Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) affects ~4 million people globally. Peptic ulcer perforation (PUP) is a serious complication of PUD associated with high mortality and morbidity. Hence, a high index of clinical suspicion is crucial in diagnosing such cases. Here, we present a case of a 19-year-old male who presented with 4 days of severe abdominal pain, fever, and vomiting. On examination, signs of acute abdomen were evident, and an erect chest X-ray confirmed free air under the diaphragm. The patient underwent an emergency midline laparotomy, during which 1000 ml of purulent fluid was evacuated. A perforation measuring 8 × 8 mm2 was repaired using the falciform ligament due to the unavailability of adequate healthy omentum. His postoperative recovery was uneventful. This case report underscores the importance of considering the falciform ligament as a viable and effective alternative for the closure of PUP when the omentum is unavailable.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the immediate postoperative results in patients with perforated ulcers.
METHODS: The study enrolled 25 patients with perforated peptic ulcer (diameter of perforation <8 mm). Mean age of patients was 39 years (range 24-56), perforation size - 5.92 mm (range 3-8).
RESULTS: Mean surgery time was 59.8 min (range 50-85). There were no intraoperative and postoperative complications. All patients were discharged.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method of repair for perforated gastric ulcers is simple, effective, safe and may be recommended for clinical practice.
UNASSIGNED: Улучшение непосредственных результатов оперативного лечения пациентов с перфоративной язвой посредством использования новой методики ушивания.
UNASSIGNED: Исследование проведено на 25 пациентах с перфоративной язвой желудка (диаметр перфоративного отверстия не превышал 8 мм). Средний возраст пациентов — 39 лет (от 24 до 56 лет). Средний размер перфоративного отверстия составил 5,92 мм (от 3 до 8 мм).
UNASSIGNED: Среднее время операции — 59,8 мин (от 50 до 85 мин). Во время оперативных вмешательств и в послеоперационном периоде осложнений отмечено не было. Все пациенты были выписаны в удовлетворительном состоянии на амбулаторное наблюдение у хирурга в поликлинике по месту жительства.
UNASSIGNED: Предлагаемый способ ушивания перфоративной язвы желудка можно считать простым, эффективным и безопасным способом, который может быть рекомендован к применению в клинической практике.

Duodenal ulcer perforation in patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery is a rare late complication, occurring in less than 1% of cases. It carries a high mortality risk, particularly in cases of delayed diagnosis. The challenge lies in an unspecific clinical presentation and laboratory findings, as well as a CT scan not very helpful in almost half of cases. These features may lead to the consideration of other differential diagnoses, such as pancreatitis or cholecystitis. A multidisciplinary approach in collaboration with digestive surgeons is essential to enable rapid exploratory laparoscopy in presence of diagnostic uncertainty, and appropriate therapeutic management.
La perforation de l’ulcère duodénal chez un patient ayant subi une chirurgie de bypass gastrique est une complication tardive rare, survenant dans moins de 1 % des cas. Elle présente un risque élevé de mortalité, particulièrement en cas de diagnostic retardé. Le défi réside dans une présentation clinique et des résultats biologiques peu spécifiques, ainsi qu’un scanner peu contributif dans près de la moitié des cas. Ces caractéristiques peuvent conduire à envisager d’autres diagnostics différentiels, tels que la pancréatite ou la cholécystite. Il est essentiel d’adopter une approche multidisciplinaire en collaboration avec les chirurgiens digestifs pour permettre une laparoscopie exploratrice rapide en cas d’incertitude diagnostique, ainsi qu’une prise en charge thérapeutique appropriée.

Abdominal pain in patients with significant alcohol use and smoking history presents diagnostic challenges due to overlapping clinical features of complications like acute cholecystitis and peptic ulcers. The unreliable physical examinations of intoxicated patients often complicate accurate diagnosis. We present a case of a 56-year-old male with a history of alcoholism and smoking, who presented to the emergency department with nonspecific abdominal pain. Initial imaging suggested cholecystitis, but due to the patient\'s intoxication, his physical examination was unreliable. During a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a perforated prepyloric ulcer was unexpectedly discovered, sealed by the gallbladder. This case highlights the limitations of relying solely on imaging for diagnosing abdominal conditions in intoxicated patients. The intraoperative discovery of the perforated ulcer necessitated a shift in the surgical approach, emphasizing the need for flexibility in surgical planning and a high index of suspicion for other abdominal pathologies in patients with significant lifestyle risks. The successful management of this patient through adaptive surgical techniques and comprehensive postoperative care, including Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, underscores the importance of maintaining a broad differential diagnosis and readiness to adapt surgical plans. This approach is essential for managing complex cases effectively, ensuring that both the immediate surgical issues and underlying causes are addressed to optimize recovery and prevent recurrence.

A perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is a surgical emergency with a high mortality rate. PPUs cause secondary peritonitis due to bacterial and fungal peritoneal contamination. Surgery is the main treatment modality and patient\'s comorbidites impacts perioperative morbidity and surgical outcomes. Even after surgery, resuscitation efforts should continue. While empiric antibiotics are recommended, the role of empiric anti-fungal treatment is unclear due to a lack of scientific evidence. This literature review demonstrated a paucity of studies evaluating the role of empiric anti-fungals in PPUs, and with conflicting results. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of patient demographics and underlying surgical pathology (PPUs vs. any gastrointestinal perforation), type of anti-fungal agent, timing of administration and duration of use. Other considerations include the need to differentiate between fungal colonization vs. invasive fungal infection. Despite positive fungal isolates from fluid culture, it is important for clinical judgement to identify the right group of patients for anti-fungal administration. Biochemistry investigations including new fungal biomarkers may help to guide management. Multidisciplinary discussions may help in decision making for this conundrum. Moving forward, further research may be conducted to select the right group of patients who may benefit from empiric anti-fungal use.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the morbidity associated with excisional biopsy in patients with spontaneous gastric perforation.
METHODS: A retrospective, single-center, observational study was performed. All consecutive patients with spontaneous gastric perforation who underwent surgical therapy were included. Outcomes were assessed concerning the performance of excisional biopsy.
RESULTS: A total of 135 adult patients were enrolled. Of these, 110 (81.5%) patients underwent excisional biopsy, while 17 (12.6%) did not. The remaining eight (5.9%) patients who underwent gastric resection were excluded from the analysis. Patients undergoing excisional biopsy developed significantly higher rates of postoperative complications (p = 0.007) and experienced more severe complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, particularly type III and above (p = 0.017). However, no significant differences were observed regarding in-hospital mortality, reoperation, suture dehiscence, or length of hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: Excisional biopsy for gastric perforation has been shown to be associated with increased morbidity. Surgical closure followed by early endoscopic biopsy may be a superior approach for gastric perforation management to rule out malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Perforated peptic ulcer is the worst complication of peptic ulcer disease whose burden is disproportionately higher in low-income settings. However, there is paucity of published data on the patterns of perforated peptic ulcer in the region. The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with anatomical patterns of peptic ulcer perforation, as well as the clinical, socio-demographic, and anatomical patterns among patients in Uganda.
METHODS: This was a cross sectional study that enrolled 81 consecutive patients with perforated peptic ulcers. Using a structured pretested questionnaire the social demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained. At surgery, the patterns of the perforations were determined. Logistic regression was done in SPSS version 22 to determine the factors associated with the anatomical patterns.
RESULTS: Perforated peptic ulcer disease was more prevalent among males (79.5%), peasants (56.8%) and those from rural areas (65.4%). Majority of study participants were of blood group O (43.2%). Gastric perforations were more common (74.1%). Majority of the perforations were found anteriorly (81.5%). Being a casual laborer was independently associated with lower odds of having a gastric perforation compared to being a peasant farmer (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Public health campaigns aimed at prevention of peptic ulcer perforations should prioritize the males, peasants and those living in rural areas. When a patient in our setting is suspected to have a peptic ulcer perforation, the anterior part of the stomach should be considered as the most likely site involved more so in peasant farmers.

BACKGROUND: There is little international data on morbidity and mortality of surgery for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU). This study aimed to understand the global 30-day morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing surgery for PPU and to identify variables associated with these.
METHODS: We performed an international study of adults (≥ 18 years) who underwent surgery for PPU from 1st January 2022 to 30th June 2022. Patients who were treated conservatively or had an underlying gastric cancer were excluded. Patients were divided into subgroups according to age (≤ 50 and > 50 years) and time from onset of symptoms to hospital presentation (≤ 24 and > 24 h). Univariate and Multivariate analyses were carried out to identify factors associated with higher 30-day morbidity and mortality.
RESULTS:  1874 patients from 159 centres across 52 countries were included. 78.3% (n = 1467) of the patients were males and the median (IQR) age was 49 years (25). Thirty-day morbidity and mortality were 48.5% (n = 910) and 9.3% (n = 174) respectively. Median (IQR) hospital stay was 7 (5) days. Open surgery was performed in 80% (n = 1505) of the cohort. Age > 50 years [(OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2), (OR = 4.7, 95% CI 3.1-7.6)], female gender [(OR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.3), (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.9)], shock on admission [(OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.7-2.7), (OR = 4.8, 95% CI 3.2-7.1)], and acute kidney injury [(OR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.9-3.2), (OR = 3.9), 95% CI 2.7-5.6)] were associated with both 30-day morbidity and mortality. Delayed presentation was associated with 30-day morbidity [OR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6], but not mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that surgery for PPU was associated with high 30-day morbidity and mortality rate. Age, female gender, and signs of shock at presentation were associated with both 30-day morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical outcomes in patients with acute perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) treated with over-the-scope clip (OTSC), non-surgical, and surgical interventions, and to explore the effectiveness and safety of OTSC closure.
METHODS: Hospital stay, antibiotic use, diet resumption time, and mortality rate were analyzed retrospectively. Binary Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors influencing PPU complicated with sepsis.
RESULTS: Patients were divided into three treatment groups: OTSC (n = 62), non-surgical (n = 72), and surgical (n = 55) groups. The median time (IQR) from symptom onset to admission was 9.0 (4-23) h. 88.71% (55/62) of the patients in In the OTSC group underwent OTSC closure within 24 h (median [IQR] time: 14.5 [7.00-30.25] h). The perforation diameters in the OTSC and surgical groups were 9.87 mm ± 5.97 mm and 8.55 mm ± 6.17 mm, respectively. The median (IQR) hospital stays in the OTSC (9.50 [7.00-12.25] days) and non-surgical group (9.00[7.00-13.00]days) were similar (p > 0.05), but shorter than that in surgical group (12.00[10.00-16.00]days), (p < 0.05). The median duration of antibiotic use was shorter in the OTSC group (7.00[3.00-10.00]) than in the non-surgical group (9.00[7.00-11.00]) and surgical group (11.00[9.00-13.00]) ( p < 0.05); and the time to resume oral feeding was shorter in the OTSC group (4.00[2.00-5.25]) than in the non-surgical group (7.00[6.13-9.00]) and surgical group (8.00[6.53-10.00]), respectively ( p < 0.05). No mortality difference among groups (p = 0.109) was found. Lower albumin level at admission, older age, and elevated creatinine levels were associated with increased sepsis risk, with OR(95%CI) of 0.826 (0.687-0.993), 1.077 (1.005-1.154), and 1.025 (1.006-1.043), respectively (all p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: OTSC closure improves clinical outcomes of acute PPU patients without sepsis. Age, hypoalbuminemia, and baseline renal dysfunction increase the risk of sepsis, while mortality was associated with sepsis and multiorgan dysfunction.