The criteria for clinical diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) are not sensitive in young children. Recognition is easier when one of their parents has been diagnosed with this condition, and the causal mutation is known. We present a case of a girl with isolated café-au-lait spots, whose father was diagnosed with NF1. However, both were found to carry different de novo mutations in the NF1 gene. This possibility has significant implications for the diagnostic process and genetic counseling.

UNASSIGNED: Griscelli syndrome type 2 (GS2) and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) are both rare genetic disorders, but their coexistence has not been documented prior to this report.
UNASSIGNED: We present the case of a 4-year-old girl initially diagnosed with GS2 due to albinism and immunodeficiency, and later with NF1, manifested by the development of multiple café-au-lait macules (CALMs) and MRI findings. The patient was the second child of consanguineous parents and exhibited symptoms early, with silver-gray hair at birth and subsequent health complications at 9 months. GS2 was confirmed via the identification of a homozygous frameshift variant in the RAB27A gene, and a de novo heterozygous splice site mutation in the NF1 gene established the NF1 diagnosis. Her treatment included hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and ongoing surveillance for NF1-associated complications.
UNASSIGNED: This case emphasizes the importance of considering the potential for concurrent rare genetic diseases in clinical evaluations, especially with progressive or evolving symptomatology.

UNASSIGNED: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a unique, highly penetrant neuro-cutaneous disorder with a wide range of manifestations. Though the clinical diagnosis of NF1 is straight forward, there can be other disorders which mimic NF1, especially its cutaneous features. Here we describe the clinical and mutation spectrum of a series of individuals whose primary diagnosis was NF1 or NF1 related disorders.
UNASSIGNED: We have screened 29 unrelated individuals who fulfilled the clinical criteria of NF1. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was done in all individuals except one with suspected microdeletion syndrome with NF1 in whom Cytogenetic microarray (CMA) was done.
UNASSIGNED: Out of 29 suspected patients, 25 had germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants involving NF1 gene. Five novel and 20 known variants in coding and non-coding regions were identified, among them 7 variants were deletions (28%), 7 nonsense (28%), 3 splice-site (12%), 4 missense (16%), 2 duplications (8%) and 2 (8%) were contiguous deletions. In those where NF1 variants were not detected, 3 had neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and 1 rare autosomal recessive form of Elher Danlos syndrome.
UNASSIGNED: We hereby present the wide range of manifestations in different age groups and the mutation spectrum ranging from small scale variants to contiguous gene deletion syndromes involving NF1 gene. We highlight the usefulness of molecular testing and its importance in tumor surveillance and genetic counseling in this disorder.

UNASSIGNED: To summarize the gene therapy strategies for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and related research progress.
UNASSIGNED: The recent literature on gene therapy for NF1 at home and abroad was reviewed. The structure and function of the NF1 gene and its mutations were analyzed, and the current status as well as future prospects of the transgenic therapy and gene editing strategies were summarized.
UNASSIGNED: NF1 is an autosomal dominantly inherited tumor predisposition syndrome caused by mutations in the NF1 tumor suppressor gene, which impair the function of the neurofibromin and lead to the disease. It has complex clinical manifestations and is not yet curable. Gene therapy strategies for NF1 are still in the research and development stage. Existing studies on the transgenic therapy for NF1 have mainly focused on the construction and expression of the GTPase-activating protein-related domain in cells that lack of functional neurofibromin, confirming the feasibility of the transgenic therapy for NF1. Future research may focus on split adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene delivery, oversized AAV gene delivery, and the development of new vectors for targeted delivery of full-length NF1 cDNA. In addition, the gene editing tools of the new generation have great potential to treat monogenic genetic diseases such as NF1, but need to be further validated in terms of efficiency and safety.
UNASSIGNED: Gene therapy, including both the transgenic therapy and gene editing, is expected to become an important new therapeutic approach for NF1 patients.
UNASSIGNED: 总结Ⅰ型神经纤维瘤病（neurofibromatosis type 1，NF1）基因治疗策略和相关研究进展。.
UNASSIGNED: 查阅近年来国内外关于NF1基因治疗的文献，对NF1基因结构、功能及其突变进行分析，并从转基因治疗和基因编辑两方面对基因治疗策略进行深入总结。.
UNASSIGNED: NF1是由抑癌基因NF1基因突变引起的常染色体显性遗传肿瘤性疾病，因神经纤维瘤蛋白功能受损而致病，临床表现复杂，目前尚无法根治。NF1的基因治疗策略仍处于研究和开发阶段。现有NF1转基因疗法主要是在神经纤维瘤蛋白缺陷的细胞中构建并表达Ras-GTP酶激活蛋白相关结构域基因片段，证实了NF1基因治疗的可行性；未来研究方向主要聚焦于使用拆分载体递送系统，增加单一载体的运载量，以及开发新的递送系统用于靶向递送全长NF1 cDNA。此外，新一代基因编辑工具在NF1等单基因遗传病的治疗领域应用潜力巨大，但效率和安全性尚需进一步验证。.
UNASSIGNED: 基因治疗，包括转基因和基因编辑两大技术，有望成为NF1患者重要的新型治疗手段。.

BACKGROUND: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is the most common neurocutaneous disease and is caused by mutations in the NF1 gene. The most common clinical features of NF1 are pigmentary abnormalities such as café-au-lait spots and inguinal or axillary freckling, cutaneous and plexiform neurofibromas, hamartomas of the iris, optic gliomas, and bone lesions. The aim of this retrospective study was to define the clinical and molecular characteristics of a pediatric sample of NF1, as well as the mutational spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlation.
METHODS: The study included 40 children with clinically suspected NF1. The patients were screened for NF1 mutations by DNA-based sequencing. In addition, all the patients were studied by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) to identify any duplications or deletions in NF1. The demographic, clinical, and genetic features of the children were characterized.
RESULTS: A total of 40 children with NF1 were included. Of those, 28 were female and 12 were male. The mean age was 8.91 years. An NF1 variant was discovered in 28 of 40 patients (70%). Among these mutations, intronic mutations were the most frequently detected mutations; 15 of these variants had not been previously reported. Only one patient had a whole NF1 gene deletion.
CONCLUSIONS: This study expands the spectrum of mutations in the NF1 gene. This study also showed that genetic screening using both next-generation sequencing and MLPA had a positive effect on diagnosis and genetic counseling in patients with suspected NF1.

The finding of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in the activity of a diagnostic genetic laboratory is a common issue, which is however provisional and needs to be periodically re-evaluated, due to the continuous advancements in our knowledge of the genetic diseases. Neurofibromatosis type 1, caused by the occurrence of heterozygous pathogenic NF1 variants, is a good model for studying the evolution of VUS, due to the widespread use of genetic testing for the disease, the constant enrichment of the international databases with NF1 variants and the full adult penetrance of the disease, which makes genotyping the parents a crucial step in the diagnostic workflow. The present study retrospectively reviewed and reinterpreted the genetic test results of NF1 in a diagnostic genetic laboratory in the period from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2020. All the VUS were reinterpreted using the 2015 consensus standards and guidelines for the interpretation. Out of 589 NF1 genetic tests which were performed in the period, a total of 85 VUS were found and reinterpreted in 72 cases (84.7%): 21 (29.2%) were reclassified as benign/likely benign, whereas 51 (70.8%) were recoded as pathogenic/likely pathogenic with a significant trend distribution (Chi square test for trend p = 0.005). Synonymous VUS have mainly been reclassified as class 1 and 2 (7/8, 87.5%), whereas missense variants have been attributed to class 4 and 5 in 38 out of the 58 cases (65.5%). These findings underline an improvement in the classification of variants over time, suggesting that a reinterpretation of the genetic tests should be routinely performed to support the physicians in the clinical diagnosis of genetic diseases.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a clinically heterogeneous neurocutaneous disorder inherited in autosomal dominant manner. Approximately 5-10% of the cases are caused by NF1 microdeletions involving the NF1 gene and its flanking regions. Microdeletions, which lead to more severe clinical manifestations, can be subclassified into four different types (type 1, 2, 3 and atypical) according to their size, the genomic location of the breakpoints and the number of genes included within the deletion. Besides the prominent hallmarks of NF1, patients with NF1 microdeletions frequently exhibit specific additional clinical manifestations like dysmorphic facial features, macrocephaly, overgrowth, global developmental delay, cognitive disability and an increased risk of malignancies. It is important to identify the genes co-deleted with NF1, because they are likely to have an effect on the clinical manifestation. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and microarray analysis are the primary techniques for the investigation of NF1 microdeletions. However, based on previous research, optical genome mapping (OGM) could also serve as an alternative method to identify copy number variations (CNVs). Here, we present a case with NF1 microdeletion identified by means of OGM and demonstrate that this novel technology is a suitable tool for the identification and classification of the NF1 microdeletions.

Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), also known as von Recklinghausen disease, is one of the most common neurocutaneous genetic disorders. Loss of function of the NF1 gene results in overactivation of the RAS/MAPK pathway, leading to neurocutaneous manifestations and osseous abnormalities. Because of medical progress, molecular testing for NF1 after genetic counseling is now available in Japan. In addition, revised diagnostic criteria for NF1 were proposed by NF1 experts of an international panel in 2021. Because the overall degree of severity and manifestations in each patient are not predictable, age-specific annual monitoring and patient education by a multidisciplinary team are important for the management of NF1. Although treatment of plexiform neurofibroma has been challenging, selumetinib (an oral selective MEK1/2 inhibitor), which targets a pathway downstream of RAS, was approved in 2022 for use in children with inoperable, symptomatic plexiform neurofibromas in Japan. This article summarizes recent progress in diagnosis, clinical characteristics, and treatment of various manifestations of NF1 and proposes the future direction required to resolve unmet needs in patients with NF1 in Japan.

暂无摘要。

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant multisystem syndrome caused by mutations in the neurofibromin 1 (NF1) gene that encodes for the protein neurofibromin acting as a tumour suppressor. Neurofibromin functions primarily as a GTPase-activating protein for the Ras family of oncogenes, which activates many signalling pathways for cell proliferation and differentiation; without neurofibromin, Ras is constitutively activated, thereby turning on many downstream signalling pathways related to oncogenesis. Patients with NF1 have a well known predisposition for certain types of malignancies including malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours, gliomas, and breast cancers, as well as a potential association of NF1 with lymphoproliferative disorders such as lymphomas. In this article, we review the pathophysiology and tumourigenesis of NF1, previously reported cases of cutaneous lymphomas in NF1 patients along with our case demonstration of a NF1-associated scalp B-cell lymphoma, and NF1-associated extra cutaneous lymphomas. The diagnosis of lymphomas particularly cutaneous lymphomas may be difficult in NF1 patients as they often have skin lesions and/or cutaneous/subcutaneous nodules or tumours like neurofibromas, which raises the possibility of underdiagnosed cutaneous lymphomas in NF1 patients. We also comprehensively discuss the association between NF1 and lymphomas. In summary, most studies support a potential association between NF1 and lymphomas. Further investigation is needed to clarify the association between NF1 and lymphomas in order to bring clinical awareness of possibly underdiagnosed NF1-associated lymphomas and individualised management of NF1 patients to practice.