Medicaid

Medicaid
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在美国,在过渡年龄(TA)成年人中,阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的患病率有所增加,18到25岁,对医疗补助覆盖的个人和家庭产生不成比例的影响。同样值得关注的是,对于许多年轻人来说,治疗系统仍然表现不佳,强调需要解决这一弱势群体在其生命历程中的关键时刻所面临的治疗挑战。药物治疗是OUD最有效的治疗方法,然而值得注意的是,观察性研究揭示了阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的药物接收和保留方面的差距,导致许多TA成人在治疗中的不良结局。目前很少有关于OUD治疗质量的研究明确考虑个体的影响,组织,和上下文因素,特别是对于那些社会角色和机构关系仍在变化的年轻人。
    方法:我们介绍了一个回顾性的,纵向队列设计,旨在研究2012年至2025年间在纽约接受OUD治疗的约65,000名TA成人的治疗质量实践和结局.我们建议合并来自多个来源的数据,包括医疗补助索赔和遭遇数据以及物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗发作的州注册表,检查OUD治疗质量的三个方面:1)MOUD使用,包括MOUD选项(例如,丁丙诺啡,美沙酮,或缓释[XR]纳曲酮);2)坚持药物治疗和治疗保留;3)不良事件(例如,过量)。使用严格的分析方法,我们将提供有关如何通过与社区相关的多层次过程更广泛地构建治疗实践和结果的变化的见解,治疗方案,和病人的特征,以及它们复杂的相互作用。
    结论:我们的发现将为患者和提供者的临床决策以及公共卫生应对越来越多的年轻人在美国阿片类药物和多物质过量危机中寻求OUD治疗提供信息
    BACKGROUND: In the United States, there has been a concerning rise in the prevalence of opioid use disorders (OUD) among transition-age (TA) adults, 18 to 25-years old, with a disproportionate impact on individuals and families covered by Medicaid. Of equal concern, the treatment system continues to underperform for many young people, emphasizing the need to address the treatment challenges faced by this vulnerable population at a pivotal juncture in their life course. Pharmacotherapy is the most effective treatment for OUD, yet notably, observational studies reveal gaps in the receipt of and retention in medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), resulting in poor outcomes for many TA adults in treatment. Few current studies on OUD treatment quality explicitly consider the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors, especially for young people whose social roles and institutional ties remain in flux.
    METHODS: We introduce a retrospective, longitudinal cohort design to study treatment quality practices and outcomes among approximately 65,000 TA adults entering treatment for OUD between 2012 and 2025 in New York. We propose to combine data from multiple sources, including Medicaid claims and encounter data and a state registry of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment episodes, to examine three aspects of OUD treatment quality: 1) MOUD use, including MOUD option (e.g., buprenorphine, methadone, or extended-release [XR] naltrexone); 2) adherence to pharmacotherapy and retention in treatment; and 3) adverse events (e.g., overdoses). Using rigorous analytical methods, we will provide insights into how variation in treatment practices and outcomes are structured more broadly by multilevel processes related to communities, treatment programs, and characteristics of the patient, as well as their complex interplay.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings will inform clinical decision making by patients and providers as well as public health responses to the rising number of young adults seeking treatment for OUD amidst the opioid and polysubstance overdose crisis in the U.S.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:严重孕产妇发病率(SMM)和死亡率的种族不平等构成了美国的公共卫生危机。杜拉护理,定义为提供文化上适当的分娩工人的护理,怀孕和产后期间的非临床支持,已被提议作为一种干预措施,以帮助破坏产科种族主义,这是黑人和其他有色人种分娩者不良妊娠结局的驱动因素。许多州医疗补助计划正在实施doula计划,以解决SMM和死亡率的持续增加。医疗补助计划有望在满足这些人群的需求方面发挥重要作用,以缩小SMM和死亡率方面的种族差距。这项研究将调查医疗补助计划可以实施导乐护理以改善种族健康公平的最有效方法。
    方法:我们描述了一项混合方法研究的方案,以了解医疗补助中doula计划的实施变化如何影响怀孕和产后健康的种族平等。主要研究结果包括SMM,个人报告的尊重产科护理措施,和接受循证护理的慢性疾病是产后死亡的主要原因(心血管,心理健康,和物质使用条件)。我们的研究小组包括Doulas,大学调查人员,和来自六个地点的医疗补助参与者(肯塔基州,马里兰,密歇根州,宾夕法尼亚,南卡罗来纳州和弗吉尼亚州)在医疗补助成果分布式研究网络(MODRN)中。研究数据将包括对导拉计划实施的政策分析,来自一群Doulas的纵向数据,来自医疗补助受益人的横截面数据,和医疗补助医疗管理数据。定性分析将检查doula和受益人在医疗保健系统和医疗补助政策方面的经验。定量分析(按种族组分层)将使用匹配技术来估计使用导乐护理对产后健康结果的影响,并将使用时间序列分析来估计doula计划对人口产后健康结果的平均治疗效果。
    结论:研究结果将促进医疗补助计划中的学习机会,doulas和医疗补助受益人。最终,我们寻求了解doula护理计划的实施和整合到医疗补助中,以及这些过程如何影响种族健康公平。研究注册该研究在开放科学基金会(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF)注册。IO/NXZUF)。
    BACKGROUND: Racial inequities in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and mortality constitute a public health crisis in the United States. Doula care, defined as care from birth workers who provide culturally appropriate, non-clinical support during pregnancy and postpartum, has been proposed as an intervention to help disrupt obstetric racism as a driver of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Black and other birthing persons of colour. Many state Medicaid programs are implementing doula programs to address the continued increase in SMM and mortality. Medicaid programs are poised to play a major role in addressing the needs of these populations with the goal of closing the racial gaps in SMM and mortality. This study will investigate the most effective ways that Medicaid programs can implement doula care to improve racial health equity.
    METHODS: We describe the protocol for a mixed-methods study to understand how variation in implementation of doula programs in Medicaid may affect racial equity in pregnancy and postpartum health. Primary study outcomes include SMM, person-reported measures of respectful obstetric care, and receipt of evidence-based care for chronic conditions that are the primary causes of postpartum mortality (cardiovascular, mental health, and substance use conditions). Our research team includes doulas, university-based investigators, and Medicaid participants from six sites (Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Virginia) in the Medicaid Outcomes Distributed Research Network (MODRN). Study data will include policy analysis of doula program implementation, longitudinal data from a cohort of doulas, cross-sectional data from Medicaid beneficiaries, and Medicaid healthcare administrative data. Qualitative analysis will examine doula and beneficiary experiences with healthcare systems and Medicaid policies. Quantitative analyses (stratified by race groups) will use matching techniques to estimate the impact of using doula care on postpartum health outcomes, and will use time-series analyses to estimate the average treatment effect of doula programs on population postpartum health outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings will facilitate learning opportunities among Medicaid programs, doulas and Medicaid beneficiaries. Ultimately, we seek to understand the implementation and integration of doula care programs into Medicaid and how these processes may affect racial health equity. Study registration The study is registered with the Open Science Foundation ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NXZUF ).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在研究Cigna和Medicaid保险持有人之间的差异,为患有头痛的患者预约两天,而非处方药没有缓解。
    方法:这是一项横断面的“秘密购物者”类型研究,评估七个州中人口最多的三个城市,医疗补助覆盖率最低,10英里半径内的内科专家,最低评级为3星,并愿意接受新患者。
    结果:密苏里州的Medicaid和Cigna患者的平均等待期有统计学意义的差异,内布拉斯加州,还有犹他州,以及所有七个州的总平均值。此外,在新罕布什尔州,有更多的医疗保健提供者接受医疗补助而不是信诺;而在怀俄明州,医疗补助和信诺的数字几乎相等。
    结论:应纠正重大的Medicaid-Cigna接受率差异,以确保获得更高的医疗保健。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to study the disparity in Cigna and Medicaid insurance holders, to secure an appointment for a patient with a headache for two days unrelieved by over-the-counter medication.
    METHODS: This is a cross-sectional \"secret shopper\" type study, assessing the three most populated cities in seven states with the lowest Medicaid coverage and Internal Medicine specialists within a 10-mile radius, with a minimum rating of 3 stars and a willingness to accept new patients.
    RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the average waiting period for those with Medicaid and Cigna in the states of Missouri, Nebraska, and Utah, as well as the total average for all seven states. Moreover, there were more healthcare providers who accepted Medicaid rather than Cigna in New Hampshire; whereas in Wyoming, the numbers for Medicaid and Cigna were almost equal.
    CONCLUSIONS: The significant Medicaid-Cigna acceptance rate disparities should be corrected to ensure higher healthcare access.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    卫生系统越来越多地通过转介社区资源来评估和满足社会需求。这项随机对照试验的目的是将患有2型糖尿病的成年Medicaid成员随机接受常规护理(n=239)或社会需求导航(n=234)6个月,并比较HbA1c(主要结果)。生活质量(次要结果),以及其他探索性结果,采用t检验和混合效应回归。符合条件的参与者在过去120天内进行了HbA1c测试,并报告了1+社会需求。数据收集时间为2019年11月至2023年7月。调查在基线和3-6-,和12个月的随访。健康计划数据包括护理管理记录以及医疗和药房索赔。样本来自路易斯安那州,美国,M=51.6(SD=9.5)岁,76.1%为女性,66.5%黑色,29.4%白色,和3.0%的西班牙裔。根据设计,更多导航(91.5%)与常规护理(6.7%)参与者有护理计划.这两个群体的社会需求持续存在。在HbA1c测试和值没有观察到组差异,尽管大量缺失的HbA1c实验室值降低了统计功效。其他结果没有观察到组间差异。在此样本中,主动激发并尝试为社会需求提供转诊和资源并未显示出显着的健康益处或降低医疗保健利用率。
    Health systems are increasingly assessing and addressing social needs with referrals to community resources. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to randomize adult Medicaid members with type 2 diabetes to receive usual care (n = 239) or social needs navigation (n = 234) for 6 months and compare HbA1c (primary outcome), quality of life (secondary outcome), and other exploratory outcomes with t-tests and mixed-effects regression. Eligible participants had an HbA1c test in claims in the past 120 days and reported 1+ social needs. Data were collected from November 2019 to July 2023. Surveys were completed at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Health plan data included care management records and medical and pharmacy claims. The sample was from Louisiana, USA, M = 51.6 (SD = 9.5) years old, 76.1% female, 66.5% Black, 29.4% White, and 3.0% Hispanic. By design, more navigation (91.5%) vs. usual care (6.7%) participants had a care plan. Social needs persisted for both groups. No group differences in HbA1c tests and values were observed, though the large amount of missing HbA1c lab values reduced statistical power. No group differences were observed for other outcomes. Proactively eliciting and attempting to provide referrals and resources for social needs did not demonstrate significant health benefits or decrease healthcare utilization in this sample.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性肾脏病(CKD)是镰状细胞病(SCD)患者的重要并发症,导致死亡率上升。
    目的:本研究旨在调查在加州接受医疗补助的SCD成人的CKD负担。检查男性和女性个体之间疾病负担的差异,并评估死亡率和获得专门护理的机会。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究使用加州镰状细胞数据收集计划来识别和监测患有SCD的个体。医疗补助声称,重要记录,急诊科,并对2011年至2020年的住院数据进行分析。CKD患病率根据ICD(国际疾病分类)代码进行评估。并计算了死亡率。通过与血液学家和肾脏病学家的门诊就诊率来检查获得专门护理的机会。
    结果:在2345名患有SCD的成年人中,24.4%(n=572)符合CKD病例定义。在本研究开始时,SCD-CKD组比无CKD组年龄大(平均年龄44岁,SD14vs34岁,SD12.6岁)。CKD患病率随年龄增长而增加,揭示了性别的显著差异。而年龄最小(18-29岁)和年龄最大(>65岁)组的CKD患病率在性别之间相似(女性:12/111,10.8%,男性:12/101,11.9%;女性:74/147,50.3%,男性:34/66,51.5%,分别),男性在30-59岁人群中的发病率明显高于女性(30-39岁:49/294,16.7%,P=0.01;40-49岁:52/182,28.6%,P=.02;50-59岁:76/157,48.4%,P<.001)。在这项研究中,2345名成年人中,发生435例(18.5%)死亡,主要在SCD-CKD队列中(226/435,39.5%)。SCD-CKD组的中位死亡年龄为53(IQR61-44)岁,而SCD组的中位死亡年龄为43(IQR33-56)岁,SCD-CKD组中男性个体的死亡率(111/242,45.9%;P=.009)显著高于女性个体(115/330,34.9%).获得专科护理的机会非常有限:大约一半(281/572,49.1%)的SCD-CKD队列没有血液学家就诊。61.9%(354/572)在本研究期间没有看到肾脏科医生。
    结论:这项研究提供了在加利福尼亚州医疗补助招募的SCD成人中CKD患病率和死亡率的稳健估计。研究结果强调,需要改善该人群获得专门护理的机会,并提高对CKD相关的高死亡风险和进展的认识。
    BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant complication in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), leading to increased mortality.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the burden of CKD in Medicaid-enrolled adults with SCD in California, examine differences in disease burden between male and female individuals, and assess mortality rates and access to specialized care.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the California Sickle Cell Data Collection program to identify and monitor individuals with SCD. Medicaid claims, vital records, emergency department, and hospitalization data from 2011 to 2020 were analyzed. CKD prevalence was assessed based on ICD (International Classification of Diseases) codes, and mortality rates were calculated. Access to specialized care was examined through outpatient encounter rates with hematologists and nephrologists.
    RESULTS: Among the 2345 adults with SCD, 24.4% (n=572) met the case definition for CKD. The SCD-CKD group was older at the beginning of this study (average age 44, SD 14 vs 34, SD 12.6 years) than the group without CKD. CKD prevalence increased with age, revealing significant disparities by sex. While the youngest (18-29 years) and oldest (>65 years) groups showed similar CKD prevalences between sexes (female: 12/111, 10.8% and male: 12/101, 11.9%; female: 74/147, 50.3% and male: 34/66, 51.5%, respectively), male individuals in the aged 30-59 years bracket exhibited significantly higher rates than female individuals (30-39 years: 49/294, 16.7%, P=.01; 40-49 years: 52/182, 28.6%, P=.02; and 50-59 years: 76/157,48.4%, P<.001). During this study, of the 2345 adults, 435 (18.5%) deaths occurred, predominantly within the SCD-CKD cohort (226/435, 39.5%). The median age at death was 53 (IQR 61-44) years for the SCD-CKD group compared to 43 (IQR 33-56) years for the SCD group, with male individuals in the SCD-CKD group showing significantly higher mortality rates (111/242, 45.9%; P=.009) than female individuals (115/330, 34.9%). Access to specialist care was notably limited: approximately half (281/572, 49.1%) of the SCD-CKD cohort had no hematologist visits, and 61.9% (354/572) did not see a nephrologist during this study\'s period.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides robust estimates of CKD prevalence and mortality among Medicaid-enrolled adults with SCD in California. The findings highlight the need for improved access to specialized care for this population and increased awareness of the high mortality risk and progression associated with CKD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经治疗的蛀牙在低收入幼儿中不成比例地存在。虽然美国儿科学会(AAP)指南要求儿科临床医生实施口腔保健,这些口腔健康干预措施的有效性尚无定论.
    为了测试多层次干预措施在增加牙科护理和减少幼儿就诊(WCV)中未经治疗的腐烂方面的有效性。
    针对儿童牙齿的儿科提供者研究是一项集群随机临床试验,在俄亥俄州东北部的18个儿科初级保健实践中进行。试验数据收集时间为2017年11月至2022年7月,数据分析时间为2022年8月至2023年3月。符合条件的参与者包括在参与实践中参加WCV的3至6岁的Medicaid注册学龄前儿童,他们在基线(WCV1)注册并随访2次连续检查(WCV2和WCV3)。
    干预组的临床医生接受了实践水平(电子病历更改以记录口腔健康)和临床医生水平(基于自我调节理论的口腔健康教育和技能培训的常识模型)干预措施。对照组临床医生仅接受基于AAP的标准口腔健康教育。
    牙科护理是通过卫生学家利用国际龋齿检测和评估系统标准以及医疗补助索赔数据进行的临床牙科检查确定的。通过临床检查确定未处理的衰变。广义估计方程(GEE)方法用于临床检查和医疗补助索赔数据。
    将18项实践随机分为干预或对照。参与者包括63名临床医生(平均[SD]年龄,47.0[11.3]岁;48名女性[76.2%]和15名男性[23.8%];干预组28名[44.4%];对照组35名[55.6%])和1023名父母对子女(平均[SD]儿童年龄,56.1[14.0]个月;555名男性儿童[54.4%]和466名女性儿童[45.6%];干预组517名[50.5%];对照组506名[49.5%])。干预组(170名儿童[52.0%])与对照组(150名儿童[43.1%])的临床检查牙科出勤率明显高于对照组,差异为8.9%(95%CI,1.4%至16.4%;P=.02)。使用临床检查的GEE模型显示,干预组与对照组的牙科护理显着增加(调整后的比值比,1.34;95%CI,1.07至1.69)。从医疗补助索赔中,对照组在2年时的牙科护理率显著高于干预组(332名儿童[79.6%]vs330名儿童[73.7%];P=.04),但在3年时没有.与对照组相比,干预组中未治疗的衰变平均数在临床上但无统计学意义(B=-0.27;95%CI,-0.56至0.02)。
    在这项整群随机临床试验中,干预组儿童的牙科结局较好,牙科护理增加和未经治疗的腐烂减少证明了这一点.这些发现表明,干预组临床医生将口腔健康服务全面整合到WCV中。
    ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03385629。
    UNASSIGNED: Untreated tooth decay is disproportionately present among low-income young children. While American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines require pediatric clinicians to implement oral health care, the effectiveness of these oral health interventions has been inconclusive.
    UNASSIGNED: To test the effectiveness of multilevel interventions in increasing dental attendance and reducing untreated decay among young children attending well-child visits (WCVs).
    UNASSIGNED: The Pediatric Providers Against Cavities in Children\'s Teeth study is a cluster randomized clinical trial that was conducted at 18 pediatric primary care practices in northeast Ohio. The trial data were collected between November 2017 and July 2022, with data analyses conducted from August 2022 to March 2023. Eligible participants included Medicaid-enrolled preschoolers aged 3 to 6 years attending WCVs at participating practices who were enrolled at baseline (WCV 1) and followed-up for 2 consecutive examinations (WCV 2 and WCV 3).
    UNASSIGNED: Clinicians in the intervention group received both the practice-level (electronic medical record changes to document oral health) and clinician-level (common-sense model of self-regulation theory-based oral health education and skills training) interventions. Control group clinicians received AAP-based standard oral health education alone.
    UNASSIGNED: Dental attendance was determined through clinical dental examinations conducted by hygienists utilizing International Caries Detection and Assessment System criteria and also from Medicaid claims data. Untreated decay was determined through clinical examinations. A generalized estimating equations (GEE) approach was used for both clinical examinations and Medicaid claims data.
    UNASSIGNED: Eighteen practices were randomized to either intervention or control. Participants included 63 clinicians (mean [SD] age, 47.0 [11.3] years; 48 female [76.2%] and 15 male [23.8%]; 28 in the intervention group [44.4%]; 35 in the control group [55.6%]) and 1023 parent-child dyads (mean [SD] child age, 56.1 [14.0] months; 555 male children [54.4%] and 466 female children [45.6%]; 517 in the intervention group [50.5%]; 506 in the control group [49.5%]). Dental attendance from clinical examinations was significantly higher in the intervention group (170 children [52.0%]) vs control group (150 children [43.1%]) with a difference of 8.9% (95% CI, 1.4% to 16.4%; P = .02). The GEE model using clinical examinations showed a significant increase in dental attendance in the intervention group vs control group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.69). From Medicaid claims, the control group had significantly higher dental attendance than the intervention group at 2 years (332 children [79.6%] vs 330 children [73.7%]; P = .04) but not at 3 years. A clinically but not statistically significant reduction in mean number of untreated decay was found in the intervention group compared with controls (B = -0.27; 95% CI, -0.56 to 0.02).
    UNASSIGNED: In this cluster randomized clinical trial, children in the intervention group had better dental outcomes as was evidenced by increased dental attendance and lower untreated decay. These findings suggest that intervention group clinicians comprehensively integrated oral health services into WCVs.
    UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03385629.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在会堂环境中提供阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的药物可显着减少过量。然而,目前还不清楚监狱中的个人一旦离开监狱,在多大程度上继续表达。我们旨在评估监狱中的MOUD与MOUD连续性之间的关系。
    方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,对2011年至2017年期间从监狱出院的OUD患者的纽约市监狱电子健康记录和社区医疗补助OUD治疗索赔进行了调查。我们比较了MOUD在发布后30天内的收据,在那些有和没有MOUD从监狱释放的人中。我们根据监禁前的MOUD接收情况测试了效果改变,并评估了与治疗中止相关的因素。
    结果:在28,298名符合条件的监禁中,52.8%的人在发布时收到了MOUD。30%的MOUD被释放的监禁在30天内收到了基于社区的MOUD,相比之下,没有MOUD的监禁率为7%(风险比:2.62(2.44-2.82))。大多数(69%)在监禁前接受MOUD继续在社区接受监狱MOUD治疗的人,相比之下,9%的人没有事先的MOUD。那些接受美沙酮的人(与丁丙诺啡),更年轻,非西班牙裔黑人和没有MOUD历史的人不太可能在发布后继续MOUD。
    结论:监狱中的MOUD维护与释放后的MOUD连续性密切相关。尽管如此,研究结果强调了再入时治疗连续性的差距,尤其是那些在监狱里发起MOUD的人。在用药过量死亡和令人不安的差距恶化之后,改善该人群的MOUD连续性仍然是当务之急。
    BACKGROUND: Offering medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in carceral settings significantly reduces overdose. However, it is unknown to what extent individuals in jails continue MOUD once they leave incarceration. We aimed to assess the relationship between in-jail MOUD and MOUD continuity in the month following release.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of linked NYC jail-based electronic health records and community Medicaid OUD treatment claims for individuals with OUD discharged from jail between 2011 and 2017. We compared receipt of MOUD within 30 days of release, among those with and without MOUD at release from jail. We tested for effect modification based on MOUD receipt prior to incarceration and assessed factors associated with treatment discontinuation.
    RESULTS: Of 28,298 eligible incarcerations, 52.8 % received MOUD at release. 30 % of incarcerations with MOUD at release received community-based MOUD within 30 days, compared to 7 % of incarcerations without MOUD (Risk Ratio: 2.62 (2.44-2.82)). Most (69 %) with MOUD claims prior to incarceration who received in-jail MOUD continued treatment in the community, compared to 9 % of those without prior MOUD. Those who received methadone (vs. buprenorphine), were younger, Non-Hispanic Black and with no history of MOUD were less likely to continue MOUD following release.
    CONCLUSIONS: MOUD maintenance in jail is strongly associated with MOUD continuity upon release. Still, findings highlight a gap in treatment continuity upon-reentry, especially among those who initiate MOUD in jail. In the wake of worsening overdose deaths and troubling disparities, improving MOUD continuity among this population remains an urgent priority.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自我伤害是一项重要的公共卫生挑战。它对急诊科(ED)服务的使用以及患者和家人的医疗费用造成了显着负担。医疗补助系统对于为与医疗费用作斗争的个人提供财务支持至关重要。这项研究探讨了医疗补助覆盖与自我伤害事件后急诊就诊的关系,利用韩国全国的ED监测数据。
    方法:所有年龄在14岁以上的患者的数据,这些患者在发生自残事件后出现在ED中,而不管是否打算结束生命,包括自我中毒的病例,是从国家ED信息系统(NEDIS)收集的。计算了各省每10万人的年度自残访视率(SHVR),并进行了广义线性模型分析,以SHVR为因变量,与医疗补助覆盖率相关的因素为自变量。
    结果:医疗补助入学率增加1%与SHVR显着下降14%有关。每增加1,000韩元的医疗补助支出与SHVR减少1%相关。然而,每位参保人的Medicaid访视次数的增加和Medicaid承保天数的延长与SHVR的增加相关.与老年人群相比,SHVR与青少年和年轻人的医疗补助覆盖率参数具有更强的相关性。
    结论:扩大医疗补助覆盖范围,并仔细监测医疗补助利用模式的变化,可以通过减少与自我伤害相关的就诊来减轻ED过载。
    BACKGROUND: Self-harm presents an important public health challenge. It imposes a notable burden on the utilization of emergency department (ED) services and medical expenses from patients and family. The Medicaid system is vital in providing financial support for individuals who struggle with medical expenses. This study explored the association of Medicaid coverage with ED visits following incidents of self-harm, utilizing nationwide ED surveillance data in Korea.
    METHODS: Data of all patients older than 14 years who presented to EDs following incidents of self-harm irrespective of intention to end their life, including cases of self-poisoning, were gathered from the National ED Information System (NEDIS). The annual self-harm visit rate (SHVR) per 100,000 people was calculated for each province and a generalized linear model analysis was conducted, with SHVR as a dependent variable and factors related to Medicaid coverage as independent variables.
    RESULTS: A 1% increase in Medicaid enrollment rate was linked to a significant decrease of 14% in SHVR. Each additional 1,000 Korean Won of Medicaid spending per enrollee was correlated with a 1% reduction in SHVR. However, an increase in Medicaid visits per enrollee and an extension of Medicaid coverage days were associated with an increase in SHVR. SHVR exhibited a stronger associated with parameters of Medicaid coverage in adolescents and young adults than in older adult population.
    CONCLUSIONS: Expansion of Medicaid coverage coupled with careful monitoring of shifts in Medicaid utilization patterns can mitigate ED overloading by reducing visits related to self-harm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估医疗补助绝育等待期的长度和产后永久性避孕实现的影响。
    方法:来自一项回顾性队列研究的模拟,该研究估计了分娩后365天内永久性避孕的潜在增加结果:在我们的2,076名患者样本中,61%的人在目前的等待期为30天的情况下实现了永久避孕。假设等待期减少到15、3、1和0天,62.9%,63.7%,64.5%,75%的患者,分别,会实现永久避孕。
    结论:考虑到潜在的医疗补助绝育政策修订,了解对履约率的影响至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of length of the Medicaid sterilization waiting period and postpartum permanent contraception fulfillment.
    METHODS: Simulations from a retrospective cohort study estimating the potential increase in permanent contraception within 365 days of delivery.
    RESULTS: In our sample of 2076 patients, 61% achieved permanent contraception with the current waiting period of 30 days. With the waiting period hypothetically reduced to 15, 3, 1, and 0 days, 62.9%, 63.7%, 64.5%, and 75% patients, respectively, would have achieved permanent contraception.
    CONCLUSIONS: As potential Medicaid sterilization policy revisions are considered, understanding the impact on fulfillment rates is critical.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    招聘组织(即,健康计划,卫生系统,或临床实践)对实施科学很重要,然而,有限的研究探索了让组织参与务实研究的有效策略。我们探索实现招聘目标所需的努力,以进行务实的实施试验,从事和非从事临床实践的特点,以及卫生计划和农村临床实践选择参与的原因。
    我们在SMARTERCRC中探讨了与组织注册相关的招聘活动和因素,一项提高农村人群CRC筛查率的随机实用试验.我们试图在参与的医疗补助健康计划中招募30家农村初级保健机构。我们追踪了招聘外展联系人,会议内容,和使用跟踪日志的结果。由实施研究综合框架通知,我们分析了采访,调查,和公开的临床实践数据,以确定参与的促进者。
    总体招聘活动涵盖2020年1月至2021年4月。9项健康计划中有5项同意参与(55%)。三个健康计划根据网络结构选择集中运营为1个站点,导致3个招募的健康计划站点。在确定的101种做法中,76人符合研究资格标准;51%(n=39)入组。在招募和随机化之间,1实践被排除在外,5退出,根据临床实践结构,将7个实践分为3个地点进行随机化,留下29个随机网站。成功的招聘需要跨时间的迭代推广,每个临床实践有2到17次接触。征聘的促进者包括多模式外联,先前的关系,有效的消息传递,灵活性,和好的时机。
    招募健康计划和农村临床实践是复杂且反复的。利用现有的关系,并分配时间和资源,使临床实践参与务实的实施研究可能有助于在未来的试验和研究结果的普遍性更多样化的代表。
    UNASSIGNED: Recruiting organizations (i.e., health plans, health systems, or clinical practices) is important for implementation science, yet limited research explores effective strategies for engaging organizations in pragmatic studies. We explore the effort required to meet recruitment targets for a pragmatic implementation trial, characteristics of engaged and non-engaged clinical practices, and reasons health plans and rural clinical practices chose to participate.
    UNASSIGNED: We explored recruitment activities and factors associated with organizational enrollment in SMARTER CRC, a randomized pragmatic trial to increase rates of CRC screening in rural populations. We sought to recruit 30 rural primary care practices within participating Medicaid health plans. We tracked recruitment outreach contacts, meeting content, and outcomes using tracking logs. Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we analyzed interviews, surveys, and publicly available clinical practice data to identify facilitators of participation.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall recruitment activities spanned January 2020 to April 2021. Five of the 9 health plans approached agreed to participate (55%). Three of the health plans chose to operate centrally as 1 site based on network structure, resulting in 3 recruited health plan sites. Of the 101 identified practices, 76 met study eligibility criteria; 51% (n = 39) enrolled. Between recruitment and randomization, 1 practice was excluded, 5 withdrew, and 7 practices were collapsed into 3 sites for randomization purposes based on clinical practice structure, leaving 29 randomized sites. Successful recruitment required iterative outreach across time, with a range of 2 to 17 encounters per clinical practice. Facilitators to recruitment included multi-modal outreach, prior relationships, effective messaging, flexibility, and good timing.
    UNASSIGNED: Recruiting health plans and rural clinical practices was complex and iterative. Leveraging existing relationships and allocating time and resources to engage clinical practices in pragmatic implementation research may facilitate more diverse representation in future trials and generalizability of research findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号