Median effective dose

有效剂量中位数
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新型短效苯二氮卓类药物,甲苯磺酸雷米唑仑,在内窥镜手术期间已用于镇静。老年患者在胃镜检查中与芬太尼联合使用时,甲苯磺酸瑞咪唑安定的最佳负荷剂量尚不清楚。因此,我们研究的主要目的是确定对接受无痛胃镜检查的老年患者,甲磺酸瑞咪唑安定联合各种芬太尼剂量的中位有效剂量(ED50)和95%有效剂量(ED95).
    招募75名年龄≥65岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I-III级患者进行择期无痛胃镜检查。将所有患者随机分为F1组,F2组和F3组,并静脉注射不同剂量的芬太尼(0.5ug/kg,1ug/kg,和1.5ug/kg)给药前3分钟,分别。甲苯磺酸瑞米唑仑的初始预设剂量F1组为0.3mg/kg,F2组为0.2mg/kg,F3组为0.15mg/kg。根据上下顺序方法,剂量梯度为0.02mg/kg/组。采用Probibt回归模型确定甲苯磺酸雷米唑仑的ED50和ED95。
    F3组的甲苯磺酸瑞米唑仑的ED50低于F1组和F2组(0.095[0.088-0.108]mg/kgvs0.162[0.153-0.171]mg/kg;0.258[0.249-0.266]mg/kg,p<0.05)。甲苯磺酸雷米咪唑仑的ED95在F1组为0.272mg/kg(95%CI:0.264-0.295mg/kg),在F2组为0.175mg/kg(95%CI:0.167-0.200mg/kg),在F3组为0.109mg/kg(95%CI:0.101-0.135mg/kg)。随着芬太尼用量的增加,甲苯磺酸瑞米唑仑的总用量逐渐减少(p<0.001)。F1组的注射疼痛频率高于F2和F3组(p<0.05)。F3组低血压发生率低于F1组和F2组(p<0.05)。没有呼吸抑制,术中意识,三组出现头晕或谵妄。
    同时使用芬太尼以剂量依赖的方式减少了老年患者镇静胃镜检查所需的甲苯磺酸瑞咪唑安定的剂量。此外,1.5ug/kg芬太尼联合甲苯磺酸瑞咪唑安定可降低低血压和注射痛的发生率。这些发现应该在大规模研究中得到证实。
    UNASSIGNED: The novel short-acting benzodiazepine drug, remimazolam tosilate, has been employed for sedation during endoscopic procedures. The optimal loading dosage of remimazolam tosilate in gastroscopy for elderly patients when co-administered with fentanyl remains unclear. Therefore, the primary objective of our research was to ascertain the median effective dose (ED50) and the 95% effective dose (ED95) of remimazolam tosilate in combination with various fentanyl dosages for elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy.
    UNASSIGNED: Seventy-five patients aged ≥65 years and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III were recruited to undergo elective painless gastroscopy. All patients were randomized assigned to group F1, group F2, and group F3, and were injected intravenously with different doses of fentanyl (0.5 ug/kg, 1 ug/kg, and 1.5 ug/kg) 3 minutes prior to the administration of remimazolam tosilate, respectively. The initial preset dose of remimazolam tosilate was 0.3 mg/kg in group F1, 0.2 mg/kg in group F2, 0.15 mg/kg in group F3. The dose gradient was 0.02 mg/kg per group according to the up-and-down sequential method. Probibt regression model was employed to determine the ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam tosilate.
    UNASSIGNED: The ED50 of remimazolam tosilate in group F3 was lower than that in group F1 and F2 (0.095 [0.088-0.108] mg/kg vs 0.162 [0.153-0.171] mg/kg; 0.258 [0.249-0.266] mg/kg, p < 0.05). The ED95 of remimazolam tosilate was 0.272 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.264-0.295 mg/kg) in group F1, 0.175 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.167-0.200 mg/kg) in group F2 and 0.109 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.101-0.135 mg/kg) in group F3. The total dosage of remimazolam tosilate decreased gradually with the increasing of fentanyl (p < 0.001). The frequency of injection pain was higher in group F1 compared to groups F2 and F3 (p < 0.05). The patients in group F3 had a lower incidence of hypotension than in groups F1 and F2 (p < 0.05). There was no respiratory depression, intraoperative consciousness, dizziness or delirium in the three groups.
    UNASSIGNED: The concurrent use of fentanyl reduces the dosage of remimazolam tosilate required for sedative gastroscopy in elderly patients in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, 1.5 ug/kg fentanyl combined with remimazolam tosilate may reduce the incidence of hypotension and injection pain. These findings should be confirmed in a large-scale study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    前瞻性确定女性患者与不同剂量的艾氯胺酮联用时,异丙酚抑制喉罩气道(LMA)插入反应的中位有效剂量(ED50)。
    共58名女性患者(年龄20-60岁,ASAⅠ-Ⅱ)择期宫腔镜检查,随机分为2组,其中之一是服用0.2mg/kg的艾氯胺酮(K1组,n=28)和其他0.3mg/kg的艾氯胺酮(K2组,n=30)。两组分别静脉注射相应剂量的艾氯胺酮,随后静脉注射丙泊酚(注射时间为30s)。异丙酚的初始剂量为2mg/kg,相邻患者的丙泊酚剂量比为0.9。如果由于LMA插入而发生阳性反应,下一个患者的剂量比增加1个梯度;如果没有,剂量比下降1个梯度。使用概率分析计算了2个艾氯胺酮组中异丙酚抑制LMA插入反应的ED50,95%有效剂量(ED95)和95%置信区间(CI)。
    异丙酚抑制女性患者LMA插入反应的ED50在K1组为1.95mg/kg(95%CI,1.82-2.08mg/kg),在K2组为1.60mg/kg(95%CI,1.18-1.83mg/kg)。异丙酚抑制女性患者LMA插入反应的ED95在K1组为2.22mg/kg(95%CI,2.09-2.86mg/kg),在K2组为2.15mg/kg(95%CI,1.88-3.09mg/kg)。
    丙泊酚联合0.3mg/kg的艾氯胺酮具有较低的ED50和ED95有效剂量,可以抑制接受宫腔镜检查和手术的女性患者的LMA插入反应。没有明显的不良反应,但额外剂量的异丙酚和气道压力显著高于给予0.2mg/kg的艾氯胺酮组.根据结果,在接受宫腔镜检查的女性患者中,我们推荐丙泊酚与0.2mg/kg艾氯胺酮的联合应用,以获得最佳条件.
    UNASSIGNED: To prospectively determine the median effective dose (ED50) of propofol for inhibiting a response to laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion when combined with different doses of esketamine in female patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 58 female patients (aged 20-60 years, ASAⅠ-Ⅱ) scheduled for elective hysteroscopy were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups, one of which was administered 0.2 mg/kg of esketamine (K1 group, n = 28) and the other 0.3 mg/kg of esketamine (K2 group, n = 30). The 2 groups received the corresponding doses of esketamine intravenously, followed by an intravenous injection of propofol (injection time was 30 s). The initial dose of propofol was 2 mg/kg, and the dose ratio of propofol in the adjacent patients was 0.9. If a positive reaction occurred due to LMA insertion, the dose ratio in the next patient was increased by 1 gradient; if not, the dose ratio was decreased by 1 gradient. The ED50, 95 % effective dose (ED95) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) of propofol for inhibiting a response to LMA insertion in the 2 esketamine groups were calculated using probit analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The ED50 of propofol for inhibiting a response to LMA insertion in female patients was 1.95 mg/kg (95 % CI, 1.82-2.08 mg/kg) in the K1 group and 1.60 mg/kg (95 % CI, 1.18-1.83 mg/kg) in the K2 group. The ED95 of propofol for inhibiting a response to LMA insertion in female patients was 2.22 mg/kg (95 % CI, 2.09-2.86 mg/kg) in the K1 group and 2.15 mg/kg (95 % CI, 1.88-3.09 mg/kg) in the K2 group.
    UNASSIGNED: Propofol combined with 0.3 mg/kg of esketamine has low ED50 and ED95 effective doses for inhibiting an LMA insertion response in female patients undergoing hysteroscopy and surgery. There were no significant adverse effects, but the additional dose of propofol and airway pressure were significantly higher than those in the group administered 0.2 mg/kg of esketamine. Based on the results, we recommend the combination of propofol with 0.2 mg/kg esketamine for optimal conditions during LMA insertion in women undergoing hysteroscopy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    环丙泊酚是一种新型镇静麻醉药物,可用于胃肠内窥镜检查和全身麻醉的诱导,但用于老年患者的合适剂量尚未确定。舒芬太尼是临床上常用的阿片类药物,本研究旨在对老年患者使用舒芬太尼联合顺丙泊酚进行麻醉诱导。然而,顺丙泊酚与舒芬太尼联合给药时的最佳剂量尚未确定.本研究旨在寻找联合舒芬太尼用于静脉麻醉的环丙泊酚的中位有效剂量(ED50)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。
    我们研究了57例接受诊断性上消化道内镜检查的患者。根据年龄,分为两组:65~74岁(A组)和75岁以上(B组)。使用改进的Dixon序列测试方法,在服用顺丙泊酚前3分钟静脉注射0.1μg/kg舒芬太尼,环丙泊酚的初始剂量为0.4mg/kg,在达到镇静深度后进行上消化道内镜检查,在每个围手术期时间点(T0-T7)记录生命体征和不良事件。
    在A组中,当与0.1μg/kg舒芬太尼联用时,顺丙泊酚抑制上消化道内镜插入反应的ED50为0.23mg/kg,95%CI为0.09~0.30mg/kg;B组,ED50为0.18mg/kg,95%CI为0.13~0.22mg/kg。
    顺丙泊酚联合舒芬太尼(0.1μg/kg)用于老年患者上消化道内镜检查的ED50:A组0.23mg/kg,B组0.18mg/kg
    UNASSIGNED: Ciprofol is a new sedative anesthetic drug that can be used for gastrointestinal endoscopy and induction of general anesthesia, but the appropriate dosage for use in elderly patients has not been determined. Sufentanil is a commonly used opioid in clinical practice, and this study was designed to induce anesthesia in elderly patients using sufentanil in combination with ciprofol. However, the optimal dosage of ciprofol when it is co-administered with sufentanil has not yet been established. This study was designed to find the median effective dose (ED50) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of ciprofol for intravenous anesthesia when combined with sufentanil.
    UNASSIGNED: We studied 57 patients who were scheduled to undergo a diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. According to age, it was divided into two groups: 65∼74 years old (group A) and over 75 years old (group B). Using the modified Dixon sequence test method, intravenous bolus of 0.1 μg/kg sufentanil was given 3 min before ciprofol is administered, the initial dose of ciprofol was 0.4 mg/kg, the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was placed after reaching the depth of sedation, and vital signs and adverse events were recorded at each perioperative time point (T0-T7).
    UNASSIGNED: In the group A, when combined with 0.1 μg/kg sufentanil, the ED50 of ciprofol to inhibiting responses to insertion of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was 0.23 mg/kg, and the 95% CI was 0.09∼0.30 mg/kg; in the group B, the ED50 was 0.18 mg/kg, and the 95% CI was 0.13∼0.22 mg/kg.
    UNASSIGNED: The ED50 of ciprofol in combination with sufentanil (0.1 μg/kg) for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients: 0.23 mg/kg in group A and 0.18 mg/kg in group B.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在接受扁桃体切除术和/或腺样体切除术的学龄前儿童中,出现谵妄(ED)的发生率更高。本研究的目的是通过probit回归分析确定右美托咪定(DEX)抑制学龄前儿童ED的中位有效剂量(ED50)。总共检索了140份麻醉记录,并根据DEX的输注速度分为7组:.2、.25、.3、.35、.4、.45和.5μg·kg-1·h-1。小儿麻醉发生谵妄量表(PAEDS)用于评估学龄前儿童的ED,ED定义为PAEDS评分≥10。Probit回归分析表明,DEX的ED50和ED95分别为.31μg·kg-1·h-1(95%CI:.29-.35)和.48μg·kg-1·h-1(95%CI:.44-.56),分别。Probit(p)=-2.84+9.28×ln(剂量),(χ2=1.925,P=.859)。ED组PAEDS评分明显增高,与无ED组相比,ED组的心动过缓发生率显着降低(27.3%vs54.1%,P=.02)。DEX可以有效抑制学龄前儿童扁桃体切除术和/或腺样体切除术后的ED,然而,心动过缓是主要并发症。
    The incidence of emergence delirium (ED) is higher in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the median effective dose (ED50) of dexmedetomidine (DEX) for the inhibition of ED in preschool children by using probit regression analysis. A total of 140 anesthesia records were retrieved and divided into seven groups based on the infusion rate of DEX: .2, .25, .3, .35, .4, .45, and .5 μg·kg-1·h-1. The Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAEDS) was used to assess ED in preschool children, and ED was defined as a PAEDS score ≥ 10. Probit regression analysis revealed that the ED50 and ED95 of DEX were .31 μg·kg-1·h-1 (95% CI: .29-.35) and .48 μg·kg-1·h-1 (95% CI: .44-.56), respectively. Probit(p) = -2.84 + 9.28 × ln (Dose), (χ2 = 1.925, P = .859). The PAEDS score was significantly increased in the ED group, and the rate of bradycardia was significantly decreased in the ED group compared with the without ED group (27.3% vs 54.1%, P = .02). DEX can effectively inhibit the ED in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy, however, bradycardia was the main complication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    探索导致老年患者意识丧失的环丙泊酚的中位有效剂量,并研究虚弱如何影响老年患者的环丙泊酚的ED50。
    共有26名非虚弱患者和28名虚弱患者,年龄在65-78岁之间,选择BMI范围为15至28kg/m2,并分类为ASAII级或III级。根据虚弱将患者分为两组:非虚弱患者(CFS<4),虚弱患者(CFS≥4)。老年非虚弱患者的初始剂量为0.3mg/kg,老年虚弱患者的初始剂量为0.25mg/kg,使用上下狄克逊方法,下一位患者的剂量取决于前一位患者的反应。人口统计信息,心率(HR),氧饱和度(SpO2),平均血压(MBP),每30秒记录一次脑电双频指数(BIS),从开始给药开始,持续到给药后3分钟。此外,诱导期间的环丙泊酚总剂量,低血压的发生,心动过缓,呼吸抑制,记录注射疼痛。
    计算的顺丙泊酚引起的意识丧失的ED50(95%置信区间[CI])和ED95(95%CI)值如下:老年非虚弱患者的0.267mg/kg(95%CI0.250-0.284)和0.301mg/kg(95%CI0.284-0.97);老年非虚弱患者的0.263mg/kg(95%CI0.244)0.281重要的是,没有患者报告静脉注射疼痛,低血压需要治疗,或经历了严重的心动过缓。
    老年患者的虚弱对麻醉诱导用顺丙泊酚的中位有效剂量没有显著影响。我们的发现表明,麻醉师可能会放弃剂量调整的必要性时,服用顺丙泊酚麻醉诱导老年虚弱患者。
    UNASSIGNED: Explore the median effective dose of ciprofol for inducing loss of consciousness in elderly patients and investigate how frailty influences the ED50 of ciprofol in elderly patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 26 non-frail patients and 28 frail patients aged 65-78 years, with BMI ranging from 15 to 28 kg/m2, and classified as ASA grade II or III were selected. Patients were divided into two groups according to frailty: non-frail patients (CFS<4), frail patients (CFS≥4). With an initial dose of 0.3 mg/kg for elderly non-frail patients and 0.25 mg/kg for elderly frail patients, using the up-and-down Dixon method, and the next patient\'s dose was dependent on the previous patient\'s response. Demographic information, heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), mean blood pressure (MBP), and bispectral index (BIS) were recorded every 30 seconds, starting from the initiation of drug administration and continuing up to 3 minutes post-administration. Additionally, the total ciprofol dosage during induction, occurrences of hypotension, bradycardia, respiratory depression, and injection pain were recorded.
    UNASSIGNED: The calculated ED50 (95% confidence interval [CI]) and ED95 (95% CI) values for ciprofol-induced loss of consciousness were as follows: 0.267 mg/kg (95% CI 0.250-0.284) and 0.301 mg/kg (95% CI 0.284-0.397) for elderly non-frail patients; and 0.263 mg/kg (95% CI 0.244-0.281) and 0.302 mg/kg (95% CI 0.283-0.412) for elderly frail patients. Importantly, no patients reported intravenous injection pain, required treatment for hypotension, or experienced significant bradycardia.
    UNASSIGNED: Frailty among elderly patients does not exert a notable impact on the median effective dose of ciprofol for anesthesia induction. Our findings suggest that anesthesiologists may forego the necessity of dosage adjustments when administering ciprofol for anesthesia induction in elderly frail patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:鼻内右美托咪定联合口服咪达唑仑镇静用于儿童磁共振成像(MRI)检查的确切中位有效剂量(ED50)尚不清楚,本研究的目的是确定其组合的ED50。
    方法:这是一项前瞻性剂量研究。将2023年2月至2023年4月进行MRI检查的年龄2个月至6岁的儿童53例随机分为D组(测定鼻内右美托咪定的ED50)和M组(测定口服咪达唑仑的ED50)。右美托咪定和咪达唑仑的剂量按改良的Dixon's上下法调整,用probit回归方法计算ED50。
    结果:右美托咪定与0.5mg·kg-1口服咪达唑仑合用时,鼻内右美托咪定的ED50为0.39µg·kg-1[95%置信区间(CI)0.30至0.46µg·kg-1],而口服咪达唑仑的ED50为0.17mg·kg-1(95%CI与右美托咪定内D组镇静成功患儿的镇静起效时间长于M组(30.0[25.0,38.0]vs19.5[15.0,35.0]min,P<0.05)。除一次烦躁不安外,在用药当天和用药后24小时未观察到其他不良反应。
    结论:这种药物联合镇静方案似乎适用于计划进行MRI检查的儿童,提供了更精确的方法来指导儿童镇静药物的临床使用。
    背景:中国临床试验注册中心,标识符:ChiCTR2300068611(24/02/2023)。
    BACKGROUND: The exact median effective dose (ED50) of intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with oral midazolam sedation for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination in children remains unknow and the aim of this study was to determine the ED50 of their combination.
    METHODS: This is a prospective dose-finding study. A total of 53 children aged from 2 months to 6 years scheduled for MRI examination from February 2023 to April 2023 were randomly divided into group D (to determine the ED50 of intranasal dexmedetomidine) and group M (to determine the ED50 of oral midazolam). The dosage of dexmedetomidine and midazolam was adjusted according to the modified Dixon\'s up-and-down method, and the ED50 was calculated with a probit regression approach.
    RESULTS: The ED50 of intranasal dexmedetomidine when combined with 0.5 mg∙kg- 1 oral midazolam was 0.39 µg∙kg- 1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 to 0.46 µg∙kg- 1] while the ED50 of oral midazolam was 0.17 mg∙kg- 1 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.29 mg∙kg- 1) when combined with 1 µg∙kg- 1 intranasal dexmedetomidine. The sedation onset time of children with successful sedation in group D was longer than in group M (30.0[25.0, 38.0]vs 19.5[15.0, 35.0] min, P < 0.05). No other adverse effects were observed in the day and 24 h after medication except one dysphoria.
    CONCLUSIONS: This drug combination sedation regimen appears suitable for children scheduled for MRI examinations, offering a more precise approach to guide the clinical use of sedative drugs in children.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier: ChiCTR2300068611(24/02/2023).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:静脉注射利多卡因可能是老年患者胃镜检查中基于丙泊酚的镇静剂的潜在替代佐剂。本研究旨在评估静脉注射利多卡因对老年患者无痛胃镜检查中丙泊酚诱导剂量的中位有效剂量(ED50)的影响。
    方法:该研究包括70例年龄≥60岁接受无痛胃镜检查的患者,其中64例随机分配到L组(2%利多卡因1.5mg/kg,n=31)或N组(等容量生理盐水,n=33)。所有患者在0.1μg/kg静脉舒芬太尼后接受丙泊酚诱导。使用了狄克逊“上下”顺序法,丙泊酚初始诱导剂量为1.5mg/kg,随后为0.1mg/kg连续可变剂量。主要终点是异丙酚诱导剂量的ED50。异丙酚的总剂量,恢复时间,不良事件,还记录了局部麻醉剂中毒反应。
    结果:L组丙泊酚诱导剂量的ED50为0.670(95%置信区间[CI]0.216-0.827)mg/kg,N组为1.118(95%CI0.803-1.232)mg/kg。两组之间有统计学差异(p<0.001)。L组低血压和丙泊酚注射痛发生率低于N组(p<0.05)。此外,与N组相比,L组的方向恢复时间更短(p<0.05)。L组的参与者在接受利多卡因后没有观察到局部麻醉剂中毒反应。
    结论:接受无痛胃镜检查的老年患者静脉注射利多卡因导致丙泊酚诱导剂量的ED50显着降低40%,这可能与低血压和注射疼痛的发生率降低有关,以及改善胃镜检查后的方向恢复。
    背景:ChiCTR,ChiCTR2200065530。2022年11月8日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Intravenous lidocaine could be a potential alternative adjuvant to propofol-based sedation for gastroscopy in elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intravenous lidocaine on the median effective dose (ED50) of propofol induction dose in elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy.
    METHODS: The study included 70 patients aged ≥ 60 years undergoing painless gastroscopy with 64 randomly assigned to either group L (2% lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg, n = 31) or group N (equal volume normal saline, n = 33). All patients received propofol induction following 0.1 μg/kg intravenous sufentanil. The Dixon \"up-and-down\" sequential method was used, with a 1.5 mg/kg initial induction dose of propofol followed by a 0.1 mg/kg sequential variable dose. The primary endpoint was the ED50 of the propofol induction dose. The total propofol dose, recovery time, adverse events, and local anesthetic intoxication reactions were also recorded.
    RESULTS: The ED50 of propofol induction dose was 0.670 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.216-0.827) mg/kg in group L and 1.118 (95% CI 0.803-1.232) mg/kg in group N. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001). The incidence of hypotension and propofol injection pain were lower in group L than in group N (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the orientation recovery time in group L was shorter compared to group N (p < 0.05). None of the participants in group L observed local anesthetic intoxication reactions after receiving lidocaine.
    CONCLUSIONS: The administration of intravenous lidocaine to elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy resulted in a significant 40% reduction in the ED50 of propofol induction dose, which may be related to the decreased incidence of hypotension and injection pain, as well as the improved post-gastroscopy orientation recovery.
    BACKGROUND: ChiCTR, ChiCTR2200065530. Registered on 08 November 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    吸入技术用于在没有静脉通路的儿童中诱导麻醉。我们旨在确定鼻内右美托咪定的中位有效剂量(ED50),以确保在麻醉下接受检查的视网膜母细胞瘤患儿在吸入诱导期间满意的面罩接受度。
    在1-60个月的儿童中进行了一项前瞻性顺序分配研究,分为A组(1-18个月)和B组(18-60个月)。儿童鼻内给予右美托咪定作为术前用药。使用改良的观察者警惕性评估和镇静量表评估镇静直至诱导。成功接受面罩被定义为吸入诱导期间合作或睡着的孩子。右美托咪定的起始剂量为1µg/kg。根据这种情况的结果,下一次剂量变化0.2µg/kg。根据狄克逊上下法,计算失败-成功序列中点的平均值以获得ED50值.
    在A组(n=23)中,鼻内右美托咪定的ED50为0.7µg/kg(95%置信区间[CI]:0.54-0.86),在B组(n=25)中为0.96µg/kg(95%CI:0.83-1.08)(P=0.020)。A组的平均麻醉时间(标准差)为33.5(14.9)分钟,B组为23.5(8.48)分钟(P=0.007)。
    18个月以下儿童的ED50低于年龄较大的儿童。尽管较小的儿童手术时间更长,但从麻醉后护理室出院的时间没有差异。
    UNASSIGNED: Inhalational technique is used to induce anaesthesia in children without intravenous access. We aimed to determine the median effective dose (ED50) of intranasal dexmedetomidine to ensure satisfactory mask acceptance during inhalation induction in children with retinoblastoma undergoing examination under anaesthesia.
    UNASSIGNED: A prospective sequential allocation study was conducted in children aged 1-60 months divided into Group A (1-18 months) and Group B (18-60 months). Children were administered dexmedetomidine intranasally as premedication. Sedation was assessed using the modified Observer Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale until induction. Successful mask acceptance was defined as a cooperative or asleep child during inhalational induction. The starting dose of dexmedetomidine was 1 µg/kg. The next dose varied by 0.2 µg/kg depending on the outcome of this case. According to the Dixon up-and-down method, the mean of midpoints of the failure-success sequence was calculated to obtain the ED50 values.
    UNASSIGNED: The ED50 of intranasal dexmedetomidine for satisfactory mask acceptance was 0.7 µg/kg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.86) in Group A (n = 23) and 0.96 µg/kg (95% CI: 0.83-1.08) in Group B (n = 25) (P = 0.020). The mean (standard deviation) duration of anaesthesia was 33.5 (14.9) minutes in group A versus 23.5 (8.48) minutes in Group B (P = 0.007).
    UNASSIGNED: ED50 was lower in children younger than 18 months than in older children. There was no difference in the time to discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit despite the procedure being longer in smaller children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    镇静镇痛在脊髓麻醉中的应用有很多好处,但阿片类药物引起呼吸抑制(RD)的风险不容忽视。我们的目的是观察地佐辛的效果,μ受体的部分激动剂,舒芬太尼诱导RD的中位有效剂量(ED50)在腰麻联合小剂量右美托咪定中的应用。
    62例患者随机分为地佐辛组(DS)和对照组(MS)。脊髓麻醉后,给予面罩氧气(5L/min)和右美托咪定(0.1ug/kg).五分钟后,DS组患者接受舒芬太尼和0.05mg/kg地佐辛的静脉(IV)推注,而MS组患者仅接受舒芬太尼静脉推注。
    DS组的ED50为0.342ug/kg,95%置信区间(CI)为(0.269,0.623)ug/kg,MS组的ED50为0.291ug/kg,95%CI为(0.257,0.346)ug/kg。两组在RD类型和治疗措施及血流动力学改变方面无差异,两组均未出现严重不良反应。
    地佐辛能改善舒芬太尼复合小剂量右美托咪定腰麻患者的RD,增加舒芬太尼使用的安全窗口。
    UNASSIGNED: The application of sedation and analgesia in spinal anesthesia has many benefits, but the risk of respiratory depression (RD) caused by opioids cannot be ignored. We aimed to observe the effect of dezocine, a partial agonist of μ-receptor, on the median effective dose (ED50) of sufentanil-induced RD in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia combined with low-dose dexmedetomidine.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty-two patients were randomly assigned to dezocine group (DS) and control group (MS). After spinal anesthesia, mask oxygen (5 L/min) and dexmedetomidine (0.1 ug/kg) were given. Five minutes later, patients in the DS group received an Intravenous (IV) bolus of sufentanil and 0.05mg/kg dezocine, while patients in the MS group only received an IV bolus of sufentanil.
    UNASSIGNED: ED50 of DS group was 0.342 ug/kg, 95% confidence interval (CI) was (0.269, 0.623) ug/kg, and the ED50 of MS group was 0.291 ug/kg, 95% CI was (0.257, 0.346) ug/kg. There was no difference in the type and treatment measures of RD and hemodynamic changes between the two groups, and no serious adverse reactions occurred in either group.
    UNASSIGNED: Dezocine can improve RD induced by sufentanil in patients with spinal anesthesia combined with low-dose dexmedetomidine, and increase the safety window of sufentanil use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Propofol-opioids are the most common drug combination and can reduce the dose of propofol and the incidence of adverse events in painless artificial abortion. We hypothesized that butorphanol may reduce the median effective dose (ED50) of propofol, propofol injection pain, and postoperative uterine contraction pain.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. A total of 54 female patients, who had ASA I or II, aged 18-49 years, undergoing painless artificial abortion, were randomly assigned into two groups, namely, Group P (propofol) and Group PB (propofol plus 10 μg/kg butorphanol). According to the pre-experiment, the initial dose of propofol for the P and PB groups was 3 and 2.5 mg/kg, respectively, with a dose gradient of 0.25 mg/kg. The ED50 of propofol was analyzed using probit regression analysis. The total propofol dose consumed, recovery time, and anesthesia-related adverse events were also recorded.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 25 and 29 patients in the P and PB groups, respectively. The ED50 (95% CI) of propofol for artificial abortion were 2.477 (2.186-2.737) and 1.555 (1.173-1.846) mg/kg in the P and PB groups, respectively. The total propofol dose consumed was (150.7 ± 21.7) mg and (110.4 ± 28.2) mg in the P and PB groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Compared with the P group, injection-site pain (76 vs. 20.7%) and uterine contraction pain (72 vs. 6.9%) in the PB group had a significant decrease (P < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Combination of propofol with 10 μg/kg butorphanol reduced the ED50 of propofol and decreased the incidence of propofol injection-site pain and postoperative uterine contraction pain during painless artificial abortion compared with propofol alone.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=166610, identifier: ChiCTR2200059795.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号