BACKGROUND: Avascular necrosis of the humeral head (AVN) is characterized by osteonecrosis secondary to disrupted blood flow to the glenohumeral joint. Following collapse of the humeral head, arthroplasty, namely total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or humeral head arthroplasty (hemiarthroplasty) is recommended standard of care. The literature is limited to underpowered and small sample sizes in comparing arthroplasty modalities. Therefore, the aims of this study were (1) to compare the 10-year survivorship of TSA and hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of AVN of the humeral head and (2) to identify differences in their revision etiologies.
METHODS: Patients who underwent primary TSA and hemiarthroplasty for AVN were identified using the PearlDiver database. TSA patients were matched by age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to the hemiarthroplasty cohort in a 4:1 ratio since TSA patients were generally older, sicker, and more often female. The 10-year cumulative incidence rate of all-cause revision was determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Multivariable analysis was conducted using Cox Proportional Hazard modeling. Chi-squared analysis was conducted to compare the indications for revisions between matched cohorts including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), dislocation, mechanical loosening, broken implants, periprosthetic fracture, and stiffness.
RESULTS: In total, 4,825 patients undergoing TSA and 1,969 patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for AVN were included in this study. The unmatched 10-year cumulative incidence of revision for patients who underwent TSA and hemiarthroplasty was 7.0% and 7.7%, respectively. The matched 10-year cumulative incidence of revision for patients who underwent TSA and hemiarthroplasty was 6.7% and 8.0%, respectively. When comparing the unmatched cohorts, TSA patients were at significantly higher risk of 10-year all-cause revision (HR: 1.39; P = 0.017) when compared to hemiarthroplasty patients. After matching, there was no significant difference in risk of 10-year all-cause revision (HR: 1.29; P = 0.148) and no difference in the observed etiologies for revision (P > 0.05 for all).
CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for confounders, only 6.7% of TSA and 8.0% hemiarthroplasties for humeral head AVN were revised within 10-years of index surgery. The demonstrated high and comparable long-term survivorship for both modalities supports the utilization of either for the AVN induced humeral head collapse.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the utility of three different risk stratification scores for gastroschisis neonates; simple/complex gastroschisis, gastroschisis prognostic score and risk stratification index.
METHODS: Data of neonates born with gastroschisis between the years 1993 and 2015 were collected. The national registers and patient records of four Finnish University Hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic and linear regression analysis were performed to identify independent predictors for adverse outcomes. The efficacy of these prognostic methods was further assessed using ROC-curves and DeLong (1988) test.
RESULTS: Gastroschisis risk stratification index was an acceptable predictor of in-hospital mortality, AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.48-0.91, p = 0.049. Complex gastroschisis and gastroschisis prognostic score were able to predict short bowel syndrome, AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.58-1.00, p = 0.012 and AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.59-1.00, p = 0.012, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: There are three easily obtainable risk stratification scores for outcome prediction in gastroschisis patients, however, their predictive ability did not have a statistical difference in the present study. The Gastroschisis risk stratification index seemed to perform moderately well in mortality prediction.

OBJECTIVE: To calculate unstratified and patient-specific meaningful improvement (MI) and patient acceptable symptom states (PASS) for the WOMAC total score in patients after total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR).
METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study. Anchor-based receiver operator characteristics curves were used to estimate MI and PASS thresholds.
RESULTS: Recovery paths were specific to individual characteristics of patients. An unstratified 12-months MI threshold of 28.1 (PASS: 13.3) and 17.8 (PASS: 15.8) for patients after THR and TKR, respectively, would unfairly detect critical recovery paths.
CONCLUSIONS: Thresholds for treatment success need to be as patient-specific as possible.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether the posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has any effect on postoperative standing balance or not.
METHODS: The patients who underwent bilateral TKA with either CR or PS design were analyzed. 30 patients (10 PS, 20 CR) were included for the final analysis. TKA designs were compared in terms of Lysholm score, range of motion, and balance characteristics including somatosensorial, vestibular, and visual balance scales, adaptation, limits of stability, and weight-bearing/squat tests by computerized dynamic posturography.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 59 months for CR, 49 months for PS group. The average Lysholm score values were 94 for CR and 95 for PS group, indicating functionally similar patient groups. The average knee flexion was found significantly higher in PS group (114°) compared to CR group (102°) (p = 0.009). In the CR group, motor adaptation tests (toes up/toes down) were found to be better (p = 0.034). In the on-axis velocity parameter (linear goal orientation) of limits of stability test, PS group patients were found to be more successful (p = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of CR implants can be recommended in patients with a high risk of falling since they provide better motor adaptation providing rapid reactions to rapid surface changes. Better linear goal orientation in PS group, providing a faster movement in an intended direction, should be considered when planning the ideal implant for the patients with relevant activities.

BACKGROUND: No studies exist comparing various femoral artery cannula sizes in children on ECMO. We hypothesize that smaller arterial cannulas provide adequate flow in children while decreasing vascular complications.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the ELSO database from 2012-2017. We included children undergoing femoral venoarterial ECMO between ages 12 and 18 years and weighing more than 30 kg. Arterial cannula sizes were grouped as: 15-16Fr, 17-18Fr, 19-20Fr and ≥21Fr. Arterial pump flow, bleeding complications, limb ischemia, and mechanical complications were compared by cannula size. Distal perfusion catheter and percutaneous placement were also compared for complications.
RESULTS: A total of 429 patients were included with 28.2% 15-16Fr, 32.2% 17-18Fr, 22.8% 19-20Fr, and 16.8% ≥ 21Fr arterial femoral cannulas. Median age was lower in the 15-16Fr group compared to the largest cannula group (14.7 years vs 15.5 years, p < 0.01). The overall mean arterial flow was 57.4 +/- 17.0 mL/kg/min with no difference in mean arterial flow rates among the cannula size groups (p = 0.85). There were no significant differences in all complications, bleeding or mechanical complications by arterial cannula size group. However, there was an increased risk of limb ischemia in the ≥21Fr group compared to the 15-16Fr group (OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.24-15.43; p = 0.02). Distal perfusion catheter was shown to increase the risk of mechanical complications (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.03-3.07; p = 0.04) but did not make a statistically significant difference in limb ischemia (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.12-1.11; p = 0.07).
CONCLUSIONS: Review of the ELSO database demonstrates that the use of larger arterial cannulas compared to 15-16Fr cannulas are not needed to achieve similar pump flows for hemodynamic support but the largest cannula sizes may increase the risk of ischemic complications.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous fixation of Lisfranc injuries is potentially less invasive to traditional open techniques but evidence of any clinical benefit is lacking. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous reduction and internal fixation (PRIF) of low energy Lisfranc injuries with a matched, control group of patients treated with ORIF.
METHODS: Over a seven-year period (2012-2019), 16 consecutive patients with a low energy Lisfranc injury (Myerson B2-type) were treated with PRIF. Patient demographics, injury mechanism and radiological outcomes were recorded within a prospectively maintained database at the institution. This study sample was matched for age, sex and mechanism of injury to a control group of 16 patients with similar low energy Lisfranc injuries (Myerson B2-type) treated with ORIF. Clinical outcome was compared using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score and Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ).
RESULTS: At a mean follow up of 43 months (95% CI 35.6 - 50.4), both the AOFAS and MOXFQ scores were significantly higher in the PRIF group compared to the control ORIF group (AOFAS 89.1vs 76.4, p=0.03; MOXFQ 10.0 vs 27.6, p=0.03). There were no immediate postoperative complications in either group. There was no radiological evidence of midfoot osteoarthritis in the PRIF group, three patients in the ORIF group developed midfoot osteoarthritis (p=0.2).
CONCLUSIONS: PRIF of low energy Lisfranc injures is a safe, minimally invasive technique and is associated with better mid-term clinical outcomes compared to ORIF.