Moving and Lifting Patients

移动和提升患者
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病在医护人员(HCWs)中很常见,但可以通过风险评估和进一步促进职业安全与健康来预防。这项研究的目的是调查风险评估仪器Tiltherometer是否可用于识别与患者处理和移动(PHM)一起工作的HCW中身体暴露的风险特征。进一步的目的是描述HCWs使用Tilthermometer的看法和经验。
    方法:本可行性研究采用混合设计方法。总的来说,来自17个瑞典护理单位的54名医护人员参加了TilThermometer并进行了风险评估。从风险评估中收集的数据用于识别身体暴露的风险概况。从活动日志中收集使用Tiltherometer的HCW经验,并进行定性分析。三个问卷被用来评估感知的可接受性,适当性,风险评估的可行性,八个研究特定问题被用于感知有用性。
    结果:通过评估每个护理接受者,在护理单位使用了Tiltherometer,在组级别编译数据时,可以提供护理单元的风险概况。据报告,在两项工作任务中,身体暴露的风险很高;在坐下来为护理接受者洗澡时,没有护理单位使用高低可调节座椅,13%的人在穿上压缩长袜时使用了推荐的辅助设备。然而,99%的人在照顾和沐浴护理接受者躺下时使用高低可调辅助设备。Tilthermometer被描述为易于使用,进行团队反思,并提供护理单位接受者和工作量的概述,但也报告了流动性群体分类的困难。Tilthermometer是,在五点量表上,被认为是可接受的(平均3.93),适当(平均3.9),且可行(平均值3.97)。这些分数符合评估有用性的问题。
    结论:风险评估提供的风险概况有可能有助于护理单位发展安全的患者处理和移动实践。研究结果表明,Tiltherometer可用于评估与患者在医院和疗养院的护理单位中的处理和运动有关的身体暴露风险。
    BACKGROUND: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are common among healthcare workers (HCWs) but might be prevented by risk assessment and further promotion of occupational safety and health. The aim of this study was to investigate if the risk assessment instrument TilThermometer can be used to identify risk profiles of physical exposure in HCWs working with patient handling and movement (PHM). Further aims were to describe HCWs\' perceptions and experiences of using the TilThermometer.
    METHODS: This feasibility study has a mixed design methodology. In total, 54 HCWs from 17 Swedish care units participated and performed risk assessments with the TilThermometer. Data collected from the risk assessments were used to identify risk profiles of physical exposure. HCWs\' experiences of using the TilThermometer were collected from activity logs and analysed qualitatively. Three questionnaires were used to assess perceived acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the risk assessment, and eight study specific questions were used for perceived usefulness.
    RESULTS: The TilThermometer was used at the care units by assessing each care recipient, and when compiling the data at a group level, a summarized risk profile for the care unit could be provided. Risk for physical exposure was reported as high in two work tasks; no care unit used the high-low adjustable seat when showering care recipients sitting down, and 13% used the recommended assistive devices when putting compression stockings on. However, 99% used high-low adjustable assistive devices when caring and bathing care recipients lying down. TilThermometer was described as easy to use, enabling team reflections and providing an overview of the care units\' recipients and workload, but difficulties in categorizing for mobility groups were also reported. The TilThermometer was, on a five-point scale, perceived as acceptable (mean 3.93), appropriate (mean 3.9), and feasible (mean 3.97). These scores are in line with questions evaluating usefulness.
    CONCLUSIONS: The risk assessment provided risk profiles with potential to contribute to care units\' development of a safe patient handling and movement practice. The findings suggest that the TilThermometer can be used to assess risks for physical exposure in relation to patient handling and movement in care units at hospital and nursing homes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于护士腰背痛(LBP)患病率的证据在文献中很普遍,报告了几个风险因素。这些包括手动处理患者,重复的弯曲和扭转运动,和长时间的工作。据报道,LBP具有负面的健康结果,并导致医护人员(HCWs)的工作表现不佳。在博茨瓦纳,与这些医疗保健活动相关的人体工程学风险的大小尚未得到充分调查。因此,本研究旨在调查博茨瓦纳护士中与手动处理患者相关的人体工程学风险水平及其与LBP患病率的关系.
    方法:这是一项观察性横断面研究,于2023年3月至4月在博茨瓦纳一家公立三级医院进行。医院患者的运动和援助(MAPO)工具用于收集有关人体工程学风险水平的数据。使用北欧肌肉骨骼问卷(NMQ)改编的工具收集参与者的人口统计学特征数据。估计赔率比和95%置信区间以确定人体工程学风险水平与LBP患病率之间的关联。
    结果:共有256名护士参与并完成了研究。本研究中自我报告的LBP患病率为76.6%。根据MAPO指数,获得LBP的风险很高(90.5%)。尽管自我报告的LBP在护士中的频率很高,这些数据与MAPO指数数据没有显著关联.这部分可能是由于样本量小。
    结论:本研究中LBP的患病率很高,MAPO指数数据证实了这一点。这证明了MAPO指数在预测患者手动操作风险方面的价值。这些发现可能有助于博茨瓦纳制定旨在解决人体工程学预防措施的政策,旨在通过解决单一风险决定因素来降低MAPO指数得分。
    BACKGROUND: Evidence on the prevalence of lower back pain (LBP) among nurses is widespread in the literature, with several risk factors being reported. These include manual handling of patients, repetitive bending and twisting movements, and long working hours. It is reported that LBP has negative health outcomes and causes poor work performance among healthcare workers (HCWs). The magnitude of ergonomic risks associated with these healthcare activities has not been adequately investigated in Botswana. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the ergonomic risk levels associated with the manual handling of patients and its association with the prevalence of LBP among nurses in Botswana.
    METHODS: This was an observational cross-sectional hospital-based study conducted in a Botswana public tertiary hospital from March to April 2023. The Movement and Assistance of Hospital Patients (MAPO) tool was used to collect data on ergonomic risk levels. Data on the demographic characteristics of participants were collected using a tool adapted from the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated to determine the association between ergonomic risk levels and the prevalence of LBP.
    RESULTS: A total of 256 nurses participated and completed the study. The self-reported prevalence of LBP in this study was 76.6%. The risk of acquiring LBP was high (90.5%) based on the MAPO index. Although the frequencies of self-reported LBP were high among nurses, these did not show any significant association with the MAPO index data. This could be partly due to the small sample size.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was a high prevalence of LBP in this study, which was corroborated by the MAPO index data. This has demonstrated the value of the MAPO index in forecasting the risk of patient manual handling. The findings might help Botswana formulate policies intended to address ergonomic preventive measures, directed towards reducing the MAPO index score by addressing the single risk determinants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    欧盟委员会发布了一项关于欧洲健康和数据空间法规的提案,以改善患者的流动性。该EHDS法规规定了用于主要用途(治疗)和次要用途(即研究,政策制定)。该提案对国家医疗保健系统具有深远的影响。问题是,有了这个草案,事实上,委员会提议超越欧盟的权力,因为医疗保健的提供和组织属于会员国的权限。此外,(缺乏)数字健康数据的交换并不是患者自由流动的唯一障碍。目前制定的《患者指令》和《社会保障协调条例》也阻止患者在国外寻求治疗。因此,一种新的患者法规形式的更综合的方法是,在我们看来,需要。
    The European Commission issued a proposal for a Regulation on the European Health and Data Space to improve patient mobility. This EHDS Regulation lays down rules for the exchange of digital health data for primary use (treatment) and for secondary use (i.e. research, policymaking). This proposal has far-reaching implications for national healthcare systems. The question arises whether, with this draft, the Commission in fact proposes to overstep the powers of the European Union, as the delivery and organization of healthcare belongs to the competences of the Member States. Furthermore, the (lack of) exchange of digital health data is not the only hinderance for the free movement of patients. The current set-up of the Patient Directive and the Social Security Coordination Regulation also discourages patients from seeking treatment abroad. Therefore, a more integrated approach in the form of a new Patient Regulation is, in our view, needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:日本疗养院护理人员的腰背痛(LBP)长期以来一直被认为是职业健康问题。本研究旨在验证我们开发的日本版本的住院患者运动和援助(J-MAPO)指数的可靠性和有效性,LBP的风险评估工具,在疗养院。
    方法:两名检查员使用J-MAPO评估了15个疗养院,并推导出以下三个LBP风险水平:低,中度,和高风险。在过去的12个月中,疗养院的护理人员对一份关于LBP的自我管理问卷做出了回应。使用来自296名护理人员的数据,没有缺失数据。我们进一步使用逻辑回归模型来分析LBP作为因变量,和J-MAPO风险水平作为自变量。我们使用Cohen的kappa系数来评估评估者之间的可靠性,以进一步评估两个检查员之间的协议。
    结果:多变量逻辑回归分析显示,随着J-MAPO风险水平的增加,LBP的调整比值比和95%置信区间逐渐增加(低风险:1.00;中等风险:1.70[0.74-3.91];高风险:2.67[1.28-5.56])。此外,两名检查员评估的J-MAPO风险水平完全一致(κ=1),使用科恩卡帕系数观察到评估者间的可靠性。
    结论:高评估者间可靠性和J-MAPO风险水平与LBP相关。因此,我们的研究结果表明,J-MAPO是日本疗养院中一种有用的LBP风险评估工具.
    UNASSIGNED: Low back pain (LBP) among caregivers in Japanese nursing homes has long been considered an occupational health issue. This study aimed to verify the reliability and validity of our developed Japanese version of the Movement and Assistance for Hospitalized Patients (J-MAPO) index, a risk assessment tool for LBP, in nursing homes.
    UNASSIGNED: Two inspectors assessed 15 nursing homes using J-MAPO, and deduced 3 LBP risk levels as follows: low, moderate, and high risk. Caregivers in nursing homes responded to a self-administered questionnaire on LBP over the past 12 months. Data from 296 caregivers with no missing data were used. We further used logistic regression models to analyze the association between LBP as a dependent variable, and J-MAPO risk level as an independent variable. We used Cohen kappa coefficient to assess interrater reliability to further assess the agreement between the 2 inspectors.
    UNASSIGNED: The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the adjusted odds ratio and 95% CIs for LBP increased progressively with J-MAPO risk level (Low-risk: 1.00; Moderate-risk: 1.70 [0.74-3.91]; High-risk: 2.67 [1.28-5.56]). Furthermore, the J-MAPO risk levels assessed by the 2 inspectors were in perfect agreement (κ = 1) observed for interrater reliability using Cohen kappa coefficient.
    UNASSIGNED: There was high interrater reliability, and J-MAPO risk levels were associated with LBP. Therefore, our results suggest that the J-MAPO is a useful risk assessment tool for LBP in Japanese nursing homes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    冠状病毒大流行震惊了已经不堪重负的全球医疗保健系统,挑战其应对大规模死亡的准备。我们的研究检查了医护人员在处理死亡(死者)尸体时面临的安全问题,强调在大规模死亡的情况下需要更好的策略。在美国COVID-19大流行期间参与尸体处理的医疗保健提供者有资格参加我们的研究。使用基于网络的调查,我们分析了美国43个州206名参与者的反应.我们使用患者安全系统工程计划(SEIPS)框架从参与者的开放式回答中推断主题。该研究表明,在大流行期间,由于工作量增加,常规任务变得异常具有挑战性,情绪压力,和资源约束。提升和转移尸体等任务,强调了工人的身体和情感损失。大规模死亡引起的精神压力以及与家人和同伴沟通的复杂性也很突出,增加了医护人员的总体负担。与会者强调了专门培训的重要性,政策完善,及其实施方面的改进。总之,我们的研究有助于了解大流行期间尸体处理的复杂性。它强调了应急响应计划和医疗保健政策和实践的系统性变化的必要性,以确保从事这些关键任务的医护人员的安全和福祉。
    The coronavirus pandemic shocked the already overwhelmed global healthcare system, challenging its preparedness to deal with mass fatalities. Our research examines the safety issues faced by healthcare workers when handling dead (deceased) bodies, highlighting the need for better strategies in the event of mass fatalities. Healthcare providers involved in dead body handling during the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. were eligible to participate in our study. Using a web-based survey, we analyzed responses of 206 participants across 43 U.S. states. We used the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework to deduce themes from participants\' open-ended responses. The study showed how routine tasks become extraordinarily challenging during pandemic due to increased workload, emotional stress, and resource constraints. Tasks such as lifting and transferring bodies, underscored physical and emotional toll on workers. The mental strain induced by mass fatalities and the complexities of communicating with families and peers were also prominent, adding to the overall burden on healthcare workers. The participants emphasized the importance of specialized training, policy refinements, and improvements in its implementation. In conclusion, our study contributes to understanding the complexities of dead body handling during a pandemic. It underscores the need for emergency response planning and systemic changes in healthcare policies and practices to ensure the safety and well-being of healthcare workers engaged in these critical tasks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在阐明运动学,尤其是肩关节和髋关节,在准备手动轮椅到床的转移期间(即,当翻转手臂和脚支撑时)。这项横断面研究包括32名身体健全的个体。当手臂和脚支撑翻转手动轮椅时,肩部和髋关节的运动学,使用基于无标记惯性传感器的运动捕捉系统进行评估。我们发现向上翻转手臂支撑涉及大量绑架,内部和外部旋转,屈曲,和肩关节的延伸,而向上翻转足部支撑涉及髋关节的大量屈曲。研究结果表明,有必要考虑翻转手动轮椅的手臂和脚支撑所需的运动范围,特别是在那些有有限的肩膀和臀部的活动范围,如老年人,神经肌肉疾病,和骨科疾病。
    This study aimed to clarify the kinematics, particularly of the shoulder and hip joints, during preparation for manual wheelchair-to-bed transfer (i.e. when flipping up the arm and foot supports). This cross-sectional study included 32 able-bodied individuals. The kinematics of the shoulder and hip joints when the arm and foot supports were flipped up of manual wheelchair, were evaluated using a markerless inertial sensor-based motion capture system. We found that flipping the arm support upwards involved a large amount of abduction, internal and external rotation, flexion, and extension at the shoulder joint, whereas flipping the foot support upwards involved a large amount of flexion at the hip joint. The findings suggest that it is necessary to consider the range of motion required to flip up the arm and foot supports of manual wheelchairs, particularly in those with limited shoulder and hip range of motion such as older people, neuromuscular disorders, and orthopedic disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有了适当的遵守,安全的患者处理和行动(SPHM)计划减少肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)。为了更好地了解个人,环境,以及与SPHM的采用和MSD的流行相关的组织因素,进行了全国性的在线调查。973名医护人员(HCWs)完成了调查,其中59.6%报告了过去与工作相关的MSD或疼痛。在那些有疼痛或受伤的人中,33.3%改变了角色,79.7%的人在受伤时工作,只有30.9%的人报告了工人的赔偿要求。不到一半的HCWs同意SPHM设备随时可用,大多数人认为手动处理体重超过91公斤的患者是可以接受的。设备可用性,天花板电梯可用性,主管鼓励,和年度培训与增加使用SPHM设备有关。SPHM设备的可用性降低了受伤护士改变角色的可能性。尽管总体上同意SPHM计划是有益的,常见的临床实践仍然不足以充分保护HCW免受损伤风险。
    With proper compliance, safe patient handling and mobility (SPHM) programs reduce musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). To better understand individual, environmental, and organizational factors associated with both the adoption of SPHM and prevalence of MSDs, a nationwide online survey was administered. 973 healthcare workers (HCWs) completed the survey, for which 59.6% reported past work-related MSDs or pain. Among those with pain or injury, 33.3% changed roles, 79.7% worked while injured, and only 30.9% reported workers\' compensation claims. Less than half of HCWs agreed that SPHM equipment is readily available, and most considered manually handling patients weighing over 91 kg acceptable. Equipment availability, ceiling lift availability, supervisor encouragement, and annual training were associated with increased use of SPHM equipment. Availability of SPHM equipment reduced the likelihood of injured nurses changing roles. Despite overall agreement that SPHM programs are beneficial, common clinical practice remains insufficient to adequately protect HCWs from risk of injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号