Metastatic breast cancer

转移性乳腺癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于CDK4/6i联合ET的疗效与HR阳性之间的关系,文献中没有明确的信息。然而,我们知道,最长的总生存期是ER强阳性/PR中或强阳性组.因此,我们旨在调查在HR中产生阳性的CDK4/6i治疗。
    用CDK4/6i和HR>10%治疗的诊断为HR+/HER2-MBC的患者进行回顾性评估。为了分析人力资源积极性的作用,ER为中度阳性(10-49%),ER为强阳性(50-100%);PR分为中度阳性(10-49%)和PR强阳性(50-100%)。
    纳入研究的150例患者的中位随访时间为15.2个月(95%CI,2.1-40.9个月)。全组反应最高的是ER强阳性/PR中度或强阳性组,和ER中度阳性/PR中度或强组。其次是ER强阳性/PR阴性组,然后是ER中度阳性/PR阴性组。尽管这些优势在统计上并不显著,它们的数值更高(ORR:83.8%与83.3%vs.77.4%vs.62.5%,分别为p=0.488)。全组生存率最高的是ER强阳性/PR中度或强阳性组,其次是ER中度阳性/PR中度或强阳性组,ER强阳性/PR阴性组,其次是ER中度阳性/PR阴性组,分别(p=0.410)。然而,这些优势没有统计学意义.
    因此,接受CDK4/6i联合ET的HR+/HER2-MBC患者提示HR阳性百分比可能具有预测和预后作用。
    UNASSIGNED: There is no clear information in the literature about the relationship between the efficacy of CDK 4/6i combined with ET and HR positivity. However, we know that the longest overall survival was in the ER-strong positive/PR intermediate or strong positive groups. Therefore, we aimed to investigate CDK4/6i treatments that create positivity in HR.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with the diagnosis of HR+/HER2- MBC who were treated with CDK 4/6i and HR >10% were retrospectively evaluated. To analyze the role of HR positivity, ER was moderately positive (10-49%) and ER was strongly positive (50-100%); PR was grouped as moderately positive (10-49%) and PR strongly positive (50-100%).
    UNASSIGNED: Median follow-up of 150 patients included in the study was 15.2 months (95% CI, 2.1-40.9 months). The highest response in the whole group was obtained in the ER-strong positive/PR moderate or strong positive group, and the ER moderate positive/PR moderate or strong group. This was followed by the ER strong positive/PR negative group, and then the ER moderate positive/PR negative group. Although these advantages were not statistically significant, they were numerically higher (ORR: 83.8% vs. 83.3% vs. 77.4% vs. 62.5%, p=0.488, respectively). The highest survival in the whole group was achieved in the ER strong positive/PR moderate or strongly positive group, followed by the ER moderately positive/PR moderate or strongly positive group, the ER strongly positive/PR negative group followed by the ER moderate positive/PR negative group, respectively(p=0.410). However, these advantages were not statistically significant.
    UNASSIGNED: As a result, HR+/HER2- MBC patients receiving CDK 4/6i combined with ET suggest that the percentage of HR positivity may have a predictive and prognostic role.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Eribulin是一种非紫杉烷合成类似物,在许多国家被批准作为治疗转移性乳腺癌患者的三线治疗方法。除了其有丝分裂性质,艾瑞布林具有非有丝分裂特性,包括但不限于,它能够诱导上皮向间充质转化的表型逆转,血管重塑,减少免疫抑制肿瘤微环境。自批准以来,在所有乳腺癌亚型中,有大量的研究调查了艾日布林作为早期治疗的应用,以及与其他药物如免疫疗法和靶向治疗的联合应用,包括激素受体阳性,HER2阳性和三阴性乳腺癌,许多展示有希望的活动。本文将重点介绍艾瑞布林在所有亚型转移性乳腺癌治疗中的应用,包括其作为早期药物的作用。它的毒性特征,和潜在的未来方向。
    Eribulin is a non-taxane synthetic analogue approved in many countries as third-line treatment for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. In addition to its mitotic property, eribulin has non-mitotic properties including but not limited to, its ability to induce phenotypic reversal of epithelial to mesenchymal transition, vascular remodelling, reduction in immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. Since approval, there has been a surge in studies investigating the application of eribulin as an earlier-line treatment and also in combination with other agents such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy across all breast cancer sub-types, including hormone receptor positive, HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer, many demonstrating promising activity. This review will focus on the application of eribulin in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer across all subtypes including its role as an earlier-line agent, its toxicity profile, and potential future directions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    手术在转移性乳腺癌(MBC)中的作用目前存在争议。几种新颖的统计和深度学习(DL)方法有望在个体水平上推断手术的适用性。
    这项研究的目的是确定最适用的DL模型,以确定可以从手术中受益的MBC患者以及所需的手术类型。
    我们介绍了具有混合效应(DSME)的深度生存回归,集成三种因果推断方法的半参数DL模型。对六个模型进行了训练,以提出个性化的治疗建议。将接受符合DL模型建议的治疗的患者与接受与建议不同的治疗的患者进行比较。反向概率加权(IPW)用于最小化偏差。使用多元线性回归和因果推断可视化和量化各种特征对手术选择的影响。
    总共,纳入5269名女性MBC患者。DSME是一个独立的保护因素,在推荐手术(IPW调整后的风险比[HR]=0.39,95%置信区间[CI]:0.19-0.78)和手术类型(IPW调整后的HR=0.66,95%CI:0.48-0.93)方面优于其他模型.DSME优于其他型号和传统指南,表明从手术中受益的患者比例更高,尤其是保乳手术.患者特征的偏见效应,包括年龄,肿瘤大小,转移部位,淋巴结状态,和乳腺癌亚型,对手术的决定也进行了量化。
    我们的研究结果表明,DSME可以有效地识别可能从手术中受益的MBC患者以及所需的特定类型的手术。这种方法可以促进开发高效、可靠的治疗建议系统,并为决策提供可量化的证据。
    UNASSIGNED: The role of surgery in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is currently controversial. Several novel statistical and deep learning (DL) methods promise to infer the suitability of surgery at the individual level.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to identify the most applicable DL model for determining patients with MBC who could benefit from surgery and the type of surgery required.
    UNASSIGNED: We introduced the deep survival regression with mixture effects (DSME), a semi-parametric DL model integrating three causal inference methods. Six models were trained to make individualized treatment recommendations. Patients who received treatments in line with the DL models\' recommendations were compared with those who underwent treatments divergent from the recommendations. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to minimize bias. The effects of various features on surgery selection were visualized and quantified using multivariate linear regression and causal inference.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 5269 female patients with MBC were included. DSME was an independent protective factor, outperforming other models in recommending surgery (IPW-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.78) and type of surgery (IPW-adjusted HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48-0.93). DSME was superior to other models and traditional guidelines, suggesting a higher proportion of patients benefiting from surgery, especially breast-conserving surgery. The debiased effect of patient characteristics, including age, tumor size, metastatic sites, lymph node status, and breast cancer subtypes, on surgery decision was also quantified.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggested that DSME could effectively identify patients with MBC likely to benefit from surgery and the specific type of surgery needed. This method can facilitate the development of efficient, reliable treatment recommendation systems and provide quantifiable evidence for decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阳性,激素受体阳性(HR阳性)转移性乳腺癌(MBC)通常在后续系列中接受曲妥珠单抗emtansine(T-DM1)治疗.将内分泌治疗(ET)与T-DM1结合可以改善该亚型的治疗结果。因此,本研究旨在探讨T-DM1联合ET在HER2阳性和HR阳性MBC中的获益.这项研究是第一个研究ET与T-DM1结合的益处。材料和方法:本研究分析了2010年6月至2021年12月接受T-DM1治疗的HER2阳性和HR阳性MBC患者的医疗记录。根据患者是否同时接受ET和T-DM1分为两组。主要终点是确定无进展生存期(PFS),而次要终点是总生存期(OS),客观反应率,和治疗的安全性。结果:我们的分析检查了88例患者,其中32例(36.4%)接受T-DM1联合ET治疗。联合治疗显示中位数PFS显着改善(15.4vs.6.4个月;p=0.00004)和中位OS(35.0与23.1个月;p=0.026)与单独的T-DM1相比。组合组的ORR也较高(65.6%vs.29.3%;p=0.026)。与未接受帕妥珠单抗治疗的患者相比,先前接受帕妥珠单抗治疗的患者在T-DM1上的中位PFS降低(11.7vs.5.4个月,分别为;p<0.01)。与HER2+患者相比,T-DM1在HER23+患者中显示出更好的中位PFS。扩增率>2.0(10.8vs5.8个月,分别为;p=0.049)。安全性与以前的T-DM1研究一致。结论:T-DM1联合ET可显著改善HER2阳性和HR阳性MBC患者的PFS和OS。我们的研究表明,先前的帕妥珠单抗治疗加曲妥珠单抗治疗可能会降低T-DM1疗效。
    Background and Objectives: Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive, hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) usually undergo trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) therapy in subsequent lines. Combining endocrine therapy (ET) with T-DM1 can improve treatment outcomes in this subtype. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the benefits of using T-DM1 with ET in HER2-positive and HR-positive MBC. This study was the first to investigate the benefits of combining ET with T-DM1. Material and Methods: This study analyzed the medical records of patients with HER2-positive and HR-positive MBC who were treated with T-DM1 from June 2010 to December 2021. The patients were divided into groups based on whether they received concomitant ET with T-DM1. The primary endpoint was to determine the progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and safety of the treatment. Results: Our analysis examined 88 patients, of whom 32 (36.4%) were treated with T-DM1 in combination with ET. The combination therapy showed a significant improvement in median PFS (15.4 vs. 6.4 months; p = 0.00004) and median OS (35.0 vs. 23.1 months; p = 0.026) compared to T-DM1 alone. The ORR was also higher in the combination group (65.6% vs. 29.3%; p = 0.026). Patients treated with pertuzumab priorly had reduced median PFS on T-DM1 compared to those who were not treated with pertuzumab (11.7 vs. 5.4 months, respectively; p < 0.01). T-DM1 demonstrated better median PFS in HER2 3+ patients compared to HER2 2+ patients, with an amplification ratio of >2.0 (10.8 vs 5.8 months, respectively; p = 0.049). The safety profiles were consistent with previous T-DM1 studies. Conclusions: The combination of T-DM1 with ET can significantly improve PFS and OS in patients with HER2-positive and HR-positive MBC. Our study suggests that prior pertuzumab treatment plus trastuzumab treatment might decrease T-DM1 efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR/HER2-)转移性乳腺癌(MBC)中,细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6is)已取代单独的内分泌治疗成为治疗标准;然而,开始治疗的几个障碍仍然存在。我们评估了医疗保险人群中健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)和与启动HR/HER2-MBC的CDK4/6i相关的其他因素。使用回顾性队列设计,我们从SEER-Medicare数据库中选择年龄≥65岁并在2015-2017年期间确诊的患者.从MBC诊断到第一次CDK4/6i开始的时间是研究结果。使用多变量精细和灰色危险模型评估了SDOH措施和其他预测因子对结果的影响。752名合格妇女中,352(46.8%)在MBC诊断后启动CDK4/6i(中位启动时间:27.9个月)。在调整后的分析中,与CDK4/6i启动显着相关的SDOH因素包括家庭收入中位数(HHI)高与低(风险比[HR]=1.70;95%CI=1.03-2.81)以及仅医疗保险覆盖率高与低的人群百分比(HR=1.54;95%CI=1.04-2.27)。总之,在HHI中位数较高且仅Medicare覆盖率较高的地区,HR+/HER2-MBC的老年Medicare患者的CDK4/6i起始率较高,暗示对这些小说的不公平访问,有效的治疗和政策干预的需要。
    In hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) have replaced endocrine therapy alone as the standard of care; however, several barriers to treatment initiation still exist. We assessed social determinants of health (SDOH) and other factors associated with the initiation of CDK4/6i for HR+/HER2- MBC in the Medicare population. Using a retrospective cohort design, patients aged ≥65 years and diagnosed during 2015-2017 were selected from the SEER-Medicare database. Time from MBC diagnosis to first CDK4/6i initiation was the study outcome. The effect of SDOH measures and other predictors on the outcome was assessed using the multivariable Fine and Gray hazard modeling. Of 752 eligible women, 352 (46.8%) initiated CDK4/6i after MBC diagnosis (median time to initiation: 27.9 months). In adjusted analysis, SDOH factors significantly associated with CDK4/6i initiation included high versus low median household income (HHI) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.03-2.81) and the percentage of population with high versus low Medicare-only coverage (HR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.04-2.27). In summary, older Medicare patients with HR+/HER2- MBC residing in areas with high median HHI and a high proportion of Medicare-only coverage had higher rates of initiating CDK4/6i, suggesting inequitable access to these novel, effective treatments and a need for policy intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:坚持口服抗癌治疗(OATs)是转移性乳腺癌(MBC)提高生存率和生活质量的关键问题。该研究旨在分析与MBC患者OATs相关的主要主题和属性。这项研究是题为“增强转移性乳腺癌患者的治疗依从性”的项目的一部分,旨在产生不依从性的预测模型,决策支持系统,以及提高对OATs依从性的指导方针。
    方法:本研究包括使用焦点小组方法的探索性观察和定性分析。开发了半结构化面试指南来处理相关的OAT主题。Wordcloud地块,网络分析,并进行情感分析。
    结果:19名女性MBC患者参加了方案(平均年龄55.95,SD=6.87)。出现了四个主要主题:(主题1)个人临床路径;(主题2)依从性障碍;(主题3)依从性资源;(主题4)患者对新技术的感知。Wordcloud和网络分析强调了治疗副作用的重要作用以及与临床医生在依从性行为调节中的关系。此结果与情绪分析相一致,该分析强调患者对与临床价值相关的问题以及负责患者护理的医生的无效沟通和不连续性感到恐惧。
    结论:该研究强调了个体的关键作用,关系变量,副作用是影响MBC依从性的内部和外部决定因素。最后,eHealth技术提供的与其他类似疾病患者联系并分享经验的机会可能会减轻MBC患者的负担。
    OBJECTIVE: Adherence to oral anticancer treatments (OATs) is a critical issue in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to enhance survivorship and quality of life. The study is aimed to analyze the main themes and attributes related to OATs in MBC patients. This research is part of a project titled \"Enhancing Therapy Adherence Among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients\" designed to produce a predictive model of non-adherence, a decision support system, and guidelines to improve adherence to OATs.
    METHODS: The study consists of an exploratory observational and qualitative analysis using a focus group method. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to handle relevant OAT themes. Wordcloud plots, network analysis, and sentiment analysis were performed.
    RESULTS: Nineteen female MBC patients participated in the protocol (age mean 55.95, SD = 6.87). Four main themes emerged: (theme 1) individual clinical pathway; (theme 2) barriers to adherence; (theme 3) resources to adherence; (theme 4) patients\' perception of new technologies. The Wordcloud and network analysis highlighted the important role of treatment side effects and the relationship with the clinician in the modulation of adherence behavior. This result is consistent with the sentiment analysis underscoring patients experience fear of issues related to clinical values and ineffective communication and discontinuity of the doctor in charge of the patient care.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted the key role of the individual, relational variables, and side effects as internal and external determinants influencing adherence to MBC. Finally, the opportunity offered by eHealth technology to connect with other patients with similar conditions and share experiences could be a relief for MBC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    ArbeitsgemeinschaftGynäkologischeOnkologie(德国妇科肿瘤学小组,AGO)提出了2024年更新的循证建议,用于诊断和治疗局部晚期和转移性乳腺癌患者。
    The Breast Committee of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (German Gynecological Oncology Group, AGO) presents the 2024 update of the evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:脑膜疾病(LMD)是转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的破坏性并发症。更好地了解风险因素至关重要,自然史,和治疗结果,包括现代队列中的患者。
    方法:在这项单中心回顾性队列研究中,我们确定了从2000年到2024年接受治疗的MBC和LMD患者,并提取了关键的临床,治疗,和生存数据。
    结果:我们确定了111例MBC和LMD患者,包括以下亚型的患者:HR+/HER2-(n=53,47.7%),HER2+(n=30,27.0%),三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC;n=28,25.2%)。从MBC诊断到LMD的中位时间为16.4个月(范围0-101.3个月)。确诊LMD后,大多数患者接受了全身治疗(n=66,59.5%)和/或中枢神经系统(CNS)定向治疗(n=94,84.7%),包括鞘内治疗(n=42,37.8%)和/或CNS定向放射治疗(n=70,63.1%).在所有患者中,从诊断LMD到死亡的中位总生存期(OS)为4.1个月(范围0.1-78.1个月),且因亚型而异,HR+/HER2-或HER2+MBC患者的寿命比TNBC患者长(分别为4.2和6.8个月与2.0个月,p<0.01,HR2.15,95%CI1.36-3.39)。接受中枢神经系统导向治疗的患者比未接受治疗的患者寿命更长(4.2vs.1.3,p=0.02HR0.54,0.32-0.91)。2015年至2024年诊断为LMD的患者比2000年至2014年诊断为LMD的患者寿命更长(6.4vs.2.9个月,p=0.04,HR0.67,95%CI0.46-0.99)。在多变量分析中,从LMD到死亡,TNBC与OS较短相关(p=0.004,HR2.03,95%CI1.25-3.30).
    结论:这是最大的MBC和LMD患者系列之一。2015年至2024年诊断为LMD的患者比2000年至2014年诊断的患者寿命更长,尽管总体中位OS较短。TNBC和LMD患者的OS特别短。LMD的新治疗策略仍然是未满足临床需求的领域。
    OBJECTIVE: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). It is critical to better understand the risk factors, natural history, and treatment outcomes, including patients in a modern cohort.
    METHODS: In this single center retrospective cohort study, we identified patients with MBC and LMD who received care from 2000 to 2024 and abstracted key clinical, treatment, and survival data.
    RESULTS: We identified 111 patients with MBC and LMD, including patients with the following subtypes: HR+/HER2- (n = 53, 47.7%), HER2+ (n = 30, 27.0%), and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC; n = 28, 25.2%). Median time from the diagnosis of MBC to LMD was 16.4 months (range 0-101.3 months). After the diagnosis of LMD, most patients received systemic therapy (n = 66, 59.5%) and/or central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapy (n = 94, 84.7%) including intrathecal therapy (n = 42, 37.8%) and/or CNS-directed radiation therapy (n = 70, 63.1%). In all patients, median overall survival (OS) from the diagnosis of LMD to death was 4.1 months (range 0.1-78.1 months) and varied by subtype, with HR+/HER2- or HER2+ MBC patients living longer than those with TNBC (4.2 and 6.8 months respectively vs. 2.0 months, p < 0.01, HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.36-3.39). Patients who received CNS-directed therapy lived longer than those who did not (4.2 vs. 1.3, p = 0.02 HR 0.54, 0.32-0.91). Patients diagnosed with LMD from 2015 to 2024 lived longer than those diagnosed from 2000 to 2014 (6.4 vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.04, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.99). On multivariable analysis, having TNBC was associated with shorter OS from time of LMD to death (p = 0.004, HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.25-3.30).
    CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the largest case series of patients with MBC and LMD. Patients diagnosed with LMD from 2015 to 2024 lived longer than those diagnosed from 2000 to 2014, although median OS was short overall. Patients with TNBC and LMD had particularly short OS. Novel therapeutic strategies for LMD remain an area of unmet clinical need.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管对老年转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者的难治性和/或内分泌治疗失败的研究有限,先前的一项研究表明,低剂量口服环磷酰胺(CY)可以提高MBC患者的总体生存率,可能通过调节性T细胞(Tregs)的免疫调节。我们通过外周血调节性T细胞分析,初步研究了内分泌治疗(ET)与口服低剂量CY相结合作为老年患者的抢救治疗。此外,我们评估了肿瘤三级淋巴结构(TLS)与治疗结果的相关性.本回顾性研究纳入2015年4月至2021年8月接受低剂量CY联合ET或ET治疗的HR+/HER2晚期乳腺癌患者。主要结果是临床控制率(CCR),次要结局是无进展生存期(PFS).在治疗期间通过流式细胞术方法监测由Tregs代表的循环T淋巴细胞亚群。TLS通过预处理标本的苏木精-伊红染色证实,使用蛋白石多色免疫荧光检测CD3,CD4和Foxp3。共纳入85例接受CY+ET的患者和50例仅接受ET的患者。接受CCR的患者百分比为73%(62/85)。70%(45/50),客观反应率(ORR)为28%(24/85)24%(12/50)。在研究期间没有发生死亡。平均PFS时间为13vs.11个月(P=0.03)。在CY+ET组中,CD4+/CD25+/Foxp3+T细胞减少(P<0.001)有利于临床控制和延长PFS(P<0.001)。与没有TLS的患者相比,具有TLS的患者更有可能具有更好的临床控制和PFS(平均时间=6个月),TLS预处理过程中Treg细胞数量增加与PFS延长相关(P=0.043)。口服低剂量CY与标准ET组合通过降低Treg水平发挥免疫作用以实现改善的临床反应。此外,有TLS的患者可能比没有TLS的患者受益更多,治疗前TLS中Treg细胞计数较高预示着更好的治疗效果。
    Despite limited research on refractory and/or endocrine therapy failure in elderly metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, a prior study showed that low-dose oral cyclophosphamide (CY) can improve the overall survival rate of MBC patients, possibly through the immunoregulation of regulatory T cells (Tregs). We preliminarily investigated the combination of endocrine therapy (ET) with oral low-dose CY as salvage therapy in elderly patients via peripheral blood regulatory T-cell analyses. In addition, we evaluated the associations of tumor tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) with therapeutic outcomes. HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients who received low-dose CY combined with ET or ET only from April 2015 to August 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The primary outcome was the clinical control rate (CCR), and the secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Circulating T lymphocyte subpopulations represented by Tregs were monitored during treatment by flow cytometry methods. TLSs wereconfirmed by hematoxylin-eosin staining of pretreatment specimens, and CD3, CD4, and Foxp3 were detected using Opal multicolor immunofluorescence. A total of 85 patients who received CY + ET and 50 patients who received ET only were enrolled, the percentage of patients who received CCR was 73% (62/85) vs. 70% (45/50), and the objective response rate (ORR) was 28% (24/85) vs. 24% (12/50). No deaths occurred during the study period. The mean PFS time was 13 vs. 11 months (P = 0.03). In the CY + ET group, decreases in CD4+/CD25+/Foxp3+ T cells (P < 0.001) were favorable for both clinical control and prolonged PFS (P < 0.001). Compared with patients without TLSs, those with TLSs were more likely to have better clinical control and PFS (mean time = 6 months), and a greater number of Treg cells during TLS pretreatment correlated with longer PFS (P = 0.043). Oral low-dose CY combined with standard ET exerts immunological effects by decreasing Treg levels to achieve improved clinical responses. Moreover, patients with TLSs might benefit more from such therapy than those without TLSs, and a high Treg cell count in TLSs before treatment predicts better therapeutic efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6(CDK4/6)抑制剂与传统内分泌疗法(ET)联合使用,现在是激素受体(HR)阳性和HER2阴性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的推荐一线治疗方法。然而,在HER2低阳性和HER2-0亚组中,对ET添加CDK4/6抑制剂的益处尚不清楚.我们旨在评估CDK4/6抑制剂联合ET在HR阳性患者中的有效性。HER2-低阳性和HER2-0MBC。
    方法:这项次要分析评估了HER2低阳性和HER2-0双盲患者的无进展生存期(PFS),安慰剂对照随机临床试验PALOMA-2和PALOMA-3。该研究包括1186例HER2阴性,HR阳性女性患者,有可用的免疫组织化学(IHC)和/或原位杂交(ISH)结果,在2013年2月至2014年8月期间注册的17个国家。HER2低阳性状态由ISH阴性的IHC1+或2+定义,和HER2-零通过IHC0。数据分析在2023年3月至5月之间进行。在PALOMA-2试验中,患者被随机分配接受palbociclib或安慰剂,与来曲唑联合用于HR阳性MBC的一线治疗。PALOMA-3研究中的患者,在以前的ET期间有进展或复发,被随机分配接受帕博西利布加氟维司群或安慰剂加氟维司群。主要终点是研究者评估的PFS。Kaplan-Meier方法和Cox比例风险模型用于评估HER2-0和HER2低阳性人群中治疗策略与PFS的关联。这两项试验在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT01740427和NCT01942135。
    结果:在PALOMA-2研究的666例MBC患者中,有153例HER2-0和513例HER2低阳性患者.在HER2-0人群中,帕博西尼-来曲唑组和安慰剂-来曲唑组的PFS无显著差异(风险比=0.79,95%置信区间[CI]0.48~1.30,p=0.34).在HER2低阳性人群中,palbociclib-来曲唑组的PFS风险显著低于安慰剂-来曲唑组(风险比=0.52,95%CI0.41-0.66,p<0.0001).PALOMA-3研究分析了520例MBC患者。在153例HER2-0患者中,帕博西尼-氟维司群组的PFS明显长于安慰剂-氟维司群组(风险比=0.54,95%CI0.30-0.95,p=0.034).在367例HER2低阳性患者中,帕博西尼-氟维司群改善PFS(风险比=0.39,95%CI0.28-0.54,p<0.0001)。
    结论:CDK4/6抑制剂与ET的组合显着改善了HER2低阳性患者的PFS,而对于HER2-0患者,获益主要在先前ET进展的患者中观察到。此外,HER2-0患者可能从一线CDK4/6抑制剂治疗中获得有限的益处。需要进一步的工作来验证这些发现并描述最有可能从CDK4/6抑制剂和ET的组合作为一线治疗中受益的患者亚群。
    背景:无。
    BACKGROUND: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in combination with traditional endocrine therapy (ET) are now the recommended first-line treatment for hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the benefits of adding CDK4/6 inhibitors to ET in HER2-low-positive and HER2-0 subgroups remain unclear. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with ET in patients with HR-positive, HER2-low-positive and HER2-0 MBC.
    METHODS: This secondary analysis assessed progression-free survival (PFS) among HER2-low-positive and HER2-0 patients enrolled in the double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3. The study included 1186 HER2-negative, HR-positive female patients, with available immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridization (ISH) results, across 17 countries enrolled between February 2013 and August 2014. HER2-low-positive status was defined by IHC 1+ or 2+ with negative ISH, and HER2-zero by IHC 0. Data analyses were conducted between March and May 2023. In the PALOMA-2 trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive either palbociclib or placebo, in combination with letrozole in the first-line treatment for HR-positive MBC. Patients in the PALOMA-3 study, who had progression or relapse during previous ET, were randomly allocated to receive either palbociclib plus fulvestrant or placebo plus fulvestrant. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. Kaplan-Meier approach and Cox proportional hazards model were applied to estimate the association of treatment strategies with PFS among HER2-0 and HER2-low-positive populations. The two trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01740427 and NCT01942135.
    RESULTS: Of the 666 patients with MBC from the PALOMA-2 study, there were 153 HER2-0 and 513 HER2-low-positive patients. In the HER2-0 population, no significant difference in PFS was observed between the palbociclib-letrozole and placebo-letrozole groups (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-1.30, p = 0.34). In the HER2-low-positive population, palbociclib-letrozole demonstrated a significantly lower risk of PFS than placebo-letrozole group (hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% CI 0.41-0.66, p < 0.0001). The PALOMA-3 study analysed 520 patients with MBC. Within the 153 HER2-0 patients, the palbociclib-fulvestrant group showed a significantly longer PFS than the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.95, p = 0.034). Among the 367 HER2-low-positive patients, palbociclib-fulvestrant improved PFS (hazard ratio = 0.39, 95% CI 0.28-0.54, p < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a CDK4/6 inhibitor with ET significantly improved PFS in HER2-low-positive patients, while for HER2-0 patients, benefits were primarily observed in patients who had progressed on previous ET. Furthermore, HER2-0 patients may derive limited benefits from first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment. Further work is needed to validate these findings and to delineate patient subsets that are most likely to benefit from the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and ET as first-line treatments.
    BACKGROUND: None.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号