BACKGROUND: Radiological imaging has played an important role in diagnostic medicine for over a century, though it is known to contribute to dermatological conditions, cataracts, and cancer. The associated risk of harm has led to the introduction of protective regulations around the world. Present-day NHS clinicians are increasingly requesting and relying on diagnostic imaging. Knowledge surrounding the radiation doses of common radiological investigations and the associated risks is imperative, and on a global level has been found to be inadequate. Consequently, there is a need for the formal inclusion of teaching within training programmes.
OBJECTIVE: This prospective audit aims to establish the knowledge of radiation doses and risks of common radiological investigations of both medical students and referrers within four NHS Health Boards based in the North of Scotland. It also seeks to establish prior teaching and the preference for further educational interventions.
UNASSIGNED: Referrers should have adequate knowledge of radiation doses and the risks associated with common radiological investigations.
UNASSIGNED: The standard should be achieved by 90% of referrers.
METHODS: A 19-question online survey was devised to include subjective and objective questions on ionising radiation awareness, education preference, and respondent demographics, based on RCR (Royal College of Radiologists) audit criteria and previous studies. Data collection was conducted between the 22/02/23 to the 22/03/2023 and the questionnaire was distributed to senior medical students and radiological referrers of different grades within NHS Grampian, NHS Highland, NHS Shetland, and NHS Orkney. A descriptive analysis of the data was undertaken using Microsoft Excel Version 16.71.
RESULTS: Two hundred eight questionnaires were completed. 22.11% (n = 46) of the sample population had received no prior teaching on the topic of ionising radiation. Over half of the respondents (51.92%, n = 108) rated the importance of radiation risks as either important or extremely important, with 69.71% (n = 145) of participants rating their perceived knowledge as limited or average. Most correctly identified that a CT scan (n = 203), PET-CT scan (n = 199) and a chest x-ray (n = 196) exposed patients to ionising radiation. A small proportion of the participants incorrectly thought that an MRI scan (n = 21) and an ultrasound scan (n = 2) involved ionising radiation. The results obtained failed to meet the RCR audit target, which states that 90% of doctors should be aware of common radiological doses. It was observed that only 17.79% (n = 37) of survey respondents scored over 50% in the knowledge assessment, with the median knowledge score of the whole cohort being 2.5 out of 9 (27.78%). Respondents who had prior teaching on the topic performed better those who had no prior teaching, with average scores of 3.19 (35.44%) and 2.04 (22.67%) respectively. Senior clinicians performed better when compared to junior clinicians and medical students.
UNASSIGNED: This audit found that the knowledge of radiation risks within the North of Scotland in the selected sample population was insufficient across all levels of the clinical team. Further, continuous education around the topic and future audit opportunities may help to optimise knowledge and training.

OBJECTIVE: This audit describes variation in the time from referral to starting disease modifying drug (DMARD) for people with newly diagnosed seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA), how frequently this was within the recommended 6 weeks and whether regional, service-level or patient-level factors were associated with this variation.
METHODS: Rheumatologists submitted data on new patients with a new diagnosis of rheumatoid factor and/or cyclic-citrullinated peptide antibody positive RA. The association between visit funding, ethnicity, socio-economic deprivation, rurality, local specialist staffing levels and the time to DMARD treatment was assessed using Cox proportional-hazard models.
RESULTS: Data were collected on 355 patients over 12 months. Overall, 64.8% of patients commenced DMARD treatment within 6 weeks of referral and this was associated with rheumatologist FTE per 100,000 population (adjusted HR 2.47, 95%CI 1.27-4.81; p=0.008) and the rurality (Geographic Classification of Health [GCH]) of the patient (for R2 compared to U1 adjusted HR 0.20, 95%CI 0.09-0.43; p<0.001). There was no association between time to DMARD and ethnicity or socio-economic deprivation.
CONCLUSIONS: There was significant variation in time to DMARD treatment, mainly related to variation in rheumatologist staffing levels and patient rurality. Rheumatologist staffing levels of 1.0 FTE/100,000 population was associated with 80% of patients meeting the recommended 6-week time to DMARD treatment.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Errors associated with failures in filing, actioning and communicating blood test results can lead to delayed and missed diagnoses and patient harm. This study aimed to audit how blood tests in primary care are filed, actioned and communicated in primary care, to identify areas for patient safety improvements.
METHODS: UK primary care clinicians were recruited through the Primary Care Academic CollaboraTive (PACT). PACT members audited 50 recent sets of blood tests from their practice and retrospectively extracted data on blood test result coding, actioning and communication. PACT members received a practice report, showing their own results, benchmarked against other participating practices.
RESULTS: PACT members from 57 general practices across all four UK nations collected data on 2572 patients who had blood tests in April 2021. In 89.9% (n=2311) they agreed with the initial clinician\'s actioning of blood tests; 10.1% disagreed, either partially (7.1%) or fully (3.0%).In 44% of patients (n=1132) an action (eg, \'make an appointment\') was specified by the filing clinician. This action was carried out in 89.7% (n=1015/1132) of cases; in 6.8% (n=77) the action was not carried out, in 3.5% (n=40) it was unclear. In the 117 cases where the test result had not been actioned 38% (n=45) were felt to be at low risk of harm, 1.7% (n=2) were at high risk of harm, 0.85% (n=1) came to harm.Overall, in 47% (n=1210) of patients there was no evidence in the electronic health records that results had been communicated. Out of 1176 patients with one or more abnormal results there was no evidence of test communication in 30.6% (n=360). There were large variations between practices in rates of actioning and communicating tests.
CONCLUSIONS: This research demonstrates variation in the way blood test results are actioned and communicated, with important patient safety implications.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Audit of brain metastasis (BM) patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) in a tertiary cancer center from South India was carried out to assess the incidence of BM by site with a specific focus on their primary origin, with an aim to evaluate the relationship between the primary site and the site of metastases, pattern of care, and RT over the years.
METHODS: All consecutive BM patients who received RT with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), hippocampal avoidance WBRT (HA-WBRT), and radiosurgery SRS between 2007 and 2022 after radiologic confirmation of a known case of malignancy or histology-proven BM were audited.
RESULTS: From January 2007 to December 2022, hospital information system (HIS)-identified 778 patients with BM treated with RT were audited. Incidence of BM was 0.64% in 2008 and over the years, it had increased to 0.89% in 2020, 0.93% in 2021, and 1.24% in 2022. Usage of SRS was almost nil in 2007, whereas in 2022, it was 40%. Also, 593 (76%) patients were treated with WBRT, 157 (20%) with SRS, and only 23 (3%) received HA-WBRT. Lung and breast cancers (40%) were the most common primary, and among rare primary tumors were those of larynx (two), tonsil (one), tongue (three), pancreas (one), and blood disorders (two). Lung primary presented with frontal lesion in 51%, parietal lesion in 43%, cerebellar lesion in 38%, and temporal lesion in 33% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Audit of BM in the Indian population suggests a shift in treatment paradigm from WBRT to SRS as a primary modality in oligo-brain metastasis with a good performance status. This audit provides us information regarding geographic variation in presentation and primary site.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Foundation doctors and nurses are the clinicians most closely involved in fluid assessment, intravenous (IV) fluid prescription and administration. However, both groups report challenges regarding IV fluids. At a large NHS trust in England, adherence to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline CG174, regarding IV fluids, was largely unknown.
UNASSIGNED: To assess the baseline adherence, within the hospitals, to CG174 and identify areas for improvement.
UNASSIGNED: A set of 12 audit standards were developed and used to collect data across 29 clinical areas between September 2022 and May 2023, with 255 patients receiving IV fluids at any time during their inpatient stay included.
UNASSIGNED: For two standards target adherence of 95% was achieved, with an adherence less than 50% in most. Areas of particularly poor adherence included assessing and meeting fluid and electrolyte requirements, patient reassessment and developing IV fluid management plans.
UNASSIGNED: Trust baseline adherence to NICE CG174 requires improvement, particularly regarding patient assessment and reassessment, and meeting electrolyte requirements.

The World Health Organization released the practical toolkit for antimicrobial stewardship in health-care facilities in low- and middle-income countries in 2019 due to increasing rates of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) causing the diminishing of treatment options and that the available antibiotics seem to no longer work. The introduction of this toolkit indicates the need to be more down-to-earth in combating the problems of antimicrobial resistance. This situation happened because we have taken antibiotics for granted for too long with less awareness, which results in the potential loss of its use and benefits. On the other hand, even though medicine is available, a major issue on the limited access to antibiotics are still reported in many parts of the world.The problem of antimicrobial resistance extended to the community; the population that is difficult to evaluate. In a hospital setting, patients are expected to be monitored which allows data to be gained easily. The commitment to combat resistance is demonstrated by the Indonesian government through the establishment of the National Committee of Antibiotics mentioned in Permenkes no. 8 (2015) that is located in each hospital and the upscaling of the issues of Antimicrobial Resistance to become one of the national priorities and program.In this issue, Fadrian, et al. conducted a study to measure the quality of antibiotics use at the western part of Indonesia. Every year between 18 to 24 November, we are celebrating the World AMR Awareness Week, with a strong hope to reduce the number of deaths which is at an estimate of 1.27 million people in 2019 who have been presumed to have died as a result to drug resistance.The hope must be followed by a strong commitment and understanding of the risk of overprescribing antibiotics, and if we ignore this, there will be a chance of a 9 times increase in mortality rates which translates to up to an estimate of 10 million deaths per year after 2050.

BACKGROUND: Anaemia during pregnancy is common worldwide. In Australia, approximately 17% of non-pregnant women of reproductive age have anaemia, increasing to a rate of 25% in pregnant women. This study sought to determine the rate of screening for anaemia in pregnancy in regional New South Wales, and to determine whether screening and treatment protocols followed the recommended guidelines.
METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed antenatal and postnatal (48 h) data of women (n = 150) who had a live birth at Bathurst Hospital between 01/01/2020 and 30/04/2020. Demographic data, risk factors for anaemia in pregnancy, antenatal bloods, treatments provided in trimesters one (T1), two (T2) and three (T3), and postpartum complications were recorded. These were compared to the Australian Red Cross Guidelines (ARCG) using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Of the women with screening data available (n = 103), they were mostly aged 20-35yrs (79.6%), 23.3% were obese, 97.1% were iron deficient, 17% were anaemic and only a few (5.3%) completed the full pregnancy screening as recommended by the ARCG while a majority completed only partial screenings specifically Hb levels in T1 (56.7%), T2 (44.7%) and T3 (36.6%). Compliance to oral iron was largely undocumented, but constipation was a common side effect among the women. IV iron was administered in 14.0% of women, approximately 1.75x higher than the recommended rate.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provided useful information about compliance to screening and treatment guidelines for anaemia in pregnancy. We identified the need for improved documentation and communication between various health providers to ensure adequate antenatal care to prevent maternal complications during pregnancy. This will improve patient care and encourage further developments in maternal care, bridging the rural health gap.