Oligometastases

寡核苷酸
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:新兴的随机数据,主要来自第二阶段试验,已经表明,患有寡转移癌的患者可能受益于消融治疗,例如立体定向消融放疗(SABR)。然而,缺乏对这一范例进行测试的第三阶段数据,许多研究已经在异时寡转移疾病的背景下检查了SABR。SABR-SYNC试验的目标是评估SABR在寡转移癌和同步原发肿瘤患者中的作用。
    方法:一百八十位患者将以1:2的比例在标准护理(SOC)姑息治疗与对所有已知疾病部位进行SOC+消融治疗(SABR优先)。随机化将基于组织学和登记时的转移数量进行分层。SABR可以在1-,3-和5-分数方案,推荐剂量为20Gy,30Gy,和35Gy,分别。非SABR局部模式(如手术、热消融,常规放射)可用于治疗原发或转移,由治疗医师自行决定,如果这些方式是临床首选。主要终点是总生存期,次要终点包括无进展生存期,新的转移性病变的发展时间,开始下一次全身治疗的时间,生活质量,和毒性。转化终点包括循环肿瘤DNA的评估和结果的免疫学预测因子。
    结论:SABR-SYNC将提供III期数据,以评估SABR对同步寡转移患者总体生存率的影响。翻译组件将尝试鉴定新的预后和预测性生物标志物,以帮助临床决策。
    背景:Clinicaltrials.govNCT05717166(注册日期:2月8,2023年)。
    BACKGROUND: Emerging randomized data, mostly from phase II trials, have suggested that patients with oligometastatic cancers may benefit from ablative treatments such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). However, phase III data testing this paradigm are lacking, and many studies have examined SABR in the setting of metachronous oligometastatic disease. The goal of the SABR-SYNC trial is to assess the effect of SABR in patients with oligometastatic cancers and a synchronous primary tumor.
    METHODS: One hundred and eighty patients will be randomized in a 1:2 ratio between standard of care (SOC) palliative-intent treatments vs. SOC + ablative therapy (SABR preferred) to all sites of known disease. Randomization will be stratified based on histology and number of metastases at enrollment. SABR may be delivered in 1-, 3- and 5-fraction regimens, with recommended doses of 20 Gy, 30 Gy, and 35 Gy, respectively. Non-SABR local modalities (e.g. surgery, thermal ablation, conventional radiation) may be used for treatment of the primary or metastases at the discretion of the treating physicians, if those modalities are clinically preferred. The primary endpoint is overall survival, and secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, time to development of new metastatic lesions, time to initiation of next systemic therapy, quality of life, and toxicity. Translational endpoints include assessment of circulating tumor DNA and immunological predictors of outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: SABR-SYNC will provide phase III data to assess the impact of SABR on overall survival in a population of patients with synchronous oligometastases. The translational component will attempt to identify novel prognostic and predictive biomarkers to aid in clinical decision making.
    BACKGROUND: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05717166 (registration date: Feb. 8, 2023).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    转移定向放疗(MDRT)的数据有限,特别是关于其与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)倍增时间(PSADT)的关联。本研究评估了基于PSADT的MDRT在寡复发性前列腺癌患者中的肿瘤学结果。
    我们回顾性分析了北萨托大学医院29例患者的35例MDRT的临床资料,靶向寡转移前列腺癌在非转移性前列腺癌的根治性治疗后发展。将35例MDRTs分为PSADT>3个月(n=25)或PSADT≤3个月(n=10)组。进行统计分析以比较两个PSADT组和肿瘤学结果之间的关联,例如无进展生存期(PFS)和MDRT后的PSA反应。
    两组的临床病理特征无显著差异。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,PSADT>3个月组的PFS明显优于PSADT≤3个月组[中位数:13.3vs(vs.)2.6个月,p=0.046]。关于阉割敏感性,PSADT>3个月的预测作用在21例接受MDRT而未接受补救激素治疗的患者中得到维持(中位PFS:12.7vs.2.6个月,p=0.024)。在抗去势设置(n=14),MDRT后血清PSA水平下降90%的频率为54.5%(中位PFS:23.1个月).
    MDRT特别是对于PSADT≥3个月且在非转移性前列腺癌根治术后出现少许复发的患者。
    UNASSIGNED: Data on metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDRT) are limited, particularly regarding its association with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (PSADT). The present study evaluated the oncological outcomes of MDRT on the basis of the PSADT in oligo-recurrent prostate cancer patients.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 35 MDRTs for 29 patients at the Kitasato University Hospital, targeting oligometastatic prostate cancer developed after radical treatment for non-metastatic prostate cancer. Thirty-five MDRTs were classified into the PSADT >3 months (n=25) or PSADT ≤3 months group (n=10). Statistical analyses were performed to compare associations between the two PSADT groups and oncological outcomes such as progression-free survival (PFS) and PSA response after MDRT.
    UNASSIGNED: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the clinicopathological features. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that PFS was significantly better in the PSADT >3 months group than in the PSADT ≤3 months group [median: 13.3 versus (vs.) 2.6 months, p=0.046]. Regarding castration sensitivity, the predictive role of PSADT >3 months was maintained in 21 patients who received MDRT without prior salvage hormone therapy (median PFS: 12.7 vs. 2.6 months, p=0.024). In the castration-resistant setting (n=14), the frequency of a decrease in serum PSA levels after MDRT by 90% was 54.5% (median PFS: 23.1 months).
    UNASSIGNED: MDRT can provide benefit especially for patients with PSADT ≥3 months who had oligo-recurrence after the radical treatment for non-metastatic prostate cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:局部治疗可能有益于寡转移癌患者。然而,关于胰腺癌的数据有限.这里,在转移性胰腺癌患者中,我们比较了立体定向全身放疗(SBRT)对原发肿瘤的疗效和安全性,以及所有寡转移瘤对SBRT对原发肿瘤的疗效和安全性.
    方法:对接受SBRT的同步寡转移胰腺癌(多达5个病灶)患者的所有病灶(包括所有寡转移和原发肿瘤)进行回顾性分析。另一组具有相似基线特征的相当患者,包括转移负担,SBRT剂量,和化疗方案,对原发肿瘤单独接受SBRT进行鉴定。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。次要终点是进展释放生存期(PFS),无多进展生存期(PPFS)和不良事件。
    结果:有59和158例患者接受SBRT治疗所有病变和仅原发肿瘤。SBRT患者对所有病变和原发肿瘤的中位OS分别为10.9个月(95%CI10.2-11.6个月)和9.3个月(95%CI8.8-9.8个月)(P<0.001)。两组的中位PFS分别为6.5个月(95%CI5.6-7.4个月)和4.1个月(95%CI3.8-4.4个月)(P<0.001)。两组的中位PPFS分别为9.8个月(95%CI8.9-10.7个月)和7.8个月(95%CI7.2-8.4个月)(P<0.001)。此外,两组中有14例(23.7%)和32例(20.2%)患者出现3级或4级治疗相关毒性。
    结论:SBRT对所有寡转移酶和胰腺癌患者的原发肿瘤可能会提高生存率,这需要前瞻性的验证。
    BACKGROUND: Local therapies may benefit patients with oligometastatic cancer. However, there were limited data about pancreatic cancer. Here, we compared the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the primary tumor and all oligometastases with SBRT to the primary tumor alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with synchronous oligometastatic pancreatic cancer (up to 5 lesions) receiving SBRT to all lesions (including all oligometastases and the primary tumor) were performed. Another comparable group of patients with similar baseline characteristics, including metastatic burden, SBRT doses, and chemotherapy regimens, receiving SBRT to the primary tumor alone were identified. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression frees survival (PFS), polyprogression free survival (PPFS) and adverse events.
    RESULTS: There were 59 and 158 patients receiving SBRT to all lesions and to the primary tumor alone. The median OS of patients with SBRT to all lesions and the primary tumor alone was 10.9 months (95% CI 10.2-11.6 months) and 9.3 months (95% CI 8.8-9.8 months) (P < 0.001). The median PFS of two groups was 6.5 months (95% CI 5.6-7.4 months) and 4.1 months (95% CI 3.8-4.4 months) (P < 0.001). The median PPFS of two groups was 9.8 months (95% CI 8.9-10.7 months) and 7.8 months (95% CI 7.2-8.4 months) (P < 0.001). Additionally, 14 (23.7%) and 32 (20.2%) patients in two groups had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxicity.
    CONCLUSIONS: SBRT to all oligometastases and the primary tumor in patients with pancreatic cancer may improve survival, which needs prospective verification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肾细胞癌(RCC)传统上被认为是耐放射性的。正因为如此,常规放疗(RT)主要是缓解有症状的转移性疾病.立体定向消融放射治疗(SABR)的实施使安全地提供更高的消融剂量成为可能,改变肾脏放射抗性范式。SABR越来越多地被纳入治疗局部复发的多学科框架,寡进,和寡转移疾病。此外,越来越多的证据表明,SABR作为一种非侵入性的确定性治疗,适用于医学上无法手术或拒绝手术的原发性RCC患者,不适合侵入性消融(手术或经皮技术),或需要术后透析的高风险。在孤立肾或预先存在的慢性疾病(eGFR差)的病例中,甚至有令人鼓舞的结果。保留肾功能的可能性很高。对支持消融性放疗(SABR)在原发性,经常性,已进行转移性肾癌。鉴于高RT剂量的潜在免疫原性作用,我们还探索了将SABR与系统治疗相结合的新机会.此外,我们探讨了这种疾病的未来发展方向和正在进行的临床试验。
    Renal cell cancer (RCC) has traditionally been considered radioresistant. Because of this, conventional radiotherapy (RT) has been predominantly relegated to the palliation of symptomatic metastatic disease. The implementation of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has made it possible to deliver higher ablative doses safely, shifting the renal radioresistance paradigm. SABR has increasingly been adopted into the multidisciplinary framework for the treatment of locally recurrent, oligoprogressive, and oligometastatic disease. Furthermore, there is growing evidence of SABR as a non-invasive definitive therapy in patients with primary RCC who are medically inoperable or who decline surgery, unsuited to invasive ablation (surgery or percutaneous techniques), or at high-risk of requiring post-operative dialysis. Encouraging outcomes have even been reported in cases of solitary kidney or pre-existing chronic disease (poor eGFR), with a high likelihood of preserving renal function. A review of clinical evidence supporting the use of ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in primary, recurrent, and metastatic RCC has been conducted. Given the potential immunogenic effect of the high RT doses, we also explore emerging opportunities to combine SABR with systemic treatments. In addition, we explore future directions and ongoing clinical trials in the evolving landscape of this disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:寡转移疾病(OMD)局部治疗的疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估OMD分类系统的预后实用性,并探讨哪些群体可能从立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)中受益。
    方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了45例(52个部位)实体瘤和1-3例颅外寡转移瘤患者,他们在2018年1月至2021年12月期间在我们机构接受了SBRT治疗。OMD状态是根据欧洲放射治疗和肿瘤学学会(ESTRO)和欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)分类系统进行分类的。本地控制(LC),总生存期(OS),使用Kaplan-Meier方法分析各组的无进展生存期(PFS)。根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)5.0版评估急性和晚期不良事件(AE)。
    结果:中位随访期为14个月(范围:0-48个月)。从头(首次诊断为OMD)的患者人数,重复(OMD的先前历史),和诱导(既往有多转移病史)OMD组分别为15、17和13。整个LC的费率为一年,从头,重复,诱导队列为87.2%,87.5%,90.2%,和83.9%,分别(p=0.80)。各组一年PFS率为35.0%,56.7%,和29.9%,分别(p=0.58)。各组一年OS率为80.0%,86.2%,80.8%,分别(p=0.50)。5例患者发生2级或3级AE(10.4%)。没有观察到4级或5级AE。
    结论:SBRT对于局部控制是安全有效的。重复OMD的患者表现出更长的PFS趋势,提示此亚组可能受益于转移部位的局部治疗.
    OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of local therapy for oligometastatic disease (OMD) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic utility of the classification system for OMD and explore which groups may benefit from stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
    METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 45 patients (52 sites) with solid tumors and 1-3 extracranial oligometastases who underwent SBRT for all metastases at our institution between January 2018 and December 2021. OMD states were classified based on the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) classification system. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) for each group were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Acute and late adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
    RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 14 months (range: 0-48 months). The numbers of patients in the de novo (first diagnosis of OMD), repeat (previous history of OMD), and induced (previous history of polymetastatic disease) OMD groups were 15, 17, and 13, respectively. The LC rates at one year for the entire, de novo, repeat, and induced cohorts were 87.2%, 87.5%, 90.2%, and 83.9%, respectively (p=0.80). The one-year PFS rates for each group were 35.0%, 56.7%, and 29.9%, respectively (p=0.58). The one-year OS rates for each group were 80.0%, 86.2%, and 80.8%, respectively (p=0.50). Grade 2 or 3 AEs occurred in five patients (10.4%). No grade 4 or 5 AEs were observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is safe and highly effective for local control. Patients with repeat OMD demonstrated a trend of longer PFS, suggesting that this subgroup may benefit from local therapy at metastatic sites.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:淋巴结前列腺癌寡转移根据其部位有不同的治疗方法:盆腔是局部淋巴结;相反,主动脉旁淋巴结被认为是远处转移。该研究的目的是比较立体定向身体放射治疗(SBRT)治疗的主动脉旁和盆腔寡转移。方法:回顾性分析。从头转移或结外疾病被排除。进行了单变量和多变量分析;还评估了复发的模式。应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来创建可比较的队列。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点是生化无复发生存期(BRFS),无ADT生存(ADTFS),无多转移生存期(PMFS),局部无进展生存期(LPFS),和复发模式。结果:总的来说,对164例患者(127例盆腔和37例主动脉旁)的240例淋巴结寡转移进行了治疗。骨盆和主动脉旁患者的中位PFS为20和11个月,分别(p=0.042)。在多变量分析中没有证实差异(p=0.06)。BRFS中位数为16个月和9个月,分别,在骨盆和主动脉旁组中(p=0.07)。未检测到ADTFS或PMFS的统计学差异。5年累计LPFS为90.5%。在PSM中,所有研究终点均未检测到统计学显著差异.结论:受主动脉旁疾病影响的患者的PFS可能与盆腔疾病相当;两个队列的局部控制率都很高。我们的结果也支持SBRT用于主动脉旁转移。
    Background: Lymph-nodal prostate cancer oligometastases are differently treated according to their site: pelvic are locoregional lymph nodes; instead, para-aortic lymph nodes are considered as distant metastases. The aim of the study was a comparison between para-aortic and pelvic oligometastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis. De novo metastatic or extra-nodal disease were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed; the pattern of recurrence was also evaluated. A propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to create comparable cohorts. The primary end-point was the progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end-points were biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), ADT-free survival (ADTFS), polymetastases-free survival (PMFS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), and pattern of relapse. Results: In total, 240 lymph-nodal oligometastases in 164 patients (127 pelvic and 37 para-aortic) were treated. The median PFS was 20 and 11 months in pelvic and para-aortic patients, respectively (p = 0.042). The difference was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.06). The median BRFS was 16 and 9 months, respectively, in the pelvic and para-aortic group (p = 0.07). No statistically significant differences for ADTFS or PMFS were detected. The cumulative 5-year LPFS was 90.5%. In PSM, no statistically significant differences for all the study end-points were detected. Conclusions: Patients affected by para-aortic disease might have a PFS comparable to pelvic disease; local control is high in both cohorts. Our results also support the use of SBRT for para-aortic metastases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    “晚期乳腺癌国际共识会议”(ABC)的基本原理是使用循证方法将全球晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者的治疗标准化。目的还在于确保所有国家的患者根据当前的治疗建议和标准接受适当的治疗。第七届晚期乳腺癌国际共识会议(ABC7)于2023年11月9日至12日在葡萄牙里斯本举行。ABC7专注于转移性疾病以及局部晚期和炎性乳腺癌。专题包括治疗寡转移患者,软脑膜疾病,脑转移的治疗,和孕妇ABC。和往年一样,来自世界各地的患者倡导者参加了共识会议,并参与了决策。
    The rationale behind the \"International Consensus Conference for Advanced Breast Cancer\" (ABC) is to standardize the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer worldwide using an evidence-based approach. The aim is also to ensure that patients in all countries receive adequate treatment based on current treatment recommendations and standards. The 7th International Consensus Conference on Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC7) took place from November 9 to 12, 2023 in Lisbon/Portugal. ABC7 focused on metastatic disease as well as on locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer. Special topics included the treatment of oligometastatic patients, leptomeningeal disease, treatment of brain metastases, and pregnant women with ABC. As in previous years, patient advocates from all over the world participated in the consensus conference and were involved in decision making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在寡转移的多学科管理中,持久性,或复发性(MPR)卵巢癌,放射治疗(RT)正在成为一种越来越有价值的治疗方法,以潜在地改善疾病的慢性性。粒子束RT已被证明对几种妇科恶性肿瘤有效,但是到目前为止还没有卵巢癌的数据。
    这是一个真实的世界,回顾性,双机构,单臂研究旨在评估碳离子RT(CIRT)在这种情况下的有效性和安全性。共同第一终点是1年和2年精算局部控制(LC)率和客观缓解率(ORR),以“每个病变”为基础。次要终点是毒性。使用Kaplan-Meier方法评估精算结果,同时使用Log-rank检验探索潜在预测因子。双变量逻辑回归用于分析预测每个病变的完全反应的因素。
    26例患者,共36个病灶未接受CIRT,总剂量中位数为52.8Gy[RBE](范围:39-64Gy[RBE])。五名患者接受CIRT再照射。CIRT期间未同时进行全身治疗。治疗后12个月内,17个病变(47%)获得完全缓解,18个病变(50%)获得部分缓解,ORR为97%.完全反应的实现与每个分数的剂量有关(>4.2Gy[RBE],p=0.04)和总剂量(>52,8Gy[RBE],p=0.05)。1年LC为92%,2年LC为83%,根据CR(p=0.007)和GTV≤14cm3(p=0.024)的实现。未治疗和再次照射的患者均未记录到>3级毒性。PARP-i和抗VEGF似乎不会加剧严重毒性的风险。
    CIRT在MPR卵巢癌中是有效和安全的,即使在重新照射的情况下。需要最大的队列研究和更长时间的随访来证实这些数据。
    UNASSIGNED: In the multidisciplinary management of oligometastatic, persistent, or recurrent (MPR) ovarian cancer, radiotherapy (RT) is becoming a more and more worthwhile treatment to potentially improve the chronicity of the disease. Particle beam RT has proved to be effective in several gynecological malignancies, but so far no data are available for ovarian cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a real-world, retrospective, bi-institutional, single-arm study aimed to assess the effectiveness and the safety of carbon ion RT (CIRT) in this setting. The co-first endpoints are 1-year and 2-year actuarial local control (LC) rates and the objective response rate (ORR) defined on a \"per lesion\" basis. The secondary endpoint was toxicity. Actuarial outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method while potential predictors were explored using the Log-rank test. Bi-variable logistic regression was employed in the analysis of factors predicting the complete response on a per-lesion basis.
    UNASSIGNED: 26 patients accounting for a total of 36 lesions underwent CIRT with a total median dose of 52.8 Gy[RBE] (range: 39-64 Gy[RBE]). Five patients received CIRT for re-irradiation. No concomitant systemic therapies were administered during CIRT. Within 12 months after the treatment, 17 lesions (47 %) achieved complete response while 18 (50 %) obtained a partial response with an ORR of 97 %. The achievement of a complete response is related to the dose per fraction (>4.2 Gy[RBE], p = 0.04) and total dose (>52,8 Gy[RBE], p = 0.05). The 1-year LC was 92 % and the 2-year LC was 83 %, according to the achievement of a CR (p = 0.007) and GTV ≤ 14 cm3 (p = 0.024). No grade > 3 toxicities were recorded both in naïve and re-irradiated patients. PARP-i and anti-VEGF seemed not to exacerbate the risk of severe toxicities.
    UNASSIGNED: CIRT was effective and safe in MPR ovarian cancers, even in the case of re-irradiation. Largest cohort studies and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    寡聚转移酶被定义为小于或等于5的可检测转移的数目。在去势耐药的寡转移性前列腺癌(CRoligoMPC)中,转移定向消融放疗(MDRT)的研究很少。我们的研究回顾性分析了8个法国高容量放疗中心接受MDRT治疗的CRoligiMPC病例。根据PCWG标准(PFS),OS和PFS定义为MDRT的第一天与死亡(OS)或进展之间的延迟。OS和PFS根据KaplanMeyer进行评估,用对数秩检验比较曲线。Logistic回归用于确定预后的预测因素:骨与淋巴结转移,ISUP等级,MDRT时的PSA倍增时间(PSADT),时间去势抵抗。107名患者被纳入研究,在197个转移灶中接受了MDRT.对于总人口来说,中位随访时间为25.2个月(1,4-145个月).OS在2年为93%,在3年为81,4%。在2年,仅有淋巴结转移的患者中有100%存活,而有骨转移的患者中有88,7%(p=0,72)。中位PFS为12,6个月(IC95%[9,6;17]),与队列中其他患者相比,仅淋巴结疾病患者之间没有差异。PSADT>6个月的患者的PFS为18,2个月(10,0;32,4),而PSADT劣于6个月的患者为10,7个月(8,9;14,3)。然而,这一差异并不显著.我们没有发现ISUP等级(1-2对3-4-5)和PFS之间的相关性,激素敏感性持续时间和PFS之间也是如此。接受MDRT治疗CRoligoMPC的患者在3年时预后良好,OS为81,6%。PSADT超过6个月可能与更好的PFS有关。MDRT策略可以推迟新的全身治疗的开始,中位PFS>1年。
    Oligometastases are defined as a number of detectable metastases less or equal to 5. In castrate-resistant oligo metastatic prostate Cancer (CR oligoM PC), Metastases-Directed Ablative radiotherapy (MDRT) is poorly investigated. Our study retrospectively reviewed the cases of CR oligoM PC treated with MDRT in 8 French high-volume radiotherapy centers. OS and PFS are defined as the delay between the first day of MDRT and death (OS) or progression according to PCWG criteria (PFS). OS and PFS are evaluated according to Kaplan Meyer, curves are compared with log rank test. Logistic regression was used to identify predictive factors for outcome: bone versus node metastasis, ISUP grade, PSA doubling Time (PSADT) at the time of MDRT, time to castration resistance. 107 patients were included in the study, among those 197 metastases received MDRT. For the overall population, the median follow-up was 25.2 months (1,4-145). OS was 93 % at 2 years and 81,4% at 3 years. At 2 years, 100 % of patients with node-only metastasis were alive versus 88,7% among those who have bone metastases (p = 0,72). The median PFS was 12,6 months (IC 95 % [9,6; 17]), with no difference among patients with node only disease versus the rest of the cohort. The PFS was 18,2 months (10,0; 32,4) in patients with PSADT >6 months versus 10,7 months (8,9; 14,3) when PSADT was inferior to 6 months. However, this difference did not reach significant. We did not find a correlation neither between ISUP grade (1-2 versus 3-4-5) and PFS, nor between hormone-sensitivity duration and PFS. Patients receiving MDRT for CR oligoM PC have a good prognosis with 81,6% OS at 3 years. PSA DT longer than 6 months could be related to better PFS. MDRT strategy could postpone the onset of new systemic treatment with median PFS >1 year.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:立体定向身体放射治疗(SBRT)越来越多地用于治疗寡转移(OM)环境中的疾病,因为越来越多的证据表明其有效性和安全性。鉴于前瞻性研究中的人口代表性较低,我们对接受SBRT治疗的HNC颅外OM患者的结局进行了系统评价和荟萃分析.
    方法:对Cochrane进行了系统评价,Medline,和Embase数据库从开始到2022年8月查询了接受立体定向放射治疗的颅外OMHNC的研究。多转移患者(>5个病灶),混合主要队列未能单独报告HNC,缺乏对所有病变的治疗,非定量终点,和其他明确的治疗方法(手术,常规放射治疗,和放射消融)被排除。荟萃分析检查了每个病变12个月和24个月局部对照(LC)的合并效果,无进展生存期(PFS),总生存率(OS)。使用DerSimonian和Laird方法评估加权随机效应,使用I2统计量和CochranQtest评估异质性。为每个端点生成森林地块。
    结果:15项研究符合纳入标准(639例患者,831个病变),12个有资格进行定量合成,具有共同的终点和足够的报告。14项研究是回顾性的,一个单一的前瞻性试验。研究很小,中位数为32例患者(范围:6-81)和63个病变(范围:6-126)。OM的定义各不相同,最多转移两到五个,混合同步和异时病变,和一些研究,包括少进病变。最常见的转移部位是肺。以1-10个部分(20-70Gy)递送辐射。一年期LC(LC1),在12项研究中报道,为86.9%(95%置信区间[CI]:79.3-91.9%)。LC2为77.9%(95%CI:66.4-86.3%),具有不同研究的异质性。在五项研究中报告了PFS,PFS1为43.0%(95%CI:35.0-51.4%),PFS2为23.9%(95%CI:17.8-31.2%),具有不同研究的同质性。在九项研究中分析了OS,OS1为80.1%(95%CI:74.2-85.0%),OS2为60.7%(95%CI:51.3-69.4%)。治疗耐受性良好,没有报告的4或5级毒性。报告时,3级毒性率均匀低于5%。
    结论:SBRT提供出色的LC和有前途的OS,在OMHNC中具有可接受的毒性。耐用的PFS仍然很少见,强调在这一人群中需要有效的局部或全身治疗。有必要对并行和辅助治疗进行进一步的研究。
    BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat disease in the oligometastatic (OM) setting due to mounting evidence demonstrating its efficacy and safety. Given the low population representation in prospective studies, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of HNC patients with extracranial OM disease treated with SBRT.
    METHODS: A systematic review was conducted with Cochrane, Medline, and Embase databases queried from inception to August 2022 for studies with extracranial OM HNC treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Polymetastatic patients (>five lesions), mixed-primary cohorts failing to report HNC separately, lack of treatment to all lesions, nonquantitative endpoints, and other definitive treatments (surgery, conventional radiotherapy, and radioablation) were excluded. The meta-analysis examined the pooled effects of 12- and 24-month local control (LC) per lesion, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Weighted random-effects were assessed using the DerSimonian and Laird method, with heterogeneity evaluated using the I2 statistic and Cochran Qtest. Forest plots were generated for each endpoint.
    RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria (639 patients, 831 lesions), with twelve eligible for quantitative synthesis with common endpoints and sufficient reporting. Fourteen studies were retrospective, with a single prospective trial. Studies were small, with a median of 32 patients (range: 6-81) and 63 lesions (range: 6-126). The OM definition varied, with a maximum of two to five metastases, mixed synchronous and metachronous lesions, and a few studies including oligoprogressive lesions. The most common site of metastasis was the lung. Radiation was delivered in 1-10 fractions (20-70 Gy). The one-year LC (LC1), reported in 12 studies, was 86.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.3-91.9%). LC2 was 77.9% (95% CI: 66.4-86.3%), with heterogeneity across studies. PFS was reported in five studies, with a PFS1 of 43.0% (95% CI: 35.0-51.4%) and PFS2 of 23.9% (95% CI: 17.8-31.2%), with homogeneity across studies. OS was analyzed in nine studies, demonstrating an OS1 of 80.1% (95% CI: 74.2-85.0%) and OS2 of 60.7% (95% CI: 51.3-69.4%). Treatment was well tolerated with no reported grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Grade 3 toxicity rates were uniformly below 5% when reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: SBRT offers excellent LC and promising OS, with acceptable toxicities in OM HNC. Durable PFS remains rare, highlighting the need for effective local or systemic therapies in this population. Further investigations on concurrent and adjuvant therapies are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号