Metastatic breast cancer

转移性乳腺癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Eribulin是一种非紫杉烷合成类似物,在许多国家被批准作为治疗转移性乳腺癌患者的三线治疗方法。除了其有丝分裂性质,艾瑞布林具有非有丝分裂特性,包括但不限于,它能够诱导上皮向间充质转化的表型逆转,血管重塑,减少免疫抑制肿瘤微环境。自批准以来,在所有乳腺癌亚型中,有大量的研究调查了艾日布林作为早期治疗的应用,以及与其他药物如免疫疗法和靶向治疗的联合应用,包括激素受体阳性,HER2阳性和三阴性乳腺癌,许多展示有希望的活动。本文将重点介绍艾瑞布林在所有亚型转移性乳腺癌治疗中的应用,包括其作为早期药物的作用。它的毒性特征,和潜在的未来方向。
    Eribulin is a non-taxane synthetic analogue approved in many countries as third-line treatment for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. In addition to its mitotic property, eribulin has non-mitotic properties including but not limited to, its ability to induce phenotypic reversal of epithelial to mesenchymal transition, vascular remodelling, reduction in immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. Since approval, there has been a surge in studies investigating the application of eribulin as an earlier-line treatment and also in combination with other agents such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy across all breast cancer sub-types, including hormone receptor positive, HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer, many demonstrating promising activity. This review will focus on the application of eribulin in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer across all subtypes including its role as an earlier-line agent, its toxicity profile, and potential future directions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    手术在转移性乳腺癌(MBC)中的作用目前存在争议。几种新颖的统计和深度学习(DL)方法有望在个体水平上推断手术的适用性。
    这项研究的目的是确定最适用的DL模型,以确定可以从手术中受益的MBC患者以及所需的手术类型。
    我们介绍了具有混合效应(DSME)的深度生存回归,集成三种因果推断方法的半参数DL模型。对六个模型进行了训练,以提出个性化的治疗建议。将接受符合DL模型建议的治疗的患者与接受与建议不同的治疗的患者进行比较。反向概率加权(IPW)用于最小化偏差。使用多元线性回归和因果推断可视化和量化各种特征对手术选择的影响。
    总共,纳入5269名女性MBC患者。DSME是一个独立的保护因素,在推荐手术(IPW调整后的风险比[HR]=0.39,95%置信区间[CI]:0.19-0.78)和手术类型(IPW调整后的HR=0.66,95%CI:0.48-0.93)方面优于其他模型.DSME优于其他型号和传统指南,表明从手术中受益的患者比例更高,尤其是保乳手术.患者特征的偏见效应,包括年龄,肿瘤大小,转移部位,淋巴结状态,和乳腺癌亚型,对手术的决定也进行了量化。
    我们的研究结果表明,DSME可以有效地识别可能从手术中受益的MBC患者以及所需的特定类型的手术。这种方法可以促进开发高效、可靠的治疗建议系统,并为决策提供可量化的证据。
    UNASSIGNED: The role of surgery in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is currently controversial. Several novel statistical and deep learning (DL) methods promise to infer the suitability of surgery at the individual level.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to identify the most applicable DL model for determining patients with MBC who could benefit from surgery and the type of surgery required.
    UNASSIGNED: We introduced the deep survival regression with mixture effects (DSME), a semi-parametric DL model integrating three causal inference methods. Six models were trained to make individualized treatment recommendations. Patients who received treatments in line with the DL models\' recommendations were compared with those who underwent treatments divergent from the recommendations. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to minimize bias. The effects of various features on surgery selection were visualized and quantified using multivariate linear regression and causal inference.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 5269 female patients with MBC were included. DSME was an independent protective factor, outperforming other models in recommending surgery (IPW-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.78) and type of surgery (IPW-adjusted HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48-0.93). DSME was superior to other models and traditional guidelines, suggesting a higher proportion of patients benefiting from surgery, especially breast-conserving surgery. The debiased effect of patient characteristics, including age, tumor size, metastatic sites, lymph node status, and breast cancer subtypes, on surgery decision was also quantified.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggested that DSME could effectively identify patients with MBC likely to benefit from surgery and the specific type of surgery needed. This method can facilitate the development of efficient, reliable treatment recommendation systems and provide quantifiable evidence for decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阳性,激素受体阳性(HR阳性)转移性乳腺癌(MBC)通常在后续系列中接受曲妥珠单抗emtansine(T-DM1)治疗.将内分泌治疗(ET)与T-DM1结合可以改善该亚型的治疗结果。因此,本研究旨在探讨T-DM1联合ET在HER2阳性和HR阳性MBC中的获益.这项研究是第一个研究ET与T-DM1结合的益处。材料和方法:本研究分析了2010年6月至2021年12月接受T-DM1治疗的HER2阳性和HR阳性MBC患者的医疗记录。根据患者是否同时接受ET和T-DM1分为两组。主要终点是确定无进展生存期(PFS),而次要终点是总生存期(OS),客观反应率,和治疗的安全性。结果:我们的分析检查了88例患者,其中32例(36.4%)接受T-DM1联合ET治疗。联合治疗显示中位数PFS显着改善(15.4vs.6.4个月;p=0.00004)和中位OS(35.0与23.1个月;p=0.026)与单独的T-DM1相比。组合组的ORR也较高(65.6%vs.29.3%;p=0.026)。与未接受帕妥珠单抗治疗的患者相比,先前接受帕妥珠单抗治疗的患者在T-DM1上的中位PFS降低(11.7vs.5.4个月,分别为;p<0.01)。与HER2+患者相比,T-DM1在HER23+患者中显示出更好的中位PFS。扩增率>2.0(10.8vs5.8个月,分别为;p=0.049)。安全性与以前的T-DM1研究一致。结论:T-DM1联合ET可显著改善HER2阳性和HR阳性MBC患者的PFS和OS。我们的研究表明,先前的帕妥珠单抗治疗加曲妥珠单抗治疗可能会降低T-DM1疗效。
    Background and Objectives: Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive, hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) usually undergo trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) therapy in subsequent lines. Combining endocrine therapy (ET) with T-DM1 can improve treatment outcomes in this subtype. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the benefits of using T-DM1 with ET in HER2-positive and HR-positive MBC. This study was the first to investigate the benefits of combining ET with T-DM1. Material and Methods: This study analyzed the medical records of patients with HER2-positive and HR-positive MBC who were treated with T-DM1 from June 2010 to December 2021. The patients were divided into groups based on whether they received concomitant ET with T-DM1. The primary endpoint was to determine the progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and safety of the treatment. Results: Our analysis examined 88 patients, of whom 32 (36.4%) were treated with T-DM1 in combination with ET. The combination therapy showed a significant improvement in median PFS (15.4 vs. 6.4 months; p = 0.00004) and median OS (35.0 vs. 23.1 months; p = 0.026) compared to T-DM1 alone. The ORR was also higher in the combination group (65.6% vs. 29.3%; p = 0.026). Patients treated with pertuzumab priorly had reduced median PFS on T-DM1 compared to those who were not treated with pertuzumab (11.7 vs. 5.4 months, respectively; p < 0.01). T-DM1 demonstrated better median PFS in HER2 3+ patients compared to HER2 2+ patients, with an amplification ratio of >2.0 (10.8 vs 5.8 months, respectively; p = 0.049). The safety profiles were consistent with previous T-DM1 studies. Conclusions: The combination of T-DM1 with ET can significantly improve PFS and OS in patients with HER2-positive and HR-positive MBC. Our study suggests that prior pertuzumab treatment plus trastuzumab treatment might decrease T-DM1 efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR/HER2-)转移性乳腺癌(MBC)中,细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6is)已取代单独的内分泌治疗成为治疗标准;然而,开始治疗的几个障碍仍然存在。我们评估了医疗保险人群中健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)和与启动HR/HER2-MBC的CDK4/6i相关的其他因素。使用回顾性队列设计,我们从SEER-Medicare数据库中选择年龄≥65岁并在2015-2017年期间确诊的患者.从MBC诊断到第一次CDK4/6i开始的时间是研究结果。使用多变量精细和灰色危险模型评估了SDOH措施和其他预测因子对结果的影响。752名合格妇女中,352(46.8%)在MBC诊断后启动CDK4/6i(中位启动时间:27.9个月)。在调整后的分析中,与CDK4/6i启动显着相关的SDOH因素包括家庭收入中位数(HHI)高与低(风险比[HR]=1.70;95%CI=1.03-2.81)以及仅医疗保险覆盖率高与低的人群百分比(HR=1.54;95%CI=1.04-2.27)。总之,在HHI中位数较高且仅Medicare覆盖率较高的地区,HR+/HER2-MBC的老年Medicare患者的CDK4/6i起始率较高,暗示对这些小说的不公平访问,有效的治疗和政策干预的需要。
    In hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) have replaced endocrine therapy alone as the standard of care; however, several barriers to treatment initiation still exist. We assessed social determinants of health (SDOH) and other factors associated with the initiation of CDK4/6i for HR+/HER2- MBC in the Medicare population. Using a retrospective cohort design, patients aged ≥65 years and diagnosed during 2015-2017 were selected from the SEER-Medicare database. Time from MBC diagnosis to first CDK4/6i initiation was the study outcome. The effect of SDOH measures and other predictors on the outcome was assessed using the multivariable Fine and Gray hazard modeling. Of 752 eligible women, 352 (46.8%) initiated CDK4/6i after MBC diagnosis (median time to initiation: 27.9 months). In adjusted analysis, SDOH factors significantly associated with CDK4/6i initiation included high versus low median household income (HHI) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.03-2.81) and the percentage of population with high versus low Medicare-only coverage (HR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.04-2.27). In summary, older Medicare patients with HR+/HER2- MBC residing in areas with high median HHI and a high proportion of Medicare-only coverage had higher rates of initiating CDK4/6i, suggesting inequitable access to these novel, effective treatments and a need for policy intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:乳腺癌是世界上最大的肿瘤,激素受体阳性患者预后相对较好。然而,大多数患者会出现晚期耐药性,重要因素之一是由于原始雌激素受体(ER)表达的丧失。
    方法:我们在江苏省人民医院(JSPH)进行了第二次活检的115例BC患者中进行了这项研究,并将患者分为两个亚组ERto-和ERto-。首先,评估两组患者的临床病理特征。第二,我们在42例患者中应用下一代测序(NGS),探索了与BCER瘤内异质性相关的候选基因.肿瘤转录组学的多组学整合分析,癌症相关途径,进行了诊断和预后价值以及免疫概况。此外,初步实验还用于评估KMT2C和ERα(ESR1)表达之间的相关性。CCK-8,5-乙炔基-2'-脱氧尿苷(EdU)测定,应用Transwell测定和伤口划痕测试来探索KMT2C和BC之间的细胞相互作用。
    结果:我们发现两个亚组的组织学类型(p=0.008)和无病生存期(DFS)(p=0.004)显着不同。在Cox生存分析中,转移(危险比(HR)>1,p=0.007)和新辅助(HR<1,p<0.001)是DFS的独立预后因素。此外,通过分析NGS结果,我们发现了四个基因KMT2C,FGFR19,FGF1和FGF4是ER至-亚组中高度突变的基因。此外,KMT2C基因在BC和泛癌症中显示出显著的诊断价值和预后价值.此外,KMT2C表达与T细胞CD4+免疫浸润水平呈正相关,发现巨噬细胞和中性粒细胞。最后,Westernblot和RT-qPCR检测发现,KMT2C和ERα(ESR1)在mRNA和蛋白水平的表达呈极显著正相关。抑制KMT2C显著降低增殖,入侵,和MCF7细胞的迁移。
    结论:来自JSPH的两组患者具有不同的临床特征和预后。KMT2C基因可能通过分子调控影响BC的进展,表观遗传活性和免疫浸润。它还可以作为接受ER状态从阳性转变为阴性的BC患者的新型预后生物标志物。
    BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the world\'s largest tumor species in which hormone receptor-positive patients have relatively good prognosis. However, majority of patients will develop late resistance, one of the important factors is due to the loss of the original estrogen receptor (ER) expression.
    METHODS: We conducted this study in 115 patients with BC who experienced second biopsy at Jiangsu Province Hospital (JSPH) and divided patients into two subgroups ER + to - and ER + to + . First, clinicopathological characteristics between two groups were evaluated. Second, we explored candidate genes related to BC ER intratumor heterogeneity by applying next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 42 patients. Multi-omics integrative analysis of tumor transcriptomic, cancer-related pathway, diagnostic and prognostic value and immune profile were conducted. Besides, preliminary assay were also used to evaluate the correlation between KMT2C and ERα (ESR1) expression. The CCK-8, 5-Ethynyl-2\'-deoxyuridine (EdU) assays, Transwell assays and the wound scratch tests were applied to explore the cellular interactions between KMT2C and BC.
    RESULTS: We find the histological type (p = 0.008) and disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.004) were significantly different in two subgroups. In Cox survival analysis, metastasis (Hazard ratio (HR) > 1, p = 0.007) and neo-adjuvant (HR < 1, p < 0.001) are independent prognostic factors of DFS. Besides, by analyzing NGS results, we found four genes KMT2C, FGFR19, FGF1 and FGF4 were highly mutated genes in ER + to - subgroup. Furthermore, the gene KMT2C displayed significant diagnostic value and prognostic value in BC and pan-cancer. In addition, a positive correlation between KMT2C expression and immune infiltrating levels of T cell CD4 + , macrophage and neutrophil was found. In the end, Western blot and RT-qPCR assay were used and found KMT2C and ERα (ESR1) expressions are strongly positive correlated in mRNA and protein level. Inhibition of KMT2C significantly reduced proliferation, invasion, and migration of MCF7 cells.
    CONCLUSIONS: People in two cohorts from JSPH presented different clinical characteristics and prognosis. The gene KMT2C may affect the progression of BC by regulating the molecular, epigenetic activity and immune infiltration. It may also serve as a novel prognostic biomarker for BC patients who underwent ER status converted from positive to negative.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较CDK4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)和内分泌治疗(ET)在一线和二线治疗激素受体阳性(HR)的情况,HER2阴性,转移性乳腺癌(MBC)使用真实世界的证据。
    方法:HR+患者,HER2阴性MBC,从全国电子健康记录衍生的FlatironHealth去识别数据库中确定了在2015年2月3日至2021年11月2日之间诊断并有≥3个月随访.治疗组包括:(1)具有CDK4/6i的一线ET(一线CDK4/6i)与(2)单独的一线ET,随后是具有CDK4/6i的二线ET(二线CDK4/6i)。使用卡方检验和双样本t检验测试基线特征的差异。三线治疗的时间到了,开始化疗的时间,使用Kaplan-Maier方法比较总生存期。
    结果:分析包括2771名患者(2170名一线CDK4/6i和601名二线CDK4/6i)。接受一线CDK4/6i的患者年龄较小(75%vs68%<75岁,p=0.0001),不太可能没有保险或没有保险状态记录(10%与13%,p=0.04),更好的性能状态(50%对43%,ECOG为0,p=0.03),并且更有可能从头MBC(36%与24%,p<0.001)。三线治疗时间(49vs22个月,p<0.001)和化疗时间(68vs41个月,p<0.001)在接受一线CDK4/6i的患者中更长。总生存期(54vs49个月,p=0.33)组间相似。
    结论:使用CDK4/6ivs第二-,ET线与接受三线治疗的时间更长和接受化疗的时间更长相关。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) in the first- versus second-line setting for treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) using real-world evidence.
    METHODS: Patients with HR+, HER2 negative MBC, diagnosed between 2/3/2015 and 11/2/2021 and having ≥ 3 months follow-up were identified from the nationwide electronic health record-derived Flatiron Health de-identified database. Treatment cohorts included: (1) first-line ET with a CDK 4/6i (1st-line CDK4/6i) versus (2) first-line ET alone followed by second-line ET with a CDK4/6i (2nd-line CDK4/6i). Differences in baseline characteristics were tested using chi-square tests and two-sample t-tests. Time to third-line therapy, time to start of chemotherapy, and overall survival were compared using Kaplan-Maier method.
    RESULTS: The analysis included 2771 patients (2170 1st-line CDK4/6i and 601 2nd-line CDK4/6i). Patients receiving 1st-line CDK4/6i were younger (75% vs 68% < 75 years old, p = 0.0001), less likely uninsured or not having insurance status documented (10% vs. 13%, p = 0.04), of better performance status (50% vs 43% with ECOG 0, p = 0.03), and more likely to have de novo MBC (36% vs. 24%, p < 0.001). Time to third-line therapy (49 vs 22 months, p < 0.001) and time to chemotherapy (68 vs 41 months, p < 0.001) were longer in those receiving first-line CDK4/6i. Overall survival (54 vs 49 months, p = 0.33) was similar between groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Use of CDK4/6i with first-, vs second-, line ET was associated with longer time to receipt of 3rd-line therapy and longer time to receipt of chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    雌激素受体α基因(ESRl)的突变可导致激素受体阳性(HR)/HER2转移性乳腺癌(MBC)对内分泌治疗(ET)的抵抗。在循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)中用ET预处理的患者中,可以检测到多达40%的ESR1突变。来自前瞻性随机试验的数据强调了那些具有可检测到的ESR1突变的HR+/HER2-MBC患者在接受新型选择性雌激素受体降解剂(SERD)时的预后更好。因为它是重要的及时检测临床上可行的癌症突变\'实时\',目前非常需要优化HR+/HER2-MBC中液体活检样本的ESR1测试策略,包括标准化天气病理学报告。我们的手稿旨在阐明在MBC中进行ESR1测试的临床和生物学原理,同时严格检查当前可用的ctDNA分子检测指南和建议。该目标将扩展到MBC中ESR1测试的协调和标准化的关键方面,特别关注病理学实验室工作流程。最后,我们提出了一个清晰而全面的模型来报告HR+/HER2-MBC中ctDNA的ESR1测试结果。
    Mutations in the estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1) can lead to resistance to endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). ESR1 mutations can be detected in up to 40 % of patients pretreated with ET in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Data from prospective randomized trials highlight those patients with HR+/HER2- MBC with detectable ESR1 mutations experience better outcomes when receiving novel selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs). There is a high need for optimizing ESR1 testing strategies on liquid biopsy samples in HR+/HER2- MBC, including a hugh quality workflow implementation and molecular pathology reporting standardization. Our manuscript aims to elucidate the clinical and biological rationale for ESR1 testing in MBC, while critically examining the currently available guidelines and recommendations for this specific type of molecular testing on ctDNA. The objective will extend to the critical aspects of harmonization and standardization, specifically focusing on the pathology laboratory workflow. Finally, we propose a clear and comprehensive model for reporting ESR1 testing results on ctDNA in HR+/HER2- MBC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:坚持口服抗癌治疗(OATs)是转移性乳腺癌(MBC)提高生存率和生活质量的关键问题。该研究旨在分析与MBC患者OATs相关的主要主题和属性。这项研究是题为“增强转移性乳腺癌患者的治疗依从性”的项目的一部分,旨在产生不依从性的预测模型,决策支持系统,以及提高对OATs依从性的指导方针。
    方法:本研究包括使用焦点小组方法的探索性观察和定性分析。开发了半结构化面试指南来处理相关的OAT主题。Wordcloud地块,网络分析,并进行情感分析。
    结果:19名女性MBC患者参加了方案(平均年龄55.95,SD=6.87)。出现了四个主要主题:(主题1)个人临床路径;(主题2)依从性障碍;(主题3)依从性资源;(主题4)患者对新技术的感知。Wordcloud和网络分析强调了治疗副作用的重要作用以及与临床医生在依从性行为调节中的关系。此结果与情绪分析相一致,该分析强调患者对与临床价值相关的问题以及负责患者护理的医生的无效沟通和不连续性感到恐惧。
    结论:该研究强调了个体的关键作用,关系变量,副作用是影响MBC依从性的内部和外部决定因素。最后,eHealth技术提供的与其他类似疾病患者联系并分享经验的机会可能会减轻MBC患者的负担。
    OBJECTIVE: Adherence to oral anticancer treatments (OATs) is a critical issue in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to enhance survivorship and quality of life. The study is aimed to analyze the main themes and attributes related to OATs in MBC patients. This research is part of a project titled \"Enhancing Therapy Adherence Among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients\" designed to produce a predictive model of non-adherence, a decision support system, and guidelines to improve adherence to OATs.
    METHODS: The study consists of an exploratory observational and qualitative analysis using a focus group method. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to handle relevant OAT themes. Wordcloud plots, network analysis, and sentiment analysis were performed.
    RESULTS: Nineteen female MBC patients participated in the protocol (age mean 55.95, SD = 6.87). Four main themes emerged: (theme 1) individual clinical pathway; (theme 2) barriers to adherence; (theme 3) resources to adherence; (theme 4) patients\' perception of new technologies. The Wordcloud and network analysis highlighted the important role of treatment side effects and the relationship with the clinician in the modulation of adherence behavior. This result is consistent with the sentiment analysis underscoring patients experience fear of issues related to clinical values and ineffective communication and discontinuity of the doctor in charge of the patient care.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted the key role of the individual, relational variables, and side effects as internal and external determinants influencing adherence to MBC. Finally, the opportunity offered by eHealth technology to connect with other patients with similar conditions and share experiences could be a relief for MBC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们进行了一项更新的荟萃分析,以探讨局部区域手术在初发IV期乳腺癌患者中的价值。
    方法:进行了文献检索,以确定比较原发性肿瘤切除与全身治疗在新的IV期乳腺癌中的随机对照试验。总生存期(OS)的风险比(HR),局部无复发生存率(LRFS),和远端无复发生存期(DRFS)进行估计和汇总.
    结果:六项研究符合资格,共1368名患者。与单独的全身治疗相比,局部手术的OS(HR=0.86;95CI:0.77-0.96;p=0.01;I2=45%)和LRFS(HR=0.35;95CI:0.20-0.62;p=0.0003;I2=83%)均显着改善。在DRFS方面没有显着差异(HR=0.96;95CI:0.41-2.22;p=0.92;I2=86%)。激素受体阳性患者(HR=0.79;p=0.003)和HER2阴性患者(HR=0.80;p=0.003)的OS获益更明显。
    结论:这项研究表明,局部手术在新的IV期乳腺癌患者中赋予了显着的OS和LRFS益处,并且可以作为选定患者的替代选择。
    BACKGROUND: We performed an updated meta-analysis to explore the value of locoregional surgery in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients.
    METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing primary tumor resection with systemic therapy in de novo stage IV breast cancer. The hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) were estimated and pooled.
    RESULTS: Six studies were eligible, including a total of 1368 patients. Both OS (HR = 0.86; 95 %CI: 0.77-0.96; p = 0.01; I2 = 45 %) and LRFS (HR = 0.35; 95 %CI: 0.20-0.62; p = 0.0003; I2 = 83 %) were significantly improved with locoregional surgery compared with systemic therapy alone. There was no significant difference in terms of DRFS (HR = 0.96; 95 %CI: 0.41-2.22; p = 0.92; I2 = 86 %). The OS benefit was more pronounced in hormone receptor-positive patients (HR = 0.79; p = 0.003) and HER2-negative patients (HR = 0.80; p = 0.003).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that locoregional surgery conferred significant OS and LRFS benefits in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients and may serve as an alternative choice for selected patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)是HR+HER2转移性乳腺癌的一线治疗方法。然而,之前的CDK4/6i对脑转移(BM)自然史的影响没有得到很好的描述.
    方法:我们回顾了2015年1月1日至2021年7月31日期间接受CDK4/6i(CDK-Y)的363例HR+HER2-BM患者和2010年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间未接受CDK4/6i(CDK-N)的299例HR+HER2-BM患者的回顾性数据。在BM后接受CDK4/6i的患者中评估CNSPFS和OS。在BM之前接受CDK4/6i的患者和CDK-N队列之间评估了BM发展时间的OS结果:在363例患者的CDK-Y队列中,203(56%)在BM之前接受了CDK4/6i,133(37%)仅在BM后接受CDK4/6i,而27(7%)在BM前后均接受CDK4/6i。仅在BM后接受CDK4/6i的患者的CNSPFS中位数为21.4个月,在BM前后接受CDK4/6i的患者为9.4个月(p=0.006)。仅在BM后接受CDK4/6i的患者的中位OS为24.9个月,在BM前后接受CDK4/6i的患者的中位OS为12.1个月(p=0.0098)。在BM之前接受CDK4/6i的患者与CDK-N队列相比,从BM发展时间的中位OS分别为4.3个月和7.7个月(p=0.0082)。
    结论:在BM之前暴露CDK4/6i可能导致耐药机制的发展,进而在BM发展后用CDK4/6i重新攻击时降低CNSPFS和OS。这激发了用于患者选择的生物标志物的研究。
    BACKGROUND: Cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are recommended 1st line treatments in HR+HER2- metastatic breast cancer. However, the impact of prior CDK4/6i on the natural history of brain metastases (BM) is not well described.
    METHODS: We reviewed retrospective data for 363 patients with HR+HER2- BM who received a CDK4/6i (CDK-Y) between 1 Jan 2015 to 31 July 2021 and 299 patients with HR+HER2- BM who did not receive a CDK4/6i (CDK-N) between 1 Jan 2010 to 31 Dec 2014. CNS PFS and OS were assessed in patients who received CDK4/6i after BM. OS from the time of BM development was assessed between patients who received CDK4/6i before BM and the CDK-N cohort RESULTS: In the CDK-Y cohort of 363 patients, 203 (56 %) received a CDK4/6i before BM, 133 (37 %) received a CDK4/6i only after BM and 27 (7 %) received a CDK4/6i both before and after BM. Median CNS PFS was 21.4 months for patients receiving a CDK4/6i only after BM and 9.4 months for patients who received CDK4/6i both before and after BM (p = 0.006). Median OS was 24.9 months for patients receiving a CDK4/6i only after BM and 12.1 months for patients who received CDK4/6i both before and after BM (p = 0.0098). Median OS from time of BM development for patients receiving a CDK4/6i before BM versus the CDK-N cohort was 4.3 months and 7.7 months respectively (p = 0.0082).
    CONCLUSIONS: CDK4/6i exposure prior to BM may lead to development of resistance mechanisms which in turn reduces CNS PFS and OS upon rechallenging with a CDK4/6i after BM development. This motivates investigation of biomarkers for patient selection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号