BACKGROUND: Amyloid beta protein (Aβ) is a treatment target in Alzheimer\'s Disease (AD). Lowering production of its parent protein, APP, has benefits in preclinical models. Posiphen, an orally administered small molecule, binds to an iron-responsive element in APP mRNA and decreases translation of APP and Aβ. To augment human data for Posiphen, we evaluated safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects on Aβ metabolism using Stable Isotope Labeling Kinetic (SILK) analysis.
METHODS: Double-blind phase 1b randomized ascending dose clinical trial, at five sites, under an IRB-approved protocol. Participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild AD (Early AD) confirmed by low CSF Aβ42/40 were randomized (within each dose arm) to Posiphen or placebo. Pretreatment assessment included lumbar puncture for CSF. Participants took Posiphen or placebo for 21-23 days, then underwent CSF catheter placement, intravenous infusion of 13C6-leucine, and CSF sampling for 36 h. Safety and tolerability were assessed through participant reports, EKG and laboratory tests. CSF SILK analysis measured Aβ40, 38 and 42 with immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry. Baseline and day 21 CSF APP, Aβ and other biomarkers were measured with immunoassays. The Mini-Mental State Exam and ADAS-cog12 were given at baseline and day 21.
RESULTS: From June 2017 to December 2021, 19 participants were enrolled, randomized within dose cohorts (5 active: 3 placebo) of 60 mg once/day and 60 mg twice/day; 1 participant was enrolled and completed 60 mg three times/day. 10 active drug and 5 placebo participants completed all study procedures. Posiphen was safe and well-tolerated. 8 participants had headaches related to CSF catheterization; 5 needed blood patches. Prespecified SILK analyses of Fractional Synthesis Rate (FSR) for CSF Aβ40 showed no significant overall or dose-dependent effects of Posiphen vs. placebo. Comprehensive multiparameter modeling of APP kinetics supported dose-dependent lowering of APP production by Posiphen. Cognitive measures and CSF biomarkers did not change significantly from baseline to 21 days in Posiphen vs. placebo groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Posiphen was safe and well-tolerated in Early AD. A multicenter SILK study was feasible. Findings are limited by small sample size but provide additional supportive safety and PK data. Comprehensive modeling of biomarker dynamics using SILK data may reveal subtle drug effects.
BACKGROUND: NCT02925650 on clinicaltrials.gov (registered on 10-24-2016).

The escalating global prevalence of type-2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity necessitates the development of novel oral medications. Agonism at G-protein coupled receptor-119 (GPR119) has been recognized for modulation of metabolic homeostasis in T2D, obesity, and fatty liver disease. However, off-target effects have impeded the advancement of synthetic GPR119 agonist drug candidates. Non-systemic, gut-restricted GPR119 agonism is suggested as an alternative strategy that may locally stimulate intestinal enteroendocrine cells (EEC) for incretin secretion, without the need for systemic drug availability, consequently alleviating conventional class-related side effects. Herein, we report the preclinical acute safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of novel GPR119 agonist compounds ps297 and ps318 that potentially target gut EEC for incretin secretion. In a proof-of-efficacy study, both compounds demonstrated glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion capability during glucose and mixed-meal tolerance tests in healthy mice. Furthermore, co-administration of sitagliptin with investigational compounds in diabetic db/db mice resulted in synergism, with GLP-1 concentrations rising by three-fold. Both ps297 and ps318 exhibited low gut permeability assessed in the in-vitro Caco-2 cell model. A single oral dose PK study conducted on healthy mice demonstrated poor systemic bioavailability of both agents. PK measures (mean ± SD) for compound ps297 (Cmax 23 ± 19 ng/mL, Tmax range 0.5 - 1 h, AUC0-24 h 19.6 ± 21 h*ng/mL) and ps318 (Cmax 75 ± 22 ng/mL, Tmax range 0.25 - 0.5 h, AUC0-24 h 35 ± 23 h*ng/mL) suggest poor oral absorption. Additionally, examinations of drug excretion patterns in mice revealed that around 25 % (ps297) and 4 % (ps318) of the drugs were excreted through faeces as an unchanged form, while negligible drug concentrations (<0.005 %) were excreted in the urine. These acute PK/PD assessments suggest the gut is a primary site of action for both agents. Toxicity assessments conducted in the zebrafish and healthy mice models confirmed the safety and tolerability of both compounds. Future chronic in-vivo studies in relevant disease models will be essential to confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of these novel compounds.

Dose-scale pharmacodynamic bioequivalence is recommended for evaluating the consistency of generic and innovator formulations of certain locally acting drugs, such as orlistat. This study aimed to investigate the standard methodology for sample size determination and the impact of study design on dose-scale pharmacodynamic bioequivalence using orlistat as the model drug. A population pharmacodynamic model of orlistat was developed using NONMEM 7.5.1 and utilized for subsequent simulations. Three different study designs were evaluated across various predefined relative bioavailability ratios of test/reference (T/R) formulations. These designs included Study Design 1 (2×1 crossover with T1 60 mg, R1 60 mg, and R2 120 mg), Study Design 2 (2×1 crossover with T2 120 mg, R1 60 mg, and R2 120 mg), and Study Design 3 (2×2 crossover with T1 60 mg, T2 120 mg, R1 60 mg, and R2 120 mg). Sample sizes were determined using a stochastic simulation and estimation approach. Under the same T/R ratio and power, Study Design 3 required the minimum sample size for bioequivalence, followed by Study Design 1, while Study Design 2 performed the worst. For Study Designs 1 and 3, a larger sample size was needed on the T/R ratio < 1.0 side for the same power compared to that on the T/R ratio > 1.0 side. The opposite asymmetry was observed for Study Design 2. We demonstrated that Study Design 3 is most effective for reducing the sample size for orlistat bioequivalence studies, and the impact of T/R ratio on sample size shows asymmetry.

As comparative pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) against Candida spp. are lacking, we explored L-AMB pharmacodynamics against different Candida species in an in vitro PK/PD dilution model. Eight Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida krusei isolates (EUCAST/CLSI AMB MIC 0.125-1 mg/L) were studied in the in vitro PK/PD model simulating L-AMB Cmax = 0.25-64 mg/L and t1/2 = 9 h. The model was validated with one susceptible and one resistant Candida albicans isolate. The Cmax/MIC-log10CFU/mL reduction from the initial inoculum was analyzed with the Emax model, and Monte Carlo analysis was performed for the standard (3 mg/kg with Cmax = 21.87 ± 12.47 mg/L) and higher (5 mg/kg with Cmax = 83 ± 35.2 mg/L) L-AMB dose. A ≥1.5 log10CFU/mL reduction was found at L-AMB Cmax = 8 mg/L against C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei isolates (MIC 0.25-0.5 mg/L) whereas L-AMB Cmax ≥ 32 mg/L was required for C. glabrata isolates. The in vitro PK/PD relationship followed a sigmoidal pattern (R2 ≥ 0.85) with a mean Cmax/MIC required for stasis of 2.1 for C. albicans (close to the in vivo stasis), 24/17 (EUCAST/CLSI) for C. glabrata, 8 for C. parapsilosis, and 10 for C. krusei. The probability of target attainment was ≥99% for C. albicans wild-type (WT) isolates with 3 mg/kg and for wild-type isolates of the other species with 5 mg/kg. L-AMB was four- to eightfold less active against the included non-C. albicans species than C. albicans. A standard 3-mg/kg dose is pharmacodynamically sufficient for C. albicans whereas our data suggest that 5 mg/kg may be recommendable for the included non-C. albicans species.

Although MYCN has been considered an undruggable target, MYCN alterations confer poor prognosis in many pediatric and adult cancers. The novel MYCN-specific inhibitor BGA002 is an antigene peptide nucleic acid oligonucleotide covalently bound to a nuclear localization signal peptide. In the present study, we characterized the pharmacokinetics (PK) of BGA002 after single and repeated administration to mice using a novel specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. BGA002 concentrations in plasma showed linear PK, with dose proportional increase across the tested dose levels and similar exposure between male and female and between intravenous and subcutaneous route of administration. Repeated dosing resulted in no accumulation in plasma. Biodistribution up to 7 days after single subcutaneous administration of [14C]-radiolabeled BGA002 showed broad tissues and organ distribution (suggesting a potential capability to reach primary tumor and metastasis in several body sites), with high concentrations in kidney, liver, spleen, lymph nodes, adrenals, and bone marrow. Remarkably, we demonstrated that BGA002 concentrates in tumors after repeated systemic administrations in three mouse models with MYCN amplification (neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and small-cell lung cancer), leading to a significant reduction in tumor weight. Taking into account the available safety profile of BGA002, these data support further evaluation of BGA002 in patients with MYCN-positive tumors.

The class F of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) consists of ten Frizzleds (FZD1-10) and Smoothened (SMO). FZDs bind and are activated by secreted lipoglycoproteins of the Wingless/Int-1 (WNT) family and SMO is indirectly activated by the Hedgehog (Hh) family of morphogens acting on the transmembrane protein Patched (PTCH). The advance of our understanding of FZDs and SMO as dynamic transmembrane receptors and molecular machines, which emerged during the past 14 years since the first class F GPCR IUPHAR nomenclature report, justifies an update. This article focuses on the advances in molecular pharmacology and structural biology providing new mechanistic insight into ligand recognition, receptor activation mechanisms, signal initiation and signal specification. Furthermore, class F GPCRs continue to develop as drug targets, and novel technologies and tools such as genetically encoded biosensors and CRISP/Cas9 edited cell systems have contributed to refined functional analysis of these receptors. Also, advances in crystal structure analysis and cryogenic electron microscopy contribute to a rapid development of our knowledge about structure-function relationships providing a great starting point for drug development. Despite the progress questions and challenges remain to fully understand the complexity of the WNT/FZD and Hh/SMO signaling systems. Significance Statement The recent years of research have brought about substantial functional and structural insight into mechanisms of activation of Frizzleds and Smoothened. While the advance furthers our mechanistic understanding of ligand recognition, receptor activation, signal specification and initiation, broader opportunities emerge that allow targeting class F GPCRs for therapy and regenerative medicine employing both biologics and small molecule compounds.

UNASSIGNED: Icanbelimod (formerly CBP-307) is a next-generation S1PR modulator, targeting S1PR1. In this first-in-human study, icanbelimod was investigated in healthy men in Australia.
UNASSIGNED: Participants were randomized 3:1, double-blind, to icanbelimod or placebo in four single-dose cohorts (0.1 mg, 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg [n=8 per cohort], 2.5 mg [n=4]) or for 28-days once-daily treatment in two cohorts (0.15 mg, 0.25 mg [n=8 per cohort]). Participants in the 0.25-mg cohort received 0.1 mg on Day 1. Treatments were administered orally after fasting; following one-week washout, icanbelimod was administered after breakfast in the 0.5-mg cohort.
UNASSIGNED: Icanbelimod exposure increased rapidly and dose-dependently with single and multiple dosing (Tmax 4-7 hours). Lymphocyte counts decreased rapidly after single (-11%, 0.1 mg; -40%, 0.25 mg; -71%, 0.5 mg; -77%, 2.5 mg) and multiple doses (-49%, 0.15 mg; -75%, 0.25 mg), and recovered quickly, 7 days after dosing. After single-dose 0.5 mg, although a high-fat breakfast versus fasting did not affect maximal decrease, lymphocyte counts tended to be lower after breakfast across most timepoints up to 72 hours. Twenty-eight participants (63.6%) experienced mainly mild treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). After single-dose icanbelimod, the most common TEAEs were headache (28.6%, n=6) and dizziness (19.0%, n=4). Three participants experienced transient bradycardia, with one serious, following single-dose 2.5 mg icanbelimod. After multiple-dose icanbelimod, the most common TEAEs were headache (50.0%, n=6) and lymphopenia (41.7%, n=5), and two participants withdrew due to non-serious TEAEs. Up-titration attenuated heart rate reductions.
UNASSIGNED: Icanbelimod was well-tolerated up to 0.5 mg and effectively reduced lymphocyte counts.
UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02280434.b.

This report focuses on part 3 of a multicenter, open-label, phase 1 study (NCT03198650) assessing the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and antitumor activity of acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab in Japanese patients with treatment-naive (TN) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ten patients were included; median age was 68 years. With a median treatment duration of 27.2 months, treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients (grade ≥3, 70%), and the most common AEs were anemia and headache (40% each). One patient had a grade 4 AE of neutropenia (the only dose-limiting toxicity). PK results suggested no marked effects of concomitant obinutuzumab treatment on the exposure of acalabrutinib. PD assessment indicated that combination therapy provided >98% Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) occupancy. Overall response rate (ORR) was 100% with median duration of response (DoR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) not reached. Treatment with acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab was generally safe and efficacious in adult Japanese patients with TN CLL.

The use of animal models is still widespread in science but there is a movement away from this manner of experimentation. One option approved by the FDA for human-like studies is the hollow fiber bioreactor (HFS). HFSs are highly controllable, self-contained systems that allow for the modeling of individual tissues and disease phenotypes. Oxygen, drug concentration & half-life, and immune cell invasion are all scalable to human and veterinary conditions using a HFS. There are drawbacks to the systems including cost and contamination so the use of these systems must be carefully managed.With these limitations in mind, the scope of the technology is great. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is possible with greater accuracy and clinical validity than classical in vitro techniques making minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) data generated on the bench more translatable to the clinic.In this chapter, we will outline the background of the HFS and some typical uses.

Interleukin-23 (IL-23), a member of the IL-12 family of cytokines, maintains intestinal homeostasis but is also implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The IL-23 receptor (IL-23R) is a heterodimer composed of disulfide-linked p19- and p23-subunits. Humanized monoclonal antibodies selectively targeting the p19-subunit of IL-23 are poised to become prominent drugs in IBD. In this review, we discuss pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of the currently available IL-23p19 inhibitors and discuss the mechanistic underpinnings of their therapeutic effects, including the mechanism of action, epitope affinity, potency, and downstream signaling. Furthermore, we address available data on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of IL-23-specific p19-inhibitors in the treatment of IBD and discuss important studies performed in other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Finally, we evaluate the potential for combining classes of biological therapies and provide future directions on the development of precision medicine-guided positioning of IL-23p19 inhibitors in IBD.