Personnel, Hospital

人员,医院
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是调查基于生活回顾的拼贴书制作对长期住院精神分裂症患者的心理社会影响,并验证该计划在减少自我感知与他人“评估患者”日常功能之间的差异方面的有效性。参与者被随机分配到干预组或对照组。干预组参加了一项基于生活回顾的拼贴书制作的个人计划。在三个评估点(干预前后以及3个月的随访),患者对他们的主观困难进行了评分,工作人员对患者日常功能的客观严重程度进行了评级,使用日本版精神分裂症认知评定量表(SCoRS-J)。情绪状态简介(POMS),恢复评估量表,和生活技能概况被用来评估心理社会功能,比较两组量表评分的变化。此外,对于基线SCoRS-J患者和工作人员评分之间存在较大差异的人,比较两组差异评分的变化.因此,在POMS的Confusion子量表得分的变化中,两组之间存在显著的群体主效应和交互作用,这表明该计划的混乱程度有所减轻。此外,对于那些在SCoRS-J上有较大差异的人,两组在得分差异上存在显著的群体主效应和交互作用,表明该计划可以有助于减少观念上的差异,以及合作治疗方法。
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychosocial effects of life review-based collage book making on long-term inpatients with schizophrenia, and to verify the effectiveness of this program in reducing the discrepancy between self-perception and others\' evaluation of patients\' day-to-day functioning. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention or control group. The intervention group participated in an individual program of life review-based collage book making. At three evaluation points (pre-and post-intervention and at 3-month follow-up) the patients rated their subjective difficulties, and the staff rated the objective severity of the patient\'s day-to-day functioning, using the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale Japanese version (SCoRS-J). The Profile of Mood Status-Brief Form (POMS), Recovery Assessment Scale, and Life Skills Profile were used to assess psychosocial functioning, and the changes in scores on the scales were compared between the two groups. In addition, for those with large discrepancy between patient and staff rating scores on the SCoRS-J at baseline, the change in the discrepancy scores were compared between the two groups. As a result, there was a significant group main effect and interaction between the two groups in the changes in the Confusion subscale scores of the POMS, indicating an alleviation of confusion in this program. In addition, for those with large discrepancy scores on the SCoRS-J, there was a significant group main effect and interaction between the two groups in discrepancy scores, indicating that this program can contribute to the reduction of discrepancies in the perceptions, and to the collaborative approach to treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:研究表明,与其他职业相比,医护人员的自杀风险更大,但是大多数发表的研究都集中在医生身上。这项研究调查了广泛的非医师医护人员中自杀意念(SI)和相关职业因素的患病率。
    方法:在2022年9月至11月之间,对大型城市医疗保健系统中30%的非医师医疗保健人员进行了一项匿名在线调查。进行加权多变量二元逻辑回归以确定与SI相关的工作场所和心理健康因素。
    结果:1084名受访者包括护士,行政人员,研究人员,医疗助理,执业护士,医师助理,和其他角色。在样本中,8.6%的人在前两周接受了SI。回归结果表明,在调整了人口因素后,SI的更大几率与患者或来访者的身体暴力有关(优势比[OR]=2.15,95%置信区间[CI]=1.06-4.37),较低的感知领导支持(OR=0.95,95%CI=0.92-0.98),和抑郁症筛查阳性(OR=4.66,95%CI=2.45-8.86)。探索性分析表明,抑郁可能是工作场所压力源和SI之间的中介因素。
    结论:限制包括中度反应率,使用单个项目来评估SI,和横截面设计。
    结论:研究结果表明,在医护人员中,工作场所暴力和领导支持是与SI相关的重要职业因素。减少和减轻工作场所暴力,加强领导支持,改善获得精神卫生保健的机会应被视为干预措施的目标,以降低该人群的自杀风险。
    BACKGROUND: Research suggests that healthcare workers are at greater risk for suicide than other occupations, but most published studies focus on physicians. This study examines the prevalence of suicidal ideation (SI) and associated occupational factors among a broad group of non-physician healthcare staff.
    METHODS: An anonymous online survey was sent to a random sample of 30 % of non-physician healthcare staff at a large urban healthcare system between September and November 2022. Weighted multivariable binary logistic regressions were conducted to determine the workplace and mental health factors associated with SI.
    RESULTS: The 1084 respondents included nurses, administrative staff, research staff, medical assistants, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and other roles. Of the sample, 8.8 % endorsed having SI over the prior two weeks. Results of the regression indicated that, after adjusting for demographic factors, greater odds of SI were associated with physical violence experienced from a patient or visitor (odds ratio [OR] = 2.15, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-4.37), lower perceived leadership support (OR = 0.95, 95 % CI = 0.92-0.98), and positive screening for depression (OR = 4.66, 95 % CI = 2.45-8.86). Exploratory analysis suggests that depression may be a mediating factor between workplace stressors and SI.
    CONCLUSIONS: Limitations include the response rate, the use of a single item to assess SI, and the cross-sectional design.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that workplace violence and leadership support are important occupational factors associated with SI among healthcare workers. Reducing and mitigating workplace violence, enhancing leadership support, and improving access to mental health care should be considered targets for interventions to decrease suicide risk in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:卫生系统长期以来一直对急性护理环境中人员配备的最佳实践感兴趣。关于人员配备的研究通常集中在注册护士和护士与患者的人员配备比率上。关于跨专业团队成员或医院和社区特征等环境因素与患者预后之间关系的研究较少。这项定性研究旨在通过征求医院人员对人员配备和患者结果的反馈来完善解释模型。
    方法:我们使用半结构化访谈和主题分析进行了一项定性研究,以了解医院人员对影响急性护理住院结果的因素的观点和经验。2022年进行了采访,代表美国华盛顿州19家医院的38名医院人员。
    结果:研究结果支持影响患者预后的特征模型,包括社区之间复杂和相互关联的关系,医院,病人,和人员配备特点。在模型中,患者特征被定位为医院特征,反过来,这些被定位在社区特征中,以突出评估结果时设置和背景的重要性。一起,这些因素影响了工作人员的特征和患者的预后,但是这两个类别也有直接的关系。
    结论:研究结果可应用于各种情况下的医院和卫生系统,以检查诸如社区资源可用性等外部因素如何影响护理提供。未来的研究应该扩大这项工作,特别关注人员配置的变化和跨专业团队的组成如何改善患者的预后。
    BACKGROUND: Health systems have long been interested in the best practices for staffing in the acute care setting. Studies on staffing often focus on registered nurses and nurse-to-patient staffing ratios. There were fewer studies on the relationship between interprofessional team members or contextual factors such as hospital and community characteristics and patient outcomes. This qualitative study aimed to refine an explanatory model by soliciting hospital personnel feedback on staffing and patient outcomes.
    METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis to understand hospital personnel\'s perspectives and experiences of factors that affect acute care inpatient outcomes. Interviews were conducted in 2022 with 38 hospital personnel representing 19 hospitals across Washington state in the United States of America.
    RESULTS: Findings support a model of characteristics impacting patient outcomes to include the complex and interconnected relationships between community, hospital, patient, and staffing characteristics. Within the model, patient characteristics were positioned into hospital characteristics, and in turn these were positioned within community characteristics to highlight the importance of setting and context when evaluating outcomes. Together, these factors influenced both staff characteristics and patient outcomes, but these two categories also share a direct relationship.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings can be applied to hospitals and health systems in a variety of contexts to examine how external factors such as community resource availability impact care delivery. Future research should expand on this work with specific attention to how staffing changes and interprofessional team composition can improve patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在中国于2022年12月7日结束其“动态零COVID政策”之后,在全国范围内爆发了SARS-CoV-2Omicron感染的大规模爆发。我们进行了一项全医院的前瞻性研究,以记录成都某医院医护人员爆发的流行病学特征,以前没有发现工作人员SARS-CoV-2感染。
    方法:2023年1月邀请所有医院工作人员填写COVID-19的在线问卷,2023年6月对SARS-CoV-2感染病例进行电话随访,收集长COVID数据。进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析以评估与SARS-CoV-2感染相关的因素。
    结果:共有2899名医院工作人员(93.5%)完成了在线问卷,86.4%的人感染了SARS-CoV-2Omicron。这些患者的临床表现以系统症状的高发生率为特征。咳嗽(83.4%),疲劳(79.8%)和发热(74.3%)是最常见的症状.多变量logistic分析显示,女性[调整比值比(aOR):1.42,95%置信区间(CI):1.07-1.88]和临床医生(aOR:10.32,95%CI:6.57-16.20)与SARS-CoV-2感染风险增加有关,而年龄≥60岁(aOR:0.30,95%CI:0.19-0.49),以及在2022年12月7日前3个月内接种最新剂量的三剂量COVID-19疫苗(aOR:0.44,95%CI:0.23-0.87,1个月内;aOR:0.46,95%CI:0.22-0.97)与风险降低相关.在案件中,4.27%经历了长时间的疲劳COVID,脑雾或两者兼而有之,大多数报告症状轻微。
    结论:我们的发现为中国放松对COVID-19控制的管制后,成都医护人员中SARS-CoV-2感染的流行病学状况提供了一个快照。该研究中的数据可以帮助制定和实施有效的措施,以保护医护人员,并在快速和广泛的Omicron爆发等具有挑战性的时期保持医疗保健系统的完整性。
    BACKGROUND: After China ended its \'dynamic zero-COVID policy\' on 7 December 2022, a large-scale outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infections emerged across the country. We conducted a hospital-wide prospective study to document the epidemiological characteristics of the outbreak among healthcare workers in a hospital of Chengdu, where no previous staff SARS-CoV-2 infections were detected.
    METHODS: All hospital staff members were invited to complete an online questionnaire on COVID-19 in January 2023, and SARS-CoV-2 infection cases were followed up by telephone in June 2023 to collect data on long COVID. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    RESULTS: A total of 2,899 hospital staff (93.5%) completed the online questionnaire, and 86.4% were infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron. The clinical manifestations of these patients were characterized by a high incidence of systemic symptoms. Cough (83.4%), fatigue (79.8%) and fever (74.3%) were the most frequently reported symptoms. Multivariable logistic analysis revealed that females [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.88] and clinical practitioners (aOR: 10.32, 95% CI: 6.57-16.20) were associated with an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, whereas advanced age ≥ 60 years (aOR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.19-0.49) and a three-dose COVID-19 vaccination with the most recent dose administered within 3 months before 7 December 2022 (aOR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.23-0.87 for within 1 month; aOR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.22-0.97 for within 1-3 months) were associated with reduced risk. Among the cases, 4.27% experienced long COVID of fatigue, brain fog or both, with the majority reporting minor symptoms.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide a snapshot of the epidemiological situation of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers in Chengdu after China\'s deregulation of COVID-19 control. Data in the study can aid in the development and implementation of effective measures to protect healthcare workers and maintain the integrity of healthcare systems during challenging times such as a rapid and widespread Omicron outbreak.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的本研究探索经验,在COVID-19大流行期间,医院临床工作人员在育儿假后重返工作岗位的担忧和看法。方法进行探索性混合方法研究。在墨尔本的大型大都市三级医疗服务机构雇用的合格员工,澳大利亚,在2021年2月至6月间完成了一项伦理认可的匿名在线横断面调查和/或参与了一次访谈.结果96名员工完成了调查,4人参加了访谈。工作人员报告了在COVID-19大流行期间休育儿假的积极和消极方面,包括对他们的假期没有按计划进行感到失望;感到与家人和朋友隔绝;希望与他们的医疗服务机构进行更多的沟通;赞赏他们和他们的伴侣在家和与婴儿联系的机会增加;以及对重返工作岗位的担忧,例如对COVID-19工作场所政策的了解有限,并可能感染他们的婴儿和家庭。结论COVID-19大流行对医院临床工作人员的育儿假和重返工作经验产生了独特的影响。调查结果表明,工作人员将受益于正式的重返工作岗位政策和计划,包括在休育儿假时与经理定期联系以及返回时的工作场所重新定位,尤其是在大流行等事件期间。
    Objective This study explored the experiences, concerns and perceptions of hospital clinical staff returning to work after parental leave during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods An exploratory mixed-methods study was performed. Eligible staff employed at a large metropolitan tertiary health service in Melbourne, Australia, completed an ethics-approved anonymous online cross-sectional survey and/or participated in an interview between February and June 2021. Results Ninety-six staff completed a survey and four participated in an interview. Staff reported both positive and negative aspects of being on parental leave during the COVID-19 pandemic including disappointment their leave had not gone as planned; feeling isolated from family and friends; wanting greater communication from their health service; appreciating the increased opportunities for them and their partner to be at home and bond with their baby; and concerns about returning to work such as limited knowledge of COVID-19 workplace policies and potentially infecting their baby and family. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic had a unique impact on the parental leave and return to work experiences of hospital clinical staff. The findings suggest that staff would benefit from formal return to work policies and programs including regular contact with their manager while on parental leave and workplace reorientation on their return, especially during events such as a pandemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的十年中,虚拟病房的采用激增。虚拟病房旨在防止不必要的入院,加快家庭出院,提高患者满意度,这对面临住院相关风险的老年人口特别有利。因此,虚拟康复病房(VRW)正在进行大量投资,尽管有证据表明它们的实施取得了不同程度的成功。然而,虚拟病房工作人员为快速实施这些创新护理模式所经历的促进者和障碍仍然知之甚少。
    本文介绍了在澳大利亚VRW上工作的医院工作人员的见解,以应对对旨在防止住院的计划日益增长的需求。我们探讨了员工对VRW的促进者和障碍的看法,在服务设置和交付上发光。
    使用非收养对21名VRW员工进行了定性访谈,放弃,放大,传播,可持续发展(NASSS)框架。使用框架分析和NASSS框架的7个领域进行数据分析。
    结果被映射到NASSS框架的7个领域。(1)条件:管理一定的条件,特别是那些涉及合并症和社会文化因素的,可以是具有挑战性的。(2)技术:VRW证明适合无认知障碍的技术患者,通过远程监控和视频通话在临床决策中提供优势。然而,互操作性问题和设备故障导致员工沮丧,强调迅速应对技术挑战的重要性。(3)价值主张:VRW授权患者选择他们的护理地点,扩大农村社区获得护理的机会,并为老年人提供家庭治疗。(4)采用者和(5)组织:尽管有这些好处,从面对面治疗到远程治疗的文化转变引入了工作流程的不确定性,专业责任,资源分配,和摄入过程。(6)更广泛的系统和(7)嵌入:随着服务的不断发展,以解决医院能力的差距,必须优先考虑正在进行的适应。这包括完善患者顺利转移回医院的过程,解决技术方面的问题,确保护理的无缝连续性,并深思熟虑地考虑护理负担如何转移到患者及其家人身上。
    在这项定性研究中,探索医护人员对创新VRW的体验,我们确定了实施和可接受性的几个驱动因素和挑战。这些发现对考虑在服务设置和交付方面为老年人实施VRW的未来服务具有影响。未来的工作将集中在评估VRW的患者和护理人员体验。
    UNASSIGNED: Over the past decade, the adoption of virtual wards has surged. Virtual wards aim to prevent unnecessary hospital admissions, expedite home discharge, and enhance patient satisfaction, which are particularly beneficial for the older adult population who faces risks associated with hospitalization. Consequently, substantial investments are being made in virtual rehabilitation wards (VRWs), despite evidence of varying levels of success in their implementation. However, the facilitators and barriers experienced by virtual ward staff for the rapid implementation of these innovative care models remain poorly understood.
    UNASSIGNED: This paper presents insights from hospital staff working on an Australian VRW in response to the growing demand for programs aimed at preventing hospital admissions. We explore staff\'s perspectives on the facilitators and barriers of the VRW, shedding light on service setup and delivery.
    UNASSIGNED: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 21 VRW staff using the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework. The analysis of data was performed using framework analysis and the 7 domains of the NASSS framework.
    UNASSIGNED: The results were mapped onto the 7 domains of the NASSS framework. (1) Condition: Managing certain conditions, especially those involving comorbidities and sociocultural factors, can be challenging. (2) Technology: The VRW demonstrated suitability for technologically engaged patients without cognitive impairment, offering advantages in clinical decision-making through remote monitoring and video calls. However, interoperability issues and equipment malfunctions caused staff frustration, highlighting the importance of promptly addressing technical challenges. (3) Value proposition: The VRW empowered patients to choose their care location, extending access to care for rural communities and enabling home-based treatment for older adults. (4) Adopters and (5) organizations: Despite these benefits, the cultural shift from in-person to remote treatment introduced uncertainties in workflows, professional responsibilities, resource allocation, and intake processes. (6) Wider system and (7) embedding: As the service continues to develop to address gaps in hospital capacity, it is imperative to prioritize ongoing adaptation. This includes refining the process of smoothly transferring patients back to the hospital, addressing technical aspects, ensuring seamless continuity of care, and thoughtfully considering how the burden of care may shift to patients and their families.
    UNASSIGNED: In this qualitative study exploring health care staff\'s experience of an innovative VRW, we identified several drivers and challenges to implementation and acceptability. The findings have implications for future services considering implementing VRWs for older adults in terms of service setup and delivery. Future work will focus on assessing patient and carer experiences of the VRW.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:工作场所健康促进(WHP)治疗背痛的项目传统上只关注与工作相关的问题,而不关注脊柱的休闲压力。我们开发了一个全面的WHP项目,该项目涉及医院工作人员的背部健康,无论其工作的身体特征如何,并比较了其对久坐和身体活跃的医院工作人员的影响。
    方法:在参与WHP干预之前和之后6个月进行研究评估。主要结局参数是背痛(Oswestry残疾指数,ODI)。焦虑(广义焦虑症-7),工作能力(工作能力指数),抑郁症(患者健康问卷-9),压力(感知压力量表-10),和生活质量(简表-36)通过问卷作为次要结局参数进行评估.物理性能通过30秒坐立测试(30secSTS)测量。
    结果:68名非特异性背痛的医护人员被纳入WHP项目“BackHealth24/7/365”的评估研究。六个月后,背痛,物理性能,两组的自我感知的身体功能(SF-36身体功能分量表)均显着改善。没有一个参数显示出与组分配的交互作用。
    结论:全面的WHP干预对医院工作人员显示出显著的积极影响,无论其工作的身体特征如何。
    BACKGROUND: Projects for workplace health promotion (WHP) for back pain traditionally focus exclusively on work-related but not on leisure-time stress on the spine. We developed a comprehensive WHP project on the back health of hospital workers regardless of the physical characteristics of their work and compared its effects on sedentary and physically active hospital workers.
    METHODS: Study assessments were carried out before and six months after participation in the WHP intervention. The primary outcome parameter was back pain (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI). Anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), work ability (Work Ability Index), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10), and quality of life (Short Form-36) were assessed via questionnaires as secondary outcome parameters. Physical performance was measured via the 30 seconds Sit-to-Stand test (30secSTS).
    RESULTS: Sixty-eight healthcare workers with non-specific back pain were included in the evaluation study of the WHP project \"Back Health 24/7/365\". After six months, back pain, physical performance, and self-perceived physical functioning (SF-36 Physical Functioning subscale) improved significantly in both groups. Not a single parameter showed an interaction effect with the group allocation.
    CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive WHP-intervention showed significant positive effects on hospital workers regardless of the physical characteristics of their work.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分析医院环境中医护人员的情绪智力与他们对COVID-19大流行安全气候的看法之间的关系。
    方法:横截面,分析研究,与大流行期间在医院工作的81名卫生工作者一起进行,2021年9月至11月。数据收集是使用电子表格进行的,其中包括社会人口统计学/职业问卷和巴西版本的安全态度问卷和舒特自我测试。采用Spearman相关检验和简单、多元线性回归分析。
    结果:情绪智力水平增加1分导致对安全气候的感知增加0.487分。这种感知的最重要预测因素是管理他人情绪的能力(β=0.334;p=0.003;R2=0.168)。
    结论:在COVID-19大流行期间,医院医护人员的情绪智力水平较高与对安全气候的更大认识有关。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between the emotional intelligence of healthcare workers in a hospital environment and their perception of the safety climate in the COVID-19 pandemic.
    METHODS: Cross-sectional, analytical study, carried out with 81 health workers who worked in hospitals during the pandemic, between September and November 2021. Data collection was carried out using an electronic form, which included a sociodemographic/occupational questionnaire and the Brazilian versions of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire and the Schutte Self Test. Spearman\'s correlation test and simple and multiple linear regression analyses were applied.
    RESULTS: An increase of 1 point in emotional intelligence levels resulted in an increase of 0.487 points in the perception of the safety climate. The most significant predictor of this perception was the ability to manage other people\'s emotions (β=0.334; p=0.003; R2=0.168).
    CONCLUSIONS: A higher level of emotional intelligence in hospital healthcare workers was related to a greater perception of the safety climate during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在通过检查韩国综合医院工作人员对医疗保健文化多样性的理解来评估他们的跨文化能力,并确定影响他们跨文化能力的因素。
    对来自韩国四家综合医院的439名参与者进行了一项跨机构调查,采用推断统计,如单向方差分析,Mann-WhitneyU,和Kruskal-Wallis测试,然后是事后分析,和多元线性回归分析。
    虽然85%(n=362)的参与者承认多元文化在韩国社会的重要性,只有11%(n=49)认为有能力治疗多元文化患者。此外,72%(n=315)在医学交流中遇到了严重的语言困难。多元回归分析确定了高级英语能力,多元文化培训经验,和同伴支持,组织意识到多元文化的重要性,这是跨文化能力的重要积极贡献者。
    尽管认识到多元文化主义的重要性,综合医院工作人员在为多元文化患者提供护理时面临显著的语言障碍和低自我效能感。为了应对这些挑战,医院应指定常驻翻译人员进行文化上适当的交流。此外,提出了一种三层培训方法,以增强韩国综合医院工作人员的五个跨文化能力领域,包括全面的多元文化培训,特定职业课程,以及旨在有效管理医疗保健环境中的文化多样性的长期管理计划。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to assess the intercultural competence of general hospital workers in South Korea by examining their understanding of cultural diversity in healthcare and to identify factors influencing their intercultural competence.
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-institutional survey was conducted with 439 participants from four South Korean general hospitals, employing inferential statistics such as one-way Analysis of Variance, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis test followed by post-hoc, and multiple linear regression analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: While 85% (n = 362) of participants acknowledged the significance of multiculturalism in Korean society, only 11% (n = 49) felt competent in treating multicultural patients. Additionally, 72% (n = 315) experienced significant linguistic difficulties in medical communication. Multiple regression analysis identified advanced English competency, multicultural training experiences, and peer support with organizational awareness of multicultural importance as significant positive contributors to intercultural competence.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite recognizing the importance of multiculturalism, general hospital workers face significant language barriers and low self-efficacy in providing care to multicultural patients. To address these challenges, hospitals should designate resident translators for culturally appropriate communication. Furthermore, a tri-tiered training approach is proposed to enhance the five domains of intercultural competence among general hospital workers in Korea, including overarching multicultural training, occupation-specific courses, and long-term managerial programs aimed at managing cultural diversity effectively in healthcare settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于工作场所的条件,例如医院不安全和不卫生的工作环境,医院环卫工人(SWs)暴露于许多职业危害。因此,知道幅度,职业危害暴露的类型和来源及其决定因素对于进一步缓解非常重要。
    方法:在公立医院进行基于医院的横断面研究设计,埃塞俄比亚东部从5月1日至8月30日,2023年。809名SWs参加。将数据输入到用于分析的Epi数据版本3.1和Stata17MP版本中。描述性分析用于描述数据。同时,探索了多水平逻辑回归,以确定个体水平(模型1)中结局与独立性之间的关联,在医院(模式2)和两者的组合(模式3)。报告了模型2和模型3的粗比值比(COR)和调整后比值比(AOR)。报告了P值<0.05的具有95%置信区间(CI)的AOR的变量。
    结果:在809SWs中,729人(90.11%)回答。SWs中自我报告的职业危害暴露的总体程度为63.65%(95%CI0.60-0.67)。其中,生物,化学,人体工程学危害占82.44%,74.76%,70.92%,分别。多水平Logistic回归显示,具有社会认可度(AOR:0.37,95%CI0.14,0.91),中立态度(AOR:0.48,95%CI0.17,1.41)与消极态度相比。该模型还发现,与非监督的SWs相比,监督的SWs可以将职业危害暴露的可能性降低50%倍(AOR:0.50,95%CI0.18,1.38)。最终模型预测卫生工作者从医院到医院的职业危害暴露变化为26.59%。
    结论:结论是医院卫生工作者正面临生物,化学,符合人体工程学,物理,心理,机械,和电气危险。这项研究的发现预测,对他们的环境不满意,每天工作8小时以上,对工作场所风险的消极态度和监督不足可能是这些群体中职业危害暴露可能性的促成因素。因此,研究表明,如果医院实施风险评估和安全管理(RASM)模型,可以降低这些危险风险,其中包括多模式策略,指标和三方哲学。
    BACKGROUND: Hospital sanitation workers (SWs) are exposed to numerous occupational hazards due to workplace conditions such as unsafe and unhygienic working environment in the hospitals. Therefore, knowing magnitude, types and source of occupational hazard exposures with their determinants are very significant for further mitigations.
    METHODS: Hospital based cross-sectional study design was conducted in public hospitals, eastern Ethiopia from 1st May to August 30th, 2023. 809 SWs participated. Data was entered into Epi Data Version 3.1 and Stata 17MP version used for analysis. Descriptive analysis was applied to describe the data. While, multilevel logistic regression was explored to determine the association between outcome and independents among at individual level (model 1), at hospitals (model 2) and combination of the two (model 3). The crude odds ratio (COR) and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for models 2 and 3 were reported. Variables with an AOR with a 95% confidence interval (CI) at a p-value < 0.05 were reported.
    RESULTS: Out of 809 SWs, 729 (90.11%) responded. The overall magnitude of self-reported occupational hazard exposures among SWs was 63.65% (95% CI 0.60-0.67). Of this, biological, chemical, and ergonomic hazards accounted for 82.44%, 74.76%, and 70.92%, respectively. The multilevel logistic regression shows that having social recognition (AOR: 0.37, 95% CI 0.14, 0.91), neutral attitude (AOR: 0.48, 95% CI 0.17, 1.41) as compared to negative attitude. The model also found that SWs those supervised could reduce the likelihood of occupational hazard exposures by 50% times (AOR: 0.50, 95% CI 0.18, 1.38) as compared to non-supervised SWs. The final model predicted the variation of occupational hazard exposures among sanitary workers from the hospitals to hospitals was 26.59%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The concluded that hospital sanitary workers are facing biological, chemical, ergonomic, physical, psychological, mechanical, and electrical hazards. This study\'s findings predicted that dissatisfied with their environment, working more than 8 hr per a day,  a negative attitude towards workplace risks and inadequate supervision may serve as contributing factors for the likelihood of occupational hazard exposures among these groups. Thus, the study suggested that hospitals could reduce these hazard risks if they implement the Risk Assessment and Safety Management (RASM) model, which includes multi-modal strategies, indicators and tripartite philosophy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号