UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to analyze optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of generative adversarial networks (GANs) for the prediction of diabetic macular edema after long-term treatment.
UNASSIGNED: Diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes (n = 327) underwent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments every 4 weeks for 52 weeks from a randomized controlled trial (CRTH258B2305, KINGFISHER) were included. OCT B-scan images through the foveal center at weeks 0, 4, 12, and 52, fundus photography, and retinal thickness (RT) maps were collected. GAN models were trained to generate probable OCT images after treatment. Input for each model were comprised of either the baseline B-scan alone or combined with additional OCT, thickness map, or fundus images. Generated OCT B-scan images were compared with real week 52 images.
UNASSIGNED: For 30 test images, 28, 29, 15, and 30 gradable OCT images were generated by CycleGAN, UNIT, Pix2PixHD, and RegGAN, respectively. In comparison with the real week 52, these GAN models showed positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, and kappa for residual fluid ranging from 0.500 to 0.889, 0.455 to 1.000, 0.357 to 0.857, and 0.537 to 0.929, respectively. For hard exudate (HE), they were ranging from 0.500 to 1.000, 0.545 to 0.900, 0.600 to 1.000, and 0.642 to 0.894, respectively. Models trained with week 4 and 12 B-scans as additional inputs to the baseline B-scan showed improved performance.
UNASSIGNED: GAN models could predict residual fluid and HE after long-term anti-VEGF treatment of DME.
UNASSIGNED: The implementation of this tool may help identify potential nonresponders after long-term treatment, thereby facilitating management planning for these eyes.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL) combined with ranibizumab in treating diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled study. Patients diagnosed with DME in the Ophthalmology Department of Beijing Hospital were enrolled from January 2020 to December 2022. Patients were randomized in a ratio of 1∶1 using a table of random numbers into the ranibizumab monotherapy group and the SMPL combined with ranibizumab therapy group. We compared the changes of best-corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography parameters, including the vessel density of the superficial and deep capillary plexus (DCP), foveal avascular zone size and peripapillary vessel density, at baseline, 6 and 12 months after the treatment. After 12 months of follow-up, fundus fluorescein angiography results, adverse events, and the number of injections or laser therapies were recorded. The Fisher\'s exact test and group t-test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Seventy-two patients (72 eyes) were enrolled, with a mean age of (61.1±8.2) years. Patients in the combination therapy group included 19 males and 17 females, while patients in the ranibizumab monotherapy group were 17 males and 19 females. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). A significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity was shown in both groups at 6 and 12 months [(58.5±12.9) and (58.2±12.2) ETDRS letters in the combination therapy group, and (63.3±13.1) and (63.8±12.5) ETDRS letters in the ranibizumab monotherapy group]. A significant reduction in central macular thickness was shown in both groups at 6 and 12 months [(451.0±185.5) and (380.4±159.3)μm in the combination therapy group, and (387.5±135.5) and (372.8±146.1)μm in the ranibizumab monotherapy group]. However, there was no significant difference between groups at each timepoint (all P>0.05). At 12 months, the vessel density of the superficial capillary plexus showed no statistical difference compared to the baseline value in each group or between groups (42.6%±5.9% in the ranibizumab monotherapy group and 42.2%±5.5% in the combination therapy group, P>0.05). The vessel density of the DCP in the combination therapy group significantly increased to 47.5%±5.6% at 12 months, significantly different from that in the ranibizumab group (43.4%±5.1%; P<0.05). The foveal avascular zone size in the ranibizumab monotherapy group reduced to (0.32±0.13) mm2, significantly different from that in the combination therapy group [(0.34±0.16) mm2] at 12 months (P<0.05). Patients in the ranibizumab monotherapy group received (7.3±2.5) intravitreal injections, while patients in the combination therapy group received 3 injections. No unfavorable outcomes on fundus fluorescein angiography or systemic or topical severe adverse events were observed during the follow-up. Conclusions: The SMPL combined with intravitreal ranibizumab injections was effective and safe in treating DME patients. The combination treatment significantly reduced the number of injections and improved the vessel density of the DCP and macular ischemia, compared to the ranibizumab monotherapy.
目的： 探讨阈值下微脉冲激光（SMPL）联合雷珠单克隆抗体治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿（DME）的有效性、安全性及特点。 方法： 前瞻性随机对照研究。连续收集2020年1月至2022年12月在北京医院眼科确诊为DME的患者，使用随机数字表按照1∶1比例随机分为SMPL联合雷珠单克隆抗体治疗组（联合组）和单纯雷珠单克隆抗体治疗组（单纯组）。记录并比较两组治疗前（基线）和治疗6和12个月随访时的最佳矫正视力（BCVA）、黄斑中心凹视网膜厚度（CMT）以及相干光层析血管成像术参数，包括浅层毛细血管丛血管密度（SCP-VD）、深层毛细血管丛血管密度（DCP-VD）、黄斑中心凹无血管区（FAZ）面积、视盘旁血管密度（P-VD）；治疗前和治疗12个月随访时的荧光素眼底血管造影术（FFA）检查结果，治疗12个月随访时玻璃体腔注射药物次数、SMPL治疗次数和不良反应。采用Fisher精确概率法和成组t检验进行统计学分析。 结果： 共纳入符合标准DME患者72例（72只眼），年龄为（61.1±8.2）岁；联合组36例（36只眼），男性19例（19只眼），女性17例（17只眼）；单纯组36例（36只眼），男性17例（17只眼），女性19例（19只眼），两组基线特征比较差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。治疗6和12个月随访时，两组BCVA均明显改善［联合组提升至（58.5±12.9）和（58.2±12.2）个早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究（ETDRS）字母；单纯组提升至（63.3±13.1）和（63.8±12.5）个ETDRS字母］；CMT均显著下降［联合组降低至（451.0±185.5）和（380.4±159.3）μm；单纯组降低至（387.5±135.5）和（372.8±146.1）μm］，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05），但是组间比较的差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。治疗12个月随访时，单纯组（42.6%±5.9%）和联合组（42.2%±5.5%）SCP-VD与基线比较的差异和组间比较的差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）；联合组DCP-VD增加至47.5%±5.6%，与单纯组比较（43.4%±5.1%）的差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；单纯组FAZ面积缩小至（0.32±0.13）mm2，联合组FAZ面积缩小至（0.34±0.16）mm2，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；眼内注射药物次数单纯组为（7.3±2.5）次，联合组为3次。两组随访期间FFA检查无明显变化，全身或局部无严重不良反应发生。 结论： SMPL联合雷珠单克隆抗体注射治疗DME患者有效且安全；与单纯雷珠单克隆抗体注射治疗比较，可减少眼内注射药物次数，并改善深层毛细血管丛的血流灌注，改善黄斑缺血。.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: To compare the efficacy of intravitreal injections of Conbercept combined with dexamethasone (DEX) for macular edema (ME) following central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).
UNASSIGNED: This was a prospective, single-masked, randomised, controlled clinical trial. Patients with ME following CRVO were randomised into groups to receive intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg Conbercept plus 0.2 mg DEX or 0.5 mg Conbercept alone on day 0 followed by repeat injections as indicated. The primary outcome measure was the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to month 12. Secondary outcome measures included decrease in central retinal thickness (CRT), injection frequency and interval and percentage of patients who gained more than 15 ETDRS letters or achieved a CRT of < 250 μm at month 12.
UNASSIGNED: 33 males (51%) and 32 females (49%) were initially recruited with an average age of 56.64 ± 13.88 years. Patients in the Conbercept and Conbercept + DEX groups gained an average of 14.55 ± 19.19 and 14.88 ± 17.68 ETDRS letters, respectively, at months 12 (t = 4.221, P = 0.000; and t = 4.834, P = 0.000) with no significant difference between the two groups (t = 0.071, P = 0.943). In the Conbercept group, the mean reduction in CRT from baseline to month 12 was 435.26 ± 293.37 μm (t = 8.261, P = 0.000) compared to 431.36 ± 294.55 (t = 8.413, P = 0.000) in the Conbercept + DEX group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (t = 0.053, P = 0.958). The Conbercept + DEX group received fewer intravitreal injections. No major complications occurred.
UNASSIGNED: Conbercept, alone or with DEX, can improve BCVA and reduce CRT in ME following CRVO without serious adverse events. The treatment interval was longer in the Conbercept + DEX group.
UNASSIGNED: The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at 5 July 2017. (http://www.chictr.org.cn, 05/07/2017 Registration Number: ChiCTR-INR-17011877).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of Ozurdex® (DEX) implant in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in real-world clinical practice, and to determine the correlation between known OCT biomarkers and the effect of treatment.
This retrospective study included 42 eyes of 33 patients (16 women, 17 men) treated with DEX at the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc for DME indication between 2020 and 2023. Follow-up examinations were conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months after the first DEX application. The main assessed parameters were: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central retinal thickness (CRT), OCT biomarkers. The results were subsequently statistically evaluated.
At the first follow-up after DEX application, there was an average decrease in CRT of 186 ±146µm and a gain of 3 ±7 letters. Positive morphological and functional responses were observed in 39 eyes (92.9%) and 23 eyes (54.8%) respectively. The disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) biomarker was initially present in 41 eyes (97.6%), with reduction or disappearance observed in 13 eyes (31%) post-application. Eyes with ellipsoid zone disruption (EZ disruption) had an average initial BCVA of 49.6 letters, compared to 57.8 letters in the group without this biomarker. The mean gain in BCVA was +8.7 letters in treatment-naive eyes and +2.1 letters in previously treated eyes. Chronic DME was less frequent in treatment-naive (n = 1, 14.3%) compared to previously treated eyes (n = 28, 84.8%). All these results were statistically significant (p < 0.05). An increase in IOP post-DEX application occurred in 9 patients (21.4%).
Our results confirm DEX as a safe and effective treatment option for DME. Treatment-naive patients achieved better functional outcomes. We confirmed ellipsoid zone disruption (EZ disruption) as a negative biomarker. Additionally, we demonstrated the capacity of DEX to reduce disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a switch to faricimab in individuals affected by DME and previously treated with aflibercept.
METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, DME patients previously treated with at least 3 injections of aflibercept then switched to faricimab were enrolled. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) were recorded at baseline, at the time of the switch and at 6 months follow-up. At transition to faricimab, patients were categorized as \"good visual responders\" (≥ 5 letters from baseline) or \"poor visual responders\" (< 5 letters), and as \"good anatomical responders\" (any reduction in edema compared to baseline) or \"poor anatomical responders\" (no reduction or worsening of edema). Changes in BCVA and CST were recorded at 6 months after the switch to faricimab.
RESULTS: 100 eyes of 100 patients (61 female, 61%) were switched to faricimab after a mean of 6.8 ± 3.3 aflibercept injections. At the 6 months follow-up, only \"poor visual responders\" (N = 62) demonstrated a meaningful increase in BCVA (Δswitch-6M =  + 5 letters; P = 0.007), coupled with a reduction in CST (Δswitch-6M = - 67.9 µm; P = 0.004); participants with \"poor anatomical response\" upon transitioning exhibited a significant functional gain (Δswitch-6M =  + 4.5 letters; p = 0.05) but limited CST enhancements (Δswitch-6M = - 95.1 µm; p = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Faricimab shows a positive impact on anatomical and functional metrics in DME cases refractory to aflibercept.

BACKGROUND: Macular edema (ME) is a common complication following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and is also the main reason for visual impairment. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or dexamethasone implant (IDI) monotherapy, as well as the combination of IVR and IDI injections, in patients with ME secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, and comparative study included 292 patients with unilateral ME involvement (total of 292 eyes) secondary to BRVO. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups and followed up for 12 months. Patients in group 1 (n = 96) were treated with 3-dose loading IVR injections followed by a pro re nata (PRN) regimen. Patients in group 2 (n = 98) received IVR combined with IDI injection, followed by IVR PRN regimen. Patients in group 3 (n = 98) were treated with IDI injection, followed by repeated IDI injection based on clinical necessity. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), complications, and frequency of injections were recorded and compared between the three groups.
RESULTS: At baseline, the three groups did not differ in age, gender, duration of ME, BCVA, IOP, and CRT (P > 0.05). Mean number of total injections per eye within 12 months were 7.1 ± 2.3 (range 4-9) in group 1, 3.7 ± 1.5 (range 2-6) in group 2, and 1.8 ± 0.4 (range 1-3) in group 3. There was a statistical difference in the number of injections between group 1 and group 2 (P = 0.037). Eyes in group 3 received fewer injections than those in group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.052). BCVA improvement and CRT reduction were achieved in all groups and there was no significant difference between the three groups at the end of the 12th month. However, IOP elevation and cataract progression were more frequent in group 3, especially in those patients who received repeated IDI injections.
CONCLUSIONS: Three therapeutic regimens had comparable efficacy in treating ME secondary to BRVO. Combination therapy had an advantage in maintaining good effect with fewer re-injections and complications.
UNASSIGNED: The study complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Xi\'an Aier Ancient City Eye Hospital, Xi\'an Aier Eye Hospital, and Xianyang Aier Eye Hospital ethics committees (2022SF-367).

UNASSIGNED: To assess the impact of ocular confounding factors on aqueous humor (AH) proteomic and metabolomic analyses for retinal disease characterization.
UNASSIGNED: This study recruited 138 subjects (eyes): 102 with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), 18 with diabetic macular edema (DME), and 18 with cataract (control group). AH samples underwent analysis using Olink Target 96 proteomics and Metabolon\'s metabolomics platform Data analysis included correlation, differential abundance, and gene-set analysis.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 756 proteins and 408 metabolites were quantified in AH. Total AH protein concentration was notably higher in nAMD (3.2-fold) and DME (4.1-fold) compared to controls. Pseudophakic eyes showed higher total AH protein concentrations than phakic eyes (e.g., 1.6-fold in nAMD) and a specific protein signature indicative of matrix remodeling. Unexpectedly, pupil-dilating drugs containing phenylephrine/tropicamide increased several AH proteins, notably interleukin-6 (5.4-fold in nAMD). Correcting for these factors revealed functionally relevant protein correlation clusters and disease-relevant, differentially abundant proteins across the groups. Metabolomics analysis, for which the relevance of confounder adjustment was less apparent, suggested insufficiently controlled diabetes and chronic hyperglycemia in the DME group.
UNASSIGNED: AH protein concentration, pseudophakia, and pupil dilation with phenylephrine/tropicamide are important confounding factors for AH protein analyses. When these factors are considered, AH analyses can more clearly reveal disease-relevant factors.
UNASSIGNED: Considering AH protein concentration, lens status, and phenylephrine/tropicamide administration as confounders is crucial for accurate interpretation of AH protein data.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the macular morphological and visual outcomes of combined idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) removal with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injection based on consideration of the ectopic inner foveal layer (EIFL) staging scheme.
METHODS: Retrospective case-control study. The clinical data of 84 eyes of 84 patients who underwent vitrectomy for iERM between 2018 and 2022 were reviewed. The enrolled subjects were divided into the TA and non-TA groups. Fifty-one eyes received intravitreal TA injection following vitrectomy and ERM peeling (TA group), and 33 were only treated by standard vitrectomy and ERM peeling (non-TA group). Preoperative and postoperative EIFL stages, central foveal thickness (CFT), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were compared between both groups.
RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 7.69 ± 3.68 months, both groups exhibited significant improvement in EIFL stages (P < 0.01), with no discernible advantage observed in the TA group. The TA and non-TA groups demonstrated improvement in the EIFL stages in 56.86 and 63.64% of eyes, respectively (P = 0.43). The CFT and BCVA significantly improved in both groups at the final visit (P < 0.01). However, CFT in the non-TA group displayed a more significant reduction during the follow-up (P < 0.03). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in postoperative CFT and BCVA between the two groups in cases with or without continuous EIFL (P > 0.10).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that combined intravitreal TA injection following ERM removal conferred no significant benefits in alleviating macular thickening or improving visual acuity in iERM.

To improve the understanding of potential pathological mechanisms of macular edema (ME), we try to discover biomarker candidates related to ME caused by diabetic retinopathy (DR) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images by means of deep learning (DL). 32 eyes of 26 subjects with non-proliferative DR (NPDR), 77 eyes of 61 subjects with proliferative DR (PDR), 120 eyes of 116 subjects with branch RVO (BRVO), and 17 eyes of 15 subjects with central RVO (CRVO) were collected. A DL model was implemented to guide biomarker candidate discovery. The disorganization of the retinal outer layers (DROL), i.e., the gray value of the retinal tissues between the external limiting membrane (ELM) and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), the disrupted and obscured rate of the ELM, ellipsoid zone (EZ), and RPE, was measured. In addition, the occurrence, number, volume, and projected area of hyperreflective foci (HRF) were recorded. ELM, EZ, and RPE are more likely to be obscured in RVO group and HRFs are observed more frequently in DR group (all P ≤ 0.001). In conclusion, the features of DROL and HRF can be possible biomarkers related to ME caused by DR and RVO in OCT modality.