Only a few physicians are willing to comprehensively concern themselves with how a legally watertight treatment documentation should be structured, in addition to their practical activities; however, the importance of the documentation cannot be emphasized enough, not only for a potential case of liability but also for the medical (further) treatment. This article therefore illustrates the legal foundations of the mandatory documentation and the most important questions associated with it for the practice, in particular on the content of the documentation, the timing of the documentation, the preservation of treatment documents and on the conduct in cases of an impending incident.
UNASSIGNED: Die wenigsten Mediziner setzen sich neben ihrer praktischen Tätigkeit gern umfassend damit auseinander, wie eine juristisch „wasserdichte“ Behandlungsdokumentation zu gestalten ist. Die Bedeutung der Dokumentation nicht nur für einen etwaigen Haftungsfall, sondern auch für die medizinische (Weiter‑)Behandlung kann jedoch nicht ausreichend hervorgehoben werden. Der Beitrag beleuchtet daher die rechtlichen Grundlagen der Dokumentationspflicht sowie die wichtigsten damit zusammenhängenden Fragen für die Praxis, insbesondere zum Inhalt der Dokumentation, zum Dokumentationszeitpunkt, zur Aufbewahrung der Behandlungsunterlagen und zum Verhalten bei einem sich abzeichnenden Zwischenfall.

UNASSIGNED: In the hospital environment, any liability for organizational inadequacy and/or inefficiency, or again for defects in the facilities, or inadequacy of health equipment may be found in the work of the apex professional figures: Medical Director, the General Manager, and/or others. The responsibility for the internal organization of the department falls on the figure of the Director of the Complex Structure where the deficiencies have not been promptly and adequately reported to the top figures.
UNASSIGNED: A woman 61-year-old, was admitted on a voluntary basis to the Department of Psychiatry. On the third day, in the early morning hours, the patient was found on the ground floor, lying on the floor near the entrance door of the ward with a lacerated contusion wound to the head. The woman underwent total body CT examination with findings of fractured polytrauma as well as subarachnoid hemorrhage and complete fracture of the spleen, which was surgically removed. Three days later, despite the care given, death occurred. The injuries ascertained were consistent with voluntary precipitation from the second-floor stairwell window. The investigations conducted by the police and the checks carried out by the head of the Internal Prevention and Protection Service and the company\'s Risk Manager, highlighted multiple critical issues.
UNASSIGNED: The case allows for numerous considerations relating to liability profiles in the determinism of the patient\'s death, the hospital\'s company failure to implement measures to prevent the patient\'s suicide in the hospital was influential.

UNASSIGNED: Telemedicine is a method of providing remote services in compliance with data security, with a significant positive impact on healthcare, in which Teleradiology means the electronic transmission of radiographic images from one geographical area to another. In this context, the term \"telemanagement\" shows a real remote management of a diagnostic examination, concluded by the production of telereport and telediagnosis.
UNASSIGNED: On the basis of Italian position papers, National guidelines and current Laws, a careful analysis of multiple aspects was carried out, in order to understand the current obligations and application limits.
UNASSIGNED: Proper radiotelemanagement requires a shared operating protocol within the structure, which integrates verification and safety procedures, periodic checks and adequate resources. In addition, practical interface between the involved figures must be properly established. Then, guidelines highlight the \"standard\" radiological procedures that can be performed in the absence of the specialist: in ordinary hospitalization, it is allowed to perform Telemanagement procedures only within \"standard\" procedures; in emergency setting, the only limit is placed in case of administration of contrast agent. No provisions have been approved for teleradiological work in private settings. Finally, inter-company procedures are only provided for screening programs. In this context; potential negative implications are the risk of substitution of health professionals, as well as ethical issues related to data security, patient\'s consent and quality of the doctor-patient relationship. In an effort of optimism aimed at the future, we want to express our propensity towards a universe with lots of potential that, over time, will emerge in its concreteness.

UNASSIGNED: Since 2012, the Sicilian regional government, in view of the increase in malpractice claims, has adopted a \"self-insurance system\" The claims management activities have been delegated to the Claims Management Committees (CMCs), the importance of which was also emphasized by Law No. 24/2017. This study aims to describe the experience of Sicilian Hospital CMC and analyze the claims\' features, especially for contentious HAIs. Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) continue to be a major public health concern. The contraction of infection during hospitalization generally results in a significant worsening of the patient\'s quality of life and prolongation of his or her stay. Still, it is also responsible for an increase in costs that burden the hospital and the entire Health System.
UNASSIGNED: The study investigates the analysis of claims received by a Messina Hospital Company between January 2015 and December 2023 even though for events that occurred in earlier years. From the database, cases in which the Company was sued for HAIs were extrapolated and analyzed, distinguishing them by year and by Department. The data collected were statistically processed with the Epi Info 7.1.5 program (CDC - Atlanta - USA).
UNASSIGNED: The CMC experience highlighted a statistically significant increase in complaints especially for those relating to HAI, without differences by Department. In most cases, the CMC admitted the hospital\'s liability, and an attempt at conciliation was promoted and moreover risk management initiatives were adopted. This is important when considering the recent ruling 6386/2023 of March 3, 2023.

UNASSIGNED: Tracheal injury may be a rare complication of the endotracheal intubation procedure. Incidence and determinant factors are not well known, nevertheless a greater incidence have been recognized with a difficult maneuver or the use of nitrogen peroxide. The therapeutic approach can be conservative or surgical, depending on the characteristics of the lesion and of the patient and therefore the outcomes of medico-legal interest can be different.
UNASSIGNED: It is a case of alleged medical liability regarding a 70-year-old woman, that during the intubation procedure was pouncing on the right. Furthermore, nitrous oxide was used as an anaesthetic. A few hours after the operation the patient showed swelling on the right half of the face and on the right lateral region of the neck. The emergency chest CT scan highlighted subcutaneous emphysema and pneumomediastinum. In the operating room, fibrobronchoscopy was performed with a double-lumen bronchial tube which confirmed the hypotheses lesion; then, right posterolateral thoracotomy was perfor-med followed by suturing of the tracheal lesion. Subsequently, the patient was discharged in good clinical conditions but with a scar in the region of the right hemithorax.
UNASSIGNED: Iatrogenic tracheal injury is a rare and fearful complication of the orotracheal intubation procedure. Although risk factors that increase the probability of its onset have been recognized, in most cases it is not possible to identify the cause. From a medico-legal point of view, tracheal injury after intubation is unpredictable and inevitable, so in the case reported it was decided to proceed with a conciliatory solution.

BACKGROUND: Alternative Disputes Resolution (ADR) systems are becoming increasingly important tools in recent years for the management and resolution of health responsibility cases, but their dissemination and efficiency are still poorly described. The purpose of this paper is to present an ADR system in the autonomous province of Bolzano: the Conciliation Commission.
METHODS: systematic collection of all claims of the South Tyrol Sanitary Service that were dealt with in the Conciliation Commission from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2022.
RESULTS: closing times of the applications received turn out to be less than a year in 63.8% of the cases, with a number of cases managed rather stably in the time, even if minimal if compared to the number of complaints received to the South Tirol Health Service. Only 5.3% of the application continued the legal process before a civil court.
CONCLUSIONS: the Conciliation Commission of South Tirol appears to be an excellent instrument for the resolution of disputes in the healthcare field, with rapid resolution times and little to zero costs for the healthcare company, a public health institution. Despite its effectiveness, it seems to be a tool that is still little-known in South Tyrol.

We describe a rare case of severe primary spondylitis caused by Streptococcus gordonii in a 45-year-old immunocompetent woman with no relevant comorbidities. The surgical site infection arose after a L4-L5 microdiscectomy and resulted in severe clinical disability. Allegations of possible negligence as the cause prompted a forensic review to clarify the original source and transmission of this uncommon pathogen, which dismissed its cause as due to malpractice during treatment.

Aside from rheumatoid arthritis, methotrexate is also used to treat cancer, psoriasis, and other diseases. Side effects with methotrexate are possible, as they are with any medication. This drug is extremely potent and has the potential to produce serious adverse effects. Those who use this medication need to be tracked often. We provide a case of a patient with psoriasis vulgaris who died due to methotrexate administration without proper dosage verification. A female patient in her forties had a history of psoriasis vulgaris of the lower limbs. Under treatment, she developed acute methotrexate toxicity. This drug was taken as an intramuscular injection per day in an infirmary without checking that the dose regimen prescribed was per week. She developed extensive bullous and pustular lesions associated with digestive signs related to generalized toxiderma. But at that point, she had septic shock, which led to her death a few weeks after the methotrexate injection. The medical responsibilities of the doctor, pharmacist, and nurse were discussed. To conclude, methotrexate is not a killer drug in most cases, but it can be extremely harmful if it\'s overused. Acute toxicity is a potentially fatal condition, and a deeper understanding of its potential toxicity is still necessary.

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgery is a specialty at risk for medical malpractice claims. We aimed to assess the frequency of alleged malpractice cases related to orthopedic surgery in the Netherlands from the last 15 years.
METHODS: We systematically searched the database of the Dutch Medical Disciplinary Court for verdicts related to orthopedic surgery between January 2009 and July 2023 and extracted case data and data on allegations and outcomes.
RESULTS: We identified 158 verdicts (mean of 10.5 per year), of which 151 (96%) were filed against specialists and 7 (4%) against residents. Cases were most frequently classified as incorrect treatment/diagnosis (n = 107, 67.7%). Cases were related to the subspecialties of knee (n = 34, 21.5%), hip (n = 31, 19.6%), ankle (n = 25, 15.8%), spine (n = 22, 13.9%), and shoulder (n = 19, 12.0%). A total of 32 cases (20.3%) were judged as partially founded and 9 (6%) as founded. The Dutch Medical Disciplinary Court imposed 28 warnings, 10 reprimands, and 3 temporary suspensions. A total of 68 appeals were submitted, of which 95% were rejected for filing patients. In three instances, unfounded verdicts were changed to two warnings and a reprimand. In four appeals by an orthopedic surgeon, a warning and reprimand were dismissed, and two reprimands were changed to warnings.
CONCLUSIONS: The amount of malpractice cases against orthopedic surgeons in the Netherlands is relatively low. The cases in our study may improve our understanding of allegations against physicians and improve the quality of patient care.

Artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine is an increasingly studied and widespread phenomenon, applied in multiple clinical settings. Alongside its many potential advantages, such as easing clinicians\' workload and improving diagnostic accuracy, the use of AI raises ethical and legal concerns, to which there is still no unanimous response. A systematic literature review on medical professional liability related to the use of AI-based diagnostic algorithms was conducted using the public electronic database PubMed selecting studies published from 2020 to 2023. The systematic review was performed according to 2020 PRISMA guidelines. The literature review highlights how the issue of liability in case of AI-related error and patient\'s damage has received growing attention in recent years. The application of AI and diagnostic algorithm moreover raises questions about the risks of using unrepresentative populations during the development and about the completeness of information given to the patient. Concerns about the impact on the fiduciary relationship between physician and patient and on the subject of empathy have also been raised. The use of AI in medical field and the application of diagnostic algorithms introduced a revolution in the doctor-patient relationship resulting in multiple possible medico-legal consequences. The regulatory framework on medical liability when AI is applied is therefore inadequate and requires urgent intervention, as there is no single and specific regulation governing the liability of various parties involved in the AI supply chain, nor on end-users. Greater attention should be paid to inherent risk in AI and the consequent need for regulations regarding product safety as well as the maintenance of minimum safety standards through appropriate updates.