Patient reported outcome

患者报告的结果
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴是人类昼夜节律的关键调节因子。睡眠受损会对代谢产生不利影响,情感,和认知健康。
    目的:为了表征活跃和治疗库欣综合征(CS)患者的睡眠障碍,并确定与治疗患者睡眠受损相关的因素。
    方法:单中心横断面研究。
    方法:参加观察性研究的垂体或肾上腺CS患者完成了诺丁汉健康档案(NHP),CushingQoL,以及医院焦虑和抑郁评估。进行横断面分析,包括患有活动性和治疗疾病的患者。
    结果:纳入了113例(94例女性)CS患者,104垂体和9肾上腺,诊断时的平均年龄为43.9±13.4岁。平均和最长随访时间为5.1年和23年。平均NHP睡眠评分较低(即,改善)在接受治疗的患者中与活动性疾病(29.6±30.2vs.51.9±30.9,p=0.0005),CushingQoL睡眠评分(p=0.015),但41.5%接受治疗的患者表示,他们经常或总是有睡眠困难。治疗与治疗的比例活跃的患者服用药物进行睡眠,心情,或者疼痛没有什么不同。NHP和CushingQoL疼痛评分均未低于治疗组。活跃患者(p=0.39和0.53)。在接受治疗的CS患者中,焦虑和抑郁与睡眠评分较差相关。
    结论:与患有活动性疾病的患者相比,接受治疗的CS患者的睡眠质量有所改善。但是几乎一半接受治疗的患者仍然报告睡眠挑战。需要睡眠药物,三分之一的患者报告说,CS治疗后无差异。持续的情绪障碍可能在持续的睡眠中断中起作用。进一步的工作应集中在接受治疗的CS患者睡眠障碍的决定因素上。
    BACKGROUND: The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is a critical regulator of circadian rhythm in humans. Impaired sleep adversely affects metabolic, emotional, and cognitive health.
    OBJECTIVE: To characterize sleep disturbances in patients with active and treated Cushing\'s syndrome (CS), and identify factors associated with impaired sleep in treated patients.
    METHODS: Single-center cross-sectional study.
    METHODS: Patients with pituitary or adrenal CS enrolled in an observational study completed Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), CushingQoL, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression assessments. Cross-sectional analysis was conducted including patients with active and treated disease.
    RESULTS: 113 (94 female) patients with CS were included, 104 pituitary and 9 adrenal, with mean age at diagnosis of 43.9 ± 13.4 years. Mean and maximum duration of follow up was 5.1 and 23 years. Mean NHP sleep score was lower (i.e., improved) in patients with treated vs. active disease (29.6 ± 30.2 vs. 51.9 ± 30.9, p = 0.0005), as was CushingQoL sleep score (p = 0.015), but 41.5% of patients with treated disease stated they often or always had trouble sleeping. The proportion of treated vs. active patients taking medication for sleep, mood, or pain was not different. Neither NHP nor CushingQoL pain scores were lower in treated vs. active patients (p = 0.39 and 0.53). In patients with treated CS, anxiety and depression correlated with worse sleep scores.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with treated CS report improved sleep quality compared to those with active disease, but almost half of treated patients still report sleep challenges. The need for sleep medications, reported by one third of patients, was not different after CS treatment. Ongoing mood disturbances may play a role in persistent sleep disruption. Further work should focus on determinants of sleep impairments in treated CS patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全膝关节置换术(TKA)用于三室膝骨关节炎,而单室膝关节置换术(UKA)是单室膝关节骨关节炎的首选。双室膝关节置换术(BKA)旨在通过将2个UKA或1个UKA与髌股置换相结合来解决2个膝关节隔室。本研究检查了BKA的临床结果,专注于疼痛缓解和膝关节功能。这项研究的目的是报告BKA的功能结果,并在2年的随访后,从患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)和运动范围(ROM)方面看这是否与文献中的BKA结果一致。此外,射线照相校准,植入物幸存者,不良事件和住院时间是次要结局.
    方法:这是一项21例接受BKA治疗的内侧和髌股骨关节炎患者的队列研究。患者术后随访至少2年。使用膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)评估PROM,膝关节社会评分(KSS),牛津膝盖得分,西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。使用测角仪测量ROM。使用标准的全腿X光片测量术前和术后的放射线照相冠状排列。患者人口统计学,植入物幸存者,记录住院时间和不良事件.
    结果:纳入21例患者(23膝),平均随访41个月(标准差[SD]12个月;范围24-59个月)。患者报告的结果指标(PROM)显示出显着改善,80%达到良好到优秀的OKS和KSS分数。KOOS评分与文献中的评分相似。与其他作者相比,我们的结果中的WOMAC评分更高。这表明结果更糟。术前平均髋-膝-踝角度(HKAA)为2.4度内翻(SD1.9度;范围外翻1.2度-6.1度),而术后HKAA平均为0.3度外翻(SD2.8度;范围4.6度外翻-5.6度)(p<0.001)。术后平均运动范围117度(SD10度;范围98-132)。
    结论:BKA在减轻内侧和髌股骨关节炎患者的疼痛和改善膝关节功能方面显示出希望。挑战包括手术期间的翻修风险和技术困难。比较研究表明,BKA和TKA的结果相似,对年轻人来说有潜在的优势,更活跃的患者。进一步研究,特别是具有更大队列的随机试验,与其他膝关节置换术选择相比,有必要阐明BKA的长期益处和缺点。
    BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is used for tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis, while unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is preferred for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) aims to address 2 knee compartments by combining 2 UKA\'s or 1 UKA with a patellofemoral replacement. This study examines the clinical outcomes of BKA, focusing on pain alleviation and knee function. The aim of this study is to report the functional outcome of BKA and see if this aligns with BKA outcomes from literature in terms of patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and range of motion (ROM) after a 2-year follow-up. Additionally, radiographic alignment, implant survivorship, adverse events and length of stay are secondary outcomes.
    METHODS: This is a cohort study of 21 patients who underwent BKA for medial and patellofemoral osteoarthritis. The patients had follow-up for at least 2 years postoperatively. PROMs were assessed using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). ROM was measured using a goniometer. Pre- and postoperative radiographic coronal alignment was measured using standard full leg radiographs. Patient demographics, implant survivorship, length of stay and adverse events were recorded.
    RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (23 knees) were included, with a mean follow-up of 41 months (standard deviation [SD] 12 months; range 24-59 months). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) demonstrated significant improvements, with 80% achieving good to excellent OKS and KSS scores. KOOS scores were similar to scores found in literature. The WOMAC score was higher in our results compared to other authors. Which indicates worse outcome. The mean preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) was 2.4 degrees varus (SD 1.9 degrees; range 1.2 degrees valgus - 6.1 degrees varus), while the mean postoperative HKAA was 0.3 degrees valgus (SD 2.8 degrees; range 4.6 degrees valgus - 5.6 degrees varus) (p < 0.001). Postoperative range of motion averaged 117 degrees (SD 10 degrees; range 98-132).
    CONCLUSIONS: BKA shows promise in alleviating pain and improving knee function in patients with medial and patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Challenges include the risk of revision and technical difficulties during surgery. Comparative studies suggest similar outcomes between BKA and TKA, with potential advantages for younger, more active patients. Further research, particularly randomized trials with larger cohorts, is necessary to elucidate the long-term benefits and drawbacks of BKA compared to other knee arthroplasty options.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新闻Ganey®门诊医疗实践调查(PGOMPS)是一种常用的患者满意度指标,包括特定于提供者和非特定于提供者的问题。许多管理员使用PGOMPS结果来改善患者体验,并在某些情况下与医生报销相关。本研究旨在确定患者对特定于提供者和非特定于提供者的PGOMPS问题的满意度的频率,及其与患者推荐其提供者诊所的可能性的关联。
    回顾性回顾。
    2014年1月至2019年12月在大学脊柱介入诊所就诊的成年患者被纳入本研究。我们回顾性回顾了使用PGOMPS前瞻性收集的患者满意度。在门诊脊柱介入诊所预约后30天内收集数据。满意度被定义为获得完美的总分。计算每个问题的完美分数的频率。在对所有提供者特定问题给予完全满意的患者数量与对非提供者得分给予完全满意的患者数量之间进行卡方(拟合优度)分析,而不论其提供者特定得分如何。计算了各个PGOMPS问题与推荐练习问题的可能性之间的Spearman相关性。
    53,118例患者被纳入。2078个(66.65%)提供者特定问题获得了完美满意度,而1121个(35.95%)非提供者特定问题获得了完美满意度(p<0.001)。最有可能获得完美满意度的五个问题是:医生使用清晰的语言说话(92.90%),医生友好/礼貌(82.74%),清洁度练习(82.67%)推荐练习的可能性(81.27%),和推荐医生的可能性(80.96%)。最不可能的5个是:办公时间便利(64.30%),等待时间(63.00%),易于打电话(60.77%),有关延误的信息(60.19%),以及获得所需预约的能力(58.92%)。在与推荐实践的可能性相关性最强的10个问题中,有7个与医生有关。相关性最小的10个问题中没有一个与医生相关。
    大多数介入脊柱患者对他们的提供者感到满意,对他们遇到的非提供者相关方面的满意度较低。特定于提供者的因素对患者对整体体验的满意度和推荐实践的可能性具有最大的影响。
    UNASSIGNED: The Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey (PGOMPS) is a frequently used patient satisfaction metric comprised of provider-specific and non-provider-specific questions. The PGOMPS results are used by many administrators to improve the patient experience and are linked to physician reimbursements in some cases. This study aimed to determine the frequency of patient satisfaction for the provider-specific and non-provider-specific PGOMPS questions and their association with the likelihood of a patient recommending their provider\'s clinic.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review.
    UNASSIGNED: Adult patients attending a university interventional spine clinic between January 2014 and December 2019 were included in this study. We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected patient satisfaction using PGOMPS. Data was collected within 30 days after an outpatient interventional spine clinic appointment. Satisfaction was defined as receiving a perfect total score. The frequency of perfect scores for each question was calculated. Chi-square (goodness-of-fit) analysis was performed between the number of patients who gave perfect satisfaction on all provider specific questions and the number of patients who gave perfect satisfaction for non-provider scores irrespective of their provider specific scoring. Spearman correlation between individual PGOMPS questions and the likelihood to recommend the practice question were calculated.
    UNASSIGNED: 53,118 patients patient encounters were included. 2078 (66.65%) provider-specific questions received perfect satisfaction versus 1121 (35.95%) with perfect satisfaction for non-provider specific questions (p ​< ​0.001). The five questions most likely to receive perfect satisfaction were: physician spoke using clear language (92.90%), physician friendliness/courtesy (82.74%), cleanliness of the practice (82.67%) likelihood to recommend practice (81.27%), and likelihood to recommend physician (80.96%). The 5 least likely were: convenience of office hours (64.30%), wait time (63.00%), ease of getting on phone (60.77%), information about delays (60.19%), and ability to get desired appointment (58.92%). Of the 10 questions that had the strongest correlation with likelihood to recommend the practice 7 were related to the physician. None of the 10 questions with the least correlation were related to the physician.
    UNASSIGNED: Most interventional spine patients are satisfied with their providers and less satisfied with non-provider-related aspects of their encounters. Provider-specific factors carry the greatest influence in the patient\'s perceived satisfaction with the experience as a whole and likelihood to recommend the practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目的比较接受电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)治疗肺癌的减少肌肉和非减少肌肉的患者术后早期报告的结果。
    方法:本研究使用的数据来自2017年11月至2020年1月的一项纵向前瞻性研究(CN-PRO-Lung1)。术前计算机断层扫描在L3椎体水平测量骨骼肌指数,以根据建立的阈值识别肌肉减少症。症状严重程度和功能障碍状态报告为临床相关中度至重度评分0-10量表患者的比例,在基线时使用MDAnderson症状清单-肺癌进行测量,术后每日住院,和每周出院后长达4周。症状严重程度,功能状态,并比较了肌肉减少组和非肌肉减少组的术后临床结局.
    结果:本研究包括125例肺癌患者。在34例(27.2%)患者中发现了肌肉减少症。肌肉减少症患者在出院后4周内报告了更多的中度至重度疼痛(P=0.002)和更多的中度至重度疲劳(P=0.027)。此外,与非肌少症患者相比,肌少症患者从疼痛(P=0.002)和疲劳(P=0.007)恢复的时间更长。同时,术后临床结局组间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。
    结论:接受VATS治疗的肺癌患者可能会有更多的疼痛和疲劳,以及在术后早期与非肌少症患者相比,症状恢复时间更长。
    BACKGROUND: To compare early postoperative patient-reported outcomes between sarcopenic and nonsarcopenic patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung cancer.
    METHODS: The data used in this study were acquired from a longitudinal prospective study (CN-PRO-Lung 1) between November 2017 and January 2020. Skeletal muscle index was measured at L3 vertebral level on preoperative computed tomography to identify sarcopenia based on an established threshold. Symptoms severity and status of functional impairments were reported as proportions of patients with clinically relevant moderate-to-severe scores on 0-10 scales, which were measured by using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Lung Cancer at baseline, daily postoperative hospitalization, and weekly after discharge up to 4 weeks. Symptom severity, functional status, and postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between the sarcopenia and nonsarcopenia groups.
    RESULTS: This study included 125 patients undergoing VATS for lung cancer. Sarcopenia was identified in 34 (27.2%) patients. Sarcopenic patients reported more moderate-to-severe pain (P = 0.002) at discharge and more moderate-to-severe fatigue (P = 0.027) during the 4 weeks after discharge. Besides, sarcopenic patients had a longer recovery time from both pain (P = 0.002) and fatigue (P = 0.007) than nonsarcopenic patients. Meanwhile, no significant between-group difference was found in the postoperative clinical outcomes (all P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenic patients undergoing VATS for lung cancer may have more pain and fatigue, as well as longer symptoms recovery time than nonsarcopenic patients during the early postoperative period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了描述有创伤性脑损伤(TBI)病史的个体中最大的问题或需求,与有其他神经疾病史的个体相比,心理健康状况,没有神经或精神健康病史.
    方法:使用Mayo-Portland适应性清单4指导的框架,对单个在线调查问题的开放文本回答进行定向内容分析。
    方法:社区。
    方法:2,861名社区居住的成年人(n=274名患有TBI;n=289名患有TBI以外的其他神经系统疾病;n=454名患有精神健康疾病但没有神经系统疾病;n=1,844名对照)。
    方法:不适用。
    方法:对调查提示的开放文本回答:“过去2周内您最大的问题或需求是什么?”
    结果:参与指数在所有四个参与者组中的回答比例最大。四分之一(25.4%)的控制报告无(没有问题/需要),而所有其他组中只有7.9-10.7%的参与者报告“无”。在所有群体中,TBI患者在调整和能力指数中报告的问题比例最大。在患有TBI的人群中,资金管理(19.7%),无(10.6%),焦虑(7.7%)是三个最常报告的问题。与轻度TBI(mTBI)的个体相比,中度至重度TBI(msTBI)患者在能力和调整指数中报告的问题比例较高.在患有msTBI的个人中,调整指数占问题的比例最大。
    结论:本研究采用以人为中心的方法来了解TBI患者的最大需求。在有和没有TBI的个体之间观察到质量差异,在mTBI和msTBI患者之间,以及TBI患者的性别。这些发现可以帮助指导研究和政策,以解决生活在TBI社区中的人们认为非常重要的挑战。
    OBJECTIVE: To characterize the greatest problem or need among individuals with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), as compared to individuals with a history of other neurological conditions, mental health conditions, and no history of neurological or mental health conditions.
    METHODS: A directed content analysis of open-text responses to a single online survey question using a framework guided by the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4.
    METHODS: Community.
    METHODS: 2,861 community-dwelling adults (n = 274 with TBI; n = 289 with other neurological conditions besides TBI; n = 454 with mental health conditions but no neurological conditions; n = 1,844 controls).
    METHODS: Not applicable.
    METHODS: Open-text responses to the survey prompt: \"What was your greatest problem or need over the past 2 weeks?\"
    RESULTS: The Participation index comprised the greatest proportion of responses across all four participant groups. A quarter (25.4%) of controls reported None (no problem/need), whereas only 7.9 -10.7% of participants in all other groups reported None. Among all groups, individuals with TBI reported the greatest proportion of problems in the Adjustment and Ability indices. Among people with TBI, Money Management (19.7%), None (10.6%), and Anxiety (7.7%) were the three most frequently reported problems. Compared to individuals with mild TBI (mTBI), individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI (msTBI) reported a higher proportion of problems in the Ability and Adjustment indices. Among individuals with msTBI, the Adjustment index accounted for the greatest proportion of problems.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study employed a person-centered approach to understanding the greatest needs among individuals with TBI. Qualitative differences were observed between individuals with and without a TBI, between people with mTBI and msTBI, and across genders among people with TBI. These findings can help guide research and policy towards addressing challenges perceived as highly important by people living in the community with TBI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于在一个或多个量表上得分低于第25百分位数的儿童,将与患者相关的患者报告的结果测量(PROM)结果格式化为图形显示。报告在多学科诊所进行了试点,提供者对此进行了审查,它们的影响被定性记录。图形化PROM报告告知讨论,导致治疗计划的改变,并提高了对未满足的社会心理需求的认识。由于这次质量改进试点的成功,目测性PROM报告将成为我们多学科唇裂护理的常规部分.更广泛地说,图形化的PROM数据显示有助于更好地了解患者的观点,并导致更多的知情访问。
    Cleft-related Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) results were formatted into graphical displays for children scoring below the 25th percentile on one or more scales. Reports were piloted in a multidisciplinary clinic where providers reviewed them, and their impact was qualitatively recorded. Graphical PROM reports informed discussions, led to treatment plan changes, and raised awareness of unmet psychosocial needs. Because of the success of this quality improvement pilot, visual PROM reports will become a regular part of our multidisciplinary cleft care. More broadly, graphical PROM data display facilitates better understanding of the patient\'s perspective and leads to more informed visits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    渴望被认为是酒精或物质使用障碍的定义特征之一。关于渴望的基本过程没有共识,虽然存在多种模式。渴望是一种非常个人主义的症状,必须自我报告。已经开发了几种仪器来测量渴望,没有公认的黄金标准。患者的观点似乎对于确定众多现有工具的相关性至关重要。我们评估了患者对这些仪器开发的贡献。我们从三个数据库(PubMed,PsycInfo,和Embase)以及Kavanagh等人先前的评论中确定的那些。从1990年到2012年。我们纳入了所有与酒精渴求评估仪器的开发或验证相关的文章。我们确定并纳入了相应的工具。不包括翻译未经验证的现有文书或单品文书的文章。我们根据基于Consensus的健康测量指标选择标准(COSMIN)建议对文章进行了分析,以评估患者参与创建患者报告的结果测量(PROM)。研究了两个关键方面:(1)总体设计,包括构造描述的质量,与PROM相关的元素的识别,特别是纳入患者提供的概念,和(2)认知访谈的质量(进行时),评估PROM的全面性和可理解性。我们纳入了22篇文章,确定了16种测量酒精渴望的仪器。患者仅对一种仪器及其简短版本(QAU和AUQ)的项目开发做出了贡献。这些仪器都不符合所有的开发质量标准,其中14人被归类为“不足”,2人被归类为“可疑”。“目前测量酒精渴望的仪器是在病人贡献较差的情况下开发的,尽管大多数文章没有充分报道患者的受累情况.对于未来以患者为中心的方法,应该探索患者对渴望的观点。
    Craving is considered one of the defining characteristics for alcohol or substance use disorders. There is no consensus on the underlying processes of craving, although multiple models exist. Craving is a very individualistic symptom and has to be self-reported. Several instruments have been developed to measure craving, without a recognized gold standard. The patient\'s perspective appears critical to determine the relevance of the numerous existing tools. We assessed the contribution of patients to the development of these instruments. We performed a systematic review of instruments measuring alcohol craving published from 2012 to 2023 from three databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, and Embase) in addition to those identified in a previous review by Kavanagh et al. from 1990 to 2012. We included all articles related to the development or validation of instruments for the assessment of alcohol craving. We identified and included in this review the corresponding instruments. Articles translating existing instruments without validation or on single-item instruments were excluded. We analyzed the articles in accordance with COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) recommendations to assess patient involvement in the creation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). Two key aspects were investigated: (1) the general design, encompassing the quality of construct description, identification of elements pertinent to a PROM, particularly the inclusion of concepts provided by patients, and (2) the quality of cognitive interviews (when conducted), to evaluate the comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of the PROM. We included 22 articles identifying 16 instruments for measuring alcohol craving. Patients only contributed to item development for one instrument and its short version (QAU and AUQ). None of the instruments met all of the developmental quality criteria, with 14 classed as \"inadequate\" and two as \"doubtful.\" The current instruments measuring alcohol craving were developed with poor patient contribution, although most articles did not adequately report patient involvement. Patients\' perspectives on craving should be explored for future patient-centered approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:微创心脏手术(MICS)因其潜在的益处而引起了极大的关注,包括手术创伤减少,加速复苏,和改善美学效果。本案例系列旨在阐明技术方面并评估美学,功能,在接受心脏手术的女性患者中,与使用乳晕周围切口方法相关的生活质量结果。
    方法:乳晕周围MICS技术,在有或没有高清(HD)3D内窥镜可视化的情况下进行,有限的肋骨扩张,和一个跨越3到9点钟位置的乳晕周围切口,被雇用。我们提供了一个病例系列,其中包括五名女性患者,她们使用这种方法对不同的病理进行了各种心脏手术。
    结果:术中无并发症发生,所有患者术后恢复顺利。乳晕周围手术切口愈合良好,疤痕最小,保留乳房轮廓并产生令人满意的美容效果。患者报告的疼痛程度可忽略不计,并对疤痕外观表示满意。
    结论:MICS中的乳晕周围切口技术代表了一种有效的方法,其特征是良好的美学结果和增强的患者体验。需要进一步的研究来比较不同的MICS方法在疼痛管理方面及其对生活质量领域的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has garnered significant attention for its potential benefits, including decreased surgical trauma, accelerated recovery, and improved aesthetic outcomes. This case series aims to elucidate the technical aspects and assess the aesthetic, functional, and quality of life outcomes associated with the utilization of a periareolar incision approach in female patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
    METHODS: The periareolar MICS technique, performed with or without high-definition (HD) 3D endoscopic visualization, limited rib-spreading, and a periareolar incision spanning the 3 to 9 o\'clock positions, was employed. We present a case series encompassing five female patients who underwent various cardiac procedures for different pathologies using this approach.
    RESULTS: No intraoperative complications occurred, and all patients experienced uneventful postoperative recoveries. The periareolar approach resulted in well-healed incisions with minimal scaring, preserving breast contour and yielding satisfactory cosmetic outcomes. Patients reported negligible pain levels and expressed contentment with the scar appearance.
    CONCLUSIONS: The periareolar incision technique in MICS represents an efficacious approach characterized by favorable aesthetic outcomes and enhanced patient experience. Further investigations are warranted to compare different MICS approaches with respect to pain management and their impact on quality-of-life domains.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管口腔问题对姑息治疗患者的生活质量有重大影响,缺乏全面的研究。这项研究是首次通过包括牙科检查和干预措施以及使用EORTCQLQOH15问卷评估生活质量来解决这一差距。
    目的:本研究的目的是探讨将牙医纳入住院姑息治疗的影响,专注于提高生活质量和减轻症状负担。
    方法:在这项单中心研究中,数据来自姑息治疗病房,为期8个月.在多学科治疗的开始,T0,患者接受了牙科检查和访谈利用既定的问卷,EORTCQLQ-C30(核心,一般)和OH15(口腔健康)。一周后,在T1时,患者接受了随访检查和访谈.QLQ-C30和OH15是由欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)开发的广泛认可的工具,用于评估癌症患者与健康相关的生活质量。
    结果:共有103名患者(48.5%的女性)被纳入研究。自上次牙科就诊以来的中位持续时间为1年,T0时牙齿状况荒凉。在T1时,观察到口腔生活质量和症状负担的统计学和临床意义上的显着变化。在OH-QoL评分中注意到值得注意的变化(中位数63vs.92,p<0.001),粘稠的唾液(中位数33vs.0,p<0.001),对食物和饮料的敏感性(中位数33vs.0,p<0.001),口痛(中位数33vs.0,p>0.001),和不良的假牙(中位数33vs.0p<0.001)。此外,口干症念珠菌病和粘膜炎均有改善.
    结论:该研究强调了在住院姑息治疗中整合牙医的有力贡献。很少的牙科工作和简单的病房和床边治疗,可以显著改善危重姑息患者的口腔症状负担.这有助于改善护理状况,缓解痛苦的症状,最终提高了生活质量。结果强烈支持将牙科支持视为姑息治疗单位不可或缺的一部分。
    BACKGROUND: Despite the significant impact of oral problems on the quality of life of palliative care patients, comprehensive studies are lacking. This study is the first of its kind to address this gap by including both a dental examination and an intervention and assessing quality of life using the EORTC QLQ OH 15 questionnaire.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to explore the impact of incorporating dentists into inpatient palliative care, with a focus on enhancing quality of life and alleviating symptom burden.
    METHODS: In this monocentric study, data were gathered from a palliative care unit over an 8-month period. At the beginning of the multidisciplinary treatment, T0, patients underwent both a dental examination and interviews utilizing established questionnaires, the EORTC QLQ-C30 (core, general) and OH 15 (oral health). A week later, at T1, patients underwent a follow-up examination and interview. The QLQ-C30 and OH15 are widely recognized instruments developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for evaluating health related quality of life in cancer patients.
    RESULTS: A total of n = 103 patients (48.5% women) were enrolled in the study. The median duration since their last dental visit was 1 year, and the dental condition at T0 was desolate. At T1, statistically and clinically significant changes in oral quality of life and symptom burden were observed. Noteworthy changes were noted in the OH-QoL score (median 63 vs. 92, p < 0.001), sticky saliva (median 33 vs. 0, p < 0.001), sensitivity to food and drink (median 33 vs. 0, p < 0.001), sore mouth (median 33 vs. 0, p > 0.001), and poorly fitting dentures (median 33 vs. 0 p < 0.001). Additionally, improvements were observed in xerostomia candidiasis and mucositis.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the powerful contribution of integrating a dentist in inpatient palliative care. With very little dental effort and simple ward and bedside treatments, significant improvements in the oral symptom burden of critically ill palliative patients can be achieved. This contributes to improved care status, relief of distressing symptoms, and ultimately improved quality of life. The results strongly support the consideration of dental support as an integral part of palliative care units.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了确定根治性膀胱切除术(RC)和尿流改道(UD)后最影响患者的功能领域和症状量表,如果一个单一的仪器(或组合)充分捕获这些麻烦的症状。目前尚不清楚当前患者报告的结果(PRO)工具是否已用于评估RC和UD后患者的生活质量,足以涵盖影响患者的最麻烦的症状。
    对MEDLINE的系统搜索,EMBASE,PubMed,Cinahl和Cochrane于2000年1月至2023年5月对自2000年以来因肌肉浸润性膀胱癌而患有RC和UD的患者的原始文章进行了研究。遵循系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)过程的首选报告项目。提取的数据包括使用的PRO措施,术后前12个月(短期)和12个月(长期)的领域报告和评分。功能域的保守阈值<70,症状域的保守阈值>30,用于确定每个研究中哪些PRO域可能与患者有关。使用QUALSYST评估工具进行质量评估。
    35项研究符合纳入标准,包括总共八个独特的PRO仪器。主要发现表明,在短期和长期中,新膀胱(NB)和回肠导管(IC)患者的身体功能是最关心的PRO。此外,肠,泌尿和性困扰是NB患者长期的症状,但只有在短期的IC。
    使用EORTCQLQ-C30和QLQ-BLM30仪器的组合充分解决了主要问题。
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the functional domains and symptom scales that affect patients most following radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion (UD), and if a single instrument (or combination) adequately captures these bothersome symptoms. It is unclear whether current patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments that have been used to assess quality of life in patients following RC and UD adequately cover the most bothersome symptoms affecting patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cinahl and Cochrane was conducted from January 2000 to May 2023 for original articles of patients who had RC and UD since 2000 for muscle invasive bladder cancer. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) process was followed. Extracted data included the PRO measures used, domains reported and scores in the first 12 months post-surgery (short-term) and after 12 months (long-term). A conservative threshold of <70 for functional domains and >30 for symptom domains was used to determine which PRO domains were potentially concerning to patients in each study. Quality assessment was performed using the QUALSYST appraisal tool.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, including a total of eight unique PRO instruments. The main findings indicated that physical function was the most concerning PRO for patients with both neobladder (NB) and ileal conduit (IC) in the short and long term. Additionally, bowel, urinary and sexual bother were concerning symptoms for patients with NB in the long-term, but only in the short-term for those with IC.
    UNASSIGNED: The main issues are adequately addressed using the combination of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BLM30 instruments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号