Medicaid

Medicaid
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定与临床医生整体使用氟化物清漆(FV)的可能性和强度以及医疗补助和私人保险公司支付的就诊相关的因素。
    方法:使用索赔数据的观察性研究。
    方法:使用马萨诸塞州所有付款人索赔数据库(2016-2018),我们对2,911名临床医生(7277名临床医生-年观察)进行了重复的横断面研究,对1~5岁儿童进行了良好的儿童访视.零膨胀负二项模型估计了临床医生应用FV的概率以及FV应用的访问次数,医疗补助和私人保险公司支付的整体和单独就诊。
    结果:总共30.9%的临床医生-年应用FV至少一次,总的来说,平均每年有8.4%的临床医生的健康儿童访视包括FV。控制所有协变量,获得医疗补助保险的患者比例较高与应用FV(OR,1.35;95%CI,1.23-1.45)和更高的预期申请数量(OR,1.05;95%CI,1.02-1.09)。此外,1至5岁的患者比例较高与应用FV(OR,1.20;95%CI,1.01-1.43),但不是应用程序的数量。在私人保险公司的探访中也观察到了类似的联系。
    结论:尽管有临床建议和强制保险报销,大多数儿科初级保健临床医师应用FV的可能性和强度较低.临床医生的行为与患者小组特征相关,这表明需要解释这些差异的干预措施。
    OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with clinicians\' likelihood and intensity of applying fluoride varnish (FV) overall and for visits paid by Medicaid and private insurers.
    METHODS: Observational study using claims data.
    METHODS: Using the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database (2016-2018), we conducted a repeated cross-sectional study of 2911 clinicians (7277 clinician-year observations) providing well-child visits to children aged 1 to 5 years. Zero-inflated negative binomial models estimated the probability of a clinician applying FV and the number of visits with FV applications, overall and separately for visits paid by Medicaid and private insurers.
    RESULTS: A total of 30.9% of clinician-years applied FV at least once, and overall, an average of 8.4% of a clinician\'s well-child visits included FV annually. Controlling for all covariates, having a higher percentage of patients insured by Medicaid was associated with applying FV (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.23-1.45) and a higher expected number of applications (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09). Additionally, having a higher percentage of patients aged 1 to 5 years was associated with applying FV (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01-1.43), but not the number of applications. Similar associations were observed among visits paid by private insurers.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite clinical recommendations and mandated insurance reimbursements, the likelihood and intensity of FV applications was low for most pediatric primary care clinicians. Clinician behavior was associated with patient-panel characteristics, suggesting the need for interventions that account for these differences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项队列研究调查了5个州镰状细胞疾病儿童在生命的前3年的医疗补助覆盖模式。
    This cohort study examines patterns of Medicaid coverage in the first 3 years of life among children with sickle cell disease across 5 states.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定扩大医疗补助对全因死亡率的不同影响,Latino/a,农村和城市地区的白人人口,并评估扩张如何影响这些群体之间的死亡率差异。
    方法:我们采用县级随时间变化的异质性治疗效果差异分析,对2009年至2019年64岁以下人群的全因年龄调整死亡率进行医疗补助扩大。对于美国50个州和哥伦比亚特区内的所有县,我们使用限制访问的重要统计数据来估计所有种族和族裔组合对被治疗者(ATET)的平均治疗效果(Black,Latino/a,白色),农村(农村,城市),和性爱。然后我们评估总ATET,以及ATET随着扩展时间的增加而变化。
    结果:医疗补助扩大导致城市黑人人口的全因年龄调整死亡率降低,但不是农村黑人人口。城市白人人口经历了混合效应,这取决于扩张后的几年。拉丁美洲人/人口没有明显的影响。虽然对农村黑人和拉丁裔人口没有观察到影响,由于医疗补助扩大,农村白人全因年龄调整死亡率意外增加。这些影响减少了农村和城市特有的黑人-白人死亡率差距,但并没有缩小城乡死亡率差距。
    结论:医疗补助扩大对降低死亡率的影响在种族和族裔群体以及城乡状况之间是不均衡的;这表明许多人群,特别是农村个体,没有看到与其他人相同的好处。各州必须努力确保在农村地区适当实施医疗补助计划。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the differential impact of Medicaid expansion on all-cause mortality between Black, Latino/a, and White populations in rural and urban areas, and assess how expansion impacted mortality disparities between these groups.
    METHODS: We employ a county-level time-varying heterogenous treatment effects difference-in-difference analysis of Medicaid expansion on all-cause age-adjusted mortality for those 64 years of age or younger from 2009 to 2019. For all counties within the 50 US States and the District of Columbia, we use restricted-access vital statistics data to estimate Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATET) for all combinations of racial and ethnic group (Black, Latino/a, White), rurality (rural, urban), and sex. We then assess aggregate ATET, as well as how the ATET changed as time from expansion increased.
    RESULTS: Medicaid expansion led to a reduction in all-cause age-adjusted mortality for urban Black populations, but not rural Black populations. Urban White populations experienced mixed effects dependent on years after expansion. Latino/a populations saw no appreciable impact. While no effect was observed for rural Black and Latino/a populations, rural White all-cause age-adjusted mortality unexpectedly increased due to Medicaid expansion. These effects reduced rural- and urban-specific Black-White mortality disparities but did not shrink the rural-urban mortality gap.
    CONCLUSIONS: The mortality-reducing impact of Medicaid expansion has been uneven across racial and ethnic groups and rural-urban status; suggesting that many populations-particularly rural individuals-are not seeing the same benefits as others. It is imperative that states work to ensure Medicaid expansion is being appropriately implemented in rural areas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:缺乏保险与住院患者预后较差有关。然而,很少有研究探讨这种相关性与坏死性软组织感染(NSTIs)住院的关系.这项研究考察了保险状况对NSTI录取结果的影响。方法:所有成人因坏死性筋膜炎住院,气体坏疽,使用全国住院患者样本数据库检查了2016年至2018年之间的Fournier坏疽。保险状态被归类为已投保(包括医疗保险,医疗补助,私人,包括健康维护组织(HMO)或无保险(自付)。结果指标包括死亡率,肢体丧失,住院时间,住院时间延长,和重症监护入院。统计分析包括加权样本分析,卡方检验,多元回归分析,和负二项回归建模。结果:分析了约29,705名NSTIs成人住院治疗。其中,57.4%(17,065)是由于坏死性筋膜炎,22%(6,545)的气体坏疽,20.5%(6095)的Fournier坏疽。大约9.7%(2,875)没有保险,而70%(26,780)有保险。在被保险人中,医疗保险覆盖39.6%(10,605),医疗补助29%(7,775),私人保险31.4%(8400)。调整后,医疗保险与较高的死亡几率相关(调整后优势比[aOR]:1.81;95%置信区间[CI]:1.33-2.47;p=0.001)。医疗补助保险与截肢几率增加相关(aOR:1.81;95%CI:1.33-2.47;p<0.001),而私人保险与较低的截肢几率相关(aOR:0.70;95%CI:0.51-0.97;p=0.030).医疗补助保险与住院时间延长的可能性更大(aOR:1.34;95%CI:1.09-1.64;p<0.001)。在缺乏保险或自付与主要或次要结果的几率之间没有观察到显着关联。结论:医疗保险与更大的死亡率相关,而医疗补助保险与截肢几率增加和住院时间延长相关.无保险状态与NSTI结果的显着差异无关。
    Background: Lack of insurance is associated with poorer outcomes in hospitalized patients. However, few studies have explored this association in hospitalizations for necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs). This study examined the impact of insurance status on the outcome of NSTI admissions. Methods: All adult hospitalizations for necrotizing fasciitis, gas gangrene, and Fournier gangrene between 2016 and 2018 were examined using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Insurance status was categorized as insured (including Medicare, Medicaid, and Private, including Health maintenance organization (HMO) or uninsured (Self-pay). Outcome measures included mortality rates, limb loss, length of hospital stay, prolonged hospital stay, and critical care admissions. Statistical analysis included weighted sample analysis, chi-square tests, multivariate regression analysis, and negative binomial regression modeling. Results: Approximately 29,705 adult hospitalizations for NSTIs were analyzed. Of these, 57.4% (17,065) were due to necrotizing fasciitis, 22% (6,545) to gas gangrene, and 20.5% (6,095) to Fournier gangrene. Approximately 9.7% (2,875) were uninsured, whereas 70% (26,780) had insurance coverage. Among the insured, Medicare covered 39.6% (10,605), Medicaid 29% (7,775), and private insurance 31.4% (8,400). After adjustments, Medicare insurance was associated with greater odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33-2.47; p = 0.001). Medicaid insurance was associated with increased odds of amputation (aOR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.33-2.47; p < 0.001), whereas private insurance was associated with lower odds of amputation (aOR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51-0.97; p = 0.030). Medicaid insurance was associated with greater odds of prolonged hospital stay (aOR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.09-1.64; p < 0.001). No significant association was observed between the lack of insurance or self-pay and the odds of primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Medicare insurance was correlated with greater odds of mortality, whereas Medicaid insurance was associated with increased odds of amputation and longer hospital stay. Uninsured status was not associated with significant differences in NSTI outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暴露前预防(PrEP)有可能预防新的HIV感染,但是尚不清楚管理性健康和生殖健康服务(SRH)的国家政策如何影响顺性女性的获取。这项审查的目的是确定美国顺性女性获得PrEP的障碍。使用CDCAtlas计划,该分析包括了在顺性女性中艾滋病毒发病率最高的20个州。通过CDC在2022年5月至7月进行的搜索,PrEPWatch.org,以及其他国务院和保险网站,医疗补助扩大状况,药剂师PrEP规定法律,财政支持计划,和PrEP的传统医疗补助覆盖,艾滋病毒检测,并对紧急避孕进行了审查。在包括的国家中,近一半的人没有在州一级扩大医疗补助。几乎所有州的传统医疗补助都涵盖了紧急避孕和艾滋病毒检测,但是保险规定和资格要求仍然存在。尽管所有传统医疗补助计划都涵盖了PrEP,六个州需要预先授权。三个州有艾滋病毒检测任务,其中4个允许药剂师开具PrEP处方,6个有财务支持计划来支付PrEP的费用.医疗补助扩大,PrEP处方和紧急避孕的预授权要求,药剂师处方能力的限制被认为是顺式女性获得SRH的障碍。医疗补助扩大应作为在州一级扩大获得艾滋病毒预防服务的一种方法。
    Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has the potential to prevent new HIV infections, but it is unclear how state policies governing sexual and reproductive health services (SRH) impact access for cisgender women. The objective of this review is to identify barriers to PrEP access for cisgender women in the United States. Using the CDC Atlas Program, 20 states with the highest HIV incidence among cisgender women were included in this analysis. Through a search conducted in May-July 2022 of CDC, PrEPWatch.org, and other State Department and Insurance websites, Medicaid expansion status, pharmacist PrEP prescribing laws, financial support programs, and Traditional Medicaid coverage of PrEP, HIV testing, and emergency contraception were reviewed. Of the included states, nearly half did not expand Medicaid at the state level. Emergency contraception and HIV testing was covered under Traditional Medicaid for almost all included states, but insurance stipulations and eligibility requirements remain. Although PrEP is covered under all Traditional Medicaid plans, six states require pre-authorization. Three states have HIV testing mandates, four allow pharmacists to prescribe PrEP and six have financial support programs to cover the cost of PrEP. Medicaid expansion, pre-authorization requirements for PrEP prescriptions and emergency contraception, and limitations on pharmacist prescribing abilities were identified as barriers to SRH access for cisgender women. Medicaid expansion should be prioritized as an approach to expanding access to HIV prevention services at the state level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在美国出生的人在获得适当的产前护理(PNC)时面临许多挑战,交通是一个重大障碍。然而,以前的研究仅依赖于与最近提供者的距离,无法区分旅行负担对提供者选择和护理利用的影响.这些可能会夸大获取方面的不平等程度,并且无法抓住感知的旅行负担。这项研究调查了到最初拜访的提供者的旅行距离是否,对主要的PNC提供商来说,和感知的旅行负担(由旅行劣势指数(TDI)衡量)与PNC利用率相关。
    方法:从2015-2018年的南卡罗来纳州医疗补助索赔文件中确定了一个回顾性的活产者队列。使用Google地图计算旅行距离。估计的TDI来自当地试点调查数据。通过PNC起始和频率测量PNC利用率。分类变量采用重复测量逻辑回归检验,连续变量采用单向重复测量方差分析。使用重复测量的未调整和调整的序数逻辑回归来检查旅行负担与PNC使用的关联。
    结果:对于连续参加医疗补助的人中的25,801例怀孕,出生的人平均旅行24.9英里和24.2英里到他们的初始和主要提供者,分别,平均TDI为-11.4(SD,8.5).在这些怀孕中,60%的人在孕早期开始PNC,平均共访问8次。与初始提供者的专长相比,主要提供者更有可能是OBGYN相关专家(81.6%与87.9%,p<.001)和助产士(3.5%vs.4.3%,p<.001)。多元回归分析显示,旅行距离的每加倍与启动及时PNC的可能性较小(OR:0.95,p<.001)和较低的访问频率(OR:0.85,p<.001)相关。TDI的每加倍与启动及时PNC的可能性较小相关(OR:0.94,p=.04)。
    结论:研究结果表明,旅行负担与PNC利用率之间的关联具有统计学意义,但实际意义有限。
    BACKGROUND: Birthing people in the United States face numerous challenges when accessing adequate prenatal care (PNC), with transportation being a significant obstacle. Nevertheless, previous studies that relied solely on the distance to the nearest provider cannot differentiate the effects of travel burden on provider selection and care utilization. These may exaggerate the degree of inequality in access and fail to capture perceived travel burden. This study investigated whether travel distances to the initially visited provider, to the predominant PNC provider, and perceived travel burden (measured by the travel disadvantage index (TDI)) are associated with PNC utilization.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort of people with live births were identified from South Carolina Medicaid claims files in 2015-2018. Travel distances were calculated using Google Maps. The estimated TDI was derived from local pilot survey data. PNC utilization was measured by PNC initiation and frequency. Repeated measure logistic regression test was utilized for categorical variables and one-way repeated measures ANOVA for continuous variables. Unadjusted and adjusted ordinal logistic regressions with repeated measure were utilized to examine the association of travel burdens with PNC usage.
    RESULTS: For 25,801 pregnancies among those continuously enrolled in Medicaid, birthing people traveled an average of 24.9 and 24.2 miles to their initial and predominant provider, respectively, with an average TDI of -11.4 (SD, 8.5). Of these pregnancies, 60% initiated PNC in the first trimester, with an average of 8 total visits. Compared to the specialties of initial providers, predominant providers were more likely to be OBGYN-related specialists (81.6% vs. 87.9%, p < .001) and midwives (3.5% vs. 4.3%, p < .001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that every doubling of travel distance was associated with less likelihood to initiate timely PNC (OR: 0.95, p < .001) and a lower visit frequency (OR: 0.85, p < .001), and every doubling of TDI was associated with less likelihood to initiate timely PNC (OR: 0.94, p = .04).
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the association between travel burden and PNC utilization was statistically significant but of limited practical significance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项横断面研究提供了2019年阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的参与者对医疗补助覆盖的同伴支持服务利用的多州描述。
    This cross-sectional study provides a multistate description of utilization of Medicaid-covered peer support services in 2019 by enrollees with opioid use disorder (OUD).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经治疗的蛀牙在低收入幼儿中不成比例地存在。虽然美国儿科学会(AAP)指南要求儿科临床医生实施口腔保健,这些口腔健康干预措施的有效性尚无定论.
    为了测试多层次干预措施在增加牙科护理和减少幼儿就诊(WCV)中未经治疗的腐烂方面的有效性。
    针对儿童牙齿的儿科提供者研究是一项集群随机临床试验,在俄亥俄州东北部的18个儿科初级保健实践中进行。试验数据收集时间为2017年11月至2022年7月,数据分析时间为2022年8月至2023年3月。符合条件的参与者包括在参与实践中参加WCV的3至6岁的Medicaid注册学龄前儿童,他们在基线(WCV1)注册并随访2次连续检查(WCV2和WCV3)。
    干预组的临床医生接受了实践水平(电子病历更改以记录口腔健康)和临床医生水平(基于自我调节理论的口腔健康教育和技能培训的常识模型)干预措施。对照组临床医生仅接受基于AAP的标准口腔健康教育。
    牙科护理是通过卫生学家利用国际龋齿检测和评估系统标准以及医疗补助索赔数据进行的临床牙科检查确定的。通过临床检查确定未处理的衰变。广义估计方程(GEE)方法用于临床检查和医疗补助索赔数据。
    将18项实践随机分为干预或对照。参与者包括63名临床医生(平均[SD]年龄,47.0[11.3]岁;48名女性[76.2%]和15名男性[23.8%];干预组28名[44.4%];对照组35名[55.6%])和1023名父母对子女(平均[SD]儿童年龄,56.1[14.0]个月;555名男性儿童[54.4%]和466名女性儿童[45.6%];干预组517名[50.5%];对照组506名[49.5%])。干预组(170名儿童[52.0%])与对照组(150名儿童[43.1%])的临床检查牙科出勤率明显高于对照组,差异为8.9%(95%CI,1.4%至16.4%;P=.02)。使用临床检查的GEE模型显示,干预组与对照组的牙科护理显着增加(调整后的比值比,1.34;95%CI,1.07至1.69)。从医疗补助索赔中,对照组在2年时的牙科护理率显著高于干预组(332名儿童[79.6%]vs330名儿童[73.7%];P=.04),但在3年时没有.与对照组相比,干预组中未治疗的衰变平均数在临床上但无统计学意义(B=-0.27;95%CI,-0.56至0.02)。
    在这项整群随机临床试验中,干预组儿童的牙科结局较好,牙科护理增加和未经治疗的腐烂减少证明了这一点.这些发现表明,干预组临床医生将口腔健康服务全面整合到WCV中。
    ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03385629。
    UNASSIGNED: Untreated tooth decay is disproportionately present among low-income young children. While American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines require pediatric clinicians to implement oral health care, the effectiveness of these oral health interventions has been inconclusive.
    UNASSIGNED: To test the effectiveness of multilevel interventions in increasing dental attendance and reducing untreated decay among young children attending well-child visits (WCVs).
    UNASSIGNED: The Pediatric Providers Against Cavities in Children\'s Teeth study is a cluster randomized clinical trial that was conducted at 18 pediatric primary care practices in northeast Ohio. The trial data were collected between November 2017 and July 2022, with data analyses conducted from August 2022 to March 2023. Eligible participants included Medicaid-enrolled preschoolers aged 3 to 6 years attending WCVs at participating practices who were enrolled at baseline (WCV 1) and followed-up for 2 consecutive examinations (WCV 2 and WCV 3).
    UNASSIGNED: Clinicians in the intervention group received both the practice-level (electronic medical record changes to document oral health) and clinician-level (common-sense model of self-regulation theory-based oral health education and skills training) interventions. Control group clinicians received AAP-based standard oral health education alone.
    UNASSIGNED: Dental attendance was determined through clinical dental examinations conducted by hygienists utilizing International Caries Detection and Assessment System criteria and also from Medicaid claims data. Untreated decay was determined through clinical examinations. A generalized estimating equations (GEE) approach was used for both clinical examinations and Medicaid claims data.
    UNASSIGNED: Eighteen practices were randomized to either intervention or control. Participants included 63 clinicians (mean [SD] age, 47.0 [11.3] years; 48 female [76.2%] and 15 male [23.8%]; 28 in the intervention group [44.4%]; 35 in the control group [55.6%]) and 1023 parent-child dyads (mean [SD] child age, 56.1 [14.0] months; 555 male children [54.4%] and 466 female children [45.6%]; 517 in the intervention group [50.5%]; 506 in the control group [49.5%]). Dental attendance from clinical examinations was significantly higher in the intervention group (170 children [52.0%]) vs control group (150 children [43.1%]) with a difference of 8.9% (95% CI, 1.4% to 16.4%; P = .02). The GEE model using clinical examinations showed a significant increase in dental attendance in the intervention group vs control group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.69). From Medicaid claims, the control group had significantly higher dental attendance than the intervention group at 2 years (332 children [79.6%] vs 330 children [73.7%]; P = .04) but not at 3 years. A clinically but not statistically significant reduction in mean number of untreated decay was found in the intervention group compared with controls (B = -0.27; 95% CI, -0.56 to 0.02).
    UNASSIGNED: In this cluster randomized clinical trial, children in the intervention group had better dental outcomes as was evidenced by increased dental attendance and lower untreated decay. These findings suggest that intervention group clinicians comprehensively integrated oral health services into WCVs.
    UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03385629.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号