Loading dose

加载剂量
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染是对公众健康的严重威胁。万古霉素(VAN)仍然是这些感染的主要治疗方法,达到推荐的曲线下面积(AUC)目标与改善的临床结局相关.当前的VAN治疗监测指南建议20-35mg/kg的负荷剂量(LD),以在治疗后24小时内迅速达到目标VAN暴露。然而,缺乏描述VANLD对第1天曲线下面积(AUC0-24)影响的数据.本研究旨在使用药代动力学(PK)方程来计算和描述VANLD为20mg/kg后的AUC0-24。
    方法:这是一项对服用VAN20mg/kg的成年患者的回顾性研究,接受≥48小时的治疗,并在24小时内收集了两个连续的血清VAN水平。线性,非梯形PK方程和两个输注后VAN水平用于计算AUC0-24.治疗性AUC0-24定义为400-600mg/l*h。
    结果:在123名纳入的患者中,中位年龄为46岁(IQR36,62),54%(67/123)的患者体重指数(BMI)≥30kg/m2,27%(33/123)的患者入院重症监护病房(ICU)。在LD为20mg/kg之后,50%(61/123)的患者满足治疗AUC0-24,而22%(27/123)的患者为亚治疗,28%(35/123)为超治疗性。与达到治疗性AUC0-24的患者相比,亚治疗性AUC0-24的患者更可能年轻(44vs.37岁),BMI≥30kg/m2(67vs.52%)。相比之下,具有超治疗性AUC0-24的患者更可能年龄较大(64与44岁)并有慢性肾脏疾病诊断(23岁与7%)与达到治疗AUC0-24的患者相比。结论:只有50%的患者在VAN20mg/kgLD后达到目标AUC0-24,更年轻,重度患者曝光不足和老年患者肾功能损害过度曝光,这表明这些人群需要不同的给药策略。
    BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are a serious threat to public health. Vancomycin (VAN) remains the primary treatment for these infections, and achieving the recommended area under the curve (AUC) target has been linked to improved clinical outcomes. The current VAN therapeutic monitoring guidelines recommend a loading dose (LD) of 20-35 mg/kg to rapidly attain targeted VAN exposures within 24 h of therapy. However, there is a paucity of data describing the impact of VAN LD on day 1 area under the curve (AUC0-24). This study aims to employ pharmacokinetic (PK) equations to calculate and describe the AUC0-24 following a VAN LD of 20 mg/kg.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult patients who were loaded with VAN 20 mg/kg, received ≥ 48 h of treatment, and had two consecutive serum VAN levels collected within 24 h. Linear, non-trapezoidal PK equations and two post-infusion VAN levels were used to calculate AUC0-24. Therapeutic AUC0-24 was defined as 400-600 mg/l*h.
    RESULTS: Among 123 included patients, the median age was 46 years (IQR 36, 62), 54% (67/123) of the patients had a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 and 27% (33/123) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Following a LD of 20 mg/kg, 50% (61/123) of the patients met the therapeutic AUC0-24, while 22% (27/123) of the patients were subtherapeutic, and 28% (35/123) were supratherapeutic. Compared with patients who achieved therapeutic AUC0-24, patients with subtherapeutic AUC0-24 were more likely to be younger (44 vs. 37 years old) and have a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (67 vs. 52%). In contrast, patients with supratherapeutic AUC0-24 were more likely to be older (64 vs. 44 years old) and to have chronic kidney disease diagnosis (23 vs. 7%) when compared to patients who achieved a therapeutic AUC0-24. CONCLUSIONS: Only 50% of patients achieve the target AUC0-24 following a VAN 20 mg/kg LD, with younger, heavier patients underexposed and older patients with renal impairment overexposed, suggesting that different dosing strategies are needed for these populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该回顾性图表评估了与非负荷剂量方案相比,20mg/kg万古霉素负荷剂量是否在48小时内增加了曲线下早期面积(AUC)目标实现。两组之间的主要结局没有差异(46%vs.50%;P=0.58)。
    This retrospective chart review evaluated whether 20 mg/kg vancomycin loading doses increase early area under the curve (AUC) target attainment within 48 hours in comparison to non-loading dose regimens. There were no differences between groups for the primary outcome (46 % vs. 50 %; P = 0.58).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Makena(己酸17-羟孕酮)于2011年在加速批准途径下被FDA批准用于预防复发性自发性早产,但未进行基本药代动力学或药效学(阶段1和阶段2)研究。当时,没有剂量-反应或浓度-反应数据.治疗浓度未知。这些数据的缺乏质疑17-羟孕酮己酸酯的给药方案是否被优化。
    目的:本研究的目的是通过分析评估己酸17-羟孕酮药理学的三个数据集来评估17-羟孕酮的给药方案:母胎医学Omega3研究,产科-胎儿药理学研究单位研究和产科-胎儿药理学研究中心研究。如果可以识别出不适当的给药方案,这些信息可以为未来的妊娠药物治疗研究提供信息。
    方法:使用Omega3研究的数据来确定血浆浓度是否与自发性早产风险相关,以及是否可以确定阈值浓度。来自产科-胎儿药理学研究单位研究的数据用于确定17-羟基孕酮己酸酯的半衰期,并开发模型以模拟各种给药方案的药物浓度。来自产科-胎儿药理学研究中心研究的数据用于确定剂量和安全性结果之间的关系。
    结果:对Omega3数据集的分析表明,随着17-羟孕酮己酸酯的对数增加,自发性早产的风险降低[比值比(95CI)0.04(0.00-0.90)]。稳态浓度>9ng/ml(相当于在25-28周时>8ng/ml)与自发性早产的最低风险相关[风险比(95CI)0.52(0.27-0.98,p=0.04)];在接受250mg每周剂量的受试者中,有25%未达到该浓度。在产科-胎儿药理学研究单位研究中,17-羟孕酮己酸酯的校正半衰期(中位数和IQR)为14.0(11.5-17.2)天.模拟表明,每周250毫克的剂量,>5每周注射需要达到9ng/ml的目标;然而,半衰期最短的那些(对应于较高的清除率),从未达到目标9ng/ml浓度。在75%的科目中,每周500mg的负荷剂量持续2周,然后每周250mg达到并在两周内保持9ng/ml的浓度,但在半衰期最短的25%中,浓度超过9ng/ml目标仅3周。在产科-胎儿药理学研究中心的研究中,所有65名接受每周500mg剂量的受试者均超过9ng/ml稳态。
    结论:己酸17-羟孕酮的给药方案不充分。药物浓度与自发性早产之间存在显著的负相关。当浓度超过9ng/ml时,风险最低,但25%接受250mg每周剂量的女性永远不会达到并保持这一浓度。该药物的长半衰期需要负荷剂量以迅速达到治疗浓度。省略确定适当剂量的基本药理学研究可能会损害17-羟基孕酮己酸酯的有效性。未来的妊娠药物治疗试验必须首先完成基础药理学研究。
    BACKGROUND: Makena (17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth in 2011 under the accelerated approval pathway, but fundamental pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic (Phase 1 and Phase 2) studies were not performed. At the time, there were no dose-response or concentration-response data. The therapeutic concentration was not known. The lack of such data brings into question the dosing regimen for 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate and if it was optimized.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosing regimen for 17-hydroxyprogesterone by analyzing 3 data sets in which the 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate pharmacology was evaluated, namely the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Omega 3 study, the Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research Units study, and the Obstetrical-Fetal Pharmacology Research Centers study. If an inappropriate dosing regimen could be identified, such information could inform future studies of pharmacotherapy in pregnancy.
    METHODS: Data from the Omega 3 study were used to determine if plasma concentration was related to spontaneous preterm birth risk and if a threshold concentration could be identified. Data from the Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research Units study were used to determine the half-life of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate and to develop a model to simulate drug concentrations with various dosing regimens. Data from the Obstetrical-Fetal Pharmacology Research Centers study were used to determine the relationship between dose and safety outcomes.
    RESULTS: Analysis of the Omega 3 data set indicated that the risk for spontaneous preterm birth decreased as the log concentration of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate increased (odds ratio, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.90). A steady state concentration of >9 ng/mL (equivalent to >8 ng/mL at 25-28 weeks) was associated with the lowest risk for spontaneous preterm birth (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.98; P=.04); this concentration was not achieved in 25% of subjects who received the 250 mg weekly dose. In the Obstetrical-Fetal Pharmacology Research Units study, the adjusted half-life (median and interquartile range) of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate was 14.0 (11.5-17.2) days. Simulations indicated that with the 250 mg weekly dose, >5 weekly injections were required to reach the 9 ng/mL target; however, those with the shortest half-life (corresponding to higher clearance), never reached the targeted 9 ng/mL concentration. In 75% of subjects, a loading dose of 500 mg weekly for 2 weeks followed by 250 mg weekly achieved and maintained the 9 ng/mL concentration within 2 weeks but in those 25% with the shortest half-life, concentrations exceeded the 9 ng/mL target for only 3 weeks. In the Obstetrical-Fetal Pharmacology Research Centers study, all 65 subjects who received a weekly dose of 500 mg exceeded the 9 ng/mL steady state.
    CONCLUSIONS: The dosing regimen for 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate was inadequate. There is a significant inverse relationship between drug concentration and spontaneous preterm birth. The risk was lowest when the concentration exceeded 9 ng/mL, but 25% of women who received the 250 mg weekly dose never reached or maintained this concentration. The drug\'s long half-life necessitates a loading dose to achieve therapeutic concentrations rapidly. The omission of basic pharmacologic studies to determine the proper dosing may have compromised the effectiveness of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. Future pharmacotherapy trials in pregnancy must first complete fundamental pharmacology studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)感染构成严重威胁,高发病率和死亡率。这项回顾性队列研究,2015年1月至2022年10月在Nakornping医院进行,旨在评估高负荷剂量(LD)粘菌素联合雾化粘菌素在CRAB肺炎危重患者中的疗效和安全性。在纳入的261名患者中,95收到LD粘菌素,166人接受LD粘菌素和雾化粘菌素。多变量Cox回归分析,使用逆概率加权对基线协变量进行调整,结果显示,接受LD粘菌素的患者和接受LD粘菌素联合雾化粘菌素的患者30天生存率无显著差异(调整后的风险比[aHR]:1.17,95%置信区间[CI]:0.80-1.72,p=0.418).同样,临床反应无显著差异(aHR:0.93,95%CI:0.66-1.31,p=0.688),微生物反应(AHR:1.21,95%CI:0.85-1.73,p=0.279),或肾毒性(aHR:1.14,95%CI:0.79-1.64,p=0.492)在两个治疗组之间。未报告与雾化粘菌素相关的显著不良事件。这些发现表明,在30天存活方面,添加雾化粘菌素可能不会提供额外的益处,临床或微生物学反应,或这些患者的肾毒性。
    Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections pose a serious threat, with high morbidity and mortality rates. This retrospective cohort study, conducted at Nakornping Hospital between January 2015 and October 2022, aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a high loading dose (LD) of colistin combined with nebulized colistin in critically ill patients with CRAB pneumonia. Of the 261 patients included, 95 received LD colistin, and 166 received LD colistin with nebulized colistin. Multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjusted for baseline covariates using inverse probability weighting, showed no significant difference in 30-day survival between patients who received LD colistin and those who received LD colistin with nebulized colistin (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-1.72, p = 0.418). Likewise, there were no significant differences in clinical response (aHR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.66-1.31, p = 0.688), microbiological response (aHR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.85-1.73, p = 0.279), or nephrotoxicity (aHR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.79-1.64, p = 0.492) between the two treatment groups. No significant adverse events related to nebulized colistin were reported. These findings suggest that the addition of nebulized colistin may not offer additional benefits in terms of 30-day survival, clinical or microbiological response, or nephrotoxicity in these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    建议使用伏立康唑(VRCZ)的负荷剂量在早期增加其血液浓度。然而,日本VRCZ实施负荷剂量的趋势尚未明确.此外,虽然药剂师在抗菌药物管理中发挥着许多重要作用,药剂师干预对实施VRCZ负荷剂量的影响尚未报道.因此,本研究旨在阐明VRCZ负荷剂量的实施及负荷剂量的影响因素。这项研究使用了一个行政索赔数据库,其中包括2010年至2019年期间接受可注射VRCZ的患者。每年评估VRCZ中负荷剂量的实施情况。采用多因素logistic回归分析确定负荷剂量的影响因素。总的来说,包括2197名患者。在整个研究期间,负荷剂量的执行率保持在65%以下。在可以通过药剂师干预计算的医疗费用中,只有感染预防和控制费用显着增加了VRCZ的实施负荷剂量(比值比:1.587,95%置信区间:1.053-2.392)。总之,抗真菌管理可能已经在建立感染预防和控制的医疗机构得到了推广。在未来,从VRCZ给药开始,药剂师就需要更积极地进行干预.
    A loading dose of voriconazole (VRCZ) is recommended to increase its blood concentration at an early stage. However, the trends in the implementation of the loading dose in VRCZ in Japan has not yet been clarified. In addition, although pharmacists play many important roles in antimicrobial stewardship, the effect of pharmacist intervention on the implementation of a loading dose of VRCZ has not yet been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the implementation of loading dose of VRCZ and the influencing factors of loading dose. This study used an administrative claims database that included patients who received injectable VRCZ between 2010 and 2019. The implementation of loading doses in the VRCZ was evaluated annually. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors influencing loading dose. Overall, 2197 patients were included. The implementation rate of the loading dose remained below 65% throughout the study period. Among medical fees that can be calculated through pharmacist intervention, only the infection prevention and control premium significantly increased the implementation of loading dose of VRCZ (odds ratio: 1.587, 95% confidence interval: 1.053-2.392). In conclusion, antifungal stewardship may have been promoted at medical institutions that established infection prevention and control. In the future, pharmacists will need to intervene more actively from the beginning of VRCZ administration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:建议实施替考拉宁(TEIC)的负荷剂量。然而,包装插页中的剂量设置与之间存在显着差异,在准则中,日本的实际负荷剂量状况尚不清楚。此外,TEIC作为副作用引起肝损伤。虽然发展肝损伤的风险没有报告后,负荷剂量根据指南增加,大量人口缺乏报告。因此,我们评估了负荷剂量的趋势以及影响TEIC给药疗效和安全性的因素.
    方法:本研究使用日本行政索赔数据库。在2010年至2019年期间,在接受TEIC治疗的目标人群中评估了负荷剂量的趋势。根据负荷剂量的指南组(总剂量3天>1,600mg)和非指南组(≤1,600mg),通过倾向评分匹配调整患者特征。最后,采用单变量和多变量条件logistic回归分析评估影响30天死亡率和肝损伤的因素.
    结果:根据这些标准选择了10,030名患者。基于推荐指南的负荷剂量比例随着时间的推移而增加,无论是否实施治疗药物监测(TDM),但尤其是在实施TDM的情况下,负荷剂量按照指南的建议给药.条件logistic回归分析显示药物管理与指导费用之间存在关系(优势比[OR]:0.45,95%置信区间[CI]:0.36-0.55),表明药剂师干预的报销,减少30天死亡率。此外,基于推荐指南的负荷剂量对肝损伤没有影响,和其他因素与肝损伤发生率的增加没有显着相关。
    结论:因此,这项研究暗示了药物管理和指导费用所表明的药物管理的益处,并支持根据TEIC给药指南实施负荷剂量.
    BACKGROUND: The loading dose of teicoplanin (TEIC) is recommended for implementation. However, there is significant discrepancy between the dose settings in the package insert and, in the guidelines, and the actual status of loading doses in Japan is unclear. Furthermore, TEIC causes liver injury as side effect. Although the risk of developing liver injury has not been reported to be increased following a loading dose based on the guidelines, there is a lack of reports in large populations. Therefore, we evaluated the trend in the loading dose and factors affecting the efficacy and safety of TEIC administration.
    METHODS: A Japanese administrative claims database was used in this study. Trends in loading doses were evaluated in target populations administered TEIC between 2010 and 2019. Patient characteristics were adjusted by propensity score matching based on the guideline group (total dose of 3 days > 1,600 mg) and non-guideline group (≤ 1,600 mg) of the loading dose. Finally, univariable and multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors affecting 30-day mortality and liver injury.
    RESULTS: A total of 10,030 patients were selected based on these criteria. The proportion of loading doses based on the recommended guidelines showed an increase over time, regardless of the implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), but especially so in cases where TDM was implemented, the loading doses were administered in accordance with the recommendations of the guidelines. Conditional logistic regression analysis showed a relationship between drug management and guidance fees (odds ratio [OR]: 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36‒0.55), a reimbursement indicating pharmacist intervention, and a reduction in 30-day mortality. In addition, loading doses based on the recommended guidelines had no influence on liver injury, and other factors were not significantly associated with increased incidence of liver injury.
    CONCLUSIONS: Thus, this study implies the benefits of pharmacological management as indicated by drug management and guidance fee and supports the implementation of loading doses based on the guideline on TEIC administration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在建立中国成年患者替考拉宁的群体药代动力学(PK)模型,以评估标签表中的给药方案并对其进行优化。
    方法:使用非线性混合效应模型来估计药代动力学参数。使用蒙特卡罗模拟来评估各种给药方案在实现肾功能正常或下降的患者中的目标谷浓度中的实现。
    结果:本回顾性研究共纳入115例患者。肌酐清除率(CrCL)和白蛋白(ALB)被确定为替考拉宁清除率的协变量。对于治疗肾功能和血清白蛋白浓度正常的非复杂性MRSA感染患者,推荐的给药方案是600mgq12h,5次给药作为负荷剂量,然后是600mgqd作为维持剂量;用于治疗严重和/或复杂的MRSA感染,推荐的给药方案是800mgq12h,5次给药作为负荷剂量,然后800mgqd作为维持剂量.值得注意的是,负荷和维持剂量应根据患者的肾功能和血清白蛋白浓度进行调整。此外,替考拉宁的谷浓度每隔一周显着增加。
    结论:建议根据患者的肾功能和血清白蛋白浓度调整负荷给药和维持给药方案。此外,有必要至少每周进行一次替考拉宁的后续治疗药物监测。
    This study aims to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of teicoplanin in Chinese adult patients to evaluate the dosing regimen in the label sheet and optimize it.
    Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling was used to estimate PK parameters. Monte Carlo simulations were used to evaluate the attainment of various dosing regimens in achieving the target trough concentrations in patients with normal or decreased renal function.
    A total of 115 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Creatinine clearance (CrCL) and albumin (ALB) were identified as covariates on the clearance of teicoplanin. For the treatment of non-complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in patients with normal renal function and serum ALB concentration, the recommended dosing regimen was 600 mg q12h with five administrations as the loading dose followed by 600 mg qd as the maintenance dose; for the treatment of serious and/or complicated MRSA infections, the recommended dosing regimen was 800 mg q12h with five administrations as the loading dose followed by 800 mg qd as the maintenance dose. It is worth noting that both the loading and maintenance doses ought to be modified based on the patient\'s renal function and serum ALB concentration. In addition, trough concentrations of teicoplanin were significantly increased every other week.
    Both loading dosing and maintenance dosing regimens were recommended to be adjusted according to patient\'s renal function and serum ALB concentration. In addition, it is necessary to perform follow-up therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin at least once every week.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管万古霉素(VCM)的负荷剂量(LD)有助于其疗效,它可能无法充分进行。在这里,目的是通过药剂师的治疗药物监测,评估LD对患者预后的影响,并阐明由抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)驱动的教育干预对LD执行率和患者预后的影响.
    方法:首先,我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入接受VCM治疗的121例成年患者,并比较了LD组和非LD组的28日死亡率.为了避免混淆,采用倾向评分法。第二,使用ASP驱动的讲座进行后期培训,对医护人员进行了问卷调查,包括医生,护士,和药剂师。在ASP前(n=38)和ASP后(n=33)组之间的一年零9个月期间比较了VCMLD实施率和28天死亡率。
    结果:在倾向得分匹配后,LD组的28天死亡率显着改善,提示由于LD引起的VCM的早期血液水平升高是影响患者预后的重要因素。讲座结束后,一项问卷调查显示,对教育讲座的“好”和“略好”的理解率超过了所有医护人员的80%。后ASP组的LD实施率显着增加到63.6%(21/33),而前ASP组的为31.6%(12/38)(p=0.007),28日死亡率从23.7%(9/38)降至6.1%(2/33)(p=0.041).
    结论:这种ASP驱动的教育干预方法将促进LD的实施,改善患者预后。
    BACKGROUND: Although the loading dose (LD) of vancomycin (VCM) contributes to its efficacy, it may not be conducted adequately. Herein, the objective was to evaluate the effect of LD on patient prognosis using therapeutic drug monitoring by pharmacists and elucidate the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP)-driven educational intervention on the LD implementation rate and patient prognosis.
    METHODS: First, a retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 121 adult patients administered with VCM and compared with 28-day mortality in LD and non-LD groups. To avoid confounding, the propensity score method was employed. Second, post-training with ASP-driven lectures, a questionnaire survey was conducted for healthcare workers, including physicians, nurses, and pharmacists. The rates of VCM LD implementation and 28-day mortality were compared during a period of one year and 9 months between the pre-ASP (n = 38) and post-ASP (n = 33) groups.
    RESULTS: After propensity score matching, the 28-day mortality in the LD group was significantly improved, suggesting that the early increase in blood levels of VCM due to an LD is an important factor influencing patient prognosis. After the lecture, a questionnaire survey revealed that the understanding rates of \"well\" and \"slightly well\" for educational lectures exceeded 80% of all healthcare workers. The rate of LD implementation significantly increased to 63.6% (21/33) in the post-ASP group compared with 31.6% (12/38) in the pre-ASP group (p = 0.007), and the 28-day mortality declined from 23.7% (9/38) to 6.1% (2/33) (p = 0.041).
    CONCLUSIONS: This method of ASP-driven educational intervention would facilitate LD implementation, improving patient prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管有其局限性,药代动力学(PK)和药效学(PD)指数构成了我们目前对抗生素开发的理解的基础,选择,和剂量优化。PK-PD在医学中的应用与更好的临床疗效有关,抑制电阻,和优化抗生素消费。β-内酰胺抗生素仍然是许多患者经验性和定向治疗的基石。游离(未结合)药物浓度保持高于最小抑制浓度(MIC)(%fT>MIC)的给药间隔的时间百分比被认为是PK-PD指数,其最佳地预测抗生素暴露与β-内酰胺抗生素的杀灭之间的关系。β-内酰胺抗生素的时间依赖性起源于青霉素结合蛋白的丝氨酸活性位点的酰化过程,这随后导致在给药间隔期间的抑菌和杀菌作用。为了提高达到目标的可能性,更高的剂量,和长期输注策略,有/或没有负荷剂量,已用于补偿与PK-PD变化相关的抗生素的亚治疗水平,特别是在严重脓毒症的早期。为了最大限度地减少耐药性和最大限度地提高临床疗效,对于表现为严重(革兰氏阴性)脓毒症的高接种物感染患者,应考虑采用美罗培南负荷剂量,然后进行高剂量长时间输注的经验性治疗.β-内酰胺抗生素的后续降级和给药应被视为个体化的动态过程,需要在疾病过程的整个时间过程中进行剂量调整,该过程由间接评估PK-PD改变的临床参数介导。
    Despite their limitations, the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) indices form the basis for our current understanding regarding antibiotic development, selection, and dose optimization. Application of PK-PD in medicine has been associated with better clinical outcome, suppression of resistance, and optimization of antibiotic consumption. Beta-lactam antibiotics remain the cornerstone for empirical and directed therapy in many patients. The percentage of time of the dosing interval that the free (unbound) drug concentration remains above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (%fT > MIC) has been considered the PK-PD index that best predicts the relationship between antibiotic exposure and killing for the beta-lactam antibiotics. Time dependence of beta-lactam antibiotics has its origin in the acylation process of the serine active site of penicillin-binding proteins, which subsequently results in bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects during the dosing interval. To enhance the likelihood of target attainment, higher doses, and prolonged infusion strategies, with/or without loading doses, have been applied to compensate for subtherapeutic levels of antibiotics related to PK-PD changes, especially in the early phase of severe sepsis. To minimize resistance and maximize clinical outcome, empirical therapy with a meropenem loading dose followed by high-dose-prolonged infusion should be considered in patients with high inoculum infections presenting as severe (Gram negative) sepsis. Subsequent de-escalation and dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics should be considered as an individualized dynamic process that requires dose adjustments throughout the time course of the disease process mediated by clinical parameters that indirectly assess PK-PD alterations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    双重抗血小板治疗是接受经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)支架的患者的标准治疗。传统上,患者在PCI之前或期间吞服负荷剂量的P2Y12抑制剂.吞咽负荷剂量后达到足够血小板抑制的时间显著变化。咀嚼片剂可允许更快速地抑制血小板聚集。然而,在患有稳定性缺血性心脏病或非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)的患者中,该策略的数据不太可靠.
    在这项单中心前瞻性试验中,112名接受阿司匹林治疗并在冠状动脉造影后但在PCI前接受替格瑞洛治疗的稳定性缺血性心脏病或NSTE-ACS的P2Y12初治患者被随机分为咀嚼(n=55)或吞咽(n=57)替格瑞洛负荷剂量(180mg)。基线变量使用2样本t检验和卡方/Fisher精确检验进行比较,alpha设置为0.05。P2Y12反应单位(PRU)在基线比较,1小时,和4小时使用Wilcoxon秩和检验。然后患者接受标准替格瑞洛给药。
    排除后,基线时咀嚼和吞咽组的P2Y12PRU,1小时,替格瑞洛负荷后4小时剂量为243比256(P=0.75),143vs210(P=0.09),和28vs25(P=0.89),分别。在30天和1年时,主要不良心脏事件(MACE)或大出血没有发现差异。
    在患有稳定性缺血性心脏病或NSTE-ACS的患者中,咀嚼而不是吞咽替格瑞洛可能导致1小时时血小板聚集的抑制略快,而MACE或大出血没有增加.
    UNASSIGNED: Dual antiplatelet therapy is standard for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stents. Traditionally, patients swallow the loading dose of a P2Y12 inhibitor before or during PCI. Time to achieve adequate platelet inhibition after swallowing the loading dose varies significantly. Chewed tablets may allow more rapid inhibition of platelet aggregation. However, data for this strategy in patients with stable ischemic heart disease or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) are less robust.
    UNASSIGNED: In this single-center prospective trial, 112 P2Y12-naïve patients with stable ischemic heart disease or NSTE-ACS on aspirin therapy and who received ticagrelor after coronary angiography but before PCI were randomized to chewing (n=55) or swallowing (n=57) the ticagrelor loading dose (180 mg). Baseline variables were compared using 2-sample t-test and chi-squared/Fisher\'s exact tests as appropriate, with alpha set at 0.05. P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) were compared at baseline, 1 hour, and 4 hours using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Patients then received standard ticagrelor dosing.
    UNASSIGNED: After exclusions, P2Y12 PRU in the chewed and swallowed groups at baseline, 1 hour, and 4 hours after ticagrelor loading dose were 243 vs 256 (P=0.75), 143 vs 210 (P=0.09), and 28 vs 25 (P=0.89), respectively. No differences were found in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) or major bleeding at 30 days and 1 year.
    UNASSIGNED: In patients with stable ischemic heart disease or NSTE-ACS, chewing rather than swallowing ticagrelor may lead to slightly faster inhibition of platelet aggregation at 1 hour with no increase in MACE or major bleeding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号