cam group presented a significantly lower IER and EER (respectively p=0.014 and p=0.047). The comparative analysis between the FAI- and
pincer groups found a significant difference in PI (p=0.001), PV (p<0.001), IER (p=0.017) and hip flexion (p<0.001), SS in lunge position (p=0.031) and EER (p=0.039).
CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic subjects with radiographic signs of FAI present with weak pelvic version when standing. This pelvic hyper-anteversion is mainly found in the event of a radiological
pincer sign.
METHODS: III, retrospective comparative study.