背景:在过去,循证医学(EBM)和共享决策(SDM)已分别在健康科学和医学教育中教授。然而,越来越认识到包括SDM在内的EBM培训的重要性,从业者将EBM的所有步骤纳入其中,包括使用SDM的以人为中心的决策。然而,对初级医生整合EBM和SDM(EBM-SDM)的培训的好处很少进行实证调查,及其影响因素。本研究旨在探讨综合EBM-SDM培训如何影响初级医生对EBM和SDM的态度和实践;确定与初级医生的EBM-SDM学习和实践相关的障碍和促进者;并研究监督顾问的态度和权威如何影响初级医生的EBM-SDM学习和实践机会。
方法:我们为私人医疗保健环境中的初级医生开发并运行了一系列EBM-SDM课程,并保护教育活动时间。使用紧急定性设计,我们首先对12名初级医生进行了课程前和课程后的半结构化访谈,并专题分析了EBM-SDM课程对他们对EBM和SDM的态度和实践的影响。以及EBM和SDM综合学习和实践的障碍和促进者。根据初级医生的反应,然后,我们对他们的10名监督顾问进行了访谈,并使用第二个主题分析来了解顾问对初级医生的EBM-SDM学习和实践的影响。
结果:初级医生很欣赏EBM-SDM培训中患者的参与。培训课程结束后,他们打算提高包括SDM在内的以人为中心的决策技能。然而,初级医生确定了医学等级,时间因素,缺乏事先培训是EBM-SDM学习和实践的障碍,而具有受保护的学习时间和支持性顾问的私人医疗保健环境被认为是促进者。顾问对EBM和SDM的态度参差不齐,对初级医生在两种实践中的作用有不同的看法。这两者都影响了初级医生的执业。
结论:这些研究结果表明,未来的医学教育和研究应包括整合EBM和SDM的培训,以承认必须将培训付诸实践的复杂环境。并考虑了克服实践中实施EBM-SDM学习障碍的策略。
BACKGROUND: In the past, evidence-based medicine (EBM) and shared decision-making (SDM) have been taught separately in health sciences and medical education. However, recognition is increasing of the importance of EBM training that includes SDM, whereby practitioners incorporate all steps of EBM, including person-centered decision-making using SDM. However, there are few empirical investigations into the benefits of training that integrates EBM and SDM (EBM-SDM) for junior doctors, and their influencing factors. This study aimed to explore how integrated EBM-SDM training can influence junior doctors\' attitudes to and practice of EBM and SDM; to identify the barriers and facilitators associated with junior doctors\' EBM-SDM learning and practice; and to examine how supervising consultants\' attitudes and authority impact on junior doctors\' opportunities for EBM-SDM learning and practice.
METHODS: We developed and ran a series of EBM-SDM courses for junior doctors within a private healthcare setting with protected time for educational activities. Using an emergent qualitative design, we first conducted pre- and post-course semi-structured interviews with 12 junior doctors and thematically analysed the influence of an EBM-SDM course on their attitudes and practice of both EBM and SDM, and the barriers and facilitators to the integrated learning and practice of EBM and SDM. Based on the responses of junior doctors, we then conducted interviews with ten of their supervising consultants and used a second thematic analysis to understand the influence of consultants on junior doctors\' EBM-SDM learning and practice.
RESULTS: Junior doctors appreciated EBM-SDM training that involved patient participation. After the training course, they intended to improve their skills in person-centered decision-making including SDM. However, junior doctors identified medical hierarchy, time factors, and lack of prior training as barriers to the learning and practice of EBM-SDM, whilst the private healthcare setting with protected learning time and supportive consultants were considered facilitators. Consultants had mixed attitudes towards EBM and SDM and varied perceptions of the role of junior doctors in either practice, both of which influenced the practice of junior doctors.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested that future medical education and research should include training that integrates EBM and SDM that acknowledges the complex environment in which this training must be put into practice, and considers strategies to overcome barriers to the implementation of EBM-SDM learning in practice.