Pancreatic Cyst

胰腺囊肿
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在比较通过深度学习重建(DLR)和滤波反投影(FBP)重建的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像之间的胰腺囊性病变的图像质量和检测性能。这项回顾性研究包括2023年5月至2023年8月接受对比增强CT检查的54例患者(平均年龄:67.7±13.1)。在符合条件的患者中,30和24为胰腺囊性病变阳性和阴性,分别。DLR和FBP用于重建门静脉期图像。客观图像质量分析计算定量图像噪声,信噪比(SNR),和对比噪声比(CNR)使用腹主动脉上的感兴趣区域,胰腺病变,和胰腺实质.三名失明的放射科医生进行了主观图像质量评估和病变检测测试。病变描绘,正常结构图,主观图像噪声,整体图像质量作为主观图像质量指标。与FBP相比,DLR显着降低了定量图像噪声(p<0.001)。与FBP相比,DLR的SNR和CNR显着改善(p<0.001)。在所有主观图像质量指标中,三名放射科医生对DLR的评分均显着较高(p≤0.029)。DLR和FBP在病变检测方面的性能相当,接收器工作特性曲线下的面积没有统计学上的显着差异,灵敏度,特异性和准确性。DLR降低了图像噪声,提高了图像质量,更清晰地描绘了胰腺结构。这些改善可能对评估胰腺囊性病变有积极作用,这有助于这些病变的适当管理。
    This study aimed to compare the image quality and detection performance of pancreatic cystic lesions between computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed by deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and filtered back projection (FBP). This retrospective study included 54 patients (mean age: 67.7 ± 13.1) who underwent contrast-enhanced CT from May 2023 to August 2023. Among eligible patients, 30 and 24 were positive and negative for pancreatic cystic lesions, respectively. DLR and FBP were used to reconstruct portal venous phase images. Objective image quality analyses calculated quantitative image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) using regions of interest on the abdominal aorta, pancreatic lesion, and pancreatic parenchyma. Three blinded radiologists performed subjective image quality assessment and lesion detection tests. Lesion depiction, normal structure illustration, subjective image noise, and overall image quality were utilized as subjective image quality indicators. DLR significantly reduced quantitative image noise compared with FBP (p < 0.001). SNR and CNR were significantly improved in DLR compared with FBP (p < 0.001). Three radiologists rated significantly higher scores for DLR in all subjective image quality indicators (p ≤ 0.029). Performance of DLR and FBP were comparable in lesion detection, with no statistically significant differences in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. DLR reduced image noise and improved image quality with a clearer depiction of pancreatic structures. These improvements may have a positive effect on evaluating pancreatic cystic lesions, which can contribute to appropriate management of these lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)衍生的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的治疗通常是从胰腺上皮内瘤变(PanIN)衍生的PDAC指南中推断出来的。然而,这些是生物学上不同的,管状亚型和胶体亚型之间进一步存在异质性。
    方法:从国际中心(2000-2019年)回顾性地确定了连续的PanIN衍生和IPMN衍生PDAC的前期手术患者。临床病理因素的一对一倾向评分匹配产生了三个队列:IPMN衍生的与PanIN衍生的PDAC,管状IPMN衍生与PanIN衍生PDAC,和管状与胶体IPMN衍生的PDAC。使用Kaplan-Meier和对数秩检验比较总生存期(OS)。多变量Cox回归确定了相应的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。
    结果:2350名PanIN衍生和700名IPMN衍生的PDAC患者的中位OS(mOS)分别为23.0和43.1个月(P<0.001),分别。PanIN衍生的PDAC的T期较差,CA19-9年级,和节点状态。管状亚型T分期更差,CA19-9年级,节点状态,和R1边距,胶体中的mOS为33.7个月,而胶体中的mOS为94.1个月(P<0.001)。匹配(n=495),PanIN衍生和IPMN衍生的PDAC的mOS分别为30.6和42.8个月(P<0.001),分别。在匹配(n=341)PanIN衍生和管状IPMN衍生的PDAC中,mOS仍然较差(27.7vs37.4,P<0.001)。匹配的管状和胶体癌(n=112)具有相似的OS(P=0.55)。在多变量Cox回归中,PanIN衍生的PDAC与IPMN衍生的(HR:1.66,95%CI:1.44-1.90)和管状IPMN衍生的(HR:1.53,95%CI:1.32-1.77)PDAC的OS更差。胶体和肾小管亚型与OS无关(P=0.16)。
    结论:PanIN衍生的PDAC比IPMN衍生的PDAC具有更差的生存率,支持不同的结局。虽然更懒惰,经风险调整后,胶体IPMN衍生的PDAC与肾小管具有相似的存活率。
    OBJECTIVE: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) management is generally extrapolated from pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)-derived PDAC guidelines. However, these are biologically divergent, and heterogeneity further exists between tubular and colloid subtypes.
    METHODS: Consecutive upfront surgery patients with PanIN-derived and IPMN-derived PDAC were retrospectively identified from international centers (2000-2019). One-to-one propensity score matching for clinicopathologic factors generated three cohorts: IPMN-derived versus PanIN-derived PDAC, tubular IPMN-derived versus PanIN-derived PDAC, and tubular versus colloid IPMN-derived PDAC. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Multivariable Cox regression determined corresponding hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
    RESULTS: The median OS (mOS) in 2350 PanIN-derived and 700 IPMN-derived PDAC patients was 23.0 and 43.1 months (P < 0.001), respectively. PanIN-derived PDAC had worse T-stage, CA19-9, grade, and nodal status. Tubular subtype had worse T-stage, CA19-9, grade, nodal status, and R1 margins, with a mOS of 33.7 versus 94.1 months (P < 0.001) in colloid. Matched (n = 495), PanIN-derived and IPMN-derived PDAC had mOSs of 30.6 and 42.8 months (P < 0.001), respectively. In matched (n = 341) PanIN-derived and tubular IPMN-derived PDAC, mOS remained poorer (27.7 vs 37.4, P < 0.001). Matched tubular and colloid cancers (n = 112) had similar OS (P = 0.55). On multivariable Cox regression, PanIN-derived PDAC was associated with worse OS than IPMN-derived (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.44-1.90) and tubular IPMN-derived (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.32-1.77) PDAC. Colloid and tubular subtype was not associated with OS (P = 0.16).
    CONCLUSIONS: PanIN-derived PDAC has worse survival than IPMN-derived PDAC supporting distinct outcomes. Although more indolent, colloid IPMN-derived PDAC has similar survival to tubular after risk adjustment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:常染色体显性多囊肾病(ADPKD)的胰腺囊肿与PKD2突变相关,具有与PKD1突变不同的表型。然而,胰腺囊肿通常被放射科医师忽视。这里,我们在ADPKD的腹部MRI上自动检测胰腺囊肿。
    方法:在仅正负或正负数据集上训练了八个具有2D或3D配置和各种损失函数的基于nnU-Net的分割模型,包括来自146例ADPKD患者的254次扫描的轴向和冠状T2加权MR图像,这些患者由两名放射科医生独立标记。在训练中看不见的测试对象上评估模型性能,包括40个内部,40个外部,23例复检重复性ADPKD患者。
    结果:两位放射科医师对训练数据上标记的囊肿有52%达成一致,以及内部/外部测试数据集上的33%/25%。具有组合骰子相似性系数和交叉熵的损失的2D模型用具有正和负两种情况的数据集训练,在内部/外部验证的体素水平上产生0.7±0.5/0.8±0.4的最佳骰子得分,因此被用作表现最好的模型。在重测中,与6名专家观察者(77%的一致性)相比,最佳模型在胰腺囊肿分割方面显示出较好的可重复性(扫描A和扫描B的一致性为83%).在内部/外部验证中,最佳模型的特异性高,为94%/100%,但灵敏度有限,为20%/24%.
    结论:在ADPKD患者的腹部T2图像上标记胰腺囊肿具有挑战性,深度学习可以帮助自动检测胰腺囊肿,和进一步的图像质量改进是必要的。
    BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cysts in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) correlate with PKD2 mutations, which have a different phenotype than PKD1 mutations. However, pancreatic cysts are commonly overlooked by radiologists. Here, we automate the detection of pancreatic cysts on abdominal MRI in ADPKD.
    METHODS: Eight nnU-Net-based segmentation models with 2D or 3D configuration and various loss functions were trained on positive-only or positive-and-negative datasets, comprising axial and coronal T2-weighted MR images from 254 scans on 146 ADPKD patients with pancreatic cysts labeled independently by two radiologists. Model performance was evaluated on test subjects unseen in training, comprising 40 internal, 40 external, and 23 test-retest reproducibility ADPKD patients.
    RESULTS: Two radiologists agreed on 52% of cysts labeled on training data, and 33%/25% on internal/external test datasets. The 2D model with a loss of combined dice similarity coefficient and cross-entropy trained with the dataset with both positive and negative cases produced an optimal dice score of 0.7 ± 0.5/0.8 ± 0.4 at the voxel level on internal/external validation and was thus used as the best-performing model. In the test-retest, the optimal model showed superior reproducibility (83% agreement between scan A and B) in segmenting pancreatic cysts compared to six expert observers (77% agreement). In the internal/external validation, the optimal model showed high specificity of 94%/100% but limited sensitivity of 20%/24%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Labeling pancreatic cysts on T2 images of the abdomen in patients with ADPKD is challenging, deep learning can help the automated detection of pancreatic cysts, and further image quality improvement is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)衍生的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)与其生物学上不同的对应物相比,切除的尺寸较小,胰腺上皮内瘤变(PanIN)衍生的PDAC。因此,专家建议对IPMN衍生的PDAC进行T1子分期。然而,这从未得到验证。
    方法:对来自5个国际高容量中心的IPMN衍生PDAC的连续前期手术患者进行分类,并使用侵入性组件尺寸,按照建议的T1亚分期分类(T1a≤0.5,T1b>0.5和≤1.0,T1c>1.0和≤2.0cm)。使用Kaplan-Meier和对数秩检验来比较总生存期(OS)。多变量Cox回归用于确定具有置信区间(95CI)的风险比(HR)。
    结果:在747名患者中,69(9.2%),50(6.7%),99(13.0%),531名患者(71.1%),包括T1a,T1b,T1c,和T2-4子组,分别。T期增加与CA19-9升高,较差等级相关,节点阳性,R1-margin,和管状亚型。T1a的中位操作系统,T1b,T1c,T2-4为159.0(95CI:126.0-NR),128.8(98.3-NR),77.6(48.3-108.2),和31.4(27.5-37.7)个月,分别(p<.001)。对于所有成对比较,OS随着T分期的增加而降低(所有p<0.05)。风险调整后,年龄>65,CA19-9升高,T1b[HR:2.55(1.22-5.32)],T1c[HR:3.04(1.60-5.76)],和T2-4[HR:3.41(1.89-6.17)]与T1a相比,节点阳性,R1-margin,无辅助化疗与OS恶化相关。与T1a(18.2%)相比,T2-4肿瘤的疾病复发更为常见(56.4%),T1b(23.9%),和T1c(36.1%,p<.001)。
    结论:T1亚分期的IPMN衍生的PDAC是有效的,具有显著的预后价值。T1子阶段的进展与组织病理学恶化有关,生存,和复发。T1子分期建议用于将来的指南。
    BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is resected at smaller sizes compared to its biologically distinct counterpart, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)-derived PDAC. Thus, experts proposed T1 sub-staging for IPMN-derived PDAC. However, this has never been validated.
    METHODS: Consecutive upfront surgery patients with IPMN-derived PDAC from five international high-volume centers were classified by the proposed T1 sub-staging classification (T1a ≤ 0.5, T1b > 0.5 and ≤1.0, and T1c >1.0 and ≤2.0 cm) using the invasive component size. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were utilized to compare overall survival (OS). A multivariable Cox-regression was used to determine hazard ratios (HR) with confidence intervals (95%CI).
    RESULTS: Among 747 patients, 69 (9.2%), 50 (6.7%), 99 (13.0%), and 531 patients (71.1%), comprised the T1a, T1b, T1c, and T2-4 subgroups, respectively. Increasing T-stage was associated with elevated CA19-9, poorer grade, nodal positivity, R1-margin, and tubular subtype. Median OS for T1a, T1b, T1c, and T2-4 were 159.0 (95%CI:126.0-NR), 128.8 (98.3-NR), 77.6 (48.3-108.2), and 31.4 (27.5-37.7) months, respectively (p < .001). OS decreased with increasing T-stage for all pairwise comparisons (all p < .05). After risk-adjustment, age > 65, elevated CA19-9, T1b [HR : 2.55 (1.22-5.32)], T1c [HR : 3.04 (1.60-5.76)], and T2-4 [HR : 3.41 (1.89-6.17)] compared to T1a, nodal positivity, R1-margin, and no adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with worse OS. Disease recurrence was more common in T2-4 tumors (56.4%) compared to T1a (18.2%), T1b (23.9%), and T1c (36.1%, p < .001).
    CONCLUSIONS: T1 sub-staging of IPMN-derived PDAC is valid and has significant prognostic value. Advancing T1 sub-stage is associated with worse histopathology, survival, and recurrence. T1 sub-staging is recommended for future guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    在胰腺囊性病变中,在鉴别诊断中应考虑包虫囊肿,在进行任何侵入性干预之前应排除其存在。应在居住在细粒棘球蚴流行区并患有胃肠道囊性病变的人群中进行血清学检查以及与包虫囊肿诊断指标相关的影像学研究。
    原发性胰腺包虫囊肿,由细粒棘球蚴引起的,代表一种罕见的事件,由于它们与其他胰腺疾病的相似性,通常难以诊断。该病例报告概述了一名67岁的男性,表现为黄疸和胆汁淤积,但缺乏与胰腺包虫囊肿相关的典型症状。实验室结果显示胆红素水平升高,肝酶异常,和肿瘤标志物,提示影像学检查显示胰头附近有囊性肿块。最初误诊为粘液性囊性肿瘤,病人接受了Whipple手术,在检查时发现了一个大的囊性病变。
    UNASSIGNED: In cystic lesions of the pancreas, hydatid cyst should be considered in the differential diagnoses and its presence should be ruled out before any invasive interventions. Serological tests along with imaging studies related to hydatid cyst diagnostic indicators should be performed in people who live in Echinococcus granulosus endemic areas and suffer from cystic lesions of the gastrointestinal tract.
    UNASSIGNED: Primary pancreatic hydatid cysts, caused by the tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus, represent a rare occurrence often challenging to diagnose due to their similarity to other pancreatic conditions. This case report outlines a 67-year-old male presenting with jaundice and cholestasis but lacking typical symptoms associated with pancreatic hydatid cysts. Laboratory findings revealed elevated bilirubin levels, liver enzyme abnormalities, and tumor markers, prompting imaging studies that indicated a cystic mass near the pancreatic head. Misdiagnosed initially as a mucinous cystic neoplasm, the patient underwent Whipple surgery, unveiling a large cystic lesion upon examination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于横截面腹部成像的使用和进步,胰腺囊性病变(PCL)的患病率增加。当前的诊断技术无法区分需要手术的PCL,密切监视,或预期管理。由于不适当的积极和保守的管理策略,这增加了发病率和医疗保健成本。内窥镜超声(EUS)基于针头的共聚焦激光显微内窥镜(nCLE)允许对PCL的表面上皮进行显微镜检查和勾画。地标研究已经确定了区分各种类型PCL的特征,证实了EUS-nCLE的高诊断率(特别是对于诊断模棱两可的PCL),并表明EUS-nCLE有助于改变管理并降低医疗保健成本。改进程序技术和减少程序长度提高了EUS-nCLE的安全性。人工智能的利用及其与其他基于EUS的先进诊断技术的结合将进一步改善基于EUS的PCL诊断的结果。结构化的训练计划和设备改进以允许更完整的胰腺囊肿上皮作图对于广泛采用这种有前途的技术至关重要。
    Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have increased in prevalence due to the increased usage and advancements in cross-sectional abdominal imaging. Current diagnostic techniques cannot distinguish between PCLs requiring surgery, close surveillance, or expectant management. This has increased the morbidity and healthcare costs from inappropriately aggressive and conservative management strategies. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) allows for microscopic examination and delineation of the surface epithelium of PCLs. Landmark studies have identified characteristics distinguishing various types of PCLs, confirmed the high diagnostic yield of EUS-nCLE (especially for PCLs with an equivocal diagnosis), and shown that EUS-nCLE helps to change management and reduce healthcare costs. Refining procedure technique and reducing procedure length have improved the safety of EUS-nCLE. The utilization of artificial intelligence and its combination with other EUS-based advanced diagnostic techniques would further improve the results of EUS-based PCL diagnosis. A structured training program and device improvements to allow more complete mapping of the pancreas cyst epithelium will be crucial for the widespread adoption of this promising technology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    浆液性囊性肿瘤是一种罕见的实体,具有良性病程。其成像特点,例如存在多个囊肿,有或没有结节状增强,可以模拟胰腺的其他囊性或实性病变。在计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)上识别具有点状钙化的增强疤痕可能是提示这种诊断的独特发现。胰腺的神经内分泌肿瘤是不同的并且也是罕见的实体。在图像中,他们有早期动脉增强。在核磁共振中,它们在T2上是高强度的,在T1上是低强度的,具有强烈的对比度增强。介绍了一例胰腺有两个局灶性病变的患者,以及整合临床表现的重要性,诊断图像中的符号学,如果适用,说明了胰腺肿瘤最佳管理的组织病理学结果,强调放射科医师在这一过程中的关键作用。
    A serous cystic tumor is a rare entity that has a benign course. Its imaging characteristics, such as the presence of multiple cysts with or without nodular enhancement, can simulate other cystic or solid lesions of the pancreas. Identification of the enhancing scar with punctate calcifications on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be a distinctive finding suggesting this diagnosis. Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas are a different and also rare entity. In images, they have early arterial enhancement. In MRI, they are hyperintense on T2 and hypointense on T1, with avid contrast enhancement. A case of a patient with two focal lesions in the pancreas is presented and the importance of integrating clinical findings, semiology in diagnostic images and, if applicable, the histopathological result for the optimal management of pancreatic tumors is illustrated, highlighting the crucial role of a radiologist in this process.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性扩大血肿是一种罕见的实体,被描述为有组织的血液收集,在最初的出血事件后大小增加,没有组织学肿瘤特征。标准治疗是完全切除。据我们所知,这是首次报道模仿胰腺囊性肿瘤的慢性扩大血肿,该血肿已通过腹腔镜手术成功切除。
    方法:我们报告了一例32岁男性患有10厘米慢性扩大血肿,术前诊断为囊性胰腺肿瘤。动态计算机断层扫描显示胰腺钩突下部有囊肿,无对比增强。他的血液生化数据在正常范围内。手术最初采用腹腔镜方法;然而,由于胶囊与周围器官的粘附,该程序被转换为手助腹腔镜手术,最后,进行肿瘤摘除。病理结果显示腹膜后间隙有慢性扩大性血肿。
    结论:腹膜后间隙的慢性扩大血肿非常罕见,有时会粘附于周围组织。术前难以区分合并胰腺的血肿和胰腺囊肿。在这种罕见的情况下,手助腹腔镜手术是可行的,有助于完全切除和防止复发的微创手术。
    BACKGROUND: A chronic expanding hematoma is an uncommon entity described as an organized blood collection that increases in size after the initial hemorrhagic event without histological neoplastic features. The standard treatment is complete resection. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a chronic expanding hematoma mimicking a pancreatic cystic tumor that has been successfully resected utilizing a laparoscopic approach.
    METHODS: We report the case of a 32-year-old man with a 10-cm chronic expanding hematoma that was preoperatively diagnosed as a cystic pancreatic tumor. Dynamic computed tomography revealed a cyst at the inferior part of the uncinate process of the pancreas without contrast enhancement. His blood biochemical data were within normal limits. The operation initially utilized a laparoscopic approach; however, the procedure was converted to hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery due to capsule adherence to surrounding organs and finally, enucleation of the tumor was performed. Pathological findings revealed a chronic expanding hematoma in the retroperitoneal space.
    CONCLUSIONS: Chronic expanding hematoma in the retroperitoneal space is so rare and sometimes adheres to the surrounding tissue. It is difficult to distinguish hematoma attaching pancreas and pancreatic cyst preoperatively. In rare cases such as this, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery is a feasible, less invasive procedure for facilitating complete resection and preventing recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于导管内乳头状粘液性肿瘤(IPMNs)的治疗指南对高危病变的手术指征都略有不同。我们的目的是回顾性比较四个指南在推荐高危IPMN手术的准确性。并评估CA-19-9水平升高的准确性和被认为是高风险的IPMNs的影像学特征在预测恶性肿瘤或高级别异型增生(HGD)方面的准确性。
    将2013-2020年期间手术切除的高风险IPMNs的最终组织病理学诊断与术前手术适应症进行比较,正如四项指南所列举的:2015年美国胃肠病学协会(AGA),2017年国际共识2018欧洲研究小组,和2018年美国胃肠病学学院(ACG)。如果手术标本的组织病理学显示HGD/恶性肿瘤,则认为手术是“合理的”。或术后症状改善。
    26/65例(40.0%)患者术后合理手术。所有患有HGD/恶性肿瘤的IPMN均由2018年ACG和2018年欧洲指南联合(绝对和相对标准)检测。综合(“高风险污名”和“令人担忧的特征”)2017年国际指南错过了1/19(5.3%)患有HGD/恶性肿瘤的IPMNs。2015年AGA指南错过了大多数HGD/恶性肿瘤IPMNs(11/19,57.9%)。我们发现与HGD/恶性肿瘤最相关的特征是胰腺导管扩张,和升高的CA-19-9水平。
    遵循2015年AGA指南,HGD/恶性肿瘤的漏诊率最高,但在没有这些功能的IPMN上运行的速率最低;同时,2018年ACG和2018年欧洲综合指南(绝对和相对标准)导致IPMNs更多无HGD/恶性肿瘤的手术,但IPMNs中HGD/恶性肿瘤的漏诊率最低。
    UNASSIGNED: The guidelines regarding the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) all have slightly different surgical indications for high-risk lesions. We aim to retrospectively compare the accuracy of four guidelines in recommending surgery for high-risk IPMNs, and assess the accuracy of elevated CA-19-9 levels and imaging characteristics of IPMNs considered high-risk in predicting malignancy or high-grade dysplasia (HGD).
    UNASSIGNED: The final histopathological diagnosis of surgically resected high-risk IPMNs during 2013-2020 were compared to preoperative surgical indications, as enumerated in four guidelines: the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), 2017 International Consensus, 2018 European Study Group, and 2018 American College of Gastroenterology (ACG). Surgery was considered \"justified\" if histopathology of the surgical specimen showed HGD/malignancy, or there was postoperative symptomatic improvement.
    UNASSIGNED: Surgery was postoperatively justified in 26/65 (40.0%) cases. All IPMNs with HGD/malignancy were detected by the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines. The combined (\"high-risk stigmata\" and \"worrisome features\") 2017 International guideline missed 1/19 (5.3%) IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. The 2015 AGA guideline missed the most cases (11/19, 57.9%) of IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. We found the features most-associated with HGD/malignancy were pancreatic ductal dilation, and elevated CA-19-9 levels.
    UNASSIGNED: Following the 2015 AGA guideline results in the highest rate of missed HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rate of operating on IPMNs without these features; meanwhile, the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines result in more operations for IPMNs without HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rates of missed HGD/malignancy in IPMNs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号