Laparoscopic

腹腔镜
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是儿科人群中越来越常见的手术,尽管数字仍然明显低于成年人。目前,该手术由成人和儿科外科医生进行,对于应由专科小容量还是成人大容量外科医生进行该手术尚无共识.进行了文献检索,以比较由成人或小儿外科医生进行小儿LC后的结果。该分析包括19,993名患者。总的来说,由大量成人外科医生进行LC时,术后并发症减少,同时减少了停留时间和相关成本。儿童LC后的总发病率与成人相当。当由更大量的成人外科医生执行时,术后并发症和再入院率均有统计学显著降低.单纯性胆石症患者的发病率也降低。初步结果显示,在小儿胆石症患者中,由大量成人普通外科医生进行LC更安全。对于有其他儿科医生需求的更复杂的儿童,建议由小儿外科医生进行手术。仍然需要进行直接比较的进一步研究。
    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is an increasingly common operation in the pediatric population, although numbers remain significantly lower than in adults. Currently, this operation is performed by both adult and pediatric surgeons and there is no consensus as to whether specialist low-volume or adult high-volume surgeons should be performing this operation. A literature search was performed to compare the outcomes following pediatric LC when performed by adult or pediatric surgeons. 19,993 patients were included in this analysis. Overall, post-operative complications were reduced when LC was performed by high-volume adult surgeons, along with reduced length of stay and associated cost. Overall morbidity following LC in children is comparable to adults. When performed by higher volume adult surgeons, there was a statically significant reduction in post-operative complications and re-admission rates. Morbidity was also reduced in patients with simple cholelithiasis. Initial results show that in pediatric patients presenting with cholelithiasis, LC performed by a high-volume adult general surgeon is safer. In more complex children with needs from other specialist pediatricians, surgery performed by a pediatric surgeon is recommended. Further research with direct comparisons is still required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:据报道,在既往癌症患者中,第二次从头胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的发生率为6%。随着系统性治疗的改善生存率的提高,在先前的PDAC之后,从头PDAC的发生率可能会变得更加普遍。3-8在这种情况下,详细介绍了在先前接受胰十二指肠切除术治疗的PDAC后,对第二次从头PDAC进行全胰腺切除术的结构化和逐步方法。
    方法:我们提出了两个相似的病例。第一位患者是一名71岁的女性,患有从头PDAC,第二个是50岁的女性,从头尾巴PDAC。为了排除复发,采用了免疫组织化学染色以及由两名经验丰富的病理学家进行的活检。两名患者均在4年和3年前接受了PDAC的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术。每位患者接受了四个周期的新辅助化疗,并接受了安全的腹腔镜全胰腺切除术。
    方法:手术前,进行三维解剖和港口部位建模,以优化对肿瘤之间空间关系的理解,血管,以及涉及的相邻器官。端口位置建模(包括气腹模拟)着重于最佳端口设置,以解剖门静脉的胆胰肢。胆胰肢完全动员后,胆胰肢主要分为肝肠和胰肠吻合术。必须格外小心,以避免意外的钉伤肝动脉或腹腔干。解剖的其余部分类似于标准的远端胰脾切除术。
    结论:虚拟胰腺切除术模型有助于为这种情况下的关键步骤进行最佳设置,即从门静脉切开胰肠造口术。胆胰肢在肝空肠吻合术和胰肠吻合术之间的早期划分对于促进解剖的其余部分至关重要。腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后用于从头PDAC的腹腔镜全胰腺切除术可能变得越来越普遍,因为既往PDAC患者的生存率随着时间的推移而提高。
    BACKGROUND: The incidence of a second de novo pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) among patients with prior cancer has been reported to be 6%.1,2 however, as survival increases through improvements in systemic therapy, this incidence of a de novo PDAC after prior PDAC may become more prevalent.3-8 In this context, a structured and stepwise approach to a total pancreatectomy for a second de novo PDAC after a prior PDAC treated with a pancreaticoduodenectomy is detailed.
    METHODS: We present two similar cases. The first patient was a 71-year-old female with de novo body PDAC, and the second was a 50-year-old female with de novo tail PDAC. To rule out recurrence, immunohistochemical staining as well as the review of biopsies by two experienced pathologists were employed. Both patients had undergone a laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy for PDAC 4 and 3 years prior. Each patient received four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent a safe laparoscopic total pancreatectomy.
    METHODS: Prior to surgery, three-dimensional anatomic and port site modeling is performed to optimize the understanding of the spatial relationship between the tumor, blood vessels, and adjacent organs involved. The port site modeling (including pneumoperitoneum simulation) focuses on the optimal port set-up for dissecting the biliopancreatic limb off the portal vein. Following complete mobilization of the biliopancreatic limb, the biliopancreatic limb is staple-divided between the hepatico- and pancreaticojejunostomy. Great care must be taken to avoid accidental staple injury to the hepatic artery or celiac trunk. The remainder of the dissection is akin to a standard distal pancreaticosplenectomy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Virtual pancreatectomy modeling facilitates an optimal set-up for the critical step of this case, i.e. dissection of the pancreaticojejunostomy off the portal vein. Early division of the biliopancreatic limb between hepatico- and pancreatojejunostomy is crucial to facilitating the remainder of the dissection. Laparoscopic total pancreatectomy for a de novo PDAC after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy may become more common as survival of patients with prior PDAC improves over time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:教科书结果已被纳入各种肿瘤环境的质量评估措施;然而,新辅助放化疗(nCRT)后低位直肠癌患者尚未应用该方法.本研究旨在研究nCRT后接受低位直肠癌手术切除的患者获得教科书结果的患病率和预测因素。
    方法:本研究是对前瞻性多中心LASRE试验的事后亚组分析,特别招募了诊断时距离齿状线5厘米以内的直肠癌患者,直径小于6厘米的肿瘤,和接受根治性腹腔镜或开腹切除术的患者。共纳入597例临床分期为直径小于6cm的cT3-4aN0-2M0肿瘤,接受新辅助放化疗后进行根治性切除的患者。
    结果:60.0%的患者达到了教科书结果。多因素logistic回归分析显示体重指数>25kg/m2(OR=0.594,P=0.01),肿瘤距肛门边缘>40mm(OR=5.518,P<0.001),手术时间>202min(OR=0.675,P=0.04),和腹腔镜方法(OR=1.497,P=0.04)是接受nCRT和根治性切除术的低位直肠癌患者实现教科书结局的独立预测因素。构建了实现教科书结果的预测列线图,产生0.727的C指数。
    结论:腹腔镜切除术在提高实现教科书结果的概率方面显示出有希望的潜力。
    BACKGROUND: Textbook outcome has been incorporated into quality assessment measures in various oncological settings; however, it has not been applied to patients with low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This study aimed to examine the prevalence and predictors of achieving a textbook outcome in patients undergoing surgical resection of low rectal cancer after nCRT.
    METHODS: This study was a post hoc subgroup analysis of the prospective multicentric LASRE trial, which specifically enrolled patients with rectal cancer located within 5 cm from the dentate line at diagnosis, tumors with diameters less than 6 cm, and patients who underwent radical laparoscopic or open resection. A total of 597 patients who had clinically staged cT3-4aN0-2M0 tumors with diameters less than 6 cm and who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical resection were included.
    RESULTS: Textbook outcome was achieved in 60.0 % of patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that body mass index >25 kg/m2 (OR = 0.594, P = 0.01), tumor distance from the anal verge >40 mm (OR = 5.518, P < 0.001), operative time >202 min (OR = 0.675, P = 0.04), and laparoscopic approach (OR = 1.497, P = 0.04) were independently predictive factors for the achievement of a textbook outcome in low rectal cancer patients undergoing nCRT and radical resection. A predictive nomogram for achieving a textbook outcome was constructed, yielding a C-index of 0.727.
    CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection exhibited promising potential in improving the probability of achieving a textbook outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:袖状胃切除术(SG)仍然是严重肥胖的安全有效治疗方法。机器人SG(RSG)的数量从2015年到2021年稳步增加。先前的研究表明,RSG的某些不良后果发生率更高,但没有考虑到使用的吻合器。
    目的:本研究的目的是比较RSG与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)的结果,占订书机类型使用。
    方法:国家医院衍生的行政数据。
    方法:本研究使用PINCAI医疗保健数据库。分析的队列包括2019年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间进行的选择性LSG或RSG。病人,医院,billing,提供者,保险,和手术数据被捕获。出血,泄漏,和其他结果由ICD-10-CM诊断代码确定。倾向评分匹配(PSM)比较RSG与SureForm订书机之间的结果带动力订书机的LSG。
    结果:分析了56,013LSG和13,832RSG。RSG从2019年的15%增加到2021年的25%,RSG的机器人订书机利用率绝对增加了27%。PSM分析比较,5434RSG与SureForm订书机vs.5434LSG与电动吻合器显示相同的并发症发生率,较短的LOS,但使用RSG的手术时间更长。
    结论:当考虑使用的订书机类型时,RSG和LSG后的患者结局相同.
    BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) remains a safe and effective treatment for severe obesity. The number of robotic SG (RSG) has steadily increased from 2015 to 2021. Prior studies have shown higher rates of some adverse outcomes with RSG but have not accounted for staplers used.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare outcomes for RSG compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), accounting for stapler type used.
    METHODS: National hospital derived administrative data.
    METHODS: The PINC AI Healthcare Database was used for the current study. Analyzed cohort included elective LSG or RSG performed between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021. Patient, hospital, billing, provider, insurance, and operative data were captured. Bleeding, leak, and other outcomes were identified by ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes. Propensity score matching (PSM) compared outcomes between RSG with SureForm stapler vs. LSG with powered stapler.
    RESULTS: 56,013 LSG and 13,832 RSG were analyzed. RSG increased from 15 % in 2019 to 25 % in 2021 with an absolute 27 ​% increase in robotic stapler utilization for RSG. PSM analysis compared, 5434 RSG with SureForm Stapler vs. 5434 LSG with powered staplers showed equivalent complication rates, shorter LOS, but longer operative time with RSG.
    CONCLUSIONS: When stapler type used is accounted for, patient outcomes following RSG and LSG are equivalent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)和腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)是亚洲两种最肥胖的手术。然而,长期结局的比较仍然有限.
    目的:为了比较长期体重减轻的程度,LRYGB和LSG手术后合并症和并发症发生率的缓解。
    方法:对所有在2005年5月至2018年5月期间接受LSG或LRYGB的患者进行回顾性分析,随访至少1-5年。收集人口统计数据。
    结果:在总共342名患者中,159例患者接受了原发性LSG,183例患者接受了LRYGB。LSG组术前BMI显著高于LRYGB组(54.7±12.6kg/m2vs48.2±8.2kg/m2,P=0.001)。LSG和LRYGB组之间的合并症相似。LSG组5年后的平均总体重减轻百分比(%TWL)为23.6±1.7%LRYGB组的29.9±1.3%(P=0.005)和LRYGB在所有时间点均导致比LSG更大的体重减轻。两组合并症的缓解情况相似,除了LRYGB组的血脂异常明显更好。LSG组的总并发症为35.2%。LRYGB组为20.8%(P=0.003)。
    结论:我们的中心显示,就所有时间点的总重量损失百分比而言,LRYGB比LSG具有更好的结果。从长远来看,与LRYGB相比,LSG显示出更高的总体并发症发生率。
    BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are the two most bariatric procedures in Asia. However, a comparison of long-term outcomes is still limited.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of long-term weight loss, remission of comorbidities and complication rates after LRYGB and LSG procedures.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for all patients who underwent LSG or LRYGB between May 2005 and May 2018 at a single institute with at least 1-5 years of follow up. Demographic data were collected.
    RESULTS: Of the total 342 patients, 159 underwent primary LSG and 183 patients underwent LRYGB. Preoperative BMI in the LSG group was significantly higher than the LRYGB group (54.7 ± 12.6 kg/m2 vs 48.2 ± 8.2 kg/m2, P = 0.001). Comorbidities between LSG and LRYGB groups were similar. Mean percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) at 5 years after was 23.6 ± 1.7 % in the LSG group vs. 29.9 ± 1.3 % in the LRYGB group (P = 0.005) and LRYGB resulted in greater weight loss than LSG at all time points. The remission of comorbidities were similar in both groups, except that dyslipidemia was significantly better in the LRYGB group. Overall complications were 35.2 % in the LSG group vs. 20.8 % in the LRYGB group (P = 0.003).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our center revealed that LRYGB had better results than LSG in terms of percentage total weight loss at all time points. In the long term, LSG showed a higher overall complication rate compared to LRYGB.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管在一些大型肝胆中心已经报道了用于肝门部胆管癌(HCCA)的机器人根治性切除术,胆肠重建(BER)仍然是阻碍手术成功的关键步骤。本研究旨在评估BER在HCCA机器人根治性切除术中的可行性和质量,并提出技术建议。方法对2016年1月至2023年7月在浙江省人民医院接受微创根治术的HCCA患者进行回顾性研究。1:2倾向得分匹配(PSM),广泛用于减少选择偏差,是为了评估结果,特别是与BER相关的数据,在机器人和腹腔镜手术之间。纳入46例HCCA患者;10例接受了机器人辅助切除,而其他人则接受了腹腔镜手术。以1:2的比例进行PSM后,将10和20名患者分配到机器人辅助组和腹腔镜组,分别。两组的基线特征总体上平衡良好。机器人组平均肝切除时间长于腹腔镜组(139.5±38.8vs108.1±35.8min,P=0.036)。然而,前者术中失血较少[200(50-500)vs310(100-850)ml],尽管没有统计学差异(P=0.109)。残余胆管数量分别为2.6±1.3和2.7±1.2(P=0.795),两组吻合口均为1.6±0.7(P=0.965)。误码率时间分别为38.4±13.6和59.1±25.5min(P=0.024),占总手术时间的9.9±2.8%和15.4±4.8%(P=0.001)。虽然腹腔镜组术后胆漏发生率(40%)高于机器人组(10%),两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.204);拔管分别为6.7±4.4和12.1±11.7天(P=0.019);吻合口狭窄和结石发生率分别为10%和30%(P=0.372),0%和15%(P=0.532),分别。两组均未出现出血或胆漏相关死亡。HCCA的机器人根治性切除术可提供与常规腹腔镜手术相当的围手术期结果,并且在吻合时间和质量方面趋于有利。随着手术技术和经验的提高,我们对其未来的广泛应用持乐观态度。
    Although robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) has been reported in some large hepatobiliary centers, biliary-enteric reconstruction (BER) remains a critical step that hampers the operation\'s success. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and quality of BER in robotic radical resection of HCCA and propose technical recommendations. A retrospective study was conducted on patients with HCCA who underwent minimally invasive radical resection at Zhejiang Provincial People\'s Hospital between January 2016 and July 2023. A 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM), widely used to reduce selection bias, was performed to evaluate the outcomes, especially BER-related data, between the robotic and laparoscopic surgery. Forty-six patients with HCCA were enrolled; ten underwent robotic-assisted resection, while the others underwent laparoscopic surgery. After PSM at a ratio of 1:2, 10 and 20 patients were assigned to the robot-assisted and laparoscopic groups, respectively. The baseline characteristics of both groups were generally well-balanced. The average liver resection time was longer in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (139.5 ± 38.8 vs 108.1 ± 35.8 min, P = 0.036). However, the former had less intraoperative blood loss [200 (50-500) vs 310 (100-850) ml], despite no statistical difference (P = 0.109). The number of residual bile ducts was 2.6 ± 1.3 and 2.7 ± 1.2 (P = 0.795), and anastomoses were both 1.6 ± 0.7 in the two groups (P = 0.965). The time of BER was 38.4 ± 13.6 and 59.1 ± 25.5 min (P = 0.024), accounting for 9.9 ± 2.8% and 15.4 ± 4.8% of the total operation time (P = 0.001). Although postoperative bile leakage incidence in laparoscopic group (40%) was higher than that in robotic group (10%), there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.204); 6.7 ± 4.4 and 12.1 ± 11.7 days were observed for tube drawing (P = 0.019); anastomosis stenosis and calculus rate was 10% and 30% (P = 0.372), 0% and 15% (P = 0.532), respectively. Neither group had hemorrhage- or bile leakage-related deaths. Robotic radical resection for HCCA may offer perioperative outcomes comparable to conventional laparoscopic procedures and tends to be advantageous in terms of anastomosis time and quality. We are optimistic about its wide application in the future with the improvement of surgical techniques and experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:截至2022年,患者遵守术后指南可以将腹腔镜腹部手术后的并发症风险降低高达52.4%。随着各种术前教育干预措施(POEI)的可用性,了解哪些POEI可以改善整个程序的患者预后。
    目的:本研究旨在通过系统回顾文献中报道的所有POEI来确定哪种POEI对患者预后最有效。
    方法:总共,4753篇调查各种POEI的文章(例如,视频,介绍,移动应用程序,和一对一的教育或辅导)是从PubMed收集的,Embase,和Scopus数据库。纳入标准为接受腹部腹腔镜手术的成年患者,随机对照试验,以及提供术后结果的研究。排除标准包括未以英文发表且无结果报告的研究。标题和摘要及全文文章与POEI随机对照研究是基于上述标准通过盲法筛选,使用Covidence(Veritas健康创新)进行双重审查。通过Cochrane偏差风险工具评估研究质量。对收录的文章进行了教育内容分析,干预时机,干预类型,和适合特定手术的术后结果。
    结果:只有17项研究符合我们的标准,1831例患者接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术,减肥手术(胃旁路和胃袖),还有结肠切除术.总的来说,15项研究报告了至少1名患者术后结果的统计学显着改善。根据Cochrane标准,这些研究均未发现总体偏倚风险较高。总的来说,41%(7/17)的纳入研究使用直接个人教育改善了几乎所有手术类型的结果,虽然教育视频对焦虑的影响最大,恶心,术后疼痛(P<0.01)。直接团体教育显示体重显着改善,BMI,锻炼,33%(2/6)的腹腔镜胃旁路术研究中出现抑郁症状。
    结论:直接教育(以个人或团体为基础)对术后腹腔镜手术结局有积极影响。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42023438698;https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?RecordID=438698。
    BACKGROUND: As of 2022, patient adherence to postoperative guidelines can reduce the risk of complications by up to 52.4% following laparoscopic abdominal surgery. With the availability of various preoperative education interventions (POEIs), understanding which POEI results in improvement in patient outcomes across the procedures is imperative.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine which POEI could be the most effective on patient outcomes by systematically reviewing all the POEIs reported in the literature.
    METHODS: In total, 4753 articles investigating various POEIs (eg, videos, presentations, mobile apps, and one-on-one education or coaching) were collected from the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing abdominal laparoscopic surgery, randomized controlled trials, and studies that provided postoperative outcomes. Exclusion criteria included studies not published in English and with no outcomes reported. Title and abstract and full-text articles with POEI randomized controlled studies were screened based on the above criteria through a blinded, dual review using Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation). Study quality was assessed through the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The included articles were analyzed for educational content, intervention timing, intervention type, and postoperative outcomes appropriate for a particular surgery.
    RESULTS: Only 17 studies matched our criteria, with 1831 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bariatric surgery (gastric bypass and gastric sleeve), and colectomy. In total, 15 studies reported a statistically significant improvement in at least 1 patient postoperative outcome. None of these studies were found to have an overall high risk of bias according to Cochrane standards. In total, 41% (7/17) of the included studies using direct individual education improved outcomes in almost all surgery types, while educational videos had the greatest statistically significant impact for anxiety, nausea, and pain postoperatively (P<.01). Direct group education demonstrated significant improvement in weight, BMI, exercise, and depressive symptoms in 33% (2/6) of the laparoscopic gastric bypass studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Direct education (individual or group based) positively impacts postoperative laparoscopic surgery outcomes.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42023438698; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=438698.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:盆腔器官脱垂(POP)是一个影响全球数百万女性的公共卫生问题,对生活质量有重大影响。从FDA关于在POP手术中使用网状植入物的并发症的声明到已经显示出益处和副作用的研究,我们进行了一项系统评价,调查了与POP修复手术网状物植入相关的并发症.
    方法:通过对科学数据库的全面搜索确定了相关研究。包括评估网片在POP手术中的使用和相关并发症报告的研究。
    结果:在2816项研究中,28项研究符合研究标准,共有8958名患者,揭示了在腹腔镜网状手术中,与阴道网状手术相比,网状物暴露率更低,在其他并发症中。
    结论:腹腔镜网状手术作为POP修复的长期方法优于阴道网状手术,提供更低的并发症发生率和潜在更好的解剖学成功率。然而,对于因特定因素而不适合进行腹腔镜检查的患者,阴道网片手术仍是一种有价值的选择.未来的研究应该探索替代技术,比如有或没有网眼的胸膜,进一步改善手术效果和患者体验。
    BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a public health problem that influences millions of women around the globe, and it has a significant impact on the quality of life. From the FDA statement regarding the complications of using mesh implants in POP surgery to studies that have shown the benefits and side effects, we conducted a systematic review investigating the complications associated with surgical mesh implantation for POP repair.
    METHODS: Relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive search of scientific databases. Studies evaluating the use of mesh in POP surgery and reporting on associated complications were included.
    RESULTS: Among 2816 studies, 28 studies met the research criteria, with a total number of 8958 patients, revealing that in laparoscopic mesh surgery, the rate of mesh exposure was lower compared to vaginal mesh surgery, among other complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic mesh surgery is superior as a long-term approach for POP repair compared to vaginal mesh surgery, offering lower complication rates and potentially better anatomical success. However, vaginal mesh surgery remains a valuable option for patients who are unsuitable for laparoscopy due to specific factors. Future research should explore alternative techniques, like pectopexy with or without mesh, to further improve surgical outcomes and patient experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    髋臼骨折是创伤学中最具挑战性的损伤之一。复杂的解剖结构通常需要广泛的手术方法,以免对周围的神经血管结构造成医源性损伤。作为一种可行的选择,近年来出现了微创内镜技术。本文报道了专门为微创髋臼手术设计的新型外皮上钢板的不同耦合机制的可行性。
    共有34名参与者参与了本研究,他们的关节镜和手术经验不同。腹腔镜模型用于通过失败的尝试次数比较四种不同的耦合机制,钢板固定所需的时间,手术经验以及学习成功对每个个体耦合机制的影响。此外,通过问卷评估每种机制的可行性.
    结果表明,采用开槽和压力滑动耦合机构的板减少了失败的尝试,并减少了试验时间,特别是在对比唯一的滑动机构。此外,我们的研究显示,熟练掌握内镜操作对结局有显著影响.值得注意的是,参与者的主观评价表明,压力底座和压力滑动底板设计是最支持和可行的设计。
    总之,本研究首次评估了微创手术的不同钢板和联轴器设计,表明具有开槽和压力滑动机构的板具有优越的可行性。
    UNASSIGNED: Acetabular fractures are among the most challenging injuries in traumatology. The complex anatomy usually requires extensive surgical approaches baring the risk for iatrogenic damage to surrounding neurovascular structures. As a viable alternative, minimally invasive endoscopic techniques have emerged during the recent years. This paper reports on the feasibility of different coupling mechanisms for a novel suprapectineal plate especially designed for minimally invasive acetabular surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: A total number of 34 participants contributed to the present study, who differed in their arthroscopic and surgical experience. A laparoscopic model was used to compare four different coupling mechanisms by the number of failed attempts, the time required for plate fixation, the influence of surgical experience as well as the learning success for each individual coupling mechanism. Moreover, the feasibility of each mechanism was evaluated by a questionnaire.
    UNASSIGNED: The results demonstrate that plates employing grooved and pressure-sliding coupling mechanisms exhibit fewer failed attempts and reduce trial times, especially in contrast to sole sliding mechanisms. Furthermore, our study revealed that proficiency in endoscopic procedures significantly influenced the outcome. Notably, the subjective evaluation of the participants show that the pressure base and pressure-slide base plate designs are the most supportive and feasible designs.
    UNASSIGNED: In summary, the present study evaluates for the first-time different plate and coupling designs for minimal-invasive surgery, indicating a superior feasibility for plates with a grooved and pressure-sliding mechanism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管腹腔镜引导的微创肝切除术成为切除肝细胞癌(HCC)的主要方法,与这些技术无缝结合以实现有效止血和抑制手术边缘残留肿瘤的合适生物材料仍存在显著差距。电纺薄膜越来越多地用于伤口闭合,然而,在微创肝癌切除术中使用预制电纺膜止血受到手术时间延长的阻碍,实施的复杂性,手术期间能见度有限,术后预防HCC复发不足。在这项研究中,我们将蒙脱石-氧化铁片集成到PVP聚合物框架中,增强所得电纺聚乙烯吡咯烷酮(PVP)/蒙脱石-氧化铁(MI)薄膜(缩写为PMI)的鲁棒性,止血能力,和磁热特性。与体外预制电纺膜相比,电纺PMI膜被设计为在肝切除术期间在腹腔镜引导下在肝伤口上原位形成。这种设计提供了优越的伤口适应性,有助于细致的伤口闭合和快速止血,从而简化了操作过程,并最终减轻了医疗保健专业人员的工作量。此外,当暴露于交变磁场时,该薄膜可以有效地切除残留的肿瘤,显着提高肝癌的治疗效果。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
    Despite laparoscopic-guided minimally invasive hepatectomy emerging as the primary approach for resecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there\'s still a significant gap in suitable biomaterials that seamlessly integrate with these techniques to achieve effective hemostasis and suppress residual tumors at the surgical margin. Electrospun films are increasingly used for wound closure, yet the employment of prefabricated electrospun films for hemostasis during minimally invasive HCC resection is hindered by prolonged operation times, complexity in implementation, limited visibility during surgery, and inadequate postoperative prevention of HCC recurrence. In this study, we integrated montmorillonite-iron oxide sheets into the PVP polymer framework, enhancing the resulting electrospun polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) /montmorillonite-iron oxide (MI) film (abbreviated as PMI) with robustness, hemostatic capability, and magnetocaloric properties. In contrast to the in vitro prefabricated electrospun films, the electrospun PMI film is designed to be formed in situ on liver wounds under laparoscopic guidance during hepatectomy. This design affords superior wound adaptability, facilitating meticulous wound closure and expeditious hemostasis, thereby simplifying the operative process and ultimately alleviating the workload of healthcare professionals. Moreover, when exposed to an alternating magnetic field, the film can efficiently ablate residual tumors, significantly augmenting the treatment efficacy of HCC. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号