The disease severity of psoriasis is mainly assessed subjectively via  psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) and body surface area (BSA), while an optimal measure of cutaneous response, may overlook systemic inflammation in psoriasis patients. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), monocyte to high density lipoprotein ratio (MHR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) exhibit notable associations with the inflammation severity in multiple diseases. The aim of this retrospective study was to explore the associations between inflammatory parameters and the skin lesions\' severity of psoriasis. After analysis, we found that patients with psoriasis had higher NLR, MLR, PLR, MHR, and SII levels compared to the control group. At baseline, the parameters of NLR (r = 0.124, P = 0.003), MLR (r = 0.153, P < 0.001), MHR (r = 0.217, P < 0.001) and SII (r = 0.141, P = 0.001) had a positive correlation with PASI in psoriasis patients. At the same time, we analyzed the patients who received different systemic therapy. We observed a significant decrease in NLR, PLR, MLR, and SII in psoriasis patients after treatment. Notably, TNF-α inhibitors and IL-17A inhibitors subgroups showed a more significant reduction than IL-23/IL-12/23 inhibitors and MTX medication. Additionally, we found the change of NLR (r = 0.194, P < 0.001), PLR (r = 0.104, P = 0.014), MLR (r = 0.191, P < 0.001), MHR (r = 0.106, P = 0.012), and SII (r = 0.228, P < 0.001) had a positive correlation with the change of PASI in psoriasis patients. In conclusion, this study suggests that NLR, MLR, and SII may serve as useful biomarkers for assessing systemic inflammation extent and disease severity in psoriasis patients.

OBJECTIVE: The accurate and timely diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is critical for guiding optimal treatment management and success, highlighting the requirement of readily available inexpensive serum biomarkers to increase the diagnostic accuracy for PJI. Many studies have investigated the diagnostic accuracy of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR). However, there is a lack of existing literature regarding optimal thresholds for acute PJI. The purpose of this study was to reveal the most appropriate cut-off values for MLR and NLR in detecting acute PJI with a gender specific analysis.
METHODS: Patients were classified as having an acute PJI if they met the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 modified criteria. Patients who had a negative clinical and diagnostic workup for a PJI and the presence of erythema on the index surgical area were included in the erysipelas group (control group). Data obtained from all patients included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), procedure type (THA or TKA), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), and blood studies at the admission and culture results were retrieved from the electronic medical record.
RESULTS: ROC curve analysis was used to determine the gender-specific optimal threshold values for CRP, NLR, and MLR. Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of NLR and MLR at the identified best thresholds in males and females, the study found similar sensitivities of NLR in males and females with 0.84 and 0.84, respectively. On the other hand, an MLR of 0.67 or more reported a notably higher specificity in male patients [0.90 (95% CI 0.75-0.96) versus 0.70 (95% CI 0.56-0.80)].
CONCLUSIONS: NLR and MLR represent commonly ordered, low-cost, simple, and readily available complete cell count laboratory values and should be used as adjunct tests with reasonable diagnostic accuracy in detecting acute PJIs. Moreover, with its excellent specificity and PPV, MLR could provide valuable insight in diagnosing acute PJI, particularly in male patients.
METHODS: Level III Retrospective Cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical overlap is observed between multiple sclerosis (MS) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein immunoglobulin-G (MOG-IgG) associated disease (MOGAD) and the difficulty in distinguishing between the two diseases. Here, we measured and compared the readily available neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) to determine whether these three biomarkers can help to distinguish MOGAD and MS at disease onset. The impact of these three biomarkers on MOGAD and MS relapse also needs to be explored.
METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we obtained clinical and paraclinical data from the first attacks of MOGAD (N = 31) and MS (N = 50). Electronic medical records were used to collect demographic data (gender, age at onset), clinical symptoms, EDSS at onset, and medical treatments. The primary outcome was relapse within one year of onset. Four hematological parameters were recorded, including neutrophil count, platelet count, lymphocyte count, and monocyte count. NLR, PLR, and MLR were calculated and compared between MOGAD, MS, and HC. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the ability of NLR, PLR, and MLR to distinguish between MOGAD and MS, MOGAD and HC, respectively. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of NLR/PLR/MLR on MOGAD/MS relapse within one year of onset.
RESULTS: Compared to HC, NLR is significantly higher in MOGAD and MS (p<0.001, p = 0.04, respectively). The PLR and MLR are elevated in MOGAD compared to HC (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively), and MLR in MS are also statistically higher than in HC (p = 0.023). It is worth noting that NLR and PLR were much higher in MOGAD compared to MS (p<0.001, p = 0.001, respectively), but a significant difference regarding MLR has not been found between MOGAD and MS. Based on ROC curve analyses, we found that using NLR, PLR, and MLR to discriminate between MOGAD and MS yielded a ROC-plot area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.794, 0.727, and 0.681, respectively. Meanwhile, the AUC of NLR, PLR, and MLR to discriminate between MOGAD and HC were 0.926, 0.772, and 0.786. Furthermore, the logistics analysis revealed a significant positive association between PLR and MOGAD relapse.
CONCLUSIONS: NLR helps differentiate MOGAD and MS in disease onset, and higher PLR was related to MOGAD relapse.

BACKGROUND: Currently, precise predictors in gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy are lacking. The study aims to investigate the prognostic value of the monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) or oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen.
METHODS: The data from Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from August 2008 to September 2015 were retrospectively collected. Ninety-one patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. The blood samples were collected before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The MLR was divided into two groups: Low-MLR <0.27 group and high-MLR ≥0.27 group. Survival curves were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model were evaluated to determine independent prognostic factors.
RESULTS: The univariate analysis showed that median disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were better in low-MLR value group than high-MLR value group (median DFS 26.80 and 23.73 months, P=0.653, respectively; median OS 27.93 and 26.87 months, P=0.807, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that MLR level was not an independent prognostic factor of DFS and OS. Nevertheless, median DFS and OS for all patients were better for patients with low monocyte values compared to those with high monocyte values (median DFS 30.23 and 21.03 months, P=0.645, respectively; median OS 37.97 and 25.83 months, P=0.509, respectively); in patients with high lymphocyte values compared with low lymphocyte values median DFS was 26.87 and 21.03 months, (P=0.624) respectively; median OS was 27.93 and 26.37 months, (P=0.584) respectively. However, the patients with low level MLR had better 5-year DFS and OS rates.
CONCLUSIONS: MLR may be used as a convenient and cheap prognostic marker in patients with advanced gastric cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with SOX or XELOX. Low level MLR as a prognostic marker may help doctors in terms of efficient measures to treat gastric cancer.