Oligometastases

寡核苷酸
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肾细胞癌(RCC)传统上被认为是耐放射性的。正因为如此,常规放疗(RT)主要是缓解有症状的转移性疾病.立体定向消融放射治疗(SABR)的实施使安全地提供更高的消融剂量成为可能,改变肾脏放射抗性范式。SABR越来越多地被纳入治疗局部复发的多学科框架,寡进,和寡转移疾病。此外,越来越多的证据表明,SABR作为一种非侵入性的确定性治疗,适用于医学上无法手术或拒绝手术的原发性RCC患者,不适合侵入性消融(手术或经皮技术),或需要术后透析的高风险。在孤立肾或预先存在的慢性疾病(eGFR差)的病例中,甚至有令人鼓舞的结果。保留肾功能的可能性很高。对支持消融性放疗(SABR)在原发性,经常性,已进行转移性肾癌。鉴于高RT剂量的潜在免疫原性作用,我们还探索了将SABR与系统治疗相结合的新机会.此外,我们探讨了这种疾病的未来发展方向和正在进行的临床试验。
    Renal cell cancer (RCC) has traditionally been considered radioresistant. Because of this, conventional radiotherapy (RT) has been predominantly relegated to the palliation of symptomatic metastatic disease. The implementation of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has made it possible to deliver higher ablative doses safely, shifting the renal radioresistance paradigm. SABR has increasingly been adopted into the multidisciplinary framework for the treatment of locally recurrent, oligoprogressive, and oligometastatic disease. Furthermore, there is growing evidence of SABR as a non-invasive definitive therapy in patients with primary RCC who are medically inoperable or who decline surgery, unsuited to invasive ablation (surgery or percutaneous techniques), or at high-risk of requiring post-operative dialysis. Encouraging outcomes have even been reported in cases of solitary kidney or pre-existing chronic disease (poor eGFR), with a high likelihood of preserving renal function. A review of clinical evidence supporting the use of ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in primary, recurrent, and metastatic RCC has been conducted. Given the potential immunogenic effect of the high RT doses, we also explore emerging opportunities to combine SABR with systemic treatments. In addition, we explore future directions and ongoing clinical trials in the evolving landscape of this disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估OligoCare队列中的寡转移癌患者立体定向放疗(SBRT)后6个月的急性毒性。
    方法:OligoCare是一种前瞻性,基于注册表,单臂,观察性研究旨在报告接受SBRT治疗的实体癌寡转移患者的前瞻性真实世界数据(NCT03818503)。原发肿瘤包括非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),乳腺癌(BC),结直肠癌(CRC),前列腺癌(PC)。此分析涉及试验的次要终点,SBRT后6个月内的急性毒性。
    结果:在1,597名注册患者中,对1468例患者进行了急性毒性评估。全球范围内,290人(20%)患有NSCLC原发疾病,227(16%)有BC,293(20%)患有CRC,658人(45%)拥有个人电脑。527例(35.9%)患者同时进行全身治疗。根据EORTC/ESTRO寡转移疾病(OMD)分类,828例(56%)患者有从头OMD,464(32%)重复OMD,176例(12%)诱导OMD。8例(0.5%)患者报告了急性≥3级SBRT相关不良事件,包括2例(0.1%)致命不良事件。特别是,6(0.4%)3级事件是:1个脓胸,1肺炎,1放射性肺炎,1放射性皮肤损伤,1食欲下降,1骨疼痛。其中2例发生在NSCLC患者中,2在BC患者中,CRC和PC患者各1例。两种(0.1%)5级毒性表现为:肺炎和脑出血。
    结论:OligoCare是关于寡转移疾病的最大的前瞻性登记队列。6个月内急性毒性低,证实SBRT治疗寡转移酶的安全性。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate acute toxicity at 6 months after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with oligometastatic cancer within the OligoCare cohort.
    METHODS: OligoCare is a prospective, registry-based, single-arm, observational study that aims to report prospective real-world data of patients with oligometastases from solid cancer treated with SBRT (NCT03818503). Primary tumor included non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer (BC), colorectal cancer (CRC), and prostate cancer (PC). This analysis addresses a secondary endpoint of the trial, acute toxicity within 6 months after SBRT.
    RESULTS: Out of 1,597registered patients, 1\'468 patients were evaluated for acute toxicity. Globally, 290 (20 %) had NSCLC primary disease, 227 (16 %) had BC, 293 (20 %) had CRC, and 658 (45 %) had PC. Concomitant systemic treatment was administered in 527 (35.9 %) patients. According to the EORTC/ESTRO oligometastatic disease (OMD) classification, 828 (56 %) patients had de novo OMD, 464 (32 %) repeat OMD, and 176 (12 %) induced OMD. Acute grade ≥ 3 SBRT related adverse events were reported in 8 (0.5 %) patients, including 2 (0.1 %) fatal AEs. In particular, 6 (0.4 %) grade 3 events were: 1 empyema, 1 pneumonia, 1 radiation pneumonitis, 1 radiation skin injury, 1 decreased appetite, and 1 bone pain. Among those 2 occurred in NSCLC patients, 2 in BC patients, and 1 in CRC and PC patients each. The two (0.1 %) grade 5 toxicity were represented by: pneumonitis and cerebral hemorrhage.
    CONCLUSIONS: OligoCare is the largest prospective registry cohort on oligometastatic disease. Acute toxicity within 6 months was low, confirming the safety of SBRT in the treatment of oligometastases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:代表意大利放射疗法和临床肿瘤学协会(AIRO)的寡转移疾病生物学和治疗研究小组进行了一项全国性调查,旨在描述当前的脊柱寡转移的立体定向身体放射疗法(SBRT)的实践模式。
    方法:使用Surveymonkey平台发送了28项针对人口统计的问卷,临床和技术方面相关的SBRT脊柱寡转移。邀请所有AIRO成员填写问卷。然后将数据集中到单个中心进行分析和解释。
    结果:来自47个中心的53名放射肿瘤学家完成了调查。在提出SBRT用于脊髓寡移植时,完全一致,大多数人认为多达3个并发脊柱寡移植对于SBRT是可行的(73.5%),无论脊柱部位(70%),椎体节段(85%)和病变的形态特征(71.7%)。关于剂量处方,分割方案作为首选方案,在3个会议(58.4%)或5个会议(34%)中,在应用大于1毫米的PTV余量方面达成了实质性协议(几乎90%的参与者),理想情况下,同时使用MRI和PET成像来改善靶体积和危险器官勾画(67.9%)。
    结论:这项意大利国家调查说明了SBRT用于脊柱寡移植的实践模式和主要问题。据报道,SBRT适应症的数字切断术和椎体节段基本吻合,在剂量处方和分割方案方面有轻微的异质性。
    BACKGROUND: The Study Group for the Biology and Treatment of the OligoMetastatic Disease on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) has conducted a national survey with the aim to depict the current patterns of practice of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal oligometastases.
    METHODS: The Surveymonkey platform was used to send a 28-items questionnaire focused on demographic, clinical and technical aspects related to SBRT for spinal oligometastases. All the AIRO members were invited to fill the questionnaire. Data were then centralized to a single center for analysis and interpretation.
    RESULTS: 53 radiation oncologists from 47 centers fulfilled the survey. A complete agreement was observed in proposing SBRT for spinal oligometastases, with the majority considering up to 3 concurrent spine oligometastases feasible for SBRT (73.5%), regardless of spine site (70%), vertebral segment (85%) and morphological features of the lesion (71.7%). Regarding dose prescription, fractionated regimens resulted as the preferred option, either in 3 (58.4%) or five sessions (34%), with a substantial agreement in applying a PTV-margin larger than 1 mm (almost 90% of participants), and ideally using both MRI and PET imaging to improve target volume and organs-at-risk delineation (67.9%).
    CONCLUSIONS: This national italian survey illustrates the patterns of practice and the main issues for the indication of SBRT for spinal oligometastases. A substantial agreement in the numerical cut-off and vertebral segment involved for SBRT indication was reported, with a slight heterogeneity in terms of dose prescription and fractionation schemes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    立体定向消融放疗(SABR)越来越多地用于治疗早期非小细胞肺癌(ES-NSCLC)和肺转移。在ES-NSCLC患者中,SABR非常成功,报告的5年局部控制率约为90%。然而,由于高达90%的患者可以观察到由放射性肺损伤(RILI)引起的放射学变化,因此评估肺SABR后的局部控制可能具有挑战性.这些所谓的“良性”放射学变化随时间演变,通常无症状。已经探索了几种放射学和代谢特征来帮助区分RILI和局部复发(LR)。这些包括实体瘤的反应评估标准(RECIST),FDG-PET-CT的高危特征(HRF)和最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)。然而,使用其中一些方法对复发的预测价值较差,特异性较低.将审查用于评估肺后SABR放射学变化的拟议新工作流程,该工作流程使用所谓的“可操作放射学特征”的存在来触发成像时间表的变化,并确定是否需要进行多学科委员会审查。此外,这项关于肺后SABR成像的重要回顾将突出当前的挑战,新的见解,在这个领域是未知的。
    Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is increasingly used for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) and for pulmonary metastases. In patients with ES-NSCLC, SABR is highly successful with reported 5-year local control rates of approximately 90%. However, the assessment of local control following lung SABR can be challenging as radiological changes arising from radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) can be observed in up to 90% of patients. These so-called \'benign\' radiological changes evolve with time and are often asymptomatic. Several radiological and metabolic features have been explored to help distinguish RILI from local recurrences (LR). These include the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST), high-risk features (HRF\'s) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on FDG-PET-CT. However, use of some of these approaches have poor predictive values and low specificity for recurrence. A proposed new workflow for the evaluation of post-lung SABR radiological changes will be reviewed which uses the presence of so-called \'actionable radiological features\' to trigger changes to imaging schedules and identifies the need for a multidisciplinary board review. Furthermore, this critical review of post-lung SABR imaging will highlight current challenges, new insights, and unknowns in this field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    寡转移前列腺癌(PCa)的转移导向治疗(MDT),包括立体定向身体放射治疗(SBRT),已经显示出希望,但仍被认为是研究性的。这是对TRANSFORM试验的5年分析,用SBRT为基础的MDT治疗的寡转移性PCa男性最大的前瞻性队列.主要终点是5年治疗无升级生存期(TE-FS),定义为没有任何新的癌症治疗,而不是进一步的SBRT。总的来说,199名男性接受了SBRT;基线时76.4%为激素幼稚。激素初始亚组的5年TE-FS率为21.7%(95%置信区间[CI]:15.7%-28.7%),总体为25.4%(95%CI:18.1%-33.9%)。国际泌尿外科病理学会第4-5级疾病亚组(风险比[HR]=1.48,95%CI:1.05-2.01,p=.026),较高的基线前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)(HR=1.06,95%CI:1.03-1.09,p<.001)和先前接受过雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)的患者(HR=2.13,95%CI:1.40-3.26,p<.001),治疗升级的风险更大。具有四个或五个初始病变的参与者的结果与具有一到三个病变的参与者相当。在最后的随访中,18.9%(95%CI:13.2%-25.7%)的参与者没有治疗升级(中位随访67.9个月),两名参与者的PSA水平未检测到。未报告治疗相关的3级或更高的不良事件。这项研究的结果表明,在寡转移PCa的情况下,基于SBRT的MDT是延迟全身治疗升级的有效选择。未来的随机试验需要将基于SBRT的MDT与基于ADT的标准护理方法进行比较,以评估延迟ADT对生存的影响。
    Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa), including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), has shown promise but is still considered investigational. This is the 5-year analysis of the TRANSFORM trial, the largest prospective cohort of men with oligometastatic PCa treated with SBRT-based MDT. The primary endpoint was 5-year treatment escalation-free survival (TE-FS), defined as freedom from any new cancer therapy other than further SBRT. In total, 199 men received SBRT; 76.4% were hormone-naïve at baseline. The rate of 5-year TE-FS was 21.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.7%-28.7%) overall and 25.4% (95% CI: 18.1%-33.9%) in the hormone-naïve subgroup. The subgroups with International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups 4-5 disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.05-2.01, p = .026), a higher baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (HR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.09, p < .001) and those who received prior androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.40-3.26, p < .001), were at greater risk of treatment escalation. Outcomes for participants with four or five initial lesions were comparable to those with one to three lesions. At last follow-up, 18.9% (95% CI: 13.2%-25.7%) of participants were free from treatment escalation (median follow-up of 67.9 months) and two participants had an undetectable PSA level. No treatment-related grade three or higher adverse events were reported. The findings of this study demonstrate that SBRT-based MDT is an effective option for delaying systemic treatment escalation in the context of oligometastatic PCa. Future randomised trials comparing SBRT-based MDT to standard-of-care ADT-based approaches are required to evaluate the impact of delaying ADT on survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:寡转移疾病(OMD)局部治疗的疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估OMD分类系统的预后实用性,并探讨哪些群体可能从立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)中受益。
    方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了45例(52个部位)实体瘤和1-3例颅外寡转移瘤患者,他们在2018年1月至2021年12月期间在我们机构接受了SBRT治疗。OMD状态是根据欧洲放射治疗和肿瘤学学会(ESTRO)和欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)分类系统进行分类的。本地控制(LC),总生存期(OS),使用Kaplan-Meier方法分析各组的无进展生存期(PFS)。根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)5.0版评估急性和晚期不良事件(AE)。
    结果:中位随访期为14个月(范围:0-48个月)。从头(首次诊断为OMD)的患者人数,重复(OMD的先前历史),和诱导(既往有多转移病史)OMD组分别为15、17和13。整个LC的费率为一年,从头,重复,诱导队列为87.2%,87.5%,90.2%,和83.9%,分别(p=0.80)。各组一年PFS率为35.0%,56.7%,和29.9%,分别(p=0.58)。各组一年OS率为80.0%,86.2%,80.8%,分别(p=0.50)。5例患者发生2级或3级AE(10.4%)。没有观察到4级或5级AE。
    结论:SBRT对于局部控制是安全有效的。重复OMD的患者表现出更长的PFS趋势,提示此亚组可能受益于转移部位的局部治疗.
    OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of local therapy for oligometastatic disease (OMD) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic utility of the classification system for OMD and explore which groups may benefit from stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
    METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 45 patients (52 sites) with solid tumors and 1-3 extracranial oligometastases who underwent SBRT for all metastases at our institution between January 2018 and December 2021. OMD states were classified based on the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) classification system. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) for each group were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Acute and late adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
    RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 14 months (range: 0-48 months). The numbers of patients in the de novo (first diagnosis of OMD), repeat (previous history of OMD), and induced (previous history of polymetastatic disease) OMD groups were 15, 17, and 13, respectively. The LC rates at one year for the entire, de novo, repeat, and induced cohorts were 87.2%, 87.5%, 90.2%, and 83.9%, respectively (p=0.80). The one-year PFS rates for each group were 35.0%, 56.7%, and 29.9%, respectively (p=0.58). The one-year OS rates for each group were 80.0%, 86.2%, and 80.8%, respectively (p=0.50). Grade 2 or 3 AEs occurred in five patients (10.4%). No grade 4 or 5 AEs were observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is safe and highly effective for local control. Patients with repeat OMD demonstrated a trend of longer PFS, suggesting that this subgroup may benefit from local therapy at metastatic sites.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:淋巴结前列腺癌寡转移根据其部位有不同的治疗方法:盆腔是局部淋巴结;相反,主动脉旁淋巴结被认为是远处转移。该研究的目的是比较立体定向身体放射治疗(SBRT)治疗的主动脉旁和盆腔寡转移。方法:回顾性分析。从头转移或结外疾病被排除。进行了单变量和多变量分析;还评估了复发的模式。应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来创建可比较的队列。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点是生化无复发生存期(BRFS),无ADT生存(ADTFS),无多转移生存期(PMFS),局部无进展生存期(LPFS),和复发模式。结果:总的来说,对164例患者(127例盆腔和37例主动脉旁)的240例淋巴结寡转移进行了治疗。骨盆和主动脉旁患者的中位PFS为20和11个月,分别(p=0.042)。在多变量分析中没有证实差异(p=0.06)。BRFS中位数为16个月和9个月,分别,在骨盆和主动脉旁组中(p=0.07)。未检测到ADTFS或PMFS的统计学差异。5年累计LPFS为90.5%。在PSM中,所有研究终点均未检测到统计学显著差异.结论:受主动脉旁疾病影响的患者的PFS可能与盆腔疾病相当;两个队列的局部控制率都很高。我们的结果也支持SBRT用于主动脉旁转移。
    Background: Lymph-nodal prostate cancer oligometastases are differently treated according to their site: pelvic are locoregional lymph nodes; instead, para-aortic lymph nodes are considered as distant metastases. The aim of the study was a comparison between para-aortic and pelvic oligometastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis. De novo metastatic or extra-nodal disease were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed; the pattern of recurrence was also evaluated. A propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to create comparable cohorts. The primary end-point was the progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end-points were biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), ADT-free survival (ADTFS), polymetastases-free survival (PMFS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), and pattern of relapse. Results: In total, 240 lymph-nodal oligometastases in 164 patients (127 pelvic and 37 para-aortic) were treated. The median PFS was 20 and 11 months in pelvic and para-aortic patients, respectively (p = 0.042). The difference was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.06). The median BRFS was 16 and 9 months, respectively, in the pelvic and para-aortic group (p = 0.07). No statistically significant differences for ADTFS or PMFS were detected. The cumulative 5-year LPFS was 90.5%. In PSM, no statistically significant differences for all the study end-points were detected. Conclusions: Patients affected by para-aortic disease might have a PFS comparable to pelvic disease; local control is high in both cohorts. Our results also support the use of SBRT for para-aortic metastases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    “晚期乳腺癌国际共识会议”(ABC)的基本原理是使用循证方法将全球晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者的治疗标准化。目的还在于确保所有国家的患者根据当前的治疗建议和标准接受适当的治疗。第七届晚期乳腺癌国际共识会议(ABC7)于2023年11月9日至12日在葡萄牙里斯本举行。ABC7专注于转移性疾病以及局部晚期和炎性乳腺癌。专题包括治疗寡转移患者,软脑膜疾病,脑转移的治疗,和孕妇ABC。和往年一样,来自世界各地的患者倡导者参加了共识会议,并参与了决策。
    The rationale behind the \"International Consensus Conference for Advanced Breast Cancer\" (ABC) is to standardize the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer worldwide using an evidence-based approach. The aim is also to ensure that patients in all countries receive adequate treatment based on current treatment recommendations and standards. The 7th International Consensus Conference on Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC7) took place from November 9 to 12, 2023 in Lisbon/Portugal. ABC7 focused on metastatic disease as well as on locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer. Special topics included the treatment of oligometastatic patients, leptomeningeal disease, treatment of brain metastases, and pregnant women with ABC. As in previous years, patient advocates from all over the world participated in the consensus conference and were involved in decision making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:纵隔淋巴结中的寡节转移越来越普遍,由于靠近危险器官(OAR),对立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)的治疗提出了挑战。我们报告了一项关于消融性SBRT治疗无法手术的胸淋巴结转移的单一前瞻性观察性II期试验的结果(NCT02970955)。
    方法:自2017年以来,肿瘤委员会对<3个淋巴结转移的患者进行了评估,如果认为无法手术,则将其包括在内。SBRT采用基于数字的风险自适应方法交付,转移淋巴结的部位和大小(50Gy/5个部分,60Gy/8分数,70Gy/10分数)。计划目标体积(PTV)允许部分剂量不足。主要终点是12个月时的局部控制(LC)。次要终点是:急性和晚期毒性,总生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),以及下一次全身治疗(TTNS)的时间。
    结果:在2017-11/2021之间,包括32例患者(41个淋巴结转移)。非小细胞肺癌(13分),乳腺癌(5例)和结直肠癌(4例)是最常见的原发肿瘤.在66%的案例中,部分PTV覆盖是必要的。1年和2年的LC分别为93.5%和82.3%,分别。治疗耐受性良好,无急性或晚期毒性≥G3。OS中位数为59.7个月。1年和2年的OS分别为96.9%和83.8%。PFS中位数为12.2个月。1年和2年的PFS分别为53.1%和31.3%,分别。
    结论:该试验支持消融性SBRT治疗胸淋巴结转移的可行性和安全性,这归功于风险适应性方法允许延迟新的全身治疗。需要更大规模的研究来证实这些观察结果。
    BACKGROUND: Oligometastases in mediastinal nodes are increasingly prevalent, posing challenges for treatment with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) due to proximity to organs at risk (OARs). We report the results of a single prospective observational phase II trial on ablative SBRT for medically inoperable thoracic nodes metastases (NCT02970955).
    METHODS: Since 2017, patients with < 3 nodal metastases were evaluated by the tumor board and included if deemed inoperable. SBRT was delivered using risk adaptive approach based on number, site and size of metastatic nodes (50 Gy/5fractions, 60 Gy/8fractions, 70 Gy/10 fractions). Planning target volume (PTV) partial underdosage was allowed. The primary end point was local control (LC) at 12 months. Secondary end points were: acute and late toxicities, overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and time to next systemic therapy (TTNS).
    RESULTS: Between 03/2017-11/2021, 32 patients (41 nodal metastases) were included. NSCLC (13pts), breast (5pts) and colorectal cancer (4pts) were the most represented primary tumour. In 66 % cases, partial PTV undercoverage was necessary. LC at 1 and 2 years was 93.5 % and 82.3 %, respectively. Treatment was well-tolerated with no acute or late toxicity ≥ G3. Median OS was 59.7 months. OS at 1 and 2 years was 96.9 % and 83.8 % respectively. Median PFS was 12.2 months. PFS at 1 and 2 years was 53.1 % and 31.3 %, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: This trial supported the feasibility and safety of ablative SBRT for thoracic nodes metastases thanks to risk adaptive approach allowing to delay of new systemic therapies. Larger studies are needed to confirm these observations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在寡转移的多学科管理中,持久性,或复发性(MPR)卵巢癌,放射治疗(RT)正在成为一种越来越有价值的治疗方法,以潜在地改善疾病的慢性性。粒子束RT已被证明对几种妇科恶性肿瘤有效,但是到目前为止还没有卵巢癌的数据。
    这是一个真实的世界,回顾性,双机构,单臂研究旨在评估碳离子RT(CIRT)在这种情况下的有效性和安全性。共同第一终点是1年和2年精算局部控制(LC)率和客观缓解率(ORR),以“每个病变”为基础。次要终点是毒性。使用Kaplan-Meier方法评估精算结果,同时使用Log-rank检验探索潜在预测因子。双变量逻辑回归用于分析预测每个病变的完全反应的因素。
    26例患者,共36个病灶未接受CIRT,总剂量中位数为52.8Gy[RBE](范围:39-64Gy[RBE])。五名患者接受CIRT再照射。CIRT期间未同时进行全身治疗。治疗后12个月内,17个病变(47%)获得完全缓解,18个病变(50%)获得部分缓解,ORR为97%.完全反应的实现与每个分数的剂量有关(>4.2Gy[RBE],p=0.04)和总剂量(>52,8Gy[RBE],p=0.05)。1年LC为92%,2年LC为83%,根据CR(p=0.007)和GTV≤14cm3(p=0.024)的实现。未治疗和再次照射的患者均未记录到>3级毒性。PARP-i和抗VEGF似乎不会加剧严重毒性的风险。
    CIRT在MPR卵巢癌中是有效和安全的,即使在重新照射的情况下。需要最大的队列研究和更长时间的随访来证实这些数据。
    UNASSIGNED: In the multidisciplinary management of oligometastatic, persistent, or recurrent (MPR) ovarian cancer, radiotherapy (RT) is becoming a more and more worthwhile treatment to potentially improve the chronicity of the disease. Particle beam RT has proved to be effective in several gynecological malignancies, but so far no data are available for ovarian cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a real-world, retrospective, bi-institutional, single-arm study aimed to assess the effectiveness and the safety of carbon ion RT (CIRT) in this setting. The co-first endpoints are 1-year and 2-year actuarial local control (LC) rates and the objective response rate (ORR) defined on a \"per lesion\" basis. The secondary endpoint was toxicity. Actuarial outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method while potential predictors were explored using the Log-rank test. Bi-variable logistic regression was employed in the analysis of factors predicting the complete response on a per-lesion basis.
    UNASSIGNED: 26 patients accounting for a total of 36 lesions underwent CIRT with a total median dose of 52.8 Gy[RBE] (range: 39-64 Gy[RBE]). Five patients received CIRT for re-irradiation. No concomitant systemic therapies were administered during CIRT. Within 12 months after the treatment, 17 lesions (47 %) achieved complete response while 18 (50 %) obtained a partial response with an ORR of 97 %. The achievement of a complete response is related to the dose per fraction (>4.2 Gy[RBE], p = 0.04) and total dose (>52,8 Gy[RBE], p = 0.05). The 1-year LC was 92 % and the 2-year LC was 83 %, according to the achievement of a CR (p = 0.007) and GTV ≤ 14 cm3 (p = 0.024). No grade > 3 toxicities were recorded both in naïve and re-irradiated patients. PARP-i and anti-VEGF seemed not to exacerbate the risk of severe toxicities.
    UNASSIGNED: CIRT was effective and safe in MPR ovarian cancers, even in the case of re-irradiation. Largest cohort studies and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号