BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomies (DCs) are recommended for the treatment of raised intracranial pressure after acute ischaemic stroke. Some studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with early decompressive craniectomy (< 48 h from onset) in patients with malignant cerebral oedema following middle cerebral artery infarction. Limited data is available on suboccipital decompressive craniectomy after cerebellar infarction.
OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to determine whether the timing of DCs influenced functional outcomes at 6 months. Our secondary objectives were to analyse whether age, gender, the territory of stroke, or preceding thrombectomy impacts functional outcome post-DC.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients admitted between January 2014 and December 2020 who had DCs post-acute ischaemic stroke. Data was collected from ICU electronic records, individual patient charts, and the stroke database.
RESULTS: Twenty-six patients had early DC (19 anterior/7 posterior) and 21 patients had late DC (17 anterior/4 posterior). There was no difference in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of the two groups at 90 (p = 0.318) and 180 (p = 0.333) days post early vs late DC. Overall outcomes were poor, with 5 out of 46 patients (10.9%) having a mRS score ≤ 3 at 6 months. There was no difference in mRS scores between the patients who had hemicraniectomies for anterior circulation stroke (n = 35) and suboccipital DC for posterior circulation stroke (n = 11) (p = 0.594).
CONCLUSIONS: In this single-centre retrospective study, we found no significant difference in functional outcomes between patients who had early or late DC after ischaemic stroke.

UNASSIGNED: In patients with anterior circulation aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (aSAH), endovascular coiling is currently practiced more frequently than neurosurgical clipping. However, despite multiple previous studies, it is still uncertain whether coiling is favourable in terms of long-term clinical outcome.
UNASSIGNED: What is the effect of clipping versus coiling on long-term functional outcome of patients with an aSAH?
UNASSIGNED: All anterior circulation aSAH patients (2012-2015) treated with clipping or coiling in two hospitals in the Netherlands were studied up to five years after treatment. Functional outcome, survival, retreatment- and complication rate were measured. Survival analysis was performed in both groups. A multivariable regression model with covariate adjustment was performed to investigate the likelihood of unfavourable outcome (modified Rankin Scale >2).
UNASSIGNED: Out of 204 patients, 75 patients were clipped (37%) and 129 received coiling (63%). Coiling had a higher retreatment rate compared to clipping (7.8% vs. 0.0%). Unfavourable outcome at six, 12, 24 and 60 months after treatment was higher for patients after clipping compared to coiling, but was not significant after correcting for clinical severity as represented by the WFNS grade. In 60 months, no difference in survival was found between clipping and coiling.
UNASSIGNED: No differences between clipping and coiling in survival and long-term functional outcome have been found in this study. More research with prospective design and large cohorts is needed to identify possible differences between the two treatments.

BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke presents significant challenges in healthcare, notably due to the risk and poor prognosis associated with hemorrhagic transformation (HT). Currently, there is a notable gap in the early clinical stage for a valid and reliable predictive model for HT.
METHODS: This single-center retrospective study analyzed data from 224 patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. We collected comprehensive clinical data, CT, and CTP parameters. A predictive model for HT was developed, incorporating clinical indicators alongside imaging data, and its efficacy was evaluated using decision curve analysis and calibration curves. In addition, we have also built a free browser-based online calculator based on this model for HT prediction.
RESULTS: The study identified atrial fibrillation and hypertension as significant risk factors for HT. Patients with HT showed more extensive initial ischemic damage and a smaller ischemic penumbra. Our novel predictive model, integrating clinical indicators with CT and CTP parameters, demonstrated superior predictive value compared to models based solely on clinical indicators.
CONCLUSIONS: The research highlighted the intricate interplay of clinical and imaging parameters in HT post-thrombectomy. It established a multifaceted predictive model, enhancing the understanding and management of acute ischemic stroke. Future studies should focus on validating this model in broader cohorts, further investigating the causal relationships, and exploring the nuanced effects of these parameters on patient outcomes post-stroke.

BACKGROUND: Sleep Disordered Breathing (SDB) has been shown to increase the risk of stroke and despite recommendations, routine evaluation for SDB in acute stroke is not consistent across institutions. The necessary logistics and expertise required to conduct sleep studies in hospitalized patients remain a significant barrier. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of high-resolution pulse-oximetry (HRPO) for the screening of SDB in acute stroke. Secondarily, considering impact of SDB on acute stroke, we investigated whether SDB at acute stroke predicts functional outcome at discharge and at 3 months post-stroke.
METHODS: Patients with acute mild to moderate ischemic stroke underwent an overnight HRPO within 48 h of admission. Patients were divided into SDB and no-SDB groups based on oxygen desaturations index(ODI > 10/h). Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the relevant predictors of functional outcome (favorable [mRS 1-2 points] versus unfavorable [mrS > = 3 points]).
RESULTS: Of the 142 consecutively screened patients, 96 were included in the analysis. Of these, 33/96 (34%) were identified as having SDB and were more likely to have unfavorable mRS scores as compared to those without SDB (odds ratio = 2.70, p-value = 0.032).
CONCLUSIONS: HRPO may be a low-cost and easily administered screening method to detect SDB among patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke. Patients with SDB (as defined by ODI) have a higher burden of neurological deficits as compared to those without SDB during hospitalization.

UNASSIGNED: Patients with acute stroke are at risk of respiratory or circulatory compromise resulting in vital instability, which can be captured through the widely used aggregated National Early Warning Score (NEWS). We aimed to assess the relation between vital instability (defined as NEWS of five or higher) and death or dependency at 90 days after stroke.
UNASSIGNED: In this observational cohort study we studied 763 patients with ischaemic stroke (n = 400), intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) (n = 146) or subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) (n = 217), hospitalized to a Dutch tertiary referral hospital from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2018. We calculated NEWS for each 8 h time span during the first 72 h after hospitalization. We also decomposed NEWS into its three components respiration, circulation and consciousness. The primary outcome was death or dependency (modified Rankin Scale score ⩾3) at 90 days after stroke. The association of vital instability with functional dependency was examined using Poisson regression.
UNASSIGNED: Two hundred and twenty-seven (58%) patients with ischaemic stroke, 101 (69%) with ICH and 142 (65%) with SAH had at least one episode of vital instability. In patients with ischaemic stroke or SAH, vital instability was associated after adjustment for confounders with death or dependency (adjusted relative risk 1.55 ((95% CI) 1.25-1.93 and 2.13 (1.35-3.36), respectively)). This was mainly driven by impaired consciousness, which was associated with death or dependency in all types of stroke. Respiratory insufficiency and circulatory instability were associated with death or dependency only in SAH.
UNASSIGNED: Vital instability in the first 72 h of hospitalization for ischaemic stroke or SAH is associated with death or dependency at 90 days. Impaired consciousness was the main driver of this relationship. NEWS may not be appropriate for patients with acute stroke, mainly due to the dichotomous manner in which the level of consciousness is classified, and modification of NEWS should be considered for these patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate prevalence, risk factors, and in-hospital outcomes of comatose extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients.
METHODS: Retrospective observational.
METHODS: Tertiary academic hospital.
METHODS: Adults received venoarterial (VA) or venovenous (VV) ECMO support between November 2017 and April 022.
METHODS: None.
RESULTS: We defined 24-hour off sedation as no sedative infusion (except dexmedetomidine) or paralytics administration over a continuous 24-hour period while on ECMO. Off-sedation coma (comaoff) was defined as a Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≤8 after achieving 24-hour off sedation. On-sedation coma (comaon) was defined as a Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≤8 during the entire ECMO course without off sedation for 24 hours. Neurological outcomes were assessed at discharge using the modified Rankin scale (good, 0-3; poor, 4-6). We included 230 patients (VA-ECMO 143, 65% male); 24-hour off sedation was achieved in 32.2% VA-ECMO and 26.4% VV-ECMO patients. Among all patients off sedation for 24 hours (n = 69), 56.5% VA-ECMO and 52.2% VV-ECMO patients experienced comaoff. Among those unable to be sedation free for 24 hours (n = 161), 50.5% VA-ECMO and 17.2% VV-ECMO had comaon. Comaoff was associated with poor outcomes (p < 0.05) in VA-ECMO and VV-ECMO groups, whereas comaon only impacted the VA-ECMO group outcomes. In a multivariable analysis, requirement of renal replacement therapy was an independent risk factor for comaoff after adjusting for ECMO configuration, after adjusting for ECMO configuration, acute brain injury, pre-ECMO partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood, partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood, pH, and bicarbonate level (worst value within 24 hours before cannulation).
CONCLUSIONS: Comaoff was common and associated with poor outcomes at discharge. Requirement of renal replacement therapy was an independent risk factor.

BACKGROUND: The comparative efficacy and safety of first-generation flow diverters (FDs), Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) (Medtronic, Irvine, California), Silk (Balt Extrusion, Montmorency, France), Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) (Microvention, Tustin, California), and Surpass Streamline (Stryker Neurovascular, Fremont, California), is not directly established and largely inferred.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of different FDs in treating sidewall ICA intracranial aneurysms.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively maintained databases from eighteen academic institutions from 2009-2016, comprising 444 patients treated with one of four devices for sidewall ICA aneurysms. Data on demographics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment outcomes, and complications were analyzed. Angiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed using various imaging modalities and modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Propensity score weighting was employed to balance confounding variables. The data analysis used Kaplan-Meier curves, logistic regression, and Cox proportional-hazards regression.
RESULTS: While there were no significant differences in retreatment rates, functional outcomes (mRS 0-1), and thromboembolic complications between the four devices, the probability of achieving adequate occlusion at the last follow-up was highest in Surpass device (HR: 4.59; CI: 2.75-7.66, p < 0.001), followed by FRED (HR: 2.23; CI: 1.44-3.46, p < 0.001), PED (HR: 1.72; CI: 1.10-2.70, p = 0.018), and Silk (HR: 1.0 ref. standard). The only hemorrhagic complications were with Surpass (1%).
CONCLUSIONS: All the first-generation devices achieved good clinical outcomes and retreatment rates in treating ICA sidewall aneurysms. Prospective studies are needed to explore the nuanced differences between these devices in the long term.

BACKGROUND: Hyperosmolar therapy has long been a cornerstone in managing increased intracranial pressure and improving outcomes in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). This therapy hinges on elevating serum osmolality, creating an osmotic gradient that draws excess water from the brain\'s cellular and interstitial compartments and effectively reducing cerebral edema. Given this information, we hypothesized that the serum hyperosmolality prior to any treatment could significantly impact the clinical outcomes of patients with severe TBI, potentially mitigating secondary cerebral edema after trauma.
METHODS: Data were extracted from the Korean Multi-center Traumatic Brain Injury data bank, encompassing 4628 patients with TBI admitted between January 2016 and December 2018. Of these, 507 patients diagnosed with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score < 9) were selected for comprehensive analysis across four data domains: clinical, laboratory, initial computed tomography scan, and treatment. Serum osmolality was assessed prior to treatment, and the hyperosmolar group was defined by a pretreatment serum osmolality exceeding 320 mOsm/L, whereas favorable outcomes were characterized by a modified Rankin Scale score of ≤ 3 at 6 months after trauma. Multivariate regression with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and propensity score matching were used to dissect the data set.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed serum osmolality is significantly associated with clinical outcome in patients with severe TBI (p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value for predicting favorable outcome was 331 mOsm/L, with a sensitivity of 38.9% and a specificity of 87.7%. Notably, the propensity score matching analysis comparing patients with pretreatment serum hyperosmolality with those without indicated a markedly improved functional outcome in the former group (32.5% vs 18.8%, p = 0.025).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study has uncovered a significant correlation between the pretreatment serum osmolality and the clinical outcomes of patients with severe TBI. These findings offer a novel perspective, indicating that a serum hyperosmolality prior to any treatment might potentially have a neuroprotective effect in patients with severe TBI.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is a technique to assess blood flow velocity in the cerebral arteries. TCD is frequently used to monitor aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients. This study compares TCD-criteria for vasospasm and its association with Delayed Cerebral Ischemia (DCI). An overall score based on flow velocities of various intracranial arteries was developed and evaluated.
METHODS: A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted between 1998 and 2017 with 621 patients included. Mean flow velocity (MFV) of the cerebral artery was measured between 2-5 days and between 6-9 days after ictus. Cutoff values from the literature, new cutoff values, and a new composite score (Combined Severity Score) were used to predict DCI. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were determined, and logistic regression analysis was performed.
RESULTS: The Combined Severity Score showed an AUC 0.64 (95%CI 0.56-.71) at days 2-5, with sensitivity 0.53 and specificity 0.74. The Combined Severity Score had an adjusted Odds Ratio of 3.41 (95CI 1.86-6.32) for DCI. MCA-measurements yielded the highest AUC to detect DCI at day 2-5: AUC 0.65 (95%CI 0.58-0.73). Optimal cutoff MFV of 83 cm/s for MCA resulted in sensitivity 0.73 and specificity 0.50 at days 2-5.
CONCLUSIONS: TCD-monitoring of aSAH patients may be a valuable strategy for DCI risk stratification. Lower cutoff values can be used in the early phase after the ictus (day 2-5) than are commonly used now. The Combined Severity Score incorporating all major cerebral arteries may provide a meaningful contribution to interpreting TCD measurements.

BACKGROUND: The etiology of ischemic stroke is multifactorial. Several gene mutations have been identified as leading causes of cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL), a hereditary disease that causes stroke and other neurological symptoms.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the variants of NOTCH3 and thrombophilia genes, and their complex interactions with other factors.
METHODS: We conducted a hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) on the data of 100 patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke. The variants of NOTCH3 and thrombophilia genes were identified by polymerase chain reaction with confronting 2-pair primers and real-time polymerase chain reaction. The overall preclinical characteristics, cumulative cutpoint values, and factors associated with these somatic mutations were analyzed in unidimensional and multidimensional scaling models.
RESULTS: We identified the following optimal cutpoints: creatinine, 83.67 (SD 9.19) µmol/L; age, 54 (SD 5) years; prothrombin (PT) time, 13.25 (SD 0.17) seconds; and international normalized ratio (INR), 1.02 (SD 0.03). Using the Nagelkerke method, cutpoint 50% values of the Glasgow Coma Scale score; modified Rankin scale score; and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores at admission, after 24 hours, and at discharge were 12.77, 2.86 (SD 1.21), 9.83 (SD 2.85), 7.29 (SD 2.04), and 6.85 (SD 2.90), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The variants of MTHFR (C677T and A1298C) and NOTCH3 p.R544C may influence the stroke severity under specific conditions of PT, creatinine, INR, and BMI, with risk ratios of 4.8 (95% CI 1.53-15.04) and 3.13 (95% CI 1.60-6.11), respectively (Pfisher<.05). It is interesting that although there are many genes linked to increased atrial fibrillation risk, not all of them are associated with ischemic stroke risk. With the detection of stroke risk loci, more information can be gained on their impacts and interconnections, especially in young patients.