Lichtenstein technique

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:目前,腹股沟疝在巴西人群中非常普遍,占所有腹壁疝的75%。纠正它们的推荐治疗方法是腹股沟疝修补术,可以通过开放手术进行,主要使用列支敦士登技术,或者腹腔镜检查,主要通过经腹腹膜前修复(TAPP)或完全腹膜外修复(TEP)方法。像任何手术一样,这些手术有术后并发症,疼痛是最常见和最虚弱的。目前,在欧洲和巴西的指导方针中,开放Lichtenstein和内镜腹股沟疝技术被推荐为原发性单侧疝修复的最佳循证选择,前提是外科医生在特定手术方面有足够的经验.在这个问题上,外科医生应该根据对每一种手术的益处和风险的评估做出选择,并与它耐心地分享决策。因此,本综述的目的是通过比较上述手术方法来评估慢性术后疼痛的发生率,以评估哪种手术方法对患者造成的残疾较少。
    方法:在Medline(PubMed)上进行了直到2024年5月的搜索,科克伦(中部),和紫丁香数据库。选择仅限于随机临床试验,将TAPP或TEP与LC进行比较的非随机临床试验和队列研究,评估2017年至2023年间发表的慢性术后疼痛的发生率。使用GRADEPro工具评估证据确定性,使用RoB2.0工具和ROBINSI工具评估偏倚风险。共纳入13项研究。结果:荟萃分析显示两种技术的组间差异显著,有利于腹腔镜手术,术后腹股沟痛发生率较低,相对危险度为0.49(95%CI=0.32,0.75;I2=66%(P=0.001);Z=3.28(P=0.001),证据确定性较低.
    结论:与开腹Lichtenstein技术相比,腹腔镜TEP/TAPP技术术后慢性疼痛的发生率较低,这意味着前者可以为需要腹股沟疝修补术的患者带来更多的好处。然而,需要进一步的随机临床试验来优化分析,最小化偏差。
    OBJECTIVE: Currently, inguinal hernias are highly prevalent in the Brazilian population, accounting for 75% of all abdominal wall hernias. The recommended treatment to correct them is inguinal herniorrhaphy, which can be performed through open surgery, mainly using the Lichtenstein technique, or laparoscopically, primarily through Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair (TAPP) or Total Extraperitoneal Repair (TEP) approaches. Like any surgery, these procedures have post-operative complications, with pain being the most common and debilitating. Currently, in European and Brazilian guidelines, the open Lichtenstein and endoscopic inguinal hernia techniques are recommended as best evidence-based options for repair of a primary unilateral hernia providing the surgeon is sufficiently experienced in the specific procedure. In that matter, the surgeon should make a choice based on assessment of the benefits and risks of performing each of them, and practice shared making decision with it patient. Therefore, the objective of this review was to assess the incidence of chronic postoperative pain by comparing the aforementioned surgical approaches to evaluate which procedure causes less disability to the patient.
    METHODS: The search conducted until May 2024 was performed on Medline (PubMed), Cochrane (CENTRAL), and Lilacs databases. The selection was limited to randomized clinical trials, nonrandomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing TAPP or TEP to LC, evaluating the incidence of chronic postoperative pain published between 2017 and 2023. Evidence certainty was assessed using the GRADE Pro tool, and bias risk was evaluated with the RoB 2.0 tool and ROBINS I tool. Thirteen studies were included.  RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the groups in both techniques, favoring the laparoscopic approach, which had a lower occurrence of postoperative inguinodynia with a relative risk of 0.49 (95% CI = 0.32, 0.75; I2 = 66% (P = 0.001); Z = 3.28 (P = 0.001) with low certainty of evidence.
    CONCLUSIONS: The presence of chronic postoperative pain was lower in laparoscopic TEP/TAPP techniques when compared to the open Lichtenstein technique, meaning that the former can bring more benefits to patients who requires inguinal herniorrhaphy. Nevertheless, further randomized clinical trials are needed to optimize the analysis, minimizing the bias.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹股沟疝修补术是普外科中最常见的手术。一个人一生中必须接受腹股沟疝手术的几率相当高,27%的男性和3%的女性。欧洲疝学会指南指出,Lichtenstein技术(基于网状物的修复)是成人选择性腹股沟疝的标准治疗方法。一些作者认为Shouldice技术(基于组织的修复)是开放式疝修复的最佳常规方法。在这项研究中,我们比较了这两种方法。
    在这项随机研究中,将452例患者随机分为2组。51名患者在随访期间失访,并被排除在研究的进一步分析之外。最后,分析的患者为Shouldice技术组183例患者和Lichtenstein技术组218例患者。所有患者在1周后进行检查,1、3个月,手术日期后1年、2年和3年。
    3年随访后,Shouldice技术组为7.1%,Lichtenstein技术组为3%,差异有统计学意义(p值0.006)。伤口感染组间差异无统计学意义,血清腺瘤,血肿,鞘膜积液,膀胱损伤,腹股沟区的慢性疼痛,和患者术后满意度。
    在择期患者中,Lichtenstein技术治疗腹股沟疝似乎优于Shouldice技术。
    UNASSIGNED: Inguinal hernia repair is the most frequent operation in general surgery. The chance of a person having to undergo an inguinal hernia operation during his/her life is quite high, 27 % in men and 3 % in women. European Hernia Society guidelines state that the Lichtenstein technique (mesh-based repair) is the standard treatment of elective inguinal hernia in adults. Some authors consider the Shouldice technique (tissue-based repair) the best conventional method for open hernia repair. In this study, we compared these two methods.
    UNASSIGNED: In This randomized study, 452 patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups. 51 patients were lost during follow-up period and were excluded from further analysis in the study. Finally, the analyzed patients were 183 patients in Shouldice technique group and 218 patients in Lichtenstein technique group. All patients were examined after 1 week, 1, 3 months, 1, 2, and 3 years after the operation date.
    UNASSIGNED: After 3 years follow up Recurrence of hernia in Shouldice technique group was 7.1 % and in Lichtenstein technique group was 3 % with significant differences (p-value 0.006). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in wound infection, Seroma, hematoma, Hydrocele, Bladder damage, chronic pain in the inguinal region, and Patient Satisfaction level after surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: It seems that inguinal hernia treatment by the Lichtenstein technique is better than the Shouldice technique in elective patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    腹股沟膀胱疝(IBH)是一种罕见的病例,仅在所有腹股沟疝的1-5%中观察到。肥胖,老年人,性别,和以前的操作是IBHs的有力决定因素。症状取决于疝气的大小。我们报告了一例40岁的肥胖男性,其右腹股沟隆起逐渐增加,有两个阶段的排尿史(Mery\'s征)。使用影像辅助诊断方式(US,CT,和MRI),患者被诊断为IBH。虽然IBH并不常见,在有Mery的体征和诱发因素的患者中,应始终怀疑它。
    Inguinal bladder herniation (IBH) is an uncommon case, observed in only 1-5 % of all inguinal hernias. Obesity, the elderly, gender, and previous operations are vigorous determinants for IBHs. Symptoms depend on the size of the hernia. We report a case of an obese male aged 40 presenting with a bulge increasing gradually in the right groin with a history of two-stage micturition (Mery\'s sign). With imaging-assisted diagnosis modalities (US, CT, and MRI), the patient was diagnosed with IBH. Although IBH is not common, it should always be suspected in patients with Mery\'s sign and predisposing factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:该研究旨在评估腹股沟疝手术前后的性功能,国际认可,患者管理的问卷。
    方法:前瞻性纳入57例采用Lichtenstein疝修补术的男性腹股沟疝病例。同意参加研究的患者有IIEF(国际勃起功能指数)评分系统表,包括15个问题,在术前填写,在手术后的第一个月和第六个月。患者年龄,BMI,合并症,就业状况,疝类型,疝气大小,记录单发或双侧疝。通过统计分析评估这些变量之间的关系。
    结果:在勃起功能方面发现了统计学上的显着差异,性欲,性交功能,和总体满意度,当post-postop的第一个月,第六个月,与术后1个月-术后6个月评分进行比较(p<0.05)。
    结论:腹股沟疝引起的疼痛和肿胀会对患者的性功能产生负面影响,大多数患者在手术后受益。性功能障碍可能是腹股沟疝手术的适应症之一。
    OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate sexual function before and after inguinal hernia surgery using a standard, internationally approved, patient-administered questionnaire.
    METHODS: 57 male inguinal hernia cases operated with the Lichtenstein hernioplasty technique were prospectively included in the study. Patients who agreed to participate in the study had the IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function) scoring system form consisting of 15 questions filled in preoperatively, during the first and sixth months after surgery. Patients\' age, BMI, comorbidity, employment status, hernia type, hernia size, and single or bilateral hernia were recorded. The relationship between these variables was evaluated by statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found in terms of erectile function, sexual desire, intercourse function, and overall satisfaction, when the preop-postop first month, preop-postop sixth month, and postoperative first month-postop six-month scores were compared (p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pain and swelling due to an inguinal hernia can negatively affect the sexual functions of the patient, and most of the patients benefit from this after the surgery. Sexual dysfunction may be one of the indications for an inguinal hernia operation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    背景:改良的Kugel补片比普通网片更昂贵,并且在股疝修补术中需要广泛解剖腹膜前间隙。因此,我们采用了一种使用迷你网格和Lichtenstein修复的新颖方法。这项研究比较了原发性单侧股疝患者的微型网片和Lichtenstein修复与改良的Kugel技术。
    方法:单侧股疝患者被随机分配到接受微型网片和Lichtenstein修补术(M组)或改良Kugel修补术(K组),随访一周,三个月,一年和两年。人口统计,分析两组疝特点及手术效果。
    结果:K组共48名患者和M组49名参与者完成了随访。M组手术时间(68.6±13.4分钟)明显短于K组(80.6±10.1分钟;p=0.030)。慢性疼痛两组间无显著性差异,异物感和生活质量,没有复发。
    结论:微型网片和Lichtenstein修补术在本研究中股疝患者中具有合理的效果,与改良的Kugel修复相比,手术时间缩短。该试验在中国临床试验注册中心:ChiCTR1900022264注册。
    BACKGROUND: A modified Kugel patch is more expensive than ordinary mesh and demands a wide dissection of the preperitoneal space in femoral hernia repair. We therefore adopted a novel method using mini-mesh and a Lichtenstein repair. This study compared mini-mesh and Lichtenstein repair with a modified Kugel technique in patients with a primary unilateral femoral hernia.
    METHODS: Patients with unilateral femoral hernia were assigned randomly to undergo mini-mesh and Lichtenstein repair (M group) or modified Kugel repair (K group), followed-up at one week, three months, one year and two years. Demographics, hernia characteristics and operative outcomes of two groups were analysed.
    RESULTS: A total of 48 patients in the K group and 49 participants in the M group completed follow-up. The operation time for the M group (68.6 ± 13.4 minutes) was significantly shorter than that of the K group (80.6 ± 10.1 minutes; p=0.030). There was no significant difference between the two groups for chronic pain, foreign body feeling and quality of life, and no recurrence occurred.
    CONCLUSIONS: Mini-mesh and Lichtenstein repairs have reasonable results in the patients with femoral hernia in this study, with a reduced operation time compared with a modified Kugel repair. The trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry: ChiCTR1900022264.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    UNASSIGNED: Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) endoscopic hernioplasty and Lichtenstein hernioplasty are the most commonly used approaches for inguinal hernia repair. However, current evidence on which is the preferred approach is inconclusive. This updated meta-analysis was conducted to track the accumulation of evidence over time.
    METHODS: Studies were identified by a systematic literature search of the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Fixed- and random-effects models were used to cumulatively assess the accumulation of evidence over time.
    RESULTS: The TEP cohort showed significantly higher rates of recurrences and vascular injuries compared to the Lichtenstein cohort; [Peto Odds ratio (OR) = 1.58 (1.22, 2.04), p = 0.005], [Peto OR = 2.49 (1.05, 5.88), p = 0.04], respectively. In contrast, haematoma formation rate, time to return to usual activities, and local paraesthesia were significantly lower in the TEP cohort compared to the Lichtenstein cohort; [Peto OR = 0.26 (0.16, 0.41), p ≤ 0.001], [mean difference = - 6.32 (- 8.17, - 4.48), p ≤ 0.001], [Peto OR = 0.26 (0.17, 0.40), p ≤ 0.001], respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study, which is based on randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) of high quality, showed significantly higher rates of recurrences and vascular injuries in the TEP cohort than in the Lichtenstein cohort. In contrast, rate of postoperative haematoma formation, local paraesthesia, and time to return to usual activities were significantly lower in the TEP cohort than in the Lichtenstein cohort. Future multicentre RCTs with strict adherence to the standards recommended in the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines will shed further light on the topic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    OBJECTIVE: The Open Lichtenstein technique, the Laparoscopic Trans-Abdominal PrePeritoneal (TAPP), the Totally Extra Peritoneal (TEP), and the robotic TAPP (rTAPP) are commonly performed. The aim of the present network meta-analysis was to globally compare short-term outcomes within these major surgical techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair.
    METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were consulted. A fully Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed.
    RESULTS: Sixteen studies (51.037 patients) were included. Overall, 35.5% underwent Open, 33.5% TAPP, 30.7% TEP, and 0.3% rTAPP. The postoperative seroma risk ratio (RR) was comparable considering TAPP vs. Open (RR 0.91; 95% CrI 0.50-1.62), TEP vs. Open (RR 0.64; 95% CrI 0.32-1.33), TEP vs. TAPP (RR 0.70; 95% CrI 0.39-1.31), and rTAPP vs. Open (RR 0.98; 95% CrI 0.37-2.51). The postoperative chronic pain RR was similar for TAPP vs. Open (RR 0.53; 95% CrI 0.27-1.20), TEP vs. Open (RR 0.86; 95% CrI 0.48-1.16), and TEP vs. TAPP (RR 1.70; 95% CrI 0.63-3.20). The recurrence RR was comparable when comparing TAPP vs. Open (RR 0.96; 95% CrI 0.57-1.51), TEP vs. Open (RR 1.0; 95% CrI 0.65-1.61), TEP vs. TAPP (RR 1.10; 95% CrI 0.63-2.10), and rTAPP vs. Open (RR 0.98; 95% CrI 0.45-2.10). No differences were found in term of postoperative hematoma, surgical site infection, urinary retention, and hospital length of stay.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that Open, TAPP, TEP, and rTAPP seem comparable in the short term. The surgical management of inguinal hernia is evolving and the effect of the adoption of innovative minimally invasive techniques should be further investigated in the long term. Ultimately, the choice of the most suitable treatment should be based on individual surgeon expertise and tailored on each patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    Compare testicular perfusion between the herniated and the healthy side pre- and post-surgery.
    Our study was done on patients with unilateral inguinal hernia. A Doppler ultrasound study was performed in the healthy and herniated side before surgery and 3 months after it.
    31 patients were included, 74.2% on the right and 25.8% on the left side. When comparing the pre-surgical values of testicular resistance index from the healthy side with those on the herniated side, there was a significant difference at the spermatic cord levels (0.73 ± 0.11 and 0.81 ± 0.13, p = 0.018) and the extra-testicular level (0.66 ± 0.92 and 0.74 ± 0.10, p = 0.032), but a significant difference was not present at the intra-testicular level (0.62 ± 0.07 and 0.65 ± 0.08). Three months after the surgery, there were no statistically significant differences at any of the levels studied.
    There are no intra-testicular perfusion differences caused by the presence of hernia, nor during post-surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate sexual functions which are affected by inguinal hernias and may change after hernia repair surgery.
    METHODS: A total of 47 patients who underwent Lichtenstein tension-free anterior repair and inguinal hernia surgery were evaluated in terms of erectile function, intercourse function, sexual desire, overall satisfaction and orgasm satisfaction using the International Index of Erectile function questionnaire (IIEF) scoring system before surgery and in the first and sixth months after surgery. Parameters evaluated with the IIEF score before the surgery and in the first and sixth months after surgery were compared statistically using the Wilcoxon test.
    RESULTS: The average age of patients was 46.2 ±11.2 years (range: 22-67). It was determined that all scores, apart from sexual desire (p = 0.08), significantly increased in the postoperative first and sixth months compared to the preoperative period. It was measured that the preoperative sexual desire score increased significantly in the postoperative sixth month (p <0.001). A significant score was also detected when all scores in the postoperative sixth month were compared to the postoperative first month.
    CONCLUSIONS: Inguinal hernia surgery positively affects sexual functions compared to the preoperative period. The improvement in sexual parameters in addition to the benefits of hernia removal and presence of no significant postoperative complications indicates that this surgery is useful and safe.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号