Local recurrence

局部复发
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在调查保留乳头乳房切除术(NSM)和重建后的局部复发(LR)是否与i)Ki67值和初始病变的分子亚型有关,和ii)初始肿瘤的大小和植入物的大小。共有156例乳腺癌患者,平均年龄为51.58岁(年龄范围,26-75岁)接受NSM和初次植入乳房重建的患者进行了分析。手术后,平均随访时间为59.26个月(范围,17-85个月)。分子亚型,Ki67值,雌激素受体(ER),记录每位患者的孕激素受体(PR)和人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)状态。此外,我们收集了有关植入物大小和初始肿瘤大小的信息.该信息用于评估LR。对于风险因素的单变量分析,χ2检验,费希尔的精确检验,对独立样品使用曼-惠特尼U检验和学生t检验。对于多变量分析,使用Cox比例风险模型.NSM是34/156例(21.8%)乳腺癌的主要治疗方法,而122/156(78.2%)的患者接受新辅助化疗,然后手术。管腔B是最常见的分子亚型,在82/156患者中检测到(52.6%),而37例患者(23.7%)检测到管腔A亚型,17/156例患者(10.9%)检测到HER2富集亚型.Ki67在13/156患者中表达较低(8.3%),而在78/156例患者中检测到中等表达(50.0%),在58/156例患者中检测到高表达(37.2%)。在17/156例患者中发现LR(10.9%)。由单变量分析确定,较低的ER(P=0.010)和PR(P=0.008)表达是LR的显著危险因素.总之,在目前的患者队列中,低ER和PR表达是乳腺癌LR的危险因素,而Ki67状态和分子亚型是LR的无统计学意义的危险因素.此外,初始肿瘤的大小和植入物的大小不是LR的危险因素.这些发现与目前的文献一致,在手术治疗前与患者讨论治疗方案和潜在临床结局时,应加以利用.
    The present study aimed to investigate whether local recurrence (LR) after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and reconstruction was associated with i) Ki67 values and molecular subtypes of the initial lesions, and ii) the size of the initial tumor and the size of the implant. A total of 156 patients with breast cancer with a mean age of 51.58 years (age range, 26-75 years) who underwent NSM with primary implant breast reconstruction were analyzed. After surgery, the mean follow-up time was 59.26 months (range, 17-85 months). Molecular subtypes, Ki67 values, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status were recorded for each patient. Additionally, information regarding the size of the implant and the initial tumor size were collected. The information was used to assess LR. For univariate analyses of risk factors, χ2 test, Fisher\'s exact test, Mann-Whitney U test and Student\'s t-test for independent samples were used. For multivariate analyses, a Cox proportional-hazards model was used. NSM was the primary treatment for breast cancer in 34/156 patients (21.8%), while 122/156 (78.2%) of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Luminal B was the most frequent molecular subtype, detected in 82/156 patients (52.6%), whereas the luminal A subtype was detected in 37 patients (23.7%) and the HER2-enriched subtype was detected in 17/156 patients (10.9%). Ki67 expression was low in 13/156 patients (8.3%), while medium expression was detected in 78/156 patients (50.0%) and high expression was present in 58/156 patients (37.2%). LR was noted in 17/156 patients (10.9%). As determined by univariate analysis, lower ER (P=0.010) and PR (P=0.008) expression were indicated to be significant risk factors for LR. In conclusion, in the present patient cohort, low ER and PR expression were risk factors for LR of breast cancer, whereas Ki67 status and molecular subtype were not statistically significant risk factors for LR. Additionally, the size of the initial tumor and the size of the implant were not risk factors for LR. These findings are consistent with the current literature, and should be utilized when discussing treatment options and potential clinical outcomes with patients prior to surgical management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在接受肾细胞癌(RCC)脊柱手术的患者中,我们试图:(1)描述术后靶向全身治疗和放疗(RT)的模式,(2)比较接受靶向全身治疗的患者与未接受靶向全身治疗的患者的围手术期结局,和(3)评估靶向全身治疗和/或RT对总生存期(OS)和局部复发(LR)的影响。
    方法:单一机构,我们对2010~2021年接受脊柱手术治疗转移性RCC患者进行了回顾性队列研究.治疗组单纯RT,单独的靶向系统治疗,由RT和靶向全身治疗组成的双重治疗,也没有治疗。多变量Cox回归控制年龄,种族,性别,保险,术前靶向全身治疗。
    结果:49例患者接受了RCC的脊柱手术。术后,4例患者(8%)单独接受RT,19(38.8%)单纯的靶向全身治疗,12(24.5%)双重治疗,和13(28.6%)。所有组的人口统计学相似,术前Karnofsky表现评分(P=0.372),肿瘤大小(P=0.413),再入院(P=0.884),并发症(P=0.272),Karnofsky绩效得分(P=0.466),末次随访时改良麦考密克量表(P=0.980)。与其他疗法相比,双重疗法的1年生存率更高(83.3%)。与其他治疗相比,双重治疗患者的OS明显更长(log-rank;P=0.010)。多因素Cox回归(HR=0.08,95%CI=0.02-0.31,P<0.001)显示与其他治疗相比,双重治疗的OS更长。7名患者(14.3%)出现LR,组间与LR的时间相似(对数秩;P=0.190)。
    结论:在接受脊柱转移性手术治疗的患者中,与其他疗法相比,术后双重疗法显示显著更高的1年生存率和OS.
    结论:转移性肾癌的多学科治疗是必要的,以确保及时实施靶向全身治疗和RT以改善预后。
    方法:
    BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing spine surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), we sought to: (1) describe patterns of postoperative targeted systemic therapy and radiotherapy (RT), (2) compare perioperative outcomes among those treated with targeted systemic therapy to those without, and (3) evaluate the impact of targeted systemic therapy and/or RT on overall survival (OS) and local recurrence (LR).
    METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic RCC from 2010 to 2021 was undertaken. Treatment groups were RT alone, targeted systemic therapy alone, dual therapy consisting of RT and targeted systemic therapy, and neither therapy. Multivariable Cox regression controlled for age, race, sex, insurance, and preoperative targeted systemic therapy.
    RESULTS: Forty-nine patients underwent spine surgery for RCC. Postoperatively, 4 patients (8%) received RT alone, 19 (38.8%) targeted systemic therapy alone, 12 (24.5%) dual therapy, and 13 (28.6%) neither. All groups were similar in demographics, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Score (P = 0.372), tumor size (P = 0.413), readmissions (P = 0.884), complications (P = 0.272), Karnofsky Performance Score (P = 0.466), and Modified McCormick Scale (P = 0.980) at last follow-up. Higher 1-year survival was found in dual therapy (83.3%) compared with other therapies. OS was significantly longer in patients with dual therapy compared with other therapies (log-rank; P = 0.010). Multivariate Cox regression (HR = 0.08, 95% CI = 0.02-0.31, P < 0.001) showed longer OS in dual therapy compared with other therapies. Seven patients (14.3%) experienced LR, and a similar time to LR was found between groups (log-rank; P = 0.190).
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery for RCC, postoperative dual therapy demonstrated significantly higher 1-year survival and OS compared with other therapies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary management of metastatic RCC is necessary to ensure timely implementation of targeted systemic therapy and RT to improve outcomes.
    METHODS:
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在通过比较有和没有病理性外侧淋巴结转移(LLNM)的患者的局部对照来评估直肠癌外侧淋巴结清扫(LLND)的疗效。
    我们纳入了在2017年至2019年期间在13个机构接受全直肠系膜切除术和LLND的189例直肠癌患者。有和没有病理性LLNM的患者被定义为pLLNM(+)和(-)组,分别。倾向得分匹配有助于平衡两组的基本特征。比较两组患者局部复发(LR)和外侧淋巴结复发(LLNR)的发生率。
    在整个队列中,189例患者中有39例患有病理性LLNM。pLLNM(+)和(-)组的3年LR和LLNR率分别为18.3%和4.0%(p=0.01)和7.7%和3.3%(p=0.22),分别。在倾向得分匹配后,对62例患者的数据进行了分析.两组间LR或LLNR无显著差异。pLLNM(+)和(-)组的3年LR和LLNR分别为16.4%和9.8%(p=0.46)和9.7%和9.8%(p=0.99),分别。
    如果除LLNM外的临床病理特征相似,则在pLLNM()和(-)组中,LLND将导致相当的局部控制。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for rectal cancer by comparing the local control in patients with and without pathological lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM).
    UNASSIGNED: We included 189 patients with rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision and LLND at 13 institutions between 2017 and 2019. Patients with and without pathological LLNM were defined as the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups, respectively. Propensity score-matching helped to balance the basic characteristics of both groups. The incidences of local recurrence (LR) and lateral lymph node recurrence (LLNR) were compared between the groups.
    UNASSIGNED: In the entire cohort, 39 of the 189 patients had pathological LLNM. The 3-year LR and LLNR rates were 18.3% and 4.0% (p = 0.01) and 7.7% and 3.3% (p = 0.22) in the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, the data from 62 patients were analyzed. No significant differences in LR or LLNR were observed between both groups. The 3-year LR and LLNR rates were 16.4% and 9.8% (p = 0.46) and 9.7% and 9.8% (p = 0.99) in the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: LLND would lead to comparable local control in the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups if the clinicopathological characteristics except for LLNM are similar.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)已被确定为前列腺癌的安全有效的治疗方法。SBRT需要高精度以减少治疗余量。金属髋关节假体会产生伪影,使骨盆成像失真,并可能降低目标/危险器官(OAR)识别和辐射剂量计算的准确性。关于髋关节置换术后SBRT的安全性和有效性的数据有限。这项单机构研究旨在评估SBRT治疗髋关节置换男性前列腺癌的安全性和局部控制。
    方法:23例接受局部前列腺癌治疗并有治疗前髋关节置换术史的患者,本回顾性分析包括2007年至2017年在MedStar乔治敦大学医院接受SBRT治疗的患者.使用Cyberknife®(AccurayIncorporated,桑尼维尔,CA),剂量为5个部分的35Gy或36.25Gy。目标和OAR由一位有经验的放射肿瘤学家(SPC)鉴定和轮廓。用三点量表评估CT和T2WMRI图像对治疗计划的充分性(良好,adequate,或次优)。在治疗计划期间,注意避免直接穿过髋关节假体的治疗梁。使用不良事件通用术语标准4.0版(CTCAEv.4.0)记录和评分毒性。磁共振成像和/或前列腺活检证实了局部复发。
    结果:中位随访时间为7年。患者为老年人(中位年龄=71岁),合并症发生率高(Charlson合并症指数>2,占25%)。四名患者进行了双侧髋关节置换术。根据D\'Amico分类,大多数患者为低至中等风险。大约13%的人获得了预先的ADT。总的来说,13例患者接受35Gy治疗,10例接受36.25Gy治疗。晚期>3级GU毒性和>2级GI毒性的发生率分别为8.6%和4.3%,分别。没有4级或5级毒性。六名患者(26%)在中位时间7.5年出现局部复发。在这六个病人中,4例进行单侧髋关节置换,2例进行双侧髋关节置换.三人接受了抢救冷冻疗法,三人接受了抢救ADT。
    结论:在一般人群中,前列腺SBRT术后高级别毒性和局部复发并不常见.然而,在这个先前进行过髋关节置换的患者队列中,前列腺SBRT的晚期毒性和局部复发率高于预期.在作者看来,应就前列腺SBRT的晚期毒性和局部复发风险升高对此类患者进行咨询.有了它的超声引导,近距离放射治疗具有避免对基于MRI/CT的成像的需要的优势,因此在该患者人群中可能是一种优选的辐射替代方案。如果这些患者接受SBRT治疗,应密切监测局部复发,以便尽早抢救。我们希望金属伪影减少技术和剂量计算算法的最新进展将改善未来的结果。
    OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been established as a safe and effective treatment for prostate cancer. SBRT requires high accuracy to reduce treatment margins. Metal hip prostheses create artifacts that distort pelvic imaging and potentially decrease the accuracy of target/organ at risk (OAR) identification and radiation dose calculations. Data on the safety and efficacy of SBRT after hip replacement is limited. This single-institution study sought to evaluate the safety and local control following SBRT for prostate cancer in men with hip replacements.
    METHODS: 23 patients treated with localized prostate cancer and a history of pre-treatment hip replacement, treated with SBRT from 2007 to 2017 at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital were included in this retrospective analysis. Treatment was administered with the CyberKnife® (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, CA) at doses of 35 Gy or 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. The targets and OARs were identified and contoured by a single experienced Radiation Oncologist (SPC). The adequacy of the CT and T2W MRI images for treatment planning was assessed with a three-point scale (good, adequate, or suboptimal). During treatment planning, care was taken to avoid treatment beams that directly traversed the hip prosthesis. Toxicities were recorded and scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE v.4.0). Local recurrence was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and/or prostate biopsy.
    RESULTS: The median follow-up was seven years. The patients were elderly (median age = 71 years) with a high rate of comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index > 2 in 25%). Four patients had bilateral hip replacements. The majority of patients were low to intermediate risk per the D\'Amico classification. Around 13% received upfront ADT. In total, 13 patients were treated with 35 Gy, and 10 were treated with 36.25 Gy. The rates of late > Grade 3 GU toxicity and > Grade 2 GI toxicity were 8.6% and 4.3%, respectively. There were no Grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Six patients (26%) developed a local recurrence at a median time of 7.5 years. Of these six patients, four had unilateral hip replacements and two had bilateral. Three underwent salvage cryotherapy and three received salvage ADT.
    CONCLUSIONS:  In the general population, high-grade toxicities and local recurrences are uncommon following prostate SBRT. However, in this cohort of patients with prior hip replacements, prostate SBRT had higher than expected rates of late toxicity and local recurrence. In the opinion of the authors, such patients should be counseled regarding an elevated risk of late toxicity and local recurrence with prostate SBRT. With its ultrasound guidance, brachytherapy would have the advantage of circumventing the need for MRI/CT-based imaging and thus may represent a preferable radiation alternative in this patient population. If these patients are treated with SBRT, they should be monitored closely for local recurrence so early salvage can be performed. We hope that recent advances in metal artifact reduction techniques and dose-calculation algorithms will improve future outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肾细胞癌(RCC)部分肾切除术(PN)后同侧局部复发(LR)可能是由于异时性肿瘤或PN床复发所致。迄今为止,文献主要报道了同侧LRs的集体,尽管这些事件的病理生理学和预后意义可能不同。我们试图评估与LR相关的变量,并评估LR与RCC转移和死亡的相关性。
    方法:我们确定了接受PN治疗的成年人为单侧,零星的,从2000年到2019年,使用前瞻性维护的局部碾压混凝土,单一机构登记处。LR被定义为新的,在MRI/CT上增强PN床内/附近的肿瘤。Cox比例风险模型用于创建LR的术前风险评分,并检查透明细胞RCC患者中LR与PN后转移和CSS的关系。
    结果:在2,164个PNs的队列中,识别了106个真正的LR,10年发病率为6.2%。基于年龄的LR术前风险评分,症状,孤立肾,复杂肿瘤需要开放性肾部分切除术,并创建cT阶段(c指数=0.73)。术后,正利润率,pT阶段,透明细胞亚型与LR相关。值得注意的是,21%(23/106)的LR患者出现同步转移。在LR之后,5年无转移和癌症特异性生存率分别为64%和71%,分别。在多变量分析中,LR仍然与转移(HR6.25;P<0.001)和RCC死亡(HR1.93;P=0.03)相关。
    结论:我们制定了术前风险评分以确定PN后有LR风险的患者。LR是肾癌转移和死亡的独立危险因素。需要进一步的研究来确定LR的治疗是否能改善肿瘤预后。
    OBJECTIVE: Ipsilateral local recurrence (LR) after partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may result from a metachronous tumor or PN bed recurrence. To date, literature has predominantly reported ipsilateral LRs collectively, although the pathophysiology and prognostic implications of these event may be distinct. We sought to assess variables associated with LR and evaluated associations of LR with metastasis and death from RCC.
    METHODS: We identified adults undergoing PN for unilateral, sporadic, localized RCC from 2000 to 2019 using a prospectively maintained, single institution registry. LR was defined as new, enhancing tumor within/near the PN bed on MRI/CT. Cox proportional hazards models were used to create a preoperative risk score for LR and to examine the association of LR with metastasis and CSS following PN among patients with clear cell RCC.
    RESULTS: In a cohort of 2,164 PNs, 106 true LRs were identified, for a 10-year incidence of 6.2%. A preoperative risk score for LR based on age, symptoms, solitary kidney, complex tumor necessitating open partial nephrectomy, and cT stage was created (c-index = 0.73). Postoperatively, positive margins, pT stage, and clear cell subtype were associated with LR. Notably, 21% (23/106) of patients with LR presented with synchronous metastases. Following LR, 5-year metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival were 64% and 71%, respectively. LR remained associated with metastasis (HR 6.25; P < 0.001) and death from RCC (HR 1.93; P = 0.03) on multivariable analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: We developed a preoperative risk score to identify patients at risk for LR following PN. LR was an independent risk factor for metastasis and death from RCC. Further study is warranted to determine whether treatment of LR improves oncologic outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    粘液纤维肉瘤(MFS)是一种罕见的软组织肉瘤,具有局部侵袭性,复发风险很高。围手术期放疗(RT)预防MFS局部复发(LR)的有效性尚不确定。这项回顾性研究旨在评估围手术期放疗对MFS患者局部复发的影响。
    本研究共纳入75例诊断为MFS并在单一机构治疗的患者。患者数据,包括人口统计,肿瘤特征,和治疗变量,是从电子病历中收集的。主要终点是局部复发的发生。
    在患者中,25/75(33.3%)接受放射治疗,而50/75(66.7%)没有。辐射组的局部复发率为28%(7/25),而非辐射组为36%(18/50)(p=0.20)。术后接受RT(辅助)(6/12,50%)的患者的LR率高于术前(新辅助)(1/13,7.6%)(p=0.124)。在54例切缘阴性的患者中,照射组的局部复发率(1/12,8.33)低于未照射组(9/36,25%)(p=0.034).基于肿瘤分级的亚组分析显示,辐射组和未辐射组之间的复发率没有任何显着差异。此外,在一年内,照射组和未照射组之间的复发率没有显着差异(p=0.32),两年期(p=0.24),和五年(p=0.32)随访标记。
    尽管在本研究中放疗显示出降低MFS患者复发率的趋势,观察到的差异没有达到统计学意义。新佐剂辐射似乎比佐剂辐射更有效。然而,在接受放疗的切缘阴性的患者中,复发率显著降低,这表明有效的手术切除仍然是黏液纤维肉瘤患者最重要的干预措施.证据等级:III。
    UNASSIGNED: Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is a rare type of soft tissue sarcoma that is locally aggressive and has a high risk of recurrence. The effectiveness of perioperative radiotherapy (RT) in preventing local recurrence (LR) of MFS remains uncertain. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impact of perioperative radiotherapy on local recurrence in patients with MFS.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 75 patients diagnosed with MFS and treated at a single institution were included in the study. Patient data, including demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment variables, were collected from electronic medical records. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of local recurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the patients, 25/75 (33.3%) received radiation therapy, while 50/75 (66.7%) did not. Local recurrence in the radiated group was 28% (7/25) compared to 36% (18/50) in the non-irradiated group (p = 0.20). The LR rate trended higher in patients who received RT postoperatively (adjuvant) (6/12, 50%) than preoperatively (neoadjuvant) (1/13, 7.6%) (p = 0.124). Of the 54 patients with negative margins, the local recurrence rate was lower in the radiated group (1/12, 8.33) than the non-irradiated group (9/36, 25%) (p = 0.034). A subgroup analysis based on tumor grade did not reveal any significant differences in recurrence rates between the radiated and non-irradiated groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in recurrence rates between the irradiated and non-irradiated groups at the one-year (p = 0.32), two-year (p = 0.24), and five-year (p = 0.32) follow-up marks.
    UNASSIGNED: Although radiotherapy demonstrated a trend toward reduction in recurrence rates in patients with MFS in this study, the observed difference did not reach statistical significance. Neoadjuvant radiation appears to be more effective than adjuvant radiation. However, there was a significant reduction in recurrence in patients with negative margins who received radiation demonstrating that effective surgical resection continues to be the most important intervention in patients with myxofibrosarcoma. Level of Evidence: III.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分析头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者neogenin-1(NEO1)基因转录表达对局部疾病控制的预测能力。
    方法:对手术治疗的107例HNSCC患者的肿瘤活检进行了回顾性研究。通过RT-PCR确定NEO1的转录表达。通过递归分区分析根据局部疾病控制对NEO1转录表达值进行分类。
    结果:较低的NEO1转录表达与手术治疗后较差的局部控制相关。NEO1表达较低的患者(n=25,23.4%)的5年局部无复发生存率为61.8%(95%CI:42.1-81.5%),而NEO1表达较高的患者(n=82,76.6%)的5年无局部复发生存率为85.6%(95%CI:77.6-93.6%),(P=0.003)。根据多变量分析的结果,与NEO1表达较高的患者相比,NEO1表达较低的患者局部肿瘤复发风险增加2.7倍(95%CI:1.0~7.0,P=0.043).
    结论:NEO1转录表达较低的HNSCC患者在手术治疗后局部复发的风险明显增高。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the predictive capacity for local disease control of the transcriptional expression of neogenin-1 (NEO1) gene in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
    METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on tumor biopsies from 107 patients with HNSCC treated surgically. The transcriptional expression of NEO1 was determined by RT-PCR. NEO1 transcriptional expression value was categorized according to local disease control by recursive partitioning analysis.
    RESULTS: Lower NEO1 transcriptional expression was associated with worse local control after surgical treatment. Patients with lower NEO1 expression (n = 25, 23.4%) had a 5-year local recurrence-free survival of 61.8% (95% CI: 42.1-81.5%), while patients with higher NEO1 expression (n = 82, 76.6%) had a 5-year local recurrence-free survival of 85.6% (95% CI: 77.6-93.6%), (P = 0.003). According to the result of multivariable analysis, patients with lower NEO1 expression had a 2.7-fold increased risk of local tumor recurrence (95% CI: 1.0-7.0, P = 0.043) compared to patients with higher NEO1 expression.
    CONCLUSIONS: HNSCC patients with a lower transcriptional expression of NEO1 have a significantly higher risk of local recurrence after surgical treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨直肠癌经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)后的肿瘤学结果和局部复发(LR)的危险因素。
    据报道,挪威和荷兰在TaTME之后早期出现了高LR率和多焦点模式,引起了对这种技术的肿瘤安全性的争议。
    日本腹腔镜结直肠外科学会的26个成员机构参加了这项回顾性队列研究。纳入2012年1月至2019年12月接受TaTME治疗的原发性直肠癌患者共706例进行分析。主要终点是累积3年LR率。
    共有253例患者有临床III期疾病(35.8%),91例(12.9%)有IV期。318例(45.0%)进行了括约肌间切除术,193例(27.3%)进行了腹部手术切除。尿道损伤1例(0.1%)。42例患者(5.9%)出现阳性切缘(R1)。中位随访时间为3.42年,2年和3年累计LR率分别为4.95%(95%置信区间:3.50-6.75)和6.82%(95%置信区间:5.08-8.89),分别。在56例LR患者中,有14例(25%)观察到多焦模式。从肛门边缘的肿瘤高度,病理T4疾病,病理III/IV期,神经周浸润阳性,在多变量分析中,R1切除是LR的重要危险因素。
    在这个选定的队列中,一半以上的病例进行了括约肌间切除术或腹部会阴切除术,在超过3年的中位随访期间,肿瘤结局是可接受的.
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the oncological outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer and risk factors for local recurrence (LR).
    UNASSIGNED: A high LR rate with a multifocal pattern early after TaTME has been reported in Norway and the Netherlands, causing controversy over the oncological safety of this technique.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-six member institutions of the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery participated in this retrospective cohort study. A total of 706 patients with primary rectal cancer who underwent TaTME between January 2012 and December 2019 were included for analysis. The primary endpoint was the cumulative 3-year LR rate.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 253 patients had clinical stage III disease (35.8%) and 91 (12.9%) had stage IV. Intersphincteric resection was performed in 318 patients (45.0%) and abdominoperineal resection in 193 (27.3%). There was 1 urethral injury (0.1%). A positive resection margin (R1) was seen in 42 patients (5.9%). Median follow-up was 3.42 years, and the 2- and 3-year cumulative LR rates were 4.95% (95% confidence interval: 3.50-6.75) and 6.82% (95% confidence interval: 5.08-8.89), respectively. A multifocal pattern was observed in 14 (25%) of 56 patients with LR. Tumor height from the anal verge, pathological T4 disease, pathological stage III/IV, positive perineural invasion, and R1 resection were significant risk factors for LR in multivariable analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: In this selected cohort in which intersphincteric resection or abdominoperineal resection was performed in more than half of cases, oncological outcomes were acceptable during a median follow-up of more than 3 years.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究的目的是检查首次化疗和手术后放疗延迟的个体中同侧乳腺癌复发的可能性。
    目的:分析延迟放疗对乳腺癌患者(治疗后6周以上)的影响。
    方法:回顾性分析包括2021年至2022年5月在巴格达放射肿瘤学和核医学中心接受治疗的136名女性乳腺癌患者。对于所有接受手术的患者,化疗结束后超过6周开始进行外部束放疗。临床检查和超声检查是随访过程的一部分。
    结果:患者年龄从28岁到71岁不等,大多数(83%)进行了乳房切除术。大多数病例(95.5%)在组织病理学上被诊断为浸润性导管癌,49.6%处于第二阶段,42.6%处于第三阶段。76%的患者激素检测呈阳性。尽管10例患者(7.35%)在5年内获得了远处转移,只有2例(1.47%)因RT延迟而出现局部复发。具体来说,91.1%的人在当地得到完全控制,没有疾病传播的证据。
    结论:在乳腺癌患者中延迟放疗超过6周并没有实质性影响局部控制,根据一项新研究的结果,它在伊拉克的第一个类型。
    BACKGROUND: The purpose of this research was to examine the probability of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence in individuals whose RT was delayed after the first chemotherapy and surgery.
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of delaying RT for breast cancer patients (by more than 6 weeks after treatment).
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis comprised 136 female breast cancer patients treated at the Baghdad Centre for Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine from 2021 to May 2022. External beam radiation was started more than 6 weeks after chemotherapy was finished for all patients who also had surgery. Clinical examination and ultrasound were part of the follow-up process.
    RESULTS: Patients\' ages varied from 28 to 71, and the majority (83%) had a mastectomy. The majority of cases (95.5%) were diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma on histopathology, with 49.6% being at stage 2 and 42.6% being at stage 3. Seventy-six percent of patients tested positive for hormones. Although 10 patients (7.35%) acquired distant metastases within 5 years, only 2 (1.47%) had local recurrence because of the delay in RT. Specifically, 91.1% had complete local control with no evidence of disease spread.
    CONCLUSIONS: Delaying RT by more than 6 weeks in patients with breast cancer did not substantially affect local control, according to the results of a new research, the first of its type in Iraq.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨计划复杂性对接受立体定向放疗(SBRT)的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者无局部复发生存期(LRFS)的临床影响。
    方法:分析了113例NSCLC患者的123例治疗计划的数据。平面平均光束调制(PM),平面梁不平顺(PI),计算监测单位/Gy(MU/Gy)和球形比例失调(SD)。使用ArcCHECK3D体模以2%/2mm标准测量γ通过率(GPR)。高复杂度(HC)和低复杂度(LC)组根据上述指标进行了统计分层,使用由它们与生存时间的相关性确定的截止值,使用R-3.6.1软件包计算。Kaplan-Meier分析,Cox回归,和随机生存森林(RSF)模型用于分析局部无复发生存(LRFS)。生成倾向分数匹配的对以最小化分析中的偏倚。
    结果:所有患者的中位随访时间为25.5个月(四分位距13.4-41.2)。使用RSF建议PM的预后能力,基于变量重要性和最小深度方法。1-,2-,HC组的3年LRFS发生率明显低于LC组(p=0.023),当计划复杂性由PM定义时。然而,当用其他指标定义时,HC组和LC组之间没有观察到显著差异(p>0.05).所有γ通过率均超过90.5%。
    结论:这项研究揭示了在接受SBRT治疗的NSCLC患者中,较高的PM和较差的LRFS之间存在显著关联。这一发现提供了额外的临床证据,支持治疗前质量保证方案的潜在优化。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical impact of plan complexity on the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
    METHODS: Data from 123 treatment plans for 113 NSCLC patients were analyzed. Plan-averaged beam modulation (PM), plan beam irregularity (PI), monitor unit/Gy (MU/Gy) and spherical disproportion (SD) were calculated. The γ passing rates (GPR) were measured using ArcCHECK 3D phantom with 2 %/2mm criteria. High complexity (HC) and low complexity (LC) groups were statistically stratified based on the aforementioned metrics, using cutoffs determined by their significance in correlation with survival time, as calculated using the R-3.6.1 packages. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, and Random Survival Forest (RSF) models were employed for the analysis of local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Propensity-score-matched pairs were generated to minimize bias in the analysis.
    RESULTS: The median follow-up time for all patients was 25.5 months (interquartile range 13.4-41.2). The prognostic capacity of PM was suggested using RSF, based on Variable Importance and Minimal Depth methods. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year LRFS rates in the HC group were significantly lower than those in the LC group (p = 0.023), when plan complexity was defined by PM. However, no significant difference was observed between the HC and LC groups when defined by other metrics (p > 0.05). All γ passing rates exceeded 90.5 %.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a significant association between higher PM and worse LRFS in NSCLC patients treated with SBRT. This finding offers additional clinical evidence supporting the potential optimization of pre-treatment quality assurance protocols.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号