Background/Objectives: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a non-invasive prenatal test used to screen for common trisomies (target cfDNA) that can be expanded to assess all autosomal chromosomes (genome-wide cfDNA). As cfDNA testing gains popularity, it is crucial to examine the factors influencing the decision-making process of pregnant individuals when choosing between these two approaches. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 190 individuals undergoing cfDNA testing for aneuploidy screening, according to the current screening protocol, were allowed to make their own choice between target and genome-wide cfDNA testing. They were asked to complete a first survey at 11-13 weeks, designed to explore their characteristics, preferences, and satisfaction with the prenatal genetic counseling session, as well as a Decisional Conflict Scale. A postnatal survey was administered three months after delivery, including the Decisional Regret Scale and two open questions. Results: 84% of participants opted for genome-wide cfDNA. However, 17% found the decision challenging, and 14% felt that the results might increase anxiety. No significant differences in participant characteristics were found when comparing decisions between genome-wide and target cfDNA. However, significant differences were observed regarding ethnicity (p = <0.001), educational level (p = 0.029), previous cfDNA experience (p = 0.004), and having sufficient information when comparing termination options (p = 0.002). After delivery, only 4% would have changed their decision. Conclusions: Individuals, regardless of their characteristics, prefer genome-wide cfDNA; however, the complexity of the results necessitates enhanced genetic education for prenatal care clinicians.

UNASSIGNED: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) serve as valuable tools for connecting initial genetic discoveries with clinical applications in disease risk estimation. However, limited studies have explored the association between PRS and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), particularly in predicting GDM risk among Chinese populations.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the relationship between PRS and GDM and explore the predictive capability of PRS for GDM risk in a Chinese population.
UNASSIGNED: A prospective cohort study was conducted, which included 283 GDM and 2,258 non-GDM cases based on demographic information on pregnancies. GDM was diagnosed using the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-28 weeks. The strength of the association between PRS and GDM odds was assessed employing odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) derived from logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic curves, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were employed to evaluate the improvement in prediction achieved by the new model.
UNASSIGNED: Women who developed GDM exhibited significantly higher PRS compared to control individuals (OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.33-3.07). The PRS value remained positively associated with fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 1-hour post-glucose load (1-h OGTT), and 2-hour post-glucose load (2-h OGTT) (all p < 0.05). The incorporation of PRS led to a statistically significant improvement in the area under the curve (0.71, 95% CI: 0.66-0.75, p = 0.024) and improved discrimination and classification (IDI: 0.007, 95% CI: 0.003-0.012, p < 0.001; NRI: 0.258, 95% CI: 0.135-0.382, p < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: This study highlights the increased odds of GDM associated with higher PRS values and modest improvements in predictive capability for GDM.

Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) screening is a valuable tool in clinical practice for detecting chromosomal abnormalities and autosomal dominant (AD) conditions. This study introduces a novel proof-of-concept assay designed for autosomal recessive (AR) cffDNA screening, focusing on cases involving the NPC1 gene. We aim to illustrate the significant benefits of AR cffDNA screening in managing high-risk pregnancies, specifically where biallelic pathogenic variants in NPC1 cause Niemann-Pick disease, type C1 (NPC), a disorder marked by progressive neurodegeneration. Three participants for this study were recruited and gave consent to a hospital in Saudi Arabia. These participants were either carriers of NPC or had a first- or second-degree relative affected by the disorder. No specific criteria were set for the age of the participants. All were between 15 and 18 weeks of gestation. Using amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), we analyzed the zygosity and variants in cffDNA extracted from maternal peripheral blood. After amplicon NGS, analysis was completed by a custom data analysis pipeline that included in-house-built data processing scripts and commonly used software packages. Importantly, the results were not disclosed to the patients. Our findings showed that in all three cases, AR cffDNA screening results were consistent with standard invasive diagnostic testing. This screening method offers several advantages: it provides critical information to families earlier in the pregnancy compared to invasive diagnostic tests, and it helps to alleviate parental anxiety. Moreover, this non-invasive method can determine pregnancy status in the first trimester for known familial variants. Future research may extend this approach to screen for known disease-causing variants in common AR conditions.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine whether there is a correlation between different types of ventricular septal defects (VSD) and chromosomal abnormalities in the low-risk setting of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and to evaluate the prognosis of fetuses with varying types of VSD.
METHODS: Cases of pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis due to fetal VSD were collected by Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology from May 2017 to May 2022. Exclusions were made for those without NIPT, with high-risk NIPT results, genetic disorders, and those lost to follow-up. Data collected included ultrasound classification of VSD, prenatal NIPT results, copy-number variations (CNVs) results, and neonatal outcomes.
RESULTS: The prevalence of pathogenic CNVs was investigated in 74 cases of VSDs. Of these cases, 45 were isolated VSDs (9 muscular and 36 non-muscular) and 29 were non-isolated VSDs (10 with intracardiac and 19 with extra-cardiac structural anomalies). The results revealed that the incidence of pathogenic CNVs was lower in isolated VSDs compared to non-isolated VSDs in a low-risk NIPT condition (χ2 = 9.344, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of pathogenic CNVs between VSDs with intracardiac and extra-cardiac structural anomalies (P = 0.541). Moreover, VSDs associated with intracardiac structural anomalies had the highest rate of surgical intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: When NIPT is low-risk and VSD is isolated, the likelihood of fetal chromosomal defects is not increased. However, if there are intra- or extra-cardiac structural abnormalities present alongside VSD, the possibility of pathogenic CNV is considerably greater, necessitating invasive prenatal diagnosis. Isolated muscular VSDs usually do not require surgery, which can be used as a basis for prenatal counseling regarding fetal VSD.

The inherent normativity of HTA can be conceptualized as a result of normative commitments, a concept that we further specify to encompass moral, epistemological and ontological commitments at play in the practice of HTA. Based on examples from literature, and an analysis of the example of assessing Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT), we will show that inevitable normative decisions in conducting an assessment commits the HTA practitioner to moral (regarding what makes a health technology desirable), ontological (regarding which effects of health technology are conceivable), and epistemological (regarding how to obtain reliable information about health technology) norms. This highlights and supports the need for integrating normative analysis and stakeholder participation, providing guidance to HTA practitioners when making normative choices. This will foster a shared understanding between those who conduct, use, or are impacted by assessments regarding what are conceivable and desirable outcomes of using health technology, and how to collect reliable information to assess whether these outcomes are (going to be) realized. It also provides more insight into the implications of different normative choices.

Aim This study aims to assess the effect of implementing an enhanced prenatal genetic checklist to guide the provider\'s discussion on both screening and diagnostic options for fetal aneuploidy testing at the initial prenatal visit. Methods A retrospective quality improvement (QI) project was performed at a single, large, urban academic medical center. The implementation of this project was prospective; however, data was examined retrospectively after the QI initiative was implemented for three months. Patients were included if they were less than 24 weeks gestational age with a live intrauterine gestation at their initial obstetric (OB) visit. Patients less than 18 years old at the initial OB visit were excluded. The results were analyzed using the statistical software R. Chi-squared tests were used to examine proportional differences between the pre- and post-intervention groups with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics and documented genetic counseling discussions. Results A total of 416 patients were included in the final cohort. As measured by documentation, the rate of discussion of diagnostic prenatal genetic testing increased significantly from the pre-intervention proportion of 54% to the post-intervention proportion of 72% (p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis of patients with advanced maternal age, the rate of discussion of diagnostic prenatal genetic testing increased significantly from the pre-intervention proportion of 53% to the post-intervention proportion of 83% (p = 0.003), and the rate of genetics counseling referrals made at the initial prenatal visit increased significantly from 4% pre-intervention to 38% post-intervention (p < 0.001). Conclusions The use of an enhanced prenatal genetic checklist led to increased discussion of diagnostic fetal aneuploidy testing and increased rates of referral to genetics counseling.

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a quite popular approach for detecting fetal genomic aneuploidies. However, due to the limitations on sequencing read length and coverage, NIPT suffers a bottleneck on further improving performance and conducting earlier detection. The errors mainly come from reference biases and population polymorphism. To break this bottleneck, we proposed NIPT-PG, which enables the NIPT algorithm to learn from population data. A pan-genome model is introduced to incorporate variant and polymorphic loci information from tested population. Subsequently, we proposed a sequence-to-graph alignment method, which considers the read mis-match rates during the mapping process, and an indexing method using hash indexing and adjacency lists to accelerate the read alignment process. Finally, by integrating multi-source aligned read and polymorphic sites across the pan-genome, NIPT-PG obtains a more accurate z-score, thereby improving the accuracy of chromosomal aneuploidy detection. We tested NIPT-PG on two simulated datasets and 745 real-world cell-free DNA sequencing data sets from pregnant women. Results demonstrate that NIPT-PG outperforms the standard z-score test. Furthermore, combining experimental and theoretical analyses, we demonstrate the probably approximately correct learnability of NIPT-PG. In summary, NIPT-PG provides a new perspective for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies detection. NIPT-PG may have broad applications in clinical testing, and its detection results can serve as a reference for false positive samples approaching the critical threshold.

It is now well-established that non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), originally designed to screen cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood for the presence of common fetal trisomies, can lead to incidental detection of occult maternal malignancies. Retrospective evaluations have demonstrated that the detection of multiple copy number alterations in cfDNA is particularly suggestive of an incipient tumor and that cancer detection rates not only depend on tumor biology but also on applied NIPT technologies and downstream diagnostic investigations. Since the identification of a maternal cancer in pregnancy has implications for both woman and the unborn child, prospective studies are needed to provide evidence on best clinical practices and on clinical utility in terms of patient outcomes.

(1) Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a screening test for fetal aneuploidy using cell-free fetal DNA. The fetal fragments (FF) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are derived from apoptotic trophoblast of the placenta. The level of fetal cfDNA is known to be influenced by gestational age, multiple pregnancies, maternal weight, and height. (2) Methods: This study is a single-center retrospective observational study which examines the relationship between the fetal fraction (FF) of cell-free DNA in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies. A total of 1393 samples were collected between 10 weeks and 6 days, and 25 weeks and 3 days of gestation. (3) Results: Hypertensive disease of pregnancy (HDP) occurred more frequently in the low FF group than the normal FF group (5.17% vs. 1.91%, p = 0.001). Although the rates of small for gestational age (SGA) and placental abruption did not significantly differ between groups, the composite outcome was significantly higher in the low FF group (7.76% vs. 3.64%, p = 0.002). Furthermore, women who later experienced complications such as HDP or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) had significantly lower plasma FF levels compared to those without complications (p < 0.001). After adjustments, the low FF group exhibited a significantly higher likelihood of placental compromise (adjusted odds ratio: 1.946). (4) Conclusions: Low FF in NIPT during the first and early second trimesters is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly HDP, suggesting its potential as a predictive marker for such outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been clinically available in Australia on a user-pays basis since 2012. There are numerous providers, with available tests ranging from targeted NIPT (only trisomies 21, 18, and 13 +/- sex chromosome aneuploidy) to genome-wide NIPT. While NIPT is being implemented in the public health care systems of other countries, in Australia, the implementation of NIPT has proceeded without public funding. The aim of this study was to investigate how NIPT has been integrated into antenatal care across Australia and reveal the successes and challenges in its implementation in this context.
METHODS: An anonymous online survey was conducted from September to October 2022. Invitations to participate were sent to healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the provision of NIPT in Australia through professional society mailing lists and networks. Participants were asked questions on their knowledge of NIPT, delivery of NIPT, and post-test management of results.
RESULTS: A total of 475 HCPs responded, comprising 232 (48.8%) obstetricians, 167 (35.2%) general practitioners, 32 (6.7%) midwives, and 44 (9.3%) genetic specialists. NIPT was most commonly offered as a first-tier test, with most HCPs (n = 279; 60.3%) offering it to patients as a choice between NIPT and combined first-trimester screening. Fifty-three percent (n = 245) of respondents always offered patients a choice between NIPT for the common autosomal trisomies and expanded (including genome-wide) NIPT. This choice was understood as supporting patient autonomy and informed consent. Cost was seen as a major barrier to access to NIPT, for both targeted and expanded tests. Equitable access, increasing time demands on HCPs, and staying up to date with advances were frequently reported as major challenges in delivering NIPT.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate substantial variation in the clinical implementation of NIPT in Australia, including in the offers of expanded screening options. After a decade of clinical use, Australian clinicians still report ongoing challenges in the clinical and equitable provision of NIPT.