Pancreatic Cyst

胰腺囊肿
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰腺囊性肿瘤(PCN)代表一组不同的肿瘤,其中一些可能进展为胰腺癌。考虑到它们在普通人群中的高患病率,可靠的生物标志物的开发至关重要.理想的生物标志物将准确诊断PCN的亚型并评估高级别异型增生或浸润性癌症的风险。囊肿液分析已成为实现这一目标的一种有希望的方法,然而,对于PCN评估中的常规纳入,尚无单一标志物获得一致支持.
    Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms (PCN) represent a diverse group of tumors, some of which may progress to pancreatic cancer. Considering their high prevalence in the general population, the development of reliable biomarkers is crucial. The ideal biomarker will accurately diagnose the subtype of PCN and assess the risk of high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer. Cyst fluid analysis has emerged as a promising approach to accomplish this goal, yet no single marker has yet gained unanimous support for routine inclusion in PCN evaluation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:分支导管导管内乳头状粘液性肿瘤(BD-IPMNs)随着先进的医学成像越来越普遍,并占胰腺囊性肿瘤(PCN)的大多数。大多数偶然的病变应该进行调查,切除保留用于特定的,高风险病例。实体器官移植候选人可能在移植前切除的风险很高,移植后需要全身免疫抑制,从理论上讲,这是为了改变IPMN的自然历史。我们旨在描述实体器官移植后被监视的囊肿的进展。
    方法:在一个前瞻性维护的胰腺囊性肿瘤数据库中查询IPMN患者。包括先前接受过实体器官移植且在移植后间隔>6个月进行>2次影像学检查的患者。临床相关进展(CR-Progression)定义为症状,令人担忧/高风险污名,或浸润性癌症(IC)。在2年内生长>5mm被认为是CR-Progression;仅尺寸>3cm不是。
    结果:在1997-2023年之间,252例患者接受了实体器官移植(肝=86,肾=113,肺=54),并被诊断为IPMN。将该队列与一组770名接受IPMN监测的先前没有移植的患者进行比较。中位随访期为3.7年(IQR1.6-6.8)。两名移植患者(0.8%)发展为IC,和四个(1.6%)高度发育不良。两者在移植患者中都不如非移植人群(IC=3.3%,HGD=2.9%),尽管在事件发生时间分析中这并不显著(ICp=0.152,HGDp=0.352).移植队列中的CR进展率很高(n=118,47%)。CR进展的特征包括大小增长(n=79,67%),其他令人担忧的/高风险污名(n=25,21%),新的主管道受累(n=14,12%)。与非移植(n=128,17%)相比,移植患者的CR进展率较高(p<0.001),这主要是由更频繁的尺寸增长(31%对9%,p<0.001)。然而,没有大小增长CR进展的移植患者发生IC。17例(6.7%)在移植后需要胰腺手术进行CR进展,而非移植人群中需要58例(7.5%)。六个(35%)切除的囊肿在移植后具有高风险病理(IC=2,HGD=4),与40(69%)在一般人群(p<0.001,IC=29,HGD=11)结论:BD-IPMNs的恶性转化是罕见的,尽管在实体器官移植患者的全身免疫抑制。这支持IPMN患者的移植,而不必担心胰腺癌的风险恶化,尽管它与更高的疾病进展风险相关。IPMN患者应在移植后每年进行扫描,由于我们继续为CR进展患者定义最佳标准,因此胰腺切除术仅适用于高危特征。
    BACKGROUND: Branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) are becoming more prevalent with advanced medical imaging and account for most of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs). Most incidental lesions should be surveyed, with resection reserved for specific, high-risk cases. Solid organ transplantation candidates may be high risk of resection before transplant and will require systemic immunosuppression after transplant, which has been theorized to alter the natural history of the IPMN. We aimed to describe the progression in surveilled cysts after solid organ transplantation.
    METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of PCNs was queried for patients with IPMN. Patients who had received a previous solid organ transplantation and with ≥2 imaging studies >6 months apart after transplantation were included. Clinically relevant (CR) progression was defined as symptoms, worrisome/high-risk stigmata, or invasive carcinoma (IC). Growth ≥5 mm in 2 years is considered CR progression; size ≥3 cm alone is not.
    RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2023, 252 patients received solid organ transplantation (liver, 86; kidney, 113; and lung, 54) and were diagnosed as having an IPMN. This cohort was compared with a set of 770 patients surveilled for IPMN who did not have previous transplantation. Median follow-up period was 3.7 years (IQR, 1.6-6.8). Moreover, 2 transplant patients (0.8%) developed IC, and 4 developed (1.6%) high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Both were less common in transplant patients than the nontransplant population (IC, 3.3%; HGD, 2.9%), although this was not significant on time-to-event analysis (IC, P = .152; HGD, P = .352). The rate of CR progression was high in the transplant cohort (n = 118; 47%). Features of CR progression included size growth (n = 79; 67%), other worrisome/high-risk stigmata (n = 25; 21%), and new main duct involvement (n = 14; 12%). Compared with the nontransplant (n = 128; 17%), transplant patients had a higher rate of CR progression (P < .001), which was mostly explained by a more frequent size growth (31% vs 9%; P < .001). However, no transplant patients with size growth CR progression developed IC. Moreover, 17 (6.7%) required pancreatic surgery for CR progression after transplant vs 58 (7.5%) in the nontransplant population. Furthermore, 6 resected cysts (35%) harbored high-risk pathology after transplant (IC, 2; HGD, 4) vs 40 (69%) in the general population (P < .001; IC, 29; HGD, 11).
    CONCLUSIONS: Malignant transformation of BD-IPMNs is rare despite systemic immunosuppression in solid organ transplant patients. This supports transplantation in patients with IPMN without fear of worsening their risk of pancreatic cancer, although it was associated with a higher risk of disease progression. Patients with IPMNs should be surveilled with yearly scans after transplant, with pancreatic resection reserved for only high-risk features as we continue to define the optimal criteria for those with CR progression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    胰腺腺泡囊性转化(ACT)是一种罕见的非肿瘤性囊性病变。很难与更多有关的病理学区分开来,特别是侧支导管导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)。所有报告的ACT病例在临床上都是良性的,没有复发或恶性转化的证据。福冈指南是一种分类系统,旨在帮助指导IPMNs和粘液性囊性肿瘤的管理。我们报告了一例ACT,术前诊断为可疑的侧支IPMN。通过应用现行准则,患者接受了Whipple手术。我们强调了在ACT病例中获得准确的术前诊断的困难以及临床医生可用的当前放射学和细胞学方法。
    Acinar cystic transformation (ACT) of the pancreas is a rare non-neoplastic cystic lesion. It is difficult to distinguish from more concerning pathology, particularly a side-branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). All reported cases of ACT have been clinically benign with no evidence of recurrence or malignant transformation. The Fukuoka guidelines is a classification system designed to help guide the management of IPMNs and mucinous cystic neoplasms. We report a case of ACT that was preoperatively diagnosed as a suspected side-branch IPMN. Through the application of current guidelines, the patient underwent a Whipple\'s procedure. We highlight the difficulties in obtaining an accurate preoperative diagnosis in cases of ACT and the current radiological and cytological methods available to clinicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胰腺分支导管内乳头状粘液性囊性肿瘤(BD-IPMNs)的自然史尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过关注伴随胰腺导管腺癌(cPDAC)的发展来回答这一临床问题。
    方法:日本胰腺学会每六个月进行一次BD-IPMN的前瞻性多中心监测研究,为期五年。主要终点是BD-IPMN的进展,进展为高级别异型增生/浸润性癌(HGD/IC),和cPDAC。预测BD-IPMN进展为HGD/IC和cPDAC发展的因素也被评估为次要终点。
    结果:在2104名非手术患者中,348(16.5%)显示原发性BD-IPMN进展。在5.17年的监测期内,BD-IPMN与HGD/IC和cPDAC的累积发生率分别为1.90%和2.11%,分别,BD-IPMN与HGD/IC和cPDAC的标准发生率分别为5.28和5.73。在监测期间诊断的38个cPDAC中,25例(65.8%)可切除。BD-IPMN进展为HGD/IC的显著预测特征是较大的囊肿大小(p=0.03),较大的主胰管大小(p<0.01),和壁结节(p=0.02)。cPDAC发展的重要预测特征是男性(p=0.03)和年龄较大(p=0.02),而IPMN的大小并不显著。
    结论:在BD-IPMN监测期间,应仔细注意“双重致癌作用”,表明BD-IPMN向HGD/IC的发展以及与BD-IPMN不同的cPDAC的发展,尽管建立预测cPDAC发展的风险因素仍然是一个挑战(UMIN000007349)。
    BACKGROUND: The natural history of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous cystic neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) in the pancreas remains unclear. This study aimed to answer this clinical question by focusing on the development of concomitant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (cPDAC).
    METHODS: The Japan Pancreas Society conducted a prospective multicenter surveillance study of BD-IPMN every six months for five years. The primary endpoints were progression of BD-IPMN, progression to high-grade dysplasia/invasive carcinoma (HGD/IC), and cPDAC. Factors predicting the progression of BD-IPMN to HGD/IC and development of cPDAC were also assessed as secondary endpoints.
    RESULTS: Among the 2104 non-operated patients, 348 (16.5 %) showed progression of primary BD-IPMN. Cumulative incidences of BD-IPMN with HGD/IC and cPDAC during the 5.17-year surveillance period were 1.90 % and 2.11 %, respectively, and standard incidence ratios of BD-IPMN with HGD/IC and cPDAC were 5.28 and 5.73, respectively. Of 38 cPDACs diagnosed during surveillance, 25 (65.8 %) were resectable. The significant predictive characteristics of BD-IPMN for progression to HGD/IC were larger cyst size (p = 0.03), larger main pancreatic duct size (p < 0.01), and mural nodules (p = 0.02). Significant predictive characteristics for the development of cPDAC were male sex (p = 0.03) and older age (p = 0.02), while the size of IPMN was not significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: Careful attention should be given to \"dual carcinogenesis\" during BD-IPMN surveillance, indicating the progression of BD-IPMN to HGD/IC and development of cPDAC distinct from BD-IPMN, although the establishment of risk factors that predict cPDAC development remains a challenge (UMIN000007349).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在比较通过深度学习重建(DLR)和滤波反投影(FBP)重建的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像之间的胰腺囊性病变的图像质量和检测性能。这项回顾性研究包括2023年5月至2023年8月接受对比增强CT检查的54例患者(平均年龄:67.7±13.1)。在符合条件的患者中,30和24为胰腺囊性病变阳性和阴性,分别。DLR和FBP用于重建门静脉期图像。客观图像质量分析计算定量图像噪声,信噪比(SNR),和对比噪声比(CNR)使用腹主动脉上的感兴趣区域,胰腺病变,和胰腺实质.三名失明的放射科医生进行了主观图像质量评估和病变检测测试。病变描绘,正常结构图,主观图像噪声,整体图像质量作为主观图像质量指标。与FBP相比,DLR显着降低了定量图像噪声(p<0.001)。与FBP相比,DLR的SNR和CNR显着改善(p<0.001)。在所有主观图像质量指标中,三名放射科医生对DLR的评分均显着较高(p≤0.029)。DLR和FBP在病变检测方面的性能相当,接收器工作特性曲线下的面积没有统计学上的显着差异,灵敏度,特异性和准确性。DLR降低了图像噪声,提高了图像质量,更清晰地描绘了胰腺结构。这些改善可能对评估胰腺囊性病变有积极作用,这有助于这些病变的适当管理。
    This study aimed to compare the image quality and detection performance of pancreatic cystic lesions between computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed by deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and filtered back projection (FBP). This retrospective study included 54 patients (mean age: 67.7 ± 13.1) who underwent contrast-enhanced CT from May 2023 to August 2023. Among eligible patients, 30 and 24 were positive and negative for pancreatic cystic lesions, respectively. DLR and FBP were used to reconstruct portal venous phase images. Objective image quality analyses calculated quantitative image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) using regions of interest on the abdominal aorta, pancreatic lesion, and pancreatic parenchyma. Three blinded radiologists performed subjective image quality assessment and lesion detection tests. Lesion depiction, normal structure illustration, subjective image noise, and overall image quality were utilized as subjective image quality indicators. DLR significantly reduced quantitative image noise compared with FBP (p < 0.001). SNR and CNR were significantly improved in DLR compared with FBP (p < 0.001). Three radiologists rated significantly higher scores for DLR in all subjective image quality indicators (p ≤ 0.029). Performance of DLR and FBP were comparable in lesion detection, with no statistically significant differences in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. DLR reduced image noise and improved image quality with a clearer depiction of pancreatic structures. These improvements may have a positive effect on evaluating pancreatic cystic lesions, which can contribute to appropriate management of these lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)衍生的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的治疗通常是从胰腺上皮内瘤变(PanIN)衍生的PDAC指南中推断出来的。然而,这些是生物学上不同的,管状亚型和胶体亚型之间进一步存在异质性。
    方法:从国际中心(2000-2019年)回顾性地确定了连续的PanIN衍生和IPMN衍生PDAC的前期手术患者。临床病理因素的一对一倾向评分匹配产生了三个队列:IPMN衍生的与PanIN衍生的PDAC,管状IPMN衍生与PanIN衍生PDAC,和管状与胶体IPMN衍生的PDAC。使用Kaplan-Meier和对数秩检验比较总生存期(OS)。多变量Cox回归确定了相应的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。
    结果:2350名PanIN衍生和700名IPMN衍生的PDAC患者的中位OS(mOS)分别为23.0和43.1个月(P<0.001),分别。PanIN衍生的PDAC的T期较差,CA19-9年级,和节点状态。管状亚型T分期更差,CA19-9年级,节点状态,和R1边距,胶体中的mOS为33.7个月,而胶体中的mOS为94.1个月(P<0.001)。匹配(n=495),PanIN衍生和IPMN衍生的PDAC的mOS分别为30.6和42.8个月(P<0.001),分别。在匹配(n=341)PanIN衍生和管状IPMN衍生的PDAC中,mOS仍然较差(27.7vs37.4,P<0.001)。匹配的管状和胶体癌(n=112)具有相似的OS(P=0.55)。在多变量Cox回归中,PanIN衍生的PDAC与IPMN衍生的(HR:1.66,95%CI:1.44-1.90)和管状IPMN衍生的(HR:1.53,95%CI:1.32-1.77)PDAC的OS更差。胶体和肾小管亚型与OS无关(P=0.16)。
    结论:PanIN衍生的PDAC比IPMN衍生的PDAC具有更差的生存率,支持不同的结局。虽然更懒惰,经风险调整后,胶体IPMN衍生的PDAC与肾小管具有相似的存活率。
    OBJECTIVE: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) management is generally extrapolated from pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)-derived PDAC guidelines. However, these are biologically divergent, and heterogeneity further exists between tubular and colloid subtypes.
    METHODS: Consecutive upfront surgery patients with PanIN-derived and IPMN-derived PDAC were retrospectively identified from international centers (2000-2019). One-to-one propensity score matching for clinicopathologic factors generated three cohorts: IPMN-derived versus PanIN-derived PDAC, tubular IPMN-derived versus PanIN-derived PDAC, and tubular versus colloid IPMN-derived PDAC. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Multivariable Cox regression determined corresponding hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
    RESULTS: The median OS (mOS) in 2350 PanIN-derived and 700 IPMN-derived PDAC patients was 23.0 and 43.1 months (P < 0.001), respectively. PanIN-derived PDAC had worse T-stage, CA19-9, grade, and nodal status. Tubular subtype had worse T-stage, CA19-9, grade, nodal status, and R1 margins, with a mOS of 33.7 versus 94.1 months (P < 0.001) in colloid. Matched (n = 495), PanIN-derived and IPMN-derived PDAC had mOSs of 30.6 and 42.8 months (P < 0.001), respectively. In matched (n = 341) PanIN-derived and tubular IPMN-derived PDAC, mOS remained poorer (27.7 vs 37.4, P < 0.001). Matched tubular and colloid cancers (n = 112) had similar OS (P = 0.55). On multivariable Cox regression, PanIN-derived PDAC was associated with worse OS than IPMN-derived (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.44-1.90) and tubular IPMN-derived (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.32-1.77) PDAC. Colloid and tubular subtype was not associated with OS (P = 0.16).
    CONCLUSIONS: PanIN-derived PDAC has worse survival than IPMN-derived PDAC supporting distinct outcomes. Although more indolent, colloid IPMN-derived PDAC has similar survival to tubular after risk adjustment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:常染色体显性多囊肾病(ADPKD)的胰腺囊肿与PKD2突变相关,具有与PKD1突变不同的表型。然而,胰腺囊肿通常被放射科医师忽视。这里,我们在ADPKD的腹部MRI上自动检测胰腺囊肿。
    方法:在仅正负或正负数据集上训练了八个具有2D或3D配置和各种损失函数的基于nnU-Net的分割模型,包括来自146例ADPKD患者的254次扫描的轴向和冠状T2加权MR图像,这些患者由两名放射科医生独立标记。在训练中看不见的测试对象上评估模型性能,包括40个内部,40个外部,23例复检重复性ADPKD患者。
    结果:两位放射科医师对训练数据上标记的囊肿有52%达成一致,以及内部/外部测试数据集上的33%/25%。具有组合骰子相似性系数和交叉熵的损失的2D模型用具有正和负两种情况的数据集训练,在内部/外部验证的体素水平上产生0.7±0.5/0.8±0.4的最佳骰子得分,因此被用作表现最好的模型。在重测中,与6名专家观察者(77%的一致性)相比,最佳模型在胰腺囊肿分割方面显示出较好的可重复性(扫描A和扫描B的一致性为83%).在内部/外部验证中,最佳模型的特异性高,为94%/100%,但灵敏度有限,为20%/24%.
    结论:在ADPKD患者的腹部T2图像上标记胰腺囊肿具有挑战性,深度学习可以帮助自动检测胰腺囊肿,和进一步的图像质量改进是必要的。
    BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cysts in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) correlate with PKD2 mutations, which have a different phenotype than PKD1 mutations. However, pancreatic cysts are commonly overlooked by radiologists. Here, we automate the detection of pancreatic cysts on abdominal MRI in ADPKD.
    METHODS: Eight nnU-Net-based segmentation models with 2D or 3D configuration and various loss functions were trained on positive-only or positive-and-negative datasets, comprising axial and coronal T2-weighted MR images from 254 scans on 146 ADPKD patients with pancreatic cysts labeled independently by two radiologists. Model performance was evaluated on test subjects unseen in training, comprising 40 internal, 40 external, and 23 test-retest reproducibility ADPKD patients.
    RESULTS: Two radiologists agreed on 52% of cysts labeled on training data, and 33%/25% on internal/external test datasets. The 2D model with a loss of combined dice similarity coefficient and cross-entropy trained with the dataset with both positive and negative cases produced an optimal dice score of 0.7 ± 0.5/0.8 ± 0.4 at the voxel level on internal/external validation and was thus used as the best-performing model. In the test-retest, the optimal model showed superior reproducibility (83% agreement between scan A and B) in segmenting pancreatic cysts compared to six expert observers (77% agreement). In the internal/external validation, the optimal model showed high specificity of 94%/100% but limited sensitivity of 20%/24%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Labeling pancreatic cysts on T2 images of the abdomen in patients with ADPKD is challenging, deep learning can help the automated detection of pancreatic cysts, and further image quality improvement is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)衍生的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)与其生物学上不同的对应物相比,切除的尺寸较小,胰腺上皮内瘤变(PanIN)衍生的PDAC。因此,专家建议对IPMN衍生的PDAC进行T1子分期。然而,这从未得到验证。
    方法:对来自5个国际高容量中心的IPMN衍生PDAC的连续前期手术患者进行分类,并使用侵入性组件尺寸,按照建议的T1亚分期分类(T1a≤0.5,T1b>0.5和≤1.0,T1c>1.0和≤2.0cm)。使用Kaplan-Meier和对数秩检验来比较总生存期(OS)。多变量Cox回归用于确定具有置信区间(95CI)的风险比(HR)。
    结果:在747名患者中,69(9.2%),50(6.7%),99(13.0%),531名患者(71.1%),包括T1a,T1b,T1c,和T2-4子组,分别。T期增加与CA19-9升高,较差等级相关,节点阳性,R1-margin,和管状亚型。T1a的中位操作系统,T1b,T1c,T2-4为159.0(95CI:126.0-NR),128.8(98.3-NR),77.6(48.3-108.2),和31.4(27.5-37.7)个月,分别(p<.001)。对于所有成对比较,OS随着T分期的增加而降低(所有p<0.05)。风险调整后,年龄>65,CA19-9升高,T1b[HR:2.55(1.22-5.32)],T1c[HR:3.04(1.60-5.76)],和T2-4[HR:3.41(1.89-6.17)]与T1a相比,节点阳性,R1-margin,无辅助化疗与OS恶化相关。与T1a(18.2%)相比,T2-4肿瘤的疾病复发更为常见(56.4%),T1b(23.9%),和T1c(36.1%,p<.001)。
    结论:T1亚分期的IPMN衍生的PDAC是有效的,具有显著的预后价值。T1子阶段的进展与组织病理学恶化有关,生存,和复发。T1子分期建议用于将来的指南。
    BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is resected at smaller sizes compared to its biologically distinct counterpart, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)-derived PDAC. Thus, experts proposed T1 sub-staging for IPMN-derived PDAC. However, this has never been validated.
    METHODS: Consecutive upfront surgery patients with IPMN-derived PDAC from five international high-volume centers were classified by the proposed T1 sub-staging classification (T1a ≤ 0.5, T1b > 0.5 and ≤1.0, and T1c >1.0 and ≤2.0 cm) using the invasive component size. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were utilized to compare overall survival (OS). A multivariable Cox-regression was used to determine hazard ratios (HR) with confidence intervals (95%CI).
    RESULTS: Among 747 patients, 69 (9.2%), 50 (6.7%), 99 (13.0%), and 531 patients (71.1%), comprised the T1a, T1b, T1c, and T2-4 subgroups, respectively. Increasing T-stage was associated with elevated CA19-9, poorer grade, nodal positivity, R1-margin, and tubular subtype. Median OS for T1a, T1b, T1c, and T2-4 were 159.0 (95%CI:126.0-NR), 128.8 (98.3-NR), 77.6 (48.3-108.2), and 31.4 (27.5-37.7) months, respectively (p < .001). OS decreased with increasing T-stage for all pairwise comparisons (all p < .05). After risk-adjustment, age > 65, elevated CA19-9, T1b [HR : 2.55 (1.22-5.32)], T1c [HR : 3.04 (1.60-5.76)], and T2-4 [HR : 3.41 (1.89-6.17)] compared to T1a, nodal positivity, R1-margin, and no adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with worse OS. Disease recurrence was more common in T2-4 tumors (56.4%) compared to T1a (18.2%), T1b (23.9%), and T1c (36.1%, p < .001).
    CONCLUSIONS: T1 sub-staging of IPMN-derived PDAC is valid and has significant prognostic value. Advancing T1 sub-stage is associated with worse histopathology, survival, and recurrence. T1 sub-staging is recommended for future guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    在胰腺囊性病变中,在鉴别诊断中应考虑包虫囊肿,在进行任何侵入性干预之前应排除其存在。应在居住在细粒棘球蚴流行区并患有胃肠道囊性病变的人群中进行血清学检查以及与包虫囊肿诊断指标相关的影像学研究。
    原发性胰腺包虫囊肿,由细粒棘球蚴引起的,代表一种罕见的事件,由于它们与其他胰腺疾病的相似性,通常难以诊断。该病例报告概述了一名67岁的男性,表现为黄疸和胆汁淤积,但缺乏与胰腺包虫囊肿相关的典型症状。实验室结果显示胆红素水平升高,肝酶异常,和肿瘤标志物,提示影像学检查显示胰头附近有囊性肿块。最初误诊为粘液性囊性肿瘤,病人接受了Whipple手术,在检查时发现了一个大的囊性病变。
    UNASSIGNED: In cystic lesions of the pancreas, hydatid cyst should be considered in the differential diagnoses and its presence should be ruled out before any invasive interventions. Serological tests along with imaging studies related to hydatid cyst diagnostic indicators should be performed in people who live in Echinococcus granulosus endemic areas and suffer from cystic lesions of the gastrointestinal tract.
    UNASSIGNED: Primary pancreatic hydatid cysts, caused by the tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus, represent a rare occurrence often challenging to diagnose due to their similarity to other pancreatic conditions. This case report outlines a 67-year-old male presenting with jaundice and cholestasis but lacking typical symptoms associated with pancreatic hydatid cysts. Laboratory findings revealed elevated bilirubin levels, liver enzyme abnormalities, and tumor markers, prompting imaging studies that indicated a cystic mass near the pancreatic head. Misdiagnosed initially as a mucinous cystic neoplasm, the patient underwent Whipple surgery, unveiling a large cystic lesion upon examination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号