■护理管理以护理质量管理为核心。护理质量评价指标不仅控制护理质量,衡量工作热情,判断护理水平的差异,也有助于护士准确了解患者的满意度。
■分析小儿肿瘤护理质量评价指标,建立科学严谨的小儿护理质量指标体系。
■基于本研究中的“结构-过程-结果”,采用德尔菲法对国内儿科专家进行问卷调查和意见收集,儿科肿瘤内科,和儿科肿瘤外科护理和临床两个方面。此外,采用Kendall协调系数和层次分析法确定各级指标的内容,设置重量,最后建立儿科肿瘤护理质量指标体系。
■第一轮问卷中27位专家的回复率为100%,Ca0.77,Cs,0.73,Cr0.75,专家协调系数W值为0.315。在第二轮27次专家磋商中,答复率为96%,Ca0.81,Cs0.80,Cr0.805,专家协调系数W值为0.369。经过两轮磋商,每个指标的重要性评估得分分别为3.31至4.88和3.29至5.00,94.7%以上的指标重要性评价得分高于3.50。最后,3个一级指标,12个二级指标,建立了54个三级指标。
■这项研究建立了一个简单的,全面,科学的儿科肿瘤护理质量指标体系,突出儿科肿瘤护理的特点,为儿科肿瘤专科护理提供评价体系,使儿科肿瘤护理更加规范化,促进儿科肿瘤护理的可持续、科学发展。
UNASSIGNED: Nursing management considers nursing quality management at its core. Evaluation indexes of nursing quality not only control nursing quality, measure work enthusiasm, and judge the difference in nursing levels but also help nurses accurately understand the satisfaction degree of patients.
UNASSIGNED: To analyze pediatric tumor nursing quality evaluation indexes and establish a scientific and rigorous index system of children\'s nursing quality.
UNASSIGNED: Based on the \"structure-process-result\" in this study, the Delphi method was used to carry out questionnaire investigations and opinion collection for domestic experts in pediatrics, pediatric oncology internal medicine, and pediatric oncology surgical care and clinical aspects two times. In addition, the Kendall coordination coefficient and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the content of indicators at all levels, set the weight, and finally establish the quality index system of pediatric tumor nursing.
UNASSIGNED: The response rate of 27 experts in the first round of the questionnaire was 100%, Ca0.77, Cs,0.73, Cr0.75, and the W value of the expert coordination coefficient was 0.315. In the second round of 27 expert consultations, the reply rate was 96%, Ca0.81, Cs0.80, Cr0.805, and the specialist coordination coefficient W value was 0.369. After two rounds of consultation, the importance evaluation scores of each indicator ranged from 3.31 to 4.88 and 3.29 to 5.00, respectively, and more than 94.7% of the indicators\' importance evaluation scores were higher than 3.50. Finally, 3 Level-1 indicators, 12 Level-2 indicators, and 54 Level-3 indicators are established.
UNASSIGNED: This study has established a simple, comprehensive, and scientific quality index system for pediatric tumor nursing, highlighted the characteristics of pediatric tumor nursing, and provided an evaluation system for specialized nursing of pediatric tumors to more standardized pediatric tumor nursing and contribute to the sustainable and scientific development of pediatric tumor nursing.