Massachusetts

马萨诸塞州
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阿片类药物过量死亡在美国继续增加。最近的数据显示,黑人的过量死亡率过高,而且不断增加,拉丁,土著个人,和无家可归的人。阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)可以挽救生命;然而,只有一小部分符合条件的人收到他们。我们的目标是描述我们使用移动交付模式促进公平的MOUD访问的经验。我们实施了一个移动MOUD单元,旨在改善布罗克顿的公平访问,种族多样化,马萨诸塞州的中型城市。布罗克顿的阿片类药物过量死亡率相对较高,黑人居民的死亡率越来越不成比例。布罗克顿邻里健康中心(BNHC),社区卫生中心,提供实体MOUD访问。通过作为治疗社区研究(HCS)一部分的治疗社区干预,布罗克顿召集了一个社区联盟,旨在选择基于证据的做法来减少过量死亡。BNHC领导层和联盟成员认识到,边缘化人群无法进入传统的实体治疗地点,移动程序可以增加MOUD访问。2021年9月,在HCS联盟的支持下,BNHC启动了其移动计划-社区护理-Reach®-带来低门槛的丁丙诺啡,减少危害,以及对高危人群的预防性护理。在实施过程中,该团队遇到了几个挑战,包括:确保当地的买入;导航复杂的许可流程;在整个COVID-19大流行期间维持运营;最后,可持续发展规划。在两年的运营中,流动小组在1,286次总访视中照顾了297名独特患者。超过三分之一(36%)的患者接受丁丙诺啡处方。与BNHC的实体诊所相反,在移动单元上看到的OUD患者更能代表历史上被边缘化的种族和族裔群体,和无家可归的人,证据改进,为这些历史上处于不利地位的人群提供公平的成瘾护理。在移动设备上提供各种服务,比如伤口护理,注射器和更安全的吸烟用品,纳洛酮,和其他基本医疗服务,是一个关键的参与战略。这种按需移动模式有助于纠正在获得成瘾治疗和减少伤害服务方面的系统弊端,在过量死亡人数不公平增加的时候,向不同的人提供救生穆德。
    Opioid overdose deaths continue to increase in the US. Recent data show disproportionately high and increasing overdose death rates among Black, Latine, and Indigenous individuals, and people experiencing homelessness. Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) can be lifesaving; however, only a fraction of eligible individuals receive them. Our goal was to describe our experience promoting equitable MOUD access using a mobile delivery model. We implemented a mobile MOUD unit aiming to improve equitable access in Brockton, a racially diverse, medium-sized city in Massachusetts. Brockton has a relatively high opioid overdose death rate with increasingly disproportionate death rates among Black residents. Brockton Neighborhood Health Center (BNHC), a community health center, provides brick-and-mortar MOUD access. Through the Communities That HEAL intervention as part of the HEALing Communities Study (HCS), Brockton convened a community coalition with the aim of selecting evidence-based practices to decrease overdose deaths. BNHC leadership and coalition members recognized that traditional brick-and-mortar treatment locations were inaccessible to marginalized populations, and that a mobile program could increase MOUD access. In September 2021, with support from the HCS coalition, BNHC launched its mobile initiative - Community Care-in-Reach® - to bring low-threshold buprenorphine, harm reduction, and preventive care to high-risk populations. During implementation, the team encountered several challenges including: securing local buy-in; navigating a complex licensure process; maintaining operations throughout the COVID-19 pandemic; and finally, planning for sustainability. In two years of operation, the mobile team cared for 297 unique patients during 1,286 total visits. More than one-third (36%) of patients received buprenorphine prescriptions. In contrast to BNHC\'s brick-and-mortar clinics, patients with OUD seen on the mobile unit were more representative of historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups, and people experiencing homelessness, evidencing improved, equitable addiction care access for these historically disadvantaged populations. Offering varied services on the mobile unit, such as wound care, syringe and safer smoking supplies, naloxone, and other basic medical care, was a key engagement strategy. This on-demand mobile model helped redress systemic disadvantages in access to addiction treatment and harm reduction services, reaching diverse individuals to offer lifesaving MOUD at a time of inequitable increases in overdose deaths.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)之间的关联,压力,白细胞介素-6(IL-6),以及非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔癌症幸存者的生活质量。
    通过马萨诸塞州西部的社区伙伴关系和州癌症登记处招募完成癌症治疗且未鉴定为白人(N=46)的个人。
    这项描述性横断面研究使用问卷调查和早晨唾液样本来收集2022年6月至2023年9月之间的数据。
    结果:大多数参与者是乳腺癌幸存者,是女性,被认定为非洲裔美国人或黑人,并报告中等程度的压力和低体力活动。非洲裔美国人或黑人参与者的皮质醇水平较高,那些体重指数较低的人,以及水果和蔬菜消费较少的人。较高的症状体验与较高的IL-6水平相关。在IL-6和皮质醇或感知的压力和皮质醇水平之间没有发现关联。
    结论:将SDOH纳入自我报告的结果,包括健康行为和相关的生物指标,可以促进早期识别和干预,以改善癌症幸存者的症状体验和健康结果。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate associations among social determinants of health (SDOH), stress, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and quality of life among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic cancer survivors.
    UNASSIGNED: Individuals who had completed cancer treatment and did not identify as White (N = 46) were recruited through community partnerships in western Massachusetts and a state cancer registry.
    UNASSIGNED: This descriptive cross-sectional study used questionnaires and morning salivary samples to collect data between June 2022 and September 2023.
    RESULTS: Most participants were breast cancer survivors, were female, identified as African American or Black, and reported moderate levels of stress and low physical activity. Cortisol levels were higher among African American or Black participants, those with lower body mass index, and those with less consumption of fruit and vegetables. Higher symptom experience was associated with higher IL-6 levels. No associations were identified between IL-6 and cortisol or perceived stress and cortisol levels.
    CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating SDOH in self-reported outcomes, including health behaviors and associated biologic indicators, can facilitate early identification and interventions to improve symptom experience and health outcomes of cancer survivors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有严重精神疾病(SMI)和智力障碍/发育障碍(ID/DD)的人发生COVID-19的风险更高,结果更严重。我们比较了针对马萨诸塞州(MA)患有SMI或ID/DD的人群的团体住宅(GHs)中量身定制的最佳实践COVID-19预防计划和一般最佳实践预防计划。
    方法:一项混合有效性实施整群随机对照试验,比较了四个组成部分的实施策略(量身定制的最佳实践:TBP)与标准预防指南(一般最佳实践:GBP)在六个MA行为卫生机构的GH中传播。英镑由预防COVID-19的标准最佳实践组成。TBP包括英镑以及四个组成部分,其中包括:(1)关于疫苗接种益处的可信赖信使同伴推荐;(2)动机性访谈;(3)关于预防实践的交互式教育;(4)GHs的保真度反馈仪表板。主要实施结果是完整的COVID-19疫苗接种率(基线:2021年1月1日至2021年3月31日)和保真度评分(基线:5/1/21-7/30/21),间隔3个月至15个月随访,直至2022年10月。主要有效性结果是COVID-19感染(基线:2021年1月1日至2021年3月31日),每3个月至15个月随访一次。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线估计疫苗接种的累积发生率。Cox脆弱模型评估疫苗接种摄取和次要结局的差异。线性混合模型(LMM)和泊松广义线性混合模型(GLMM)用于评估保真度评分和COVID-19感染发生率的差异。
    结果:GHs(n=415)随机分为TBP(n=208)和GBP(n=207),包括3,836名居民(1,041ID/DD;2,795SMI)和5,538名工作人员。TBP和GBP之间的保真度评分或COVID-19发病率没有差异,然而TBP有更大的可接受性,适当性,和可行性。TBP和GBP之间没有发现疫苗接种率的总体差异。然而,在未接种疫苗的智障家庭居民中,非白人居民在15个月时TBP(28.6%)比GBP(14.4%)高出一倍,达到完全疫苗接种状态.此外,与非西班牙裔白人居民相比,非白人居民TBP对疫苗接种的影响超过2倍(非白人和非西班牙裔白人TBP的HR比:2.28,p=0.03).
    结论:量身定做的COVID-19预防策略作为一种可行和可接受的实施策略是有益的,有可能减少非白人精神残疾患者亚组之间疫苗接受度的差异。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04726371,2021年1月27日。https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04726371.
    BACKGROUND: People with serious mental illness (SMI) and people with intellectual disabilities/developmental disabilities (ID/DD) are at higher risk for COVID-19 and more severe outcomes. We compare a tailored versus general best practice COVID-19 prevention program in group homes (GHs) for people with SMI or ID/DD in Massachusetts (MA).
    METHODS: A hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized control trial compared a four-component implementation strategy (Tailored Best Practices: TBP) to dissemination of standard prevention guidelines (General Best-Practices: GBP) in GHs across six MA behavioral health agencies. GBP consisted of standard best practices for preventing COVID-19. TBP included GBP plus four components including: (1) trusted-messenger peer testimonials on benefits of vaccination; (2) motivational interviewing; (3) interactive education on preventive practices; and (4) fidelity feedback dashboards for GHs. Primary implementation outcomes were full COVID-19 vaccination rates (baseline: 1/1/2021-3/31/2021) and fidelity scores (baseline: 5/1/21-7/30/21), at 3-month intervals to 15-month follow-up until October 2022. The primary effectiveness outcome was COVID-19 infection (baseline: 1/1/2021-3/31/2021), measured every 3 months to 15-month follow-up. Cumulative incidence of vaccinations were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox frailty models evaluate differences in vaccination uptake and secondary outcomes. Linear mixed models (LMMs) and Poisson generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to evaluate differences in fidelity scores and incidence of COVID-19 infections.
    RESULTS: GHs (n=415) were randomized to TBP (n=208) and GBP (n=207) including 3,836 residents (1,041 ID/DD; 2,795 SMI) and 5,538 staff. No differences were found in fidelity scores or COVID-19 incidence rates between TBP and GBP, however TBP had greater acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. No overall differences in vaccination rates were found between TBP and GBP. However, among unvaccinated group home residents with mental disabilities, non-White residents achieved full vaccination status at double the rate for TBP (28.6%) compared to GBP (14.4%) at 15 months. Additionally, the impact of TBP on vaccine uptake was over two-times greater for non-White residents compared to non-Hispanic White residents (ratio of HR for TBP between non-White and non-Hispanic White: 2.28, p = 0.03).
    CONCLUSIONS: Tailored COVID-19 prevention strategies are beneficial as a feasible and acceptable implementation strategy with the potential to reduce disparities in vaccine acceptance among the subgroup of non-White individuals with mental disabilities.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04726371, 27/01/2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04726371 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于提供者和实验室报告的莱姆病监测低估了发病率。我们开发了一种使用电子健康记录数据自动监控的算法。我们在电子健康记录数据中确定了潜在的莱姆病标志物(实验室测试,诊断代码,处方)从2017年1月至2018年12月在马萨诸塞州的2个大型实践小组中,美国。我们计算了它们的灵敏度和阳性预测值(PPV),单独和组合,相对于病历审查。敏感性范围从免疫测定的57%(95%CI47%-69%)到诊断代码的87%(95%CI70%-100%)。诊断代码的PPV范围从53%(95%CI43%-61%)到免疫测定的58%(95%CI50%-66%)。诊断代码和抗生素在14天内的组合或阳性Westernblot的敏感性为100%(95%CI86%-100%),PPV为82%(95%CI75%-89%)。该算法可以使莱姆病监测更加有效和一致。
    Lyme disease surveillance based on provider and laboratory reports underestimates incidence. We developed an algorithm for automating surveillance using electronic health record data. We identified potential Lyme disease markers in electronic health record data (laboratory tests, diagnosis codes, prescriptions) from January 2017-December 2018 in 2 large practice groups in Massachusetts, USA. We calculated their sensitivities and positive predictive values (PPV), alone and in combination, relative to medical record review. Sensitivities ranged from 57% (95% CI 47%-69%) for immunoassays to 87% (95% CI 70%-100%) for diagnosis codes. PPVs ranged from 53% (95% CI 43%-61%) for diagnosis codes to 58% (95% CI 50%-66%) for immunoassays. The combination of a diagnosis code and antibiotics within 14 days or a positive Western blot had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 86%-100%) and PPV of 82% (95% CI 75%-89%). This algorithm could make Lyme disease surveillance more efficient and consistent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:青少年吸烟是一个严重的公共卫生问题,比任何其他烟草使用都更普遍。告知戒烟干预措施,我们探讨了青少年认为戒烟的原因以及帮助他们戒烟的策略。
    方法:半结构化访谈是对11名在过去90天内报告电子烟的青少年进行的便利样本,并从马萨诸塞州的一所高中招募。访谈被转录和双重编码。采用归纳主题分析,并编写了专题摘要。
    结果:青少年报告戒烟的原因包括成本,经历尼古丁戒断或过量摄入的“nic-sick”,对情绪的负面影响,浓度,或健康,并出现尼古丁依赖的症状。几乎所有人都试图多次退出。戒烟的障碍包括暴露于vaping,获取vape产品,压力,和“酷”的新产品或口味。退出策略包括避免别人vaping,寻求社会支持退出,解决同伴继续吸电子烟的压力,从同龄人那里学习成功的戒烟策略,并使用分散注意力的策略或替代vaping。
    结论:许多想戒烟的青少年,大多数人都尝试过多次。干预措施需要让青少年有不同的戒烟理由,障碍,并退出策略偏好。
    背景:本研究通过ClinicalTrials.gov注册。试验注册号为NCT05140915。试用注册日期为2021年11月18日。
    BACKGROUND: Youth vaping is a serious public health concern, being more prevalent than any other tobacco use. To inform cessation interventions, we explored what adolescents perceive as their reasons for quitting and strategies to help them quit.
    METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of 11 adolescents reporting vaping in the past 90 days and recruited from a high school in Massachusetts. Interviews were transcribed and dual-coded. Inductive thematic analysis was employed, and thematic summaries were prepared.
    RESULTS: Reasons adolescents reported for quitting included cost, experiencing \"nic-sick\" from nicotine withdrawal or excess intake, negative impacts on mood, concentration, or health, and experiencing symptoms of nicotine dependence. Nearly all tried to quit multiple times. Barriers to quitting included exposure to vaping, access to vape products, stress, and \"cool\" new products or flavors. Quit strategies included avoiding others vaping, seeking social support to quit, addressing peer pressure to continue vaping, learning successful quit strategies from peers, and using distraction strategies or alternatives to vaping.
    CONCLUSIONS: Many adolescents who vape want to quit, and most have tried multiple times. Interventions need to engage adolescents with varying reasons to quit, barriers, and quit strategy preferences.
    BACKGROUND: This study is registered through ClinicalTrials.gov. The trial registration number is NCT05140915. The trial registration date is 11/18/2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于立即淋巴重建(ILR)的实践模式和支付方式知之甚少。本研究旨在评估ILR交付和计费实践的趋势。
    方法:我们在2016年至2020年间查询了马萨诸塞州所有付款人索赔数据库中的肿瘤适应症患者,这些患者接受了乳房肿瘤切除术或腋窝淋巴结清扫术。我们进一步确定了与肿瘤切除术相同日期接受淋巴静脉搭桥的患者。我们使用邮政编码数据来分析ILR程序的地理分布,并计算这些程序的医生付款,调整通货膨胀。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来识别变量,预测了ILR的接收。
    结果:总计,在研究期间,2862例患者接受了腋窝淋巴结清扫术。其中,53例患者行ILR。接受ILR的患者年龄较小(55.1岁vs59.3岁,P=0.023)。肥胖没有显着差异,糖尿病,或吸烟史。接受ILR的患者中有较高比例的患者有放疗(83%vs67%,P=0.027)。在多变量回归中,居住在邻近波士顿的县的患者接受ILR的几率高3.32倍(95%置信区间:1.76-6.25;P<0.001),而肥胖,放射治疗,基于紫杉烷的化疗不是显著的预测因子。ILR的付款差异很大。
    结论:在马萨诸塞州,如果患者居住在波士顿附近,则他们更有可能接受ILR。因此,许多已知乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿风险最高的患者可能面临进入ILR的障碍.需要提高将高风险患者转诊给整形外科医生的意识。
    BACKGROUND: Little is known about practice patterns and payments for immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR). This study aims to evaluate trends in ILR delivery and billing practices.
    METHODS: We queried the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database between 2016 and 2020 for patients who underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection for oncologic indications. We further identified patients who underwent lymphovenous bypass on the same date as tumor resection. We used ZIP code data to analyze the geographic distribution of ILR procedures and calculated physician payments for these procedures, adjusting for inflation. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify variables, which predicted receipt of ILR.
    RESULTS: In total, 2862 patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection over the study period. Of these, 53 patients underwent ILR. Patients who underwent ILR were younger (55.1 vs 59.3 years, P = 0.023). There were no significant differences in obesity, diabetes, or smoking history between the two groups. A greater percentage of patients who underwent ILR had radiation (83% vs 67%, P = 0.027). In multivariable regression, patients residing in a county neighboring Boston had 3.32-fold higher odds of undergoing ILR (95% confidence interval: 1.76-6.25; P < 0.001), while obesity, radiation therapy, and taxane-based chemotherapy were not significant predictors. Payments for ILR varied widely.
    CONCLUSIONS: In Massachusetts, patients were more likely to undergo ILR if they resided near Boston. Thus, many patients with the highest known risk for breast cancer-related lymphedema may face barriers accessing ILR. Greater awareness about referring high-risk patients to plastic surgeons is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管患有哮喘的儿童通常由初级保健临床医生成功治疗,对于疾病控制不佳的患者,建议进行门诊专科护理。关于医疗补助与私人保险儿童在哮喘方面的专家使用差异知之甚少。
    根据保险类型检查哮喘儿童在接受哮喘专科护理方面的差异。
    在这项横断面研究中,使用了2014年至2020年马萨诸塞州所有付款人索赔数据库(APCD)的数据,确定了哮喘儿童,并根据他们的保险是公共的(医疗补助和儿童健康保险计划)还是私人的,检查了接受门诊专科护理的差异。符合条件的参与者包括2015年至2020年2至17岁的哮喘儿童。数据分析于2023年1月至2024年4月进行。
    医疗补助与私人保险。
    主要结果是接受专科护理(任何肺科门诊就诊,过敏和免疫学,或耳鼻喉科医师)。多变量逻辑回归模型估计不同的保险类型,包括儿童和地区特征,包括人口统计学,健康状况,持续性哮喘,日历年,和邮政编码特征。其他分析检查了专科护理与保险类型的关联是否因哮喘的持久性和严重程度而有所不同,以及协会是否随着时间的推移而变化。
    在198101个独特的孩子中,有432455个儿童年观察(186296个女性[43.1%]和246159个男性[56.9%];211269个5~11岁[48.9%];82108个持续性哮喘患者[19.0%]),包括286408个医疗补助保险(66.2%)和146047个私人保险(33.8%).尽管持续性哮喘在医疗补助与私人保险的儿童年观察中更为常见(57381[20.0%]vs24727[16.9%]),接受医疗补助的儿童接受专科护理的可能性较小.总的来说,64239项儿童年观察(14.9%)接受专科护理,医疗补助儿童与私人保险的比率大大降低(34093个儿童年观察[11.9%]vs30146个儿童年观察[20.6%])。基于回归的估计证实了这些差异;医疗补助的儿童接受专科护理的几率降低了55%(调整后的优势比,0.45;95%CI,0.43至0.47)和回归调整后的9.7个百分点(95%CI,-10.4个百分点至-9.1个百分点)的专科护理接收率降低。与有私人保险的儿童相比,有持续性哮喘的Medicaid患儿还有3.2个百分点(95%CI,2.0~4.4个百分点)的不足.
    在这项横断面研究中,接受医疗补助的儿童不太可能接受专科护理,在持续性哮喘患者中差距最大。这些发现表明,缩小这一护理差距可能是解决哮喘结局持续差异的一种方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Although children with asthma are often successfully treated by primary care clinicians, outpatient specialist care is recommended for those with poorly controlled disease. Little is known about differences in specialist use for asthma among children with Medicaid vs private insurance.
    UNASSIGNED: To examine differences among children with asthma regarding receipt of asthma specialist care by insurance type.
    UNASSIGNED: In this cross-sectional study using data from the Massachusetts All Payer Claims Database (APCD) between 2014 to 2020, children with asthma were identified and differences in receipt of outpatient specialist care by whether their insurance was public (Medicaid and the Children\'s Health Insurance Program) or private were examined. Eligible participants included children with asthma in 2015 to 2020 aged 2 to 17 years. Data analysis was conducted from January 2023 to April 2024.
    UNASSIGNED: Medicaid vs private insurance.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome was receipt of specialist care (any outpatient visit with a pulmonology, allergy and immunology, or otolaryngology physician). Multivariable logistic regression models estimated differences in receipt of specialist care by insurance type accounting for child and area characteristics including demographics, health status, persistent asthma, calendar year, and zip code characteristics. Additional analyses examined if the associations of specialist care with insurance type varied by asthma persistence and severity, and whether associations varied over time.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 198 101 unique children, there were 432 455 child-year observations (186 296 female [43.1%] and 246 159 male [56.9%]; 211 269 aged 5 to 11 years [48.9%]; 82 108 [19.0%] with persistent asthma) including 286 408 (66.2%) that were Medicaid insured and 146 047 (33.8%) that were privately insured. Although persistent asthma was more common among child-year observations with Medicaid vs private insurance (57 381 [20.0%] vs 24 727 [16.9%]), children with Medicaid were less likely to receive specialist care. Overall, 64 239 child-year observations (14.9%) received specialist care, with substantially lower rates for children with Medicaid vs private insurance (34 093 child-year observations [11.9%] vs 30 146 child-year observations [20.6%]). Regression-based estimates confirmed these disparities; children with Medicaid had 55% lower odds of receiving specialist care (adjusted odds ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.47) and a regression-adjusted 9.7 percentage point (95% CI, -10.4 percentage points to -9.1 percentage points) lower rate of receipt of specialist care. Compared with children with private insurance, there was an additional 3.2 percentage point (95% CI, 2.0 percentage points to 4.4 percentage points) deficit for children with Medicaid with persistent asthma.
    UNASSIGNED: In this cross-sectional study, children with Medicaid were less likely to receive specialist care, with the largest gaps among those with persistent asthma. These findings suggest that closing this care gap may be one approach to addressing ongoing disparities in asthma outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2020年6月,马萨诸塞州成为第一个实施全面加味烟草限制的州。令人担忧的是,马萨诸塞州的居民会前往新罕布什尔州购买受限制的产品。本文评估了法律实施后两个州的烟草销售。零售扫描仪数据来自尼尔森公司和信息资源,公司(IRI),从法律实施前1年到法律实施后2年。将法律实施后的数据与法律实施前1年的数据(基线)进行比较。在马萨诸塞州,法律实施后2年,调味和薄荷醇烟草的销量下降了90%以上。总销售额下降了20%左右。在新罕布什尔州,薄荷醇烟草销量增长(IRI为25.1%,尼尔森为18.2%),但总销售额变化最小(IRI增长<5%,尼尔森下降<5%)。当两个州的数据合并时,总销售额下降了10%左右。马萨诸塞州和新罕布什尔州的总烟草销售净减少表明,尽管有可能进行跨境购买,但马萨诸塞州的加味烟草限制导致烟草销售减少。
    In June 2020, Massachusetts became the first state to implement a comprehensive flavored tobacco restriction. One concern was that Massachusetts residents would travel to New Hampshire to purchase restricted products. This article assesses tobacco sales in both states post-law implementation. Retail scanner data were obtained from the Nielsen Company and Information Resources, Inc (IRI), from 1 year pre-law implementation to 2 years post-law implementation. Data post-law implementation were compared with data from 1 year pre-law implementation (baseline). In Massachusetts, 2 years post-law implementation, flavored and menthol tobacco sales decreased by more than 90%. Total sales decreased by around 20%. In New Hampshire, menthol tobacco sales increased (25.1% in IRI and 18.2% in Nielsen), but total sales changed minimally (<5% increase in IRI, <5% decrease in Nielsen). When data from both states were combined, total sales decreased by around 10%. The net decrease in total tobacco sales across Massachusetts and New Hampshire indicates Massachusetts\' flavored tobacco restriction resulted in a reduction in tobacco sales despite potential cross-border purchases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自我监测血压(SMBP)计划是通过远程健康促进的基于证据的高血压管理干预措施。SMBP计划可以通过在家中促进高血压管理来提供超出临床环境的连续护理;然而,公平获得SMBP是一个令人担忧的问题。
    目的:在马萨诸塞州(MA)的5个联邦合格的健康中心(FQHC)中,使用公平视角评估远程医疗SMBP计划的实施情况。
    方法:前瞻性病例系列研究。
    方法:五个FQHC。
    方法:MA公共卫生部(MDPH)选择了5个FQHC来使用远程医疗实施SMBP计划。如果患者群体由于健康的社会决定因素而经历不平等并且具有较高的心血管疾病发病率,则选择FQHC。5个FQHC中的每一个都报告了参与其SMBP计划的患者的数据,该研究共检查了241名患者。
    方法:通过远程医疗实施的SMBP程序。
    方法:收缩压和舒张压。
    结果:大约53.5%的SMBP参与者经历了血压下降。平均血压从146/87降至136/81mmHg。在5个FQHCs的所有患者中,平均血压下降10.06/5.34mmHg(P<.001)。所有种族的血压都有所改善,民族,和语言子组。
    结论:五个MAFQHC成功实施了公平的远程医疗SMBP计划。参加该计划的SMBP参与者在计划结束时表现出血压的显着改善。一个灵活的,经过调整以满足独特患者需求的务实研究设计;聘请非医师团队成员,特别是社区卫生工作者;适应卫生信息技术;与社区组织的伙伴关系是计划成功的关键促进因素。
    BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring blood pressure (SMBP) programs are an evidence-based hypertension management intervention facilitated through telehealth. SMBP programs can provide a continuum of care beyond a clinical setting by facilitating hypertension management at home; however, equitable access to SMBP is a concern.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the implementation of telehealth SMBP programs using an equity lens in 5 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Massachusetts (MA).
    METHODS: A prospective case series study.
    METHODS: Five FQHCs.
    METHODS: The MA Department of Public Health (MDPH) selected 5 FQHCs to implement SMBP programs using telehealth. FQHCs were selected if their patient population experiences inequities due to social determinants of health and has higher rates of cardiovascular disease. Each of the 5 FQHCs reported data on patients enrolled in their SMBP programs totaling 241 patients examined in this study.
    METHODS: SMBP programs implemented through telehealth.
    METHODS: Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure.
    RESULTS: Approximately 53.5% of SMBP participants experienced a decrease in blood pressure. The average blood pressure decreased from 146/87 to 136/81 mm Hg. Among all patients across the 5 FQHCs, the average blood pressure decreased by 10.06/5.34 mm Hg (P < .001). Blood pressure improved in all racial, ethnic, and language subgroups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Five MA FQHCs successfully implemented equitable telehealth SMBP programs. SMBP participants enrolled in the programs demonstrated notable improvements in their blood pressure at the conclusion of the program. A flexible, pragmatic study design that was adjusted to meet unique patient needs; engaging nonphysician team members, particularly community health workers; adapting health information technology; and partnerships with community-based organizations were critical facilitators to program success.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在COVID-19大流行期间,已有精神障碍的个体的精神保健利用情况如何变化?了解这些高危个体的利用模式并确定最有可能表现出更高利用的个体可以改善患者分层和精神保健服务的有效提供。这项研究利用大规模电子健康记录(EHR)数据来描述在COVID-19大流行之前和期间已有精神障碍的个体之间的精神保健利用模式,并确定高精神保健利用的相关性。使用来自马萨诸塞州大型医疗保健系统的EHR数据,我们根据在2020年3月封锁前6个月内有记录的精神障碍诊断,确定了三个“预先存在的精神障碍”组(PMD),与:(1)压力相关疾病(例如,抑郁症,焦虑)(N=115,849),(2)严重的精神疾病(例如,精神分裂症,双相情感障碍)(N=11,530),或(3)强迫行为障碍(例如,饮食失调,强迫症)(N=5893)。我们还为上一年(2019年)的每个PMD确定了一个“历史比较”组(HC)(分别为N=113,604、11,758和5,387)。我们评估了2020年3月13日至12月31日PMD和2019年HCs的每月精神保健就诊次数。全表型关联分析(PheWAS)用于确定高精神保健利用的临床相关性。我们发现,在2020年大流行期间,每位患者的精神医疗就诊总数比2019年增加了10-12%。大多数增加的访问是由一部分高精神卫生保健使用率(最高十分位数)驱动的。PheWAS结果表明,高利用率(先前的精神障碍,慢性疼痛,失眠,病毒性丙型肝炎,等。)在大流行之前和期间基本上相似,尽管有几个条件(例如,背痛)仅在大流行期间与高利用率相关。局限性包括我们无法检查先前显示在大流行期间影响心理健康的其他风险因素(例如,社会支持,歧视),原因是EHR数据中缺乏健康信息的社会决定因素。在大流行期间,先前存在精神障碍的患者的精神保健利用总体上有所增加,可能是由于扩大了对远程医疗的访问。鉴于在COVID-19大流行之前和期间,大型医院系统中高精神医疗利用率的临床相关性在很大程度上相似,基于已知危险因素概况的资源分层可能有助于医院在大流行期间应对更高的精神医疗需求.
    How did mental healthcare utilization change during the COVID-19 pandemic period among individuals with pre-existing mental disorder? Understanding utilization patterns of these at-risk individuals and identifying those most likely to exhibit increased utilization could improve patient stratification and efficient delivery of mental health services. This study leveraged large-scale electronic health record (EHR) data to describe mental healthcare utilization patterns among individuals with pre-existing mental disorder before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify correlates of high mental healthcare utilization. Using EHR data from a large healthcare system in Massachusetts, we identified three \"pre-existing mental disorder\" groups (PMD) based on having a documented mental disorder diagnosis within the 6 months prior to the March 2020 lockdown, related to: (1) stress-related disorders (e.g., depression, anxiety) (N = 115,849), (2) serious mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorders) (N = 11,530), or (3) compulsive behavior disorders (e.g., eating disorder, OCD) (N = 5,893). We also identified a \"historical comparison\" group (HC) for each PMD (N = 113,604, 11,758, and 5,387, respectively) from the previous year (2019). We assessed the monthly number of mental healthcare visits from March 13 to December 31 for PMDs in 2020 and HCs in 2019. Phenome-wide association analyses (PheWAS) were used to identify clinical correlates of high mental healthcare utilization. We found the overall number of mental healthcare visits per patient during the pandemic period in 2020 was 10-12% higher than in 2019. The majority of increased visits was driven by a subset of high mental healthcare utilizers (top decile). PheWAS results indicated that correlates of high utilization (prior mental disorders, chronic pain, insomnia, viral hepatitis C, etc.) were largely similar before and during the pandemic, though several conditions (e.g., back pain) were associated with high utilization only during the pandemic. Limitations included that we were not able to examine other risk factors previously shown to influence mental health during the pandemic (e.g., social support, discrimination) due to lack of social determinants of health information in EHR data. Mental healthcare utilization among patients with pre-existing mental disorder increased overall during the pandemic, likely due to expanded access to telemedicine. Given that clinical correlates of high mental healthcare utilization in a major hospital system were largely similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, resource stratification based on known risk factor profiles may aid hospitals in responding to heightened mental healthcare needs during a pandemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号