%0 Journal Article
%T Understanding the Normativity of Health Technology Assessment: Ontological, Moral, and Epistemological Commitments.
%A Bloemen B
%A Oortwijn W
%A van der Wilt GJ
%J Health Care Anal
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Jun 17
%M 38884685
%F 2.236
%R 10.1007/s10728-024-00487-x
%X The inherent normativity of HTA can be conceptualized as a result of normative commitments, a concept that we further specify to encompass moral, epistemological and ontological commitments at play in the practice of HTA. Based on examples from literature, and an analysis of the example of assessing Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT), we will show that inevitable normative decisions in conducting an assessment commits the HTA practitioner to moral (regarding what makes a health technology desirable), ontological (regarding which effects of health technology are conceivable), and epistemological (regarding how to obtain reliable information about health technology) norms. This highlights and supports the need for integrating normative analysis and stakeholder participation, providing guidance to HTA practitioners when making normative choices. This will foster a shared understanding between those who conduct, use, or are impacted by assessments regarding what are conceivable and desirable outcomes of using health technology, and how to collect reliable information to assess whether these outcomes are (going to be) realized. It also provides more insight into the implications of different normative choices.