Patient-reported

患者报告
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社会关系是重要的健康资源,可以作为社交网络进行研究。我们在诊断后的3年内测量了癌症患者的社交子网络,分为通用社交网络(患者已知的人)和特定疾病的社交网络(与之谈论癌症的人)。
    方法:新诊断的局限性乳腺癌患者(n=222),淋巴瘤(n=102),和前列腺癌(n=141)在诊断后2-5个月和9,18和36个月后完成了关于其社交子网络的问卷调查。配偶/伴侣的一般和癌症特定人数;其他家庭;近亲,详细;和朋友被记录以及癌症特定的熟人人数;其他人患有癌症;工作社区;医疗保健专业人员;和宗教,爱好,和公民参与。采用回归模型对数据进行分析。
    结果:在研究进入时,大多数患者都有配偶/伴侣,都有近亲(年轻的,更多的时候是父母;年龄越大,更常见的是有家人的成年子女),大多数也是朋友。通常与他们讨论癌症,并且经常与熟人和其他患者(74-86%)。只有轻微的通常下降的时间趋势。然而,通过9个月的评估,发现远亲和朋友的数量大大增加(P<0.001)。
    结论:癌症患者具有多种社会关系,通常在诊断后不久就与他们谈论癌症。大多数时间变化是由于生命周期的自然过程。癌症通过包括其他患者和医疗保健专业人员以及更多的亲戚和朋友来扩大患者的社交网络。
    BACKGROUND: Social relationships are important health resources and may be investigated as social networks. We measured cancer patients\' social subnetworks divided into generic social networks (people known to the patients) and disease-specific social networks (the persons talked to about the cancer) during 3 years after diagnosis.
    METHODS: Newly diagnosed patients with localized breast cancer (n = 222), lymphoma (n = 102), and prostate cancer (n = 141) completed a questionnaire on their social subnetworks at 2-5 months after diagnosis and 9, 18, and 36 months thereafter. Generic and cancer-specific numbers of persons of spouse/partner; other family; close relatives, in detail; and friends were recorded as well as cancer-specific numbers of persons in acquaintances; others with cancer; work community; healthcare professionals; and religious, hobby, and civic participation. The data was analyzed with regression models.
    RESULTS: At study entry, most patients had a spouse/partner, all had close relatives (the younger, more often parents; and the older, more often adult children with families) and most also friends. The cancer was typically discussed with them, and often with acquaintances and other patients (74-86%). Only minor usually decreasing time trends were seen. However, the numbers of distant relatives and friends were found to strongly increase by the 9-month evaluation (P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients have multiple social relationships and usually talk to them about their cancer soon after diagnosis. Most temporal changes are due to the natural course of life cycle. The cancer widened the patients\' social networks by including other patients and healthcare professionals and by an increased number of relatives and friends.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:焦虑和抑郁在癫痫中非常普遍和有影响。美国神经病学质量测量强调焦虑和抑郁筛查和生活质量(QOL)测量,然而,通常的癫痫治疗QOL和焦虑/抑郁结局的特征不明确.主要目标是评估6个月的QOL,在患有癫痫和基线焦虑或抑郁症状的成人患者中,常规治疗期间的焦虑和抑郁;这些是一项远程评估方法的实用随机试验中预设的次要结局.
    方法:通过电子健康记录(EHR)嵌入程序,从三级癫痫诊所招募具有焦虑或抑郁症状并且没有自杀意念的成年人。参与者通过患者门户EHR问卷与患者门户EHR问卷进行随机1:1至6个月的结果收集电话采访。本报告侧重于整个试验的先验次要结果,重点关注全样本中患者报告的健康结局.生活质量,(主要健康结果),焦虑,并在3个月和6个月时收集抑郁测量值(癫痫-10、QOLIE-10、广泛性焦虑症-7、神经系统疾病抑郁量表-癫痫)。计算变化值和95%置信区间。在事后探索性分析中,将基线就诊时患者报告的焦虑/抑郁管理计划和医疗保健利用与EHR文档进行比较,和一致性是使用kappa统计量计算的。
    结果:总体而言,30名参与者(每组15名)被招募并分析,平均年龄42.5岁,60%的女性总体QOLIE-10的平均6个月变化为2.0(95%CI-6.8,10.9),EHR组和电话组的结局无显著差异.平均焦虑和抑郁评分在随访期间保持稳定(所有95%CI均为零)。无论是否记录了焦虑或抑郁行动计划,结果都是相似的。在基线采访中,大多数有临床就诊EHR文件的参与者表明为解决焦虑和/或抑郁而采取的行动报告没有接受治疗(12人中有7人制定了行动计划,58%),患者报告和EHR文件之间的一致性较差(kappa=0.22).医疗保健利用率很高:40%的人通过EHR报告和/或确定了至少一次住院或紧急/紧急护理访问。但三分之一(4/12)未能自我报告EHR确定的住院/紧急访视.
    结论:在患有癫痫和焦虑或抑郁症状的成人中,超过6个月的常规护理,生活质量或焦虑/抑郁没有显着改善,提示需要采取干预措施,以加强常规神经病学护理,并改善该组的生活质量。
    OBJECTIVE: Anxiety and depression are highly prevalent and impactful in epilepsy. American Academy of Neurology quality measures emphasize anxiety and depression screening and quality of life (QOL) measurement, yet usual epilepsy care QOL and anxiety/depression outcomes are poorly characterized. The main objective was to assess 6-month QOL, anxiety and depression during routine care among adults with epilepsy and baseline anxiety or depression symptoms; these were prespecified secondary outcomes within a pragmatic randomized trial of remote assessment methods.
    METHODS: Adults with anxiety or depression symptoms and no suicidal ideation were recruited from a tertiary epilepsy clinic via an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded process. Participants were randomized 1:1 to 6 month outcome collection via patient portal EHR questionnaires vs. telephone interview. This report focuses on an a priori secondary outcomes of the overall trial, focused on patient-reported health outcomes in the full sample. Quality of life, (primary health outcome), anxiety, and depression measures were collected at 3 and 6 months (Quality of Life in Epilepsy-10, QOLIE-10, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory-Epilepsy). Change values and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated. In post-hoc exploratory analyses, patient-reported anxiety/depression management plans at baseline clinic visit and healthcare utilization were compared with EHR-documentation, and agreement was calculated using the kappa statistic.
    RESULTS: Overall, 30 participants (15 per group) were recruited and analyzed, of mean age 42.5 years, with 60 % women. Mean 6-month change in QOLIE-10 overall was 2.0(95 % CI -6.8, 10.9), and there were no significant differences in outcomes between the EHR and telephone groups. Mean anxiety and depression scores were stable across follow-up (all 95 % CI included zero). Outcomes were similar regardless of whether an anxiety or depression action plan was documented. During the baseline interview, most participants with clinic visit EHR documentation indicating action to address anxiety and/or depression reported not being offered a treatment(7 of 12 with action plan, 58 %), and there was poor agreement between patient report and EHR documentation (kappa=0.22). Healthcare utilization was high: 40 % had at least one hospitalization or emergency/urgent care visit reported and/or identified via EHR, but a third (4/12) failed to self-report an EHR-identified hospitalization/urgent visit.
    CONCLUSIONS: Over 6 months of usual care among adults with epilepsy and anxiety or depression symptoms, there was no significant average improvement in quality of life or anxiety/depression, suggesting a need for interventions to enhance routine neurology care and achieve quality of life improvement for this group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本系统综述了磁共振引导放疗(MRgRT)对前列腺癌(PC)患者报告结局(PRO)影响的文献。
    方法:2023年10月在PubMed进行了系统搜索,EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆。PICOS框架(即,病人,干预,比较,结果,研究设计)用于确定合格标准。包括评估样本大小>10的PC的MRgRT后的PRO的研究。使用ROBINS-I和RoB2评估方法学质量。使用最小重要差异(MID)解释与RT前相比的相关平均差异(MD)。采用随机效应模型进行Meta分析。使用I2统计量评估研究之间的异质性。
    结果:共纳入11项观察性研究和1项随机对照试验(n=897)。九项研究包括以MRgRT为一线治疗的原发性PC患者(n=813),三项以MRgRT为二线治疗的患者(n=84)。在五项研究中发现了严重的偏倚风险。EORTCQLQ-C30和EORTCQLQ-PR25评分来自三项研究,和4项研究的EPIC-26评分。在EPIC-26(MD-10.0[95CI-12.0--8.1];I20%)和EORTCQLQ-PR25(MD8.6[95CI-4.7-22.0];I297%)中发现了尿结构域的相关MD,两者都在RT结束到一个月的随访。使用EPIC-26发现了肠域的相关MD(MD-4.7[95CI-9.2--0.2];I282%),在RT结束或一个月随访时,但不是EORTCQLQ-PR25。对于这两个域,随访3个月后未发现相关MD.在EORTCQLQ-C30的一般QoL域中未发现相关MD。
    结论:与RT前相比,MRgRT用于PC导致患者报告的泌尿和肠道症状在治疗后的第一个月暂时恶化,在3个月内解决。没有发现一般QoL域的临床相关变化。这些结果为患者咨询提供了重要信息,可以作为未来研究的基准。
    OBJECTIVE: This systematic review provides an overview of literature on the impact of MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) on patient reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with prostate cancer (PC).
    METHODS: A systematic search was performed in October 2023 in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The PICOS framework (i.e., patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, study design) was used to determine eligibility criteria. Included were studies assessing PROs following MRgRT for PC with sample size >10. Methodological quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I and RoB 2. Relevant mean differences (MD) compared to pre-RT were interpreted using minimal important differences (MID). Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2-statistic.
    RESULTS: Eleven observational studies and one randomized controlled trial (n=897) were included. Nine studies included patients with primary PC with MRgRT as first-line treatment (n=813) and three with MRgRT as second-line treatment (n=84). Substantial risk of bias was found in five studies. EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-PR25 scores were pooled from three studies, and EPIC-26 scores from four studies. Relevant MDs for the urinary domain were found with the EPIC-26 (MD-10.0 [95%CI -12.0 - -8.1]; I20%) and the EORTC QLQ-PR25 (MD8.6 [95%CI -4.7-22.0]; I297%), both at end-RT to one month follow-up. Relevant MDs for the bowel domain were found with the EPIC-26 (MD-4.7 [95%CI -9.2 - -0.2]; I282%), at end-RT or one month follow-up, but not with the EORTC QLQ-PR25. For both domains, no relevant MDs were found after three months of follow-up. No relevant MDs were found in the general QoL domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30.
    CONCLUSIONS: MRgRT for PC results in a temporarily worsening of patient-reported urinary and bowel symptoms during the first month after treatment compared to pre-RT, resolving at 3 months. No clinically relevant changes were found for general QoL domains. These results provide important information for patient counseling and can serve as a benchmark for future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在全球范围内实施患者报告结果测量(PROM)来测量和评估健康结果正在增加。随着这一新兴趋势,重要的是要确定哪些准则,框架,清单,和建议存在,以及它们是否以及如何用于实施PROM,特别是在临床质量登记处(CQR)。
    目的:这篇综述旨在确定现有的出版物,以及讨论实际指南应用的出版物,框架,清单,以及为临床试验等各种目的实施PROM的建议,临床实践,和CQR。此外,确定的出版物将用于指导在CQR中实施PROM的新指南的制定,这是更广泛项目的目标。
    方法:对MEDLINE数据库进行文献检索,Embase,CINAHL,PsycINFO,和Cochrane中央对照试验登记册将自数据库建立以来进行,除了使用谷歌学者和灰色文献来识别用于范围审查的文献。预定义的纳入和排除标准将用于筛选的所有阶段。现有的准则出版物,框架,清单,recommendations,和出版物讨论了这些方法在临床试验中实施PROM的应用,临床实践,和CQR将包括在最终审查中。与书目信息有关的数据,目标,PROM使用的目的(临床试验,实践,或注册表),准则名称,框架,清单和建议,发展的理由,它们的目的和含义将被提取出来。此外,对于实际方法的出版物,将提取PROM实施的方面或域。将对所包括的出版物进行叙述性综合。
    结果:电子数据库搜索于2024年3月完成。标题和摘要筛选,全文筛选,数据提取将于2024年5月完成。审查预计将于2024年8月底完成。
    结论:本次范围审查的结果将为在临床试验中实施PROM的任何现有方法和工具提供证据,临床实践,和CQR。预计这些出版物将帮助我们指导在CQR中实施PROM的新指南的制定。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42022366085;https://tinyurl.com/bdesk98x。
    DERR1-10.2196/52572。
    BACKGROUND: Implementing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to measure and evaluate health outcomes is increasing worldwide. Along with this emerging trend, it is important to identify which guidelines, frameworks, checklists, and recommendations exist, and if and how they have been used in implementing PROMs, especially in clinical quality registries (CQRs).
    OBJECTIVE: This review aims to identify existing publications, as well as publications that discuss the application of actual guidelines, frameworks, checklists, and recommendations on PROMs\' implementation for various purposes such as clinical trials, clinical practice, and CQRs. In addition, the identified publications will be used to guide the development of a new guideline for PROMs\' implementation in CQRs, which is the aim of the broader project.
    METHODS: A literature search of the databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be conducted since the inception of the databases, in addition to using Google Scholar and gray literature to identify literature for the scoping review. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria will be used for all phases of screening. Existing publications of guidelines, frameworks, checklists, recommendations, and publications discussing the application of those methodologies for implementing PROMs in clinical trials, clinical practice, and CQRs will be included in the final review. Data relating to bibliographic information, aim, the purpose of PROMs use (clinical trial, practice, or registries), name of guideline, framework, checklist and recommendations, the rationale for development, and their purpose and implications will be extracted. Additionally, for publications of actual methodologies, aspects or domains of PROMs\' implementation will be extracted. A narrative synthesis of included publications will be conducted.
    RESULTS: The electronic database searches were completed in March 2024. Title and abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction will be completed in May 2024. The review is expected to be completed by the end of August 2024.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this scoping review will provide evidence on any existing methodologies and tools for PROMs\' implementation in clinical trials, clinical practice, and CQRs. It is anticipated that the publications will help us guide the development of a new guideline for PROMs\' implementation in CQRs.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42022366085; https://tinyurl.com/bdesk98x.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/52572.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是确定在整个头颈部化学放射疗法治疗过程中,哪些解剖和剂量学变化与晚期患者报告的吞咽困难相关。患者队列(n=64)考虑了口咽和鼻咽患者的治疗意图,随访时间超过一年,无基线吞咽困难。患者在随访期间完成MDAnderson吞咽困难量表。测量的综合评分范围为20至100,评分低表明症状负担高;评分≤60表示患者报告的吞咽困难。咽部(PCM)和环咽收缩肌(CPM)在计划CT图像上轮廓化,并使用可变形图像配准适应每周锥束CT解剖结构,并使用加权剂量-体积直方图曲线累积剂量。检查PCM和CPM的体积,厚度,以及整个治疗过程中的剂量学变化,结果与症状组相关。解剖学评估表明,吞咽困难患者在治疗期间PCM厚度增加更多,C2椎骨的基部(p=0.04)和上下中间PCM(p=0.01)厚度表明1.0-1.5毫米增加。对PCM和CPM的计划和递送的平均剂量和DVH指标被发现在剂量累积测量的随机误差内。指示递送剂量和计划剂量是相等的。在表现吞咽困难的患者中,发现PCM和CPM器官离高剂量梯度约5毫米。音量,厚度,和高剂量梯度指标可能是识别有晚期患者报告的吞咽困难风险的患者的有用指标.
    The goal of this study was to identify which anatomical and dosimetric changes correlated with late patient-reported dysphagia throughout the course of head and neck chemo-radiotherapy treatment. The patient cohort (n = 64) considered oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal patients treated with curative intent, exhibiting no baseline dysphagia with a follow-up time greater than one year. Patients completed the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory during a follow-up visit. A composite score was measured ranging from 20 to 100, with a low score indicating a high symptom burden; a score ≤60 indicated patient-reported dysphagia. The pharyngeal (PCM) and cricopharyngeal constrictor muscles (CPM) were contoured on a planning CT image and adapted to weekly cone-beam CT anatomy using deformable image registration and dose was accumulated using weighted dose-volume histogram curves. The PCM and CPM were examined for volume, thickness, and dosimetric changes across treatment with the results correlated to symptom group. Anatomical evaluation indicated the PCM thickness increased more during treatment for patients with dysphagia, with base of C2 vertebrae (p = 0.04) and superior-inferior middle PCM (p = 0.01) thicknesses indicating a 1.0-1.5 mm increase. The planned and delivered mean dose and DVH metrics to PCM and CPM were found to be within random error measured for the dose accumulation, indicating delivered and planned dose are equivalent. The PCM and CPM organs were found to lie approximately 5 mm closer to high dose gradients in patients exhibiting dysphagia. The volume, thickness, and high dose gradient metrics may be useful metrics to identify patients at risk of late patient-reported dysphagia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肾上腺脑白质营养不良(ALD)是一个多方面的,X-linked,包括几种临床表型的神经退行性疾病。ALD通过各种身体影响患者,情感,社会,和其他疾病特异性因素共同导致疾病负担。为了促进临床护理和研究,重要的是要确定哪些症状是最常见的,并且与患有任何ALD亚型的个体相关.
    方法:我们进行了半结构化的定性访谈和国际横断面研究,以确定ALD最普遍和最重要的症状。我们的研究包括从国家和国际患者登记处招募的患有ALD的成年参与者。反应按年龄分类,性别,疾病表型,功能状态,以及其他人口统计学和临床特征。
    结果:17名ALD患者参加了定性访谈,提供1709关于他们症状负担的直接报价。一百零九个人参加了横断面调查研究,调查了182种独特的症状,代表24种不同的症状主题。总体ALD样本队列中患病率最高的症状主题是平衡问题(90.9%),行动不便或行走受限(87.3%),疲劳(86.4%),腿部无力(86.4%)。影响得分最高的症状主题(在0-4量表上,其中4个是最严重的)是麻烦解决(2.35),腿部无力(2.25),和平衡问题(2.21)。症状主题的患病率较高与功能性残疾有关,就业中断,和言语障碍。
    结论:有许多患者相关的症状和主题导致ALD患者的疾病负担。这些症状,由那些有ALD的人识别,提出了进一步研究和治疗发展的关键目标。
    BACKGROUND: Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) is a multifaceted, X-linked, neurodegenerative disorder that comprises several clinical phenotypes. ALD affects patients through a variety of physical, emotional, social, and other disease-specific factors that collectively contribute to disease burden. To facilitate clinical care and research, it is important to identify which symptoms are most common and relevant to individuals with any subtype of ALD.
    METHODS: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews and an international cross-sectional study to determine the most prevalent and important symptoms of ALD. Our study included adult participants with a diagnosis of ALD who were recruited from national and international patient registries. Responses were categorized by age, sex, disease phenotype, functional status, and other demographic and clinical features.
    RESULTS: Seventeen individuals with ALD participated in qualitative interviews, providing 1709 direct quotes regarding their symptomatic burden. One hundred and nine individuals participated in the cross-sectional survey study, which inquired about 182 unique symptoms representing 24 distinct symptomatic themes. The symptomatic themes with the highest prevalence in the overall ALD sample cohort were problems with balance (90.9%), limitations with mobility or walking (87.3%), fatigue (86.4%), and leg weakness (86.4%). The symptomatic themes with the highest impact scores (on a 0-4 scale with 4 being the most severe) were trouble getting around (2.35), leg weakness (2.25), and problems with balance (2.21). A higher prevalence of symptomatic themes was associated with functional disability, employment disruption, and speech impairment.
    CONCLUSIONS: There are many patient-relevant symptoms and themes that contribute to disease burden in individuals with ALD. These symptoms, identified by those having ALD, present key targets for further research and therapeutic development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定与患者报告的银屑病关节炎(PsA)治疗成功相关的特征。
    方法:风湿病学家诊断的符合CASPAR分类的PsA患者从一个中心招募。PsA结果测量包括:66/68肿胀/压痛关节计数,利兹/SPARCC指炎/附着点炎指数,牛皮癣体表面积(BSA),和患者报告的结果(PRO),包括PROMIS。主要结果是患者报告的项目:“今天,考虑到你的银屑病关节炎和银屑病的控制水平,您认为您的治疗成功了吗?“描述性和多变量逻辑回归分析确定了患者报告治疗成功的临床预测因素。探讨了患者报告的缺乏治疗成功的原因。
    结果:总共178名参与者进行了基线访视。平均(SD)CASPAR评分为3.7(0.9),年龄51.7(13.5)岁,BMI为31.3(7.2)kg/m2。52%是女性,和86.0%白色。分析队列中116/178(65%)患者报告治疗成功。在76名报告治疗失败的患者中,最常选择的缺乏成功的原因是疼痛(n=55,72.4%),疲劳(n=46,60.5%),发炎的关节(n=40,52.6%),和刚度(n=40,52.6%)。总的来说,105名参与者在逻辑回归模型中具有跨变量的完整数据。患者报告的治疗成功与66肿胀/68压痛关节计数独立相关,银屑病BSA,PROs(疼痛干扰,物理功能,疲劳),和TNF抑制剂治疗,在控制BMI和人口统计学后。
    结论:患者报告的PsA治疗成功可能是通过改善炎性关节炎来实现的,牛皮癣,疼痛,物理功能,疲劳,以及使用TNF抑制剂。患者报告治疗失败最常见的原因是疼痛症状,疲劳和刚度。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine characteristics associated with patient-reported treatment success in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
    METHODS: Rheumatologist-diagnosed PsA patients fulfilling the CASPAR classification were recruited from a single center. PsA outcome measures included: 66/68 swollen/tender joint counts, Leeds/SPARCC dactylitis/enthesitis indices, psoriasis body surface area (BSA), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including PROMIS. The primary outcome was a patient-reported item: \"Today, considering the level of control of your psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis, do you consider your treatment has been successful?\" Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified clinical predictors of patient-reported treatment success. Patient-reported reasons for lack of treatment success were explored.
    RESULTS: A total of 178 participants had a baseline visit. Mean (SD) CASPAR score was 3.7 (0.9), age 51.7 (13.5) years, and BMI 31.3 (7.2) kg/m2. Fifty-two percent were women, and 86.0% white. Treatment success was reported by 116/178(65%) patients in the analytic cohort. Among 76 patients who reported treatment failure, the most frequently selected reasons for lack of success were pain (n = 55, 72.4%), fatigue (n = 46, 60.5%), inflamed joints (n = 40, 52.6%), and stiffness (n = 40, 52.6%). Overall, 105 participants had complete data across variables in the logistic regression models. Patient-reported treatment success was independently associated with the 66-swollen/68-tender joint counts, psoriasis BSA, PROs (pain interference, physical function, fatigue), and TNF-inhibitor therapy, after controlling for BMI and demographics.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported treatment success in PsA may be achieved through improvement of inflammatory arthritis, psoriasis, pain, physical function, fatigue, and the use ofTNF-inhibitors. Patients reported treatment failure was most commonly due to symptoms of pain, fatigue and stiffness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    美国的全国运动,比如明智地选择,强调减少低价值的办公室访问可以最大限度地提高医疗保健价值。尽管患者报告的结果(PRO)经常用于量化术后结果,它们尚未被评估为帮助指导临床医生考虑替代方案或停止面对面随访的工具.这项研究的目的是评估患者报告实质性改善后的现场随访频率和成本,定义为高于术前患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛干扰(PI)评分的2个连续改善。
    在2015年至2020年之间获得了普通选择性足(n=759)和踝(n=578)外科手术的回顾性PROMISPI数据。根据术前PI评分将患者分为四分位数。多变量Cox比例风险模型用于研究实质性改善的时间。实质性改善定义为连续2次术后最小临床重要差异(MCID)高于术前PROMISPI评分。使用基于分布的方法测量MCID。使用多变量负二项模型来确定大量改进后的就诊次数和直接相关成本。付款人的费用是使用偿还率估算的。
    在3个月内,12%至46%的足部和16%至61%的踝关节患者获得了实质性改善。结果因术前疼痛四分位数而异,报告术前疼痛评分较高的患者获得较早的改善。在取得实质性改进后,足踝患者在一年中剩余的9个月内平均进行3.60次和4.01次随访.平均每只脚和脚踝患者的就诊费用分别为266美元和322美元。
    术后随访是耗时且昂贵的。医生可能会考虑客观的措施,如PROMISPI,为了确定需要,定时,以及在患者表现出可靠的临床改善后,选择性足部和踝关节手术的现场随访替代方案。
    三级,单一机构的回顾性队列研究。
    UNASSIGNED: National campaigns in the United States, such as Choosing Wisely, emphasize that decreasing low-value office visits maximizes health care value. Although patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are frequently used to quantify postoperative outcomes, they have not been assessed as a tool to help guide clinicians consider alternatives or discontinue in-person follow-up visits. The purpose of this study is to assess the frequency and cost of in-person follow-up visits after patients report substantial improvement defined as 2 consecutive improvements above preoperative Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) scores.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective PROMIS PI data were obtained between 2015 and 2020 for common elective foot (n = 759) and ankle (n = 578) surgical procedures. Patients were divided into quartiles according to their preoperative PI score. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate time to substantial improvement. Substantial improvement was defined as having 2 consecutive postoperative minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) above preoperative PROMIS PI scores. MCID was measured using the distribution-based method. Multivariable negative binomial models were used to determine the number of visits and direct associated costs after substantial improvement. The cost to payors was estimated using reimbursement rates.
    UNASSIGNED: Within 3 months, 12% to 46% of foot and 16% to 61% of ankle patients achieved substantial improvement. Results vary by preoperative pain quartile, with patients who report higher preoperative pain scores achieving earlier improvement. After achieving substantial improvement, foot and ankle patients averaged 3.60 and 4.01 follow-up visits during the remaining 9 months of the year. Visit costs averaged $266 and $322 per foot and ankle patient respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Postoperative follow-up visits are time-consuming and costly. Physicians might consider objective measures, such as PROMIS PI, to determine the need, timing, and alternatives for in-person follow-up visits for elective foot and ankle surgeries after patients demonstrate reliable clinical improvement.
    UNASSIGNED: Level III, retrospective cohort study at a single institution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患者报告的结果测量信息系统®(PROMIS)配置文件计算机自适应测试(CAT)由七个CAT和一个测量健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)最相关方面的项目组成。我们研究的目的是确定PROMISProfileCAT在荷兰人中风患者中的结构效度以及地板和天花板效应。
    接受康复的中风患者完成了PROMISProfileCAT和EuroQol-5尺寸(EQ5D)。基于配置文件域和EQ5D域之间的预期相关性,通过假设检验评估了结构效度。计算每个配置文件域得分最低和最高的参与者比例,以评估地板和天花板效应。
    160名参与者(平均年龄61岁,41.9%女性)。对于PROMIS配置文件域物理功能,焦虑,抑郁症,睡眠障碍,疼痛干扰,疼痛强度>75%的结果符合我们的假设。对于疲劳和参与社会角色和活动的能力,只有60%的假设得到满足。没有发现地板或天花板的影响,除了疼痛强度的地板效应,这可能表明许多参与者没有疼痛。
    PROMISProfileCAT的大多数领域在中风患者中显示出足够的构造有效性,并且没有问题的地板或天花板效应。这些CAT和单个项目疼痛强度可用于有效测量中风患者的HRQoL。
    UNASSIGNED: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) Profile Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) consists of seven CATs and one single item measuring most relevant aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of our study was to determine construct validity and floor and ceiling effects of the PROMIS Profile CAT in Dutch people with stroke.
    UNASSIGNED: People with stroke receiving rehabilitation completed the PROMIS Profile CAT and the EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ5D). Construct validity was evaluated with hypotheses testing based on expected correlations between the profile domains and the domains of the EQ5D. The proportion of participants with the lowest and highest scores were calculated for each profile domain to assess floor and ceiling effects.
    UNASSIGNED: 160 participants were included (median age 61 years, 41.9% female). For the PROMIS Profile domains Physical Function, Anxiety, Depression, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity > 75% of the results met our hypotheses. For Fatigue and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities only 60% of hypotheses were met. No floor or ceiling effects were found, with the exception of a floor effect for Pain Intensity which probably indicates that many participants had no pain.
    UNASSIGNED: Most domains of the PROMIS Profile CAT showed sufficient construct validity and no problematic floor or ceiling effects in people with stroke. These CATs and the single item Pain Intensity can be used to efficiently measure HRQoL in people with stroke.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号