纳米塑料(NP,尺寸<1000纳米)是普遍存在的塑料颗粒,环境中可能比微塑料更丰富;然而,由于分析的局限性,强调它们在淡水中分布动态的研究很少见。这里,我们调查了珠江全段地表水样品(n=30)中9种NPs聚合物的时空水平(地点,n=15)使用热解气相色谱-质谱(Py-GC/MS)。检测到六种聚合物,包括聚苯乙烯(PS),聚氯乙烯(PVC),尼龙/聚酰胺66(PA66),聚酯(PES),聚(甲基丙烯酸甲酯)(PMMA)和聚乙烯(PE),其中三种聚合物显示出高检测频率;PS(冬季和夏季为100%),其次是PVC(冬季为73%,夏季为87%)和PA66(冬季为53%,夏季为67%)。时空分布表明,与水产养殖(AQ)和航运(SHP)相关的站点显示出比人类住区(HS)和废水处理厂(WWTP)更高的NP水平(p=0.004)。与农村地区相比,城市地区的NP平均水平相对较高(p=0.04),尽管没有明显的季节性差异(p=0.78)。例如,珠江的平均PS水平依次为:夏季AQ411.55µg/L>SHP81.75µg/L>WWTP56.66µg/L>HS47.75µg/L,冬季HS188.1µg/L>SHP103.55µg/L>AQ74.7µg/L>WWTP62.1µg/L。来源分配显示,城市场地之间的生活塑料废物排放贡献更大,虽然农村地区通过水产养殖显示出更高的贡献,农业,和表面径流对NP污染的影响。风险评估显示,SHP和AQ站点的NP在污染负荷指数(PLI)方面比WWTP和HS站点的综合风险更高。关于聚合物危害指数(HI),夏季80%的采样点和冬季60%的采样点构成了III级聚合物风险,PVC构成最高的风险。这项研究为珠江NP的季节性污染和聚合物风险提供了新的见解,这将有助于规范该地区塑料的生产和消费。环境含义:淡水资源中野外纳米塑料(NPs)的污染动力学仍然知之甚少,主要归因于分析约束。本研究旨在强调珠江各种土地利用类型中NP的时空分布。城乡比较,季节性比较,他们的组成概况,潜在来源,与环境因素的相互作用,以及从柳溪水库到珠江三角洲(PRD)地区的整个珠江中所研究聚合物的生态和聚合物危害评估。这项研究,具有相对大量的样品和NP聚合物,将为中国重要的淡水河流系统之一中纳米塑料颗粒的污染状况提供新的见解。
Nanoplastics (NPs, size <1000 nm) are ubiquitous plastic particles, potentially more abundant than microplastics in the environment; however, studies highlighting their distribution dynamics in freshwater are rare due to analytical limitations. Here, we investigated spatiotemporal levels of nine polymers of NPs in surface water samples (n = 30) from the full stretch of the Pearl River (sites, n = 15) using pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS). Six polymers were detected, including polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), nylon/polyamide 66 (PA66), polyester (PES), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and polyethylene (PE), where three polymers showed high detection frequencies; PS (100 % in winter and summer), followed by PVC (73 % in winter and 87 % in summer) and PA66 (53 % in winter and 67 % in summer). The spatiotemporal distribution revealed the sites related to aquaculture (AQ) and shipping (SHP) showed higher NP levels than those of human settlement (HS) and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) (p = 0.004), and relatively high average levels of NPs in the urban sites compared to rural sites (p = 0.04), albeit showed no obvious seasonal differences (p = 0.78). For instance, the average PS levels in the Pearl River were in the following order: AQ 411.55 µg/L > SHP 81.75 µg/L > WWTP 56.66 µg/L > HS 47.75 µg/L in summer and HS 188.1 µg/L > SHP 103.55 µg/L > AQ 74.7 µg/L > WWTP 62.1 µg/L in winter. Source apportionment showed a higher contribution through domestic plastic waste emissions among urban sites, while rural sites showed an elevated contribution via aquaculture, agriculture, and surface run-off to the NP pollution. Risk assessment revealed that NPs at SHP and AQ sites posed a higher integrated risk in terms of pollution load index (PLI) than those at WWTP and HS sites. Regarding polymer hazard index (HI), 80 % of sampling sites in summer and 60 % of sampling sites in winter posed level III polymer risk, with PVC posing the highest risk. This study provides novel insights into the seasonal contamination and polymer risks of NP in the Pearl River, which will help to regulate the production and consumption of plastics in the region. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS: The contamination dynamics of field
nanoplastics (NPs) in freshwater resources remain little understood, mainly attributed to analytical constraints. This study aims to highlight the spatiotemporal distribution of NPs in the Pearl River among various land use types, urban-rural comparison, seasonal comparison, their compositional profiles, potential sources, interaction with environmental factors, and ecological and polymer hazard assessments of investigated polymers in the full stretch of the Pearl River from Liuxi Reservoir to the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region. This study, with a comparatively large number of samples and NP polymers, will offer novel insights into the contamination profiles of nano-sized plastic particles in one of the important freshwater riverine systems in China.