OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the responsiveness of the original low back pain specific Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the spinal stenosis specific Zürich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), and to investigate cut-off values for clinical \"success\" for ODI and ZCQ in surgically treated patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
METHODS: We included 601 LSS patients (218 with, 383 without degenerative spondylolisthesis) from the NORDSTEN trials. Outcome measures included ODI and ZCQ (symptom severity and physical function scales) with three alternative response parameters: scores at follow-up, absolute and relative changes from baseline to two-year follow-up. Effect size and standardised response mean evaluated internal responsiveness. External responsiveness was assessed by the Spearman rank correlation between patient-reported global perceived effect scale (GPE) and ODI and ZCQ, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC). We evaluated which cut-off values could maximise the percentage of correctly classified patients according to the GPE-anchor \"completely recovered\" / \"much improved\" for each parameter.
RESULTS: Internal and external responsiveness were high for all three indices with effect sizes, standardized response means, ROC and corresponding area under the curve > 0.8. Correlations with GPE responses were moderate (> 0.50) for absolute change and strong (> 0.67) for relative change and follow-up scores. The 30% ODI relative change cut-off correctly classified 81% of patients to \"success\", within a range of accurate cut-offs according to the GPE-anchor.
CONCLUSIONS: ODI and ZCQ demonstrate comparable responsiveness in evaluating outcomes for surgically treated LSS patients. The 30% ODI threshold was consistent with treatment \"success\" in NORDSTEN trials.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02007083 10/12/2013, NCT02051374 31/01/2014 and NCT03562936 20/06/2018.

OBJECTIVE: Selective nerve root blocks (SNRB) are used both as a therapeutic and diagnostic tool for lumbar radicular pain. Most studies evaluate the effect of SNRB simply by its relation to pain reduction. It is well known that pain is associated with other factors such as depression, anxiety, inactivity and sleeping disorders, but these patient-related outcomes are seldom evaluated. This study evaluated the influence of SNRB on pain-related outcomes including depression, anxiety, fatigue, pain interference, activity and sleep.
METHODS: One hundred three patients with lumbar radicular pain were treated with a SNRB. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed with the PROMIS-29 for 12 weeks (84 days) following the SNRB. Patients were stratified based on their pain reduction at the 14-day follow up as responders (≥ 30% pain reduction) and non-responders (< 30% pain reduction). Post-treatment duration was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier analysis with return to baseline as an event. A paired t-test was used to compare pre- and post-treatment responses at specific time intervals.
RESULTS: Forty-four percent (n = 45) of the patients were responders and showed significant improvement in all parameters throughout the 84-days follow-up, the exception was sleep that lost significance at day 70. The mean post-treatment duration among responders was 59 (52-67) days. Non-responders showed significant improvements in pain interference and pain intensity until day 35 and in ability for social participation until 21-day.
CONCLUSIONS: SNRB can improve pain intensity, pain interference, physical function, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and the ability to participate in social roles.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: In mild to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) where conservative care treatments fail, minimally invasive treatments, such as interspinous spacers without decompression or fusion (ISD), may be appropriate. While previous studies have demonstrated racial and socioeconomic disparities in the surgical treatment of LSS, there are limited data on how those factors impact accessibility to these procedures. This study explored demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic differences in the use of ISD.
METHODS: Using the Medicare 100% files from 2017 through 2022, this retrospective claims analysis identified when and if patients diagnosed with LSS received ISD implantation. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association between racial and socioeconomic characteristics and the rate of ISD implantation, stratified by geographic region.
RESULTS: A total of 1,316,622 individuals met the inclusion criteria; 4730 (0.4%) underwent ISD implantation, with a mean (standard deviation) time to treatment of 11.9 (13.2) months after diagnosis. The likelihood of ISD implantation was higher for older patients (except for the oldest group), males, those with lower disease burden, and White patients. Cox regression revealed that the associations of racial and socioeconomic factors with ISD implantation varied by U.S. region. In the Midwest and Northeast, lower median household income was associated with a decreased likelihood of ISD implantation regardless of race, while in the South, Black patients were less likely to undergo ISD implantation regardless of income.
CONCLUSIONS: The observed disparities in access to ISD implantation mirror existing trends in surgical interventions for LSS, suggesting further study and interventions are needed to address inequities.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate the short-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) in treatment of lumbar lateral saphenous fossa combined with intervertebral foramina stenosis via contralateral sublaminar approach.
UNASSIGNED: A clinical data of 15 patients with lumbar lateral saphenous fossa combined with intervertebral foramina stenosis, who were admitted between September 2021 and December 2023 and met selective criteria, was retrospectively analyzed. There were 5 males and 10 females with an average age of 70.3 years (range, 46-83 years). Surgical segment was L 4, 5 in 12 cases and L 5, S 1 in 3 cases. The disease duration was 12-30 months (mean, 18.7 months). All patients were treated by UBE via contralateral sublaminar approach. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and the occurrence of complications were recorded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the degree of lower back and leg pain before and after operation; the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate the lumbar function; and the clinical outcome was evaluated using the MacNab criteria at 6 months after operation. Postoperative MRI and CT were taken to observe whether the lateral saphenous fossa and intervertebral foramen stenosis were removed or not, and the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal (CSA-SC), cross-sectional area of the intervertebral foramen (CSA-IVF), and cross-sectional area of the facet joint (CSA-FJ) were measured.
UNASSIGNED: The operation time was 55-200 minutes (mean, 127.5 minutes); the intraoperative blood loss was 10-50 mL (mean, 27.3 mL); the length of postoperative hospital stay was 3-12 days (mean, 6.8 days). All patients were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 8.9 months). At 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after operation, the VAS scores of low back and leg pain and ODI scores after operation were significantly lower than preoperative scores and showed a gradual decrease with time; the JOA scores showed a gradual increase with time; the differences in the above indexes between different time points were significant ( P<0.05). The clinical outcome was rated as excellent in 10 cases, good in 4 cases, and poor in 1 case according to the MacNab criteria at 6 months after operation, with an excellent and good rate of 93.33%. Imaging review showed that the compression on the lateral saphenous fossa and intervertebral foramina had been significantly relieved, and the affected articular process joint was preserved to the maximum extent; the CSA-SC and CSA-IVF at 3 days after operation significantly increased compared to the preoperative values ( P<0.05), and the CSA-FJ significantly reduced ( P<0.05).
UNASSIGNED: The UBE via contralateral sublaminar approach can effectively reduce pressure in the lateral saphenous fossa and the intervertebral foramina of the same segment while preserving the bilateral articular process joints. The short-term effectiveness is good and it is expected to avoid fusion surgery caused by iatrogenic instability of the lumbar spine. However, further follow-up is needed to clarify the mid- and long-term effectiveness.
UNASSIGNED: 探讨单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术（unilateral biportal endoscopy，UBE）对侧椎板下入路治疗腰椎侧隐窝狭窄合并同节段椎间孔狭窄的早期疗效。.
UNASSIGNED: 回顾分析2021年9月—2023年12月收治且符合选择标准的15例腰椎侧隐窝狭窄合并同节段椎间孔狭窄患者临床资料。男5例，女10例；年龄46～83岁，平均70.3岁。手术节段：L 4、5 12例，L 5、S 1 3例。病程12～30个月，平均18.7个月。所有患者均接受UBE对侧椎板下入路手术治疗。记录手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间以及并发症发生情况。手术前后采用疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）评价腰腿痛程度，日本骨科协会（JOA）评分以及Oswestry功能障碍指数（ODI）评价腰部功能，术后6个月采用 MacNab 标准对患者疗效进行评价。术后复查MRI和CT，观察侧隐窝和椎间孔狭窄是否去除，测量椎管横截面积（cross-sectional area of the spinal canal，CSA-SC）、椎间孔横截面积（cross-sectional area of the intervertebral foramen，CSA-IVF）和小关节横截面积（cross-sectional area of the facet joint，CSA-FJ）。.
UNASSIGNED: 手术时间 55～200 min，平均127.5 min；术中出血量10～50 mL，平均27.3 mL；术后住院时间3～12 d，平均6.8 d。患者均获随访，随访时间6～12个月，平均8.9个月。术后1 d及1、3、6个月腰、腿痛VAS评分以及ODI均较术前降低，且随时间延长呈逐渐下降趋势；JOA评分则呈逐渐增高趋势；上述指标各时间点间差异均有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。术后6个月根据MacNab标准评估手术疗效：优10例、良4例、可1例，优良率93.33%。影像学复查示侧隐窝及椎间孔所受压迫已明显解除，最大程度保留患侧关节突关节；术后3 d CSA-SC及CSA-IVF较术前增加、CSA-FJ较术前减小，差异均有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。.
UNASSIGNED: UBE对侧椎板下入路能在保留双侧关节突关节同时，对侧隐窝及同节段椎间孔进行充分减压，早期疗效较好，有望避免腰椎医源性不稳所致的融合手术，但中、远期疗效有待进一步随访明确。.

UNASSIGNED: To determine the risk factors for recompression after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) and compare the outcomes of PTED and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) as revision surgery.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively evaluated 820 consecutive DLSS patients who underwent PTED at our institution. 26 patients developed postoperative recompression and underwent reoperation. In total, 208 patients with satisfactory clinical outcomes were enrolled in the control group. The demographic and imaging data of each patient were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess risk factors for recompression. Additionally, patients with recompression were divided into PTED and PLIF groups according to the reoperation procedure. The clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared using independent-sample t-tests.
UNASSIGNED: The grade of surgical-level disc degeneration [odds ratio (OR): 2.551, p = 0.045] and the number of disc degeneration levels (OR: 11.985, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for recompression after PTED. There was no significant difference in the visual analog score (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) two weeks postoperatively between the PTED and PLIF groups for surgical treatment. However, the mean VAS of back pain (14.1 vs. 20.5, p = 0.016) and ODI (16.0 vs. 21.8, p = 0.016) of patients in the PLIF group were smaller than those in the PTED group at the final follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: More severe degeneration and degenerated levels indicate a higher recompression rate after PTED. Although both PTED and PLIF could achieve immediate relief postoperatively in the treatment of recompression, the final follow-up results showed that the outcome of PLIF appeared better than that of PTED.

UNASSIGNED: Laminectomy has long been a \"gold standard\" to treat symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Minimal invasive spine surgery (MISS) is widely developed to overcome the limitations of conventional laminectomy to achieve a better outcome with minimal complications. Full endoscopic percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression (FE-PSLD) is the newest MISS technique for spinal canal decompression. We aimed to evaluate and analyze the significance of FE-PSLD in reducing pain and its association with age, duration of symptoms, stenosis level, and operative time (OT).
UNASSIGNED: A longitudinal cross-sectional study was conducted on 606 LSS patients who underwent FE-PSLD and enrolled from 2020 to 2022. Three-month evaluation of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the modified MacNab criteria were assessed. The significance of changes was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Spearman\'s correlation test was performed to evaluate the significant correlation of several variables (pre-PSLD-VAS, age, symptoms duration, OT, and level of LSS) to post-PSLD-VAS, and multiple regression analysis was conducted.
UNASSIGNED: The reduction of VAS was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.005) with an average pre-PSLD-VAS of 6.75 ± 0.63 and post-PSLD-VAS of 2.24 ± 1.04. Pre-PSLD-VAS, age, and stenosis level have a statistically significant correlation with post-PSLD-VAS, while the duration of the symptoms and OT have an insignificant correlation. Multiple regression showed the effect of pre-PSLD-VAS (β =0.4033, P = 0.000) and stenosis level (β =0.0951, P = 0.021) are statistically significant with a positive coefficient.
UNASSIGNED: FE-PSLD is an efficacious strategy with favorable outcomes for managing LSS, shown by a significant reduction of pain level with a relatively short follow-up time after the procedure. Preoperative pain level, age, and stenosis level are significantly correlated with postoperative pain level. Based on this experimental study, PSLD can be considered a good strategy for treating lumbar canal stenosis in all age groups and all LSS levels.

BACKGROUND: Researchers have recently linked hysterectomy, which alters sex hormone levels, to diseases like osteoporosis, lumbar spondylolisthesis, hypertension and diabetes etc. However, the association between hysterectomy and lumbar disc herniation (LDH)/lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) remains unclarified.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a correlation between hysterectomy and surgical intervention for LDH/LSS in women, further substantiated through imaging and clinical research.
METHODS: A case control and cohort study.
METHODS: The study group comprised 1202 female patients aged 45 and older who had undergone operative treatment due to LDH/LSS (825 for LDH and 377 for LSS), and the comparison group comprised 1168 females without lumbar diseases who visited health examination clinic during the same period. One hundred and 2 hysterectomized patients were further selected (Hysterectomy cohort) and matched approximately with the control cohort at a 1:2 ratio from the study group with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
METHODS: Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the association between hysterectomy and surgical intervention for LDH/LSS in women after adjusted by confounding factors. Patients from both the hysterectomy and control cohorts underwent a comprehensive assessment. This assessment included the evaluation of several parameters: the functional cross-sectional area, fat infiltration rate, relative functional cross-sectional area of the lumbar paravertebral muscles, facet joint degeneration grade, cartilage endplate damage, Modic changes for the L3/4-L5/S1 segments, Pfirrmann grade of lumbar disc degeneration, and disc height index for the L1/2-L5/S1 segments. Additionally, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were recorded preoperatively and at the last follow-up.
METHODS: Associations between hysterectomy and patients treated surgically for LDH or LSS were analyzed using multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis. Lumbar X-ray, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to evaluate the imaging variables. Imaging and clinical variables were compared.
RESULTS: Hysterectomized women were associated with requiring surgery due to LDH/LSS, with ORs of 2.613 (p<.001) and 2.084 (p=.006), respectively. The imaging evaluation further revealed that the hysterectomy cohort had more severe degeneration of the paraspinal muscles, facet joints, endplates, and intervertebral discs, Modic changes at L3/4-L5/S1 segments, and intervertebral height reduction at L1/2-L5/S1 segments when compared to the control cohort (p<.01). Compared to the control cohort, the hysterectomy cohort exhibited higher preoperative and last follow-up VAS scores for low back pain, and last follow-up JOA scores (p<.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this study, it seems that women who have had a hysterectomy are correlated with requiring surgical intervention due to LDH/LSS. Imaging and clinical studies also indicate that hysterectomized patients exhibited more severe lumbar degeneration and back pain.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate symptom trajectories in chiropractic patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with LSS were recruited from chiropractic clinics and self-reported questionnaires were collected at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Patients received weekly text messages about low back pain (LBP) and leg symptoms for 1 year. Group-based trajectory modelling was performed to identify symptom trajectory groups. The groups were compared based on patient characteristics, LBP and leg pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ).
RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were included in the analysis. A three-group trajectory model was chosen: \'improving\' (16%), \'fluctuating/improving\' (30%), and \'persistent\' (54%). The \'persistent\' group had a higher proportion of women [71% (95% CI 57-82%)] than the \'improving\' group 29% (95% CI 11-56%), and a higher ODI score at both baseline [34.2 (95% CI 29.7-38.8) vs. 22.8 (16.4-29.1)] and 1-year follow-up [28.1 (95% CI 23.2-33.0) vs. 4.8 (0.1-9.4)]. Similar differences were observed for ZCQ symptom and function scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Pain symptoms in people with LSS followed distinctly different trajectories. Half of the sample had a pattern of consistently severe symptoms over a year, while the other half either improved rapidly or experienced fluctuating symptoms with some improvement.

Introduction: For severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), the conventional percutaneous endoscopic translaminar decompression (PEID) has some limitations. The modified PEID, Cross-Overtop decompression, ensures sufficient decompression without excessive damage to the facet joints and posterior complex integrity. Objectives: To evaluate the biomechanical properties of Cross-Overtop and provide practical case validation for final decision-making in severe DLSS treatment. Methods: A finite element (FE) model of L4-L5 (M0) was established, and the validity was verified against prior studies. Endo-ULBD (M1), Endo-LOVE (M2), and Cross-Overtop (M3) models were derived from M0 using the experimental protocol. L4-L5 segments in each model were evaluated for the range of motion (ROM) and disc Von Mises stress extremum. The real clinical Cross-Overtop model was constructed based on clinical CT images, disregarding paraspinal muscle influence. Subsequent validation using actual FE analysis results enhances the credibility of the preceding virtual FE analysis. Results: Compared with M0, ROM in surgical models were less than 10°, and the growth rate of ROM ranged from 0.10% to 11.56%, while those of disc stress ranged from 0% to 15.75%. Compared with preoperative, the growth rate of ROM and disc stress were 2.66%-11.38% and 1.38%-9.51%, respectively. The ROM values in both virtual and actual models were less than 10°, verifying the affected segment stability after Cross-Overtop decompression. Conclusion: Cross-Overtop, designed for fully expanding the central canal and contralateral recess, maximizing the integrity of the facet joints and posterior complex, does no significant effect on the affected segmental biomechanics and can be recommended as an effective endoscopic treatment for severe DLSS.