UNASSIGNED:探讨(主动)生活方式干预对下肢截肢患者健康的有效性,以便在康复期间提供有效的干预措施,以改善下肢截肢患者的身体和社会心理功能。
未经授权:PubMed,CINAHL和Embase从成立到2021年2月进行了搜索。
UASSIGNED:纳入标准是(1)(准)随机对照试验;(2)至少10名下肢截肢的参与者;(3)生活方式干预侧重于身体活动,吸烟习惯,酒精使用,营养,和/或压力管理;(4)关注健康结果;(5)18岁以上的参与者;(6)荷兰研究,德语,或英语;和(7)初级研究。Title,abstract,全文筛选和质量评估由2名独立评估员进行.
未经批准:在确定的2460项研究中,本综述包括13项研究。两项研究的方法学质量中等,2项研究质量中等,9项研究质量较差。
UNASSIGNED:纳入研究的生活方式干预侧重于身体活动和压力管理。这些干预措施似乎对改善身体素质有效,步行能力,体重的变化,生活质量,和体力活动的强度。
UNASSIGNED:以体力活动和压力管理为重点的生活方式干预对于改善下肢截肢患者的身体和心理社会功能似乎是有效的。然而,考虑到纳入研究的方法学质量有限,因此应谨慎解释研究结果.未来的研究应该评估营养干预措施的有效性,吸烟习惯,和饮酒以及下肢截肢患者联合干预措施的有效性。
UNASSIGNED: To explore the effectiveness of (active) lifestyle interventions for the health of people with a lower limb amputation in order to offer effective interventions during rehabilitation that may improve physical and psychosocial functioning of people with lower limb amputation.
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, CINAHL and Embase were searched from inception to February 2021.
UNASSIGNED: Inclusion criteria were (1) (quasi-)randomized controlled trial; (2) minimum of 10 participants with a lower limb amputation; (3) lifestyle intervention focusing on physical activity, smoking habits, alcohol use, nutrition, and/or stress management; (4) focus on health outcomes; (5) participants older than 18 years; (6) studies in Dutch, German, or English; and (7) primary research. Title, abstract, and full-text screening and quality assessment were performed by 2 independent assessors.
UNASSIGNED: Of 2460 studies identified, 13 studies were included in this review. Two studies were of moderate methodological quality, 2 studies were of medium quality, and 9 studies were of poor quality.
UNASSIGNED: Lifestyle interventions in the included studies focused on physical activity and stress management. These interventions seemed effective for improving physical fitness, walking capacity, changes in body mass, quality of life, and intensity of physical activity.
UNASSIGNED: Lifestyle interventions focusing on physical activity and stress management seem effective for improving physical and psychosocial functioning of people with a lower limb amputation. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution given the limited methodological quality of the included studies. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on nutrition, smoking habits, and alcohol use and the effectiveness of combined interventions in people with a lower limb amputation.