Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) represents 2% of all leukemia cases, with men aged above 55 years being the most affected. The most common symptoms of this type of leukemia include splenomegaly, monocytopenia, and neutropenia. In the basic blood count examination, leukopenia with monocytopenia and granulocytopenia, as well as aplastic anemia and/or thrombocytopenia occur. The mutation of β-rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (BRAF) proto-oncogene, which can be found in nearly 100% of patients, is an important feature of HCL. Immunophenotypic analysis of the HCL cells reveals high expression of B-lineage antigens, including CD19, CD20, and CD22. Additionally, CD11c, CD25, CD103, and CD123 belong to specific markers of HCL. Lactate dehydrogenase activity and β-2-microglobulin concentration are also important in the patient\'s assessment. The differential diagnosis between HCL, hairy cell leukemia variant (HCL-V) and splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is of first importance. Currently, the main treatment for HCL involves the use of purine analogues, excluding pregnant women, individuals with severe infections, and those with relapsing HCL.

暂无摘要。

The association between Hairy Cell Leukemia (HCL) and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections (NTMs) is well described, most notably Mycobacterium kansasii. The exact pathophysiology is not known. We report a case of a 31-year-old male with concomitantly diagnosed HCL and disseminated M kansasii infection who presented with rash, pancytopenia, and bulky axillary lymphadenopathy. The M kansasii was initially diagnosed through use of cell-free DNA detection and confirmed by bone marrow and lymph node cultures. Hairy Cell Leukemia was diagnosed with peripheral flow cytometry and confirmed via the same bone marrow sample. His HCL was put into remission with a single course of cladribine and rituximab chemotherapy; however, his M kansasii infection persisted for 6 months despite aggressive antimicrobial and surgical therapy. It was finally controlled using high-dose rifampin in combination with azithromycin and ethambutol. This case highlights the known link between HCL and M kansasii. Furthermore, it hints at potential causes beyond chemotherapy-induced immunocompromise. Notable possibilities include HCL cells acting as sanctuary sites for M kansasii to evade the immune system, and subclinical M kansasii infections causing NLRP3 inflammasome overactivation to trigger the oncogenic transformation to HCL. More research into the pathophysiologic link between HCL and M kansasii infections would allow for more effective prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of these severe atypical infections which are the major cause of morbidity in the cladribine era of HCL treatment.

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and HCL-like disorders have to be distinguished because of their different biology and treatment response. Thus, we conducted a retrospective study on patients with HCL and hairy cell leukemia variant (HCLv) to assess diagnostic algorithms and treatment outcomes in a real-world setting. We analyzed 225 HCL and 26 HCLv patients with median follow-up of 67.9 months (HCL) and 20.1 months (HCLv). Median age at diagnosis was 56.2 (HCL) and 69.5 years (HCLv), male predominance was observed in both groups (76.0% vs. 73.1%). Diagnostics was mostly based on morphological evidence of hairy cells in the peripheral blood and bone marrow. At diagnosis, BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 94.7% of examined HCL patients and in no HCLv patient. Front-line treatment was indicated in 205 (91.1%) HCL and 18 (69.2%) HCLv patients. The majority of HCL patients were administered a cladribine-based regimen (91.2%). Overall response rate (ORR) was higher in cladribine-treated patients compared to those given other treatments (97.7% vs. 81.3%), the same applied with achieving Complete remission (CR) (91.2% vs. 62.5%). HCLv treatment was heterogeneous, but cladribine remained the most frequent option (44.4%) with ORR 81.3% and CR rates 43.8%. Second-line treatment was indicated in 52 HCL and 8 HCLv patients, 25.4% and 44.4% of those treated in first-line. In the whole HCL group, median time to next treatment (TTNT) was not reached and 10-year TTNT was estimated at 74.1%. HCLv patients who underwent first-line treatment had a median TTNT of 56 months. The median overall survival (OS) in HCL patients was not reached compared to HCLv with a median OS of 9.5 years. These data confirm an excellent prognosis for HCL patients treated with cladribine-based therapy. On the contrary, HCLv with its aggressive behavior represents a group of patients in whom novel treatment approaches are needed.

BACKGROUND: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare mature B-cell malignancy that is primarily treated with purine analogues. However, relapse remains a significant challenge, prompting the search for alternative therapies. The BRAF V600E mutation prevalent in HCL patients provides a target for treatment with vemurafenib.
METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included nine patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) HCL from six different centers. Patient data included demographics, prior treatments, clinical outcomes, and adverse events.
RESULTS: Patients received different treatment regimens between centers, including vemurafenib alone or in combination with rituximab. Despite the differences in protocols, all patients achieved at least a partial response, with seven patients achieving a complete response. Adverse events were generally mild with manageable side effects. The absence of myelotoxic effects and manageable side effects make BRAF inhibitors attractive, especially for patients ineligible for purine analogues or those with severe neutropenia.
CONCLUSIONS: Single agent vemurafenib or in combination with rituximab appears to be a promising therapeutic option for R/R HCL. Further research is needed to establish standardized treatment protocols and to investigate long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Splenic B-cell lymphoma/leukemia with prominent nucleoli (SBLPN) aka hairy cell leukemia variant (HCL-v) is a rare B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorder. The main diagnostic challenge is to differentiate SBLPN from Classical hairy cell leukemia (HCL-c), as the former faces inferior responses to therapies and a poor prognosis.
OBJECTIVE: The aim is to discuss the clinic-hematological and immunophenotyping findings of three cases of SBLPN.
METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study.
METHODS: From the year 2011 to 2021, flow cytometry of all the cases with HCL diagnosis was reviewed, and three cases with negative or dim CD25 and hematological presentation matching with SBLPN were picked up.
METHODS: Descriptive statistics is used.
RESULTS: All the cases were male. The age ranges from 43 to 64 years. Median hemoglobin concentration, total leucocyte count, and platelet count were 8.6 g/dL, 6.9 × 109/L, and 53 × 109/L, respectively. The atypical cells were medium to large. All three showed prominent nucleoli. Bone marrow biopsies showed an interstitial pattern of infiltration in all the cases. The hairy cells were positive for CD20, CD11c, and CD103. CD25 was dim positive in one case. Annexin A1 was negative in all three cases. BRAF V600E mutation analysis was done in one case and turned out negative for the mutation.
CONCLUSIONS: SBLPN is a rare entity, usually on-flow cytometry CD25 negative. However, in dim CD25-positive cases, BRAFV600E mutational analysis helps in discerning SBLPN diagnosis and differentiating it from HCL-c.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and HCL-like disorders, including HCL variant (HCL-V) and splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL), are a very heterogenous group of mature lymphoid B-cell disorders characterized by the identification of hairy cells, a specific genetic profile, a different clinical course and the need for appropriate treatment.
METHODS: Diagnosis of HCL is based on morphological evidence of hairy cells, an HCL immunologic score of 3 or 4 based on the CD11c, CD103, CD123, and CD25 expression, the trephine biopsy which makes it possible to specify the degree of tumoral bone marrow infiltration and the presence of BRAFV600E somatic mutation.
METHODS: Progression of patients with HCL is based on a large splenomegaly, leukocytosis, a high number of hairy cells in the peripheral blood, and the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene mutational status. VH4-34 positive HCL cases are associated with a poor prognosis, as well as HCL with TP53 mutations and HCL-V.
METHODS: Patients should be treated only if HCL is symptomatic. Chemotherapy with risk-adapted therapy purine analogs (PNAs) are indicated in first-line HCL patients. The use of chemo-immunotherapy combining cladribine (CDA) and rituximab (R) represents an increasingly used therapeutic approach. Management of relapsed/refractory disease is based on the use of BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) plus R, MEK inhibitors (MEKi), recombinant immunoconjugates targeting CD22, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), and Bcl-2 inhibitors (Bcl-2i). However, the optimal sequence of the different treatments remains to be determined.

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is an uncommon B-cell neoplasm uniquely characterized by a high prevalence of the BRAFV600E mutation, which leads to constitutive activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.1 In fact, the BRAFV600E point mutation is identified in nearly all cases of HCL; however, it is absent in HCL variant (vHCL) and rare in other B-cell neoplasms.2,3 Notably, in contrast to melanoma or other BRAF mutant solid tumors, HCL exhibits very few other mutations, potentially explaining the high response rates observed in patients treated with mutant BRAF-targeted agents, such as vemurafenib.

BACKGROUND: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is characterized by the underlying genetic lesion of BRAFV600E and responsiveness to BRAF inhibitors. We assessed the safety and activity of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib combined with obinutuzumab in patients with previously untreated HCL. METHODS: We conducted a single-arm, multicenter clinical study of vemurafenib plus obinutuzumab. Vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily was administered for four cycles, and obinutuzumab was administered in cycles 2 to 4. The primary end point was complete remission (CR). Secondary end points included assessment of safety, minimal residual disease (MRD), and BRAF allele burden according to digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled in the study, and 27 patients completed all four cycles of treatments and achieved CR (90%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 73 to 98). Three patients discontinued the study early because of adverse events and were not evaluable for response. Of the 27 patients who achieved CR, 26 patients (96%; 95% CI, 81 to 99) achieved MRD negativity. BRAFV600E allele was undetectable by ddPCR in all 21 evaluable patients. At a median follow-up of 34.9 months (95% CI, 29.6 to 36.9), no patient experienced disease relapse. The most common vemurafenib-related adverse events were rash and arthralgia. Febrile neutropenia occurred in two patients, and blood or platelet transfusions were required in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Combined time-limited vemurafenib and obinutuzumab achieved CR in more than 90% of patients with previously untreated HCL. In this small study, acquired vemurafenib resistance or dose-limiting toxicity was not observed. Patients were not observed long enough to reveal secondary malignancies. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03410875.)