{Reference Type}: Journal Article {Title}: Factors associated with peptic ulcer perforations in Uganda: a multi-hospital cross-sectional study. {Author}: Edyedu I;Okedi FX;Muhumuza J;Asiimwe D;Laker G;Lule H; {Journal}: BMC Gastroenterol {Volume}: 24 {Issue}: 1 {Year}: 2024 Jun 17 {Factor}: 2.847 {DOI}: 10.1186/s12876-024-03285-w {Abstract}: BACKGROUND: Perforated peptic ulcer is the worst complication of peptic ulcer disease whose burden is disproportionately higher in low-income settings. However, there is paucity of published data on the patterns of perforated peptic ulcer in the region. The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with anatomical patterns of peptic ulcer perforation, as well as the clinical, socio-demographic, and anatomical patterns among patients in Uganda.
METHODS: This was a cross sectional study that enrolled 81 consecutive patients with perforated peptic ulcers. Using a structured pretested questionnaire the social demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained. At surgery, the patterns of the perforations were determined. Logistic regression was done in SPSS version 22 to determine the factors associated with the anatomical patterns.
RESULTS: Perforated peptic ulcer disease was more prevalent among males (79.5%), peasants (56.8%) and those from rural areas (65.4%). Majority of study participants were of blood group O (43.2%). Gastric perforations were more common (74.1%). Majority of the perforations were found anteriorly (81.5%). Being a casual laborer was independently associated with lower odds of having a gastric perforation compared to being a peasant farmer (Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Public health campaigns aimed at prevention of peptic ulcer perforations should prioritize the males, peasants and those living in rural areas. When a patient in our setting is suspected to have a peptic ulcer perforation, the anterior part of the stomach should be considered as the most likely site involved more so in peasant farmers.