{Reference Type}: Journal Article {Title}: A Case Series Study Assessing an Equity-Focused Implementation of Self-Monitoring Blood Pressure Programs Using Telehealth. {Author}: Greene LK;Song G;Palma AV;Santarelli C;Wetzel C;Spillane J;Nielsen VM; {Journal}: J Public Health Manag Pract {Volume}: 30 {Issue}: 0 {Year}: 2024 Jul-Aug 1 {Factor}: 2.657 {DOI}: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001897 {Abstract}: BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring blood pressure (SMBP) programs are an evidence-based hypertension management intervention facilitated through telehealth. SMBP programs can provide a continuum of care beyond a clinical setting by facilitating hypertension management at home; however, equitable access to SMBP is a concern.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the implementation of telehealth SMBP programs using an equity lens in 5 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Massachusetts (MA).
METHODS: A prospective case series study.
METHODS: Five FQHCs.
METHODS: The MA Department of Public Health (MDPH) selected 5 FQHCs to implement SMBP programs using telehealth. FQHCs were selected if their patient population experiences inequities due to social determinants of health and has higher rates of cardiovascular disease. Each of the 5 FQHCs reported data on patients enrolled in their SMBP programs totaling 241 patients examined in this study.
METHODS: SMBP programs implemented through telehealth.
METHODS: Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure.
RESULTS: Approximately 53.5% of SMBP participants experienced a decrease in blood pressure. The average blood pressure decreased from 146/87 to 136/81 mm Hg. Among all patients across the 5 FQHCs, the average blood pressure decreased by 10.06/5.34 mm Hg (P < .001). Blood pressure improved in all racial, ethnic, and language subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Five MA FQHCs successfully implemented equitable telehealth SMBP programs. SMBP participants enrolled in the programs demonstrated notable improvements in their blood pressure at the conclusion of the program. A flexible, pragmatic study design that was adjusted to meet unique patient needs; engaging nonphysician team members, particularly community health workers; adapting health information technology; and partnerships with community-based organizations were critical facilitators to program success.