Language Disorders

语言障碍
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在有语言障碍的儿童中,同伴互动困难通常会增加,然而,这些困难背后的机制尚不清楚.先前的研究表明,糟糕的冲突管理,社会退出,情绪调节困难,而亲社会行为的减少可能会导致同伴互动困难。然而,这项研究经常使用成人的观点,未能承认孩子对这些经历的看法。本研究旨在从语言障碍儿童的角度定性调查同伴互动的看法。
    7名年龄在7至10岁之间的参与者参加了比赛。所有参与者都被诊断出患有语言障碍,语言是他们的主要困难领域。参与者是从专业语言学校和通过在线数据库招募的。进行了半结构化访谈,参与者可以选择口头或创造性地回答问题,使用玩具或绘图材料。使用解释现象学分析对访谈笔录进行了分析。
    参与者重视游戏,谈话,帮助别人。他们认为与同龄人共度时光可以减轻孤独感。然而,有时需要孤独,因为社交互动可能是压倒性的。参与者发现冲突具有挑战性,并在调节情绪方面表现出困难。参与者依靠逃跑,报复,或者向成年人求助,解决冲突。
    研究结果表明,患有语言障碍的儿童具有社会动机,并且在显示亲社会行为方面具有相对优势。然而,语言障碍儿童需要支持,以促进积极的关系。这种支持包括帮助与同行建立更深层次的联系,有机会在需要的时候独处,并提供熟练的冲突解决和情绪调节策略。
    UNASSIGNED: Peer interaction difficulties are often elevated amongst children with language disorders, yet the mechanisms underlying these difficulties are unclear. Previous research indicates that poor conflict management, social withdrawal, emotion regulation difficulties, and reduced prosocial behavior may contribute to peer interaction difficulties. However, this research often uses adult perspectives, failing to acknowledge child perceptions of these experiences. The present study aimed to qualitatively investigate perceptions of peer interactions from the perspective of children with language disorders.
    UNASSIGNED: Seven participants aged between 7- and 10-years-old took part. All participants were diagnosed with a language disorder and had language as their primary area of difficulty. Participants were recruited from a specialist language school and via an online database. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, with participants given the choice to answer questions verbally or creatively, using toys or drawing materials. Interview transcripts were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants valued play, conversation, and helping others. They felt that spending time with peers could alleviate loneliness. However, sometimes solitude was needed as social interaction could be overwhelming. Participants found conflict challenging and exhibited difficulties with regulating emotions. Participants relied on running away, retaliation, or asking an adult for help, to resolve conflict.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings suggest that children with language disorders are socially motivated and have relative strengths in displaying prosocial behavior. However, children with language disorders require support to promote positive relationships. This support includes help with making deeper connections with peers, opportunities to spend time alone when needed, and providing adept conflict resolution and emotion regulation strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有语言困难的人不能面对与社交技能相关的挑战。这些语言障碍会影响学业,工作环境,和社会互动,导致适应不良和攻击行为。年轻囚犯很有可能遇到无法识别的语言缺陷。是的,因此,有必要分析可能影响犯罪行为(毒品持有/消费和性别暴力犯罪)的语言病理学。有许多标准化的测试来评估和检测英语成人的语言障碍。然而,西班牙语的选项相对较少;没有定性和深入评估语言的测试。大多数研究是针对儿童和青少年进行的。
    提出一种可靠的编码系统,用于纠正和解释被控拥有毒品或毒品的囚犯的写作过程评估(PROESC)中的叙述(论文和叙述)。消费和性别暴力犯罪。
    样本由287名男性组成。
    他们完成了人口统计,冒犯,和机构中的行为访谈,国际人格障碍考试(IPDE),和PROESC。
    我们发现所提出的编码系统具有很高的一致性,也就是说,较高的评分者间可靠性。
    用于纠正和解释叙述的分类系统被证明是可靠的。
    UNASSIGNED: People with language difficulties cannot face challenges related to social skills. Those language disorders affect academic, work environments, and social interaction, leading to maladaptive and aggressive behaviors. Young inmates are at high risk of experiencing unrecognized language deficiencies. It is, therefore, necessary to analyze linguistic pathologies that can influence criminal behavior (drugs possession/consumption and gender violence crimes). There are many standardized tests to evaluate and detect language difficulties in adults in English. However, there are relatively few options in Spanish; there are no tests that evaluate language qualitatively and in depth. Most of the research is conducted with children and adolescents.
    UNASSIGNED: To propose a reliable coding system for the correction and interpretation of narratives (essays and narratives) from the Battery for the Evaluation of Writing Processes (PROESC) in the prisoners charged of drugs possession or consumption and gender violence crimes.
    UNASSIGNED: The sample was composed of 287 men.
    UNASSIGNED: They completed the Demographic, Offense, and Behavioral Interview in Institutions, the International Personality Disorders Examination (IPDE), and PROESC.
    UNASSIGNED: We found that the proposed coding system presented high concordance, that is, high inter-rater reliability.
    UNASSIGNED: The classification system for the correction and interpretation of narratives was shown to be reliable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    语言障碍的评估在神经退行性疾病的早期临床诊断中可能很有价值。包括阿尔茨海默病(AD)。
    本研究旨在探索宏观结构水平的语言标记是否可以利用结构化叙述的生产数据帮助个体在痴呆症连续体中放置。
    我们对170名希腊语使用者进行了图片序列叙事话语任务:年轻的健康对照(yHC),认知完整的健康老年人(eHC),患有主观认知障碍(SCI)的老年参与者,轻度认知障碍(MCI),和轻度/中度AD痴呆。结构核磁共振成像,病史,神经系统检查,和神经心理学/认知筛查确定每个说话者的状态,以适当地分组他们。
    数据分析显示,宏观结构指数,无关信息,和叙述密度标记可以追踪认知衰退和AD(p<0.001;宏观结构指数:eHC与AD敏感性93.8%,特异性74.4%,MCI与AD的敏感性为93.8%,特异性66.7%;叙述密度:eHC与AD灵敏度90.6%,特异性71.8%,MCI与AD的敏感性为93.8%,特异性66.7%)。此外,AD患者的叙事复杂性受到显著影响,在MCI和AD的说话者的叙述中,无关的信息增加了,而叙述长度似乎没有明显区分认知完整组和临床组。
    叙事宏观结构指数提供了有价值的信息,这些信息揭示了(完全)完整的认知能力下降和AD的微妙早期迹象,表明包含基于语言的评估工具将促进临床过程。
    UNASSIGNED: The assessment of language deficits can be valuable in the early clinical diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer\'s disease (AD).
    UNASSIGNED: The present study aims to explore whether language markers at the macrostructural level could assist with the placement of an individual across the dementia continuum employing production data from structured narratives.
    UNASSIGNED: We administered a Picture Sequence Narrative Discourse Task to 170 speakers of Greek: young healthy controls (yHC), cognitively intact healthy elders (eHC), elder participants with subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and with AD dementia at the mild/moderate stages. Structural MRIs, medical history, neurological examination, and neuropsychological/cognitive screening determined the status of each speaker to appropriately groupthem.
    UNASSIGNED: The data analysis revealed that the Macrostructure Index, Irrelevant Info, and Narration Density markers can track cognitive decline and AD (p < 0.001; Macrostructural Index: eHC versus AD Sensitivity 93.8%, Specificity 74.4%, MCI versus AD Sensitivity 93.8%, Specificity 66.7%; Narration Density: eHC versus AD Sensitivity 90.6%, Specificity 71.8%, MCI versus AD Sensitivity 93.8%, Specificity 66.7%). Moreover, Narrative Complexity was significantly affected for subjects with AD, Irrelevant Info increased in the narrations of speakers with MCI and AD, while Narration Length did not appear to indubitably differentiate between the cognitively intact groups and the clinical ones.
    UNASSIGNED: Narrative Macrostructure Indices provide valuable information on the language profile of speakers with(out) intact cognition revealing subtle early signs of cognitive decline and AD suggesting that the inclusion of language-based assessment tools would facilitate the clinical process.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究提出了两个稳定的语言指标,即成功预测率(SPR)和不流利度(DF),客观地量化与精神分裂症相关的语言障碍。这些新颖的语言指标可以通过建模语音信息和微调技术来捕获患者语音中的离题反应和不连贯性。此外,这些指标表现出文化敏感性,同时对精神分裂症的语言异常提供更全面的评估.这项研究在从中国主要心理健康论坛获得的750MB文本语料库上对ELECTRA预训练语言模型进行了微调。微调语言模型的有效性在包括38名诊断为精神分裂症的个体和25名精心匹配的健康对照的组中得到验证。该研究探讨了微调语言模型与阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)项目之间的关联。结果表明,健康对照组的SPR较高,通过预训练的语言模型表明更好的语言理解。相反,精神分裂症患者的DF水平更高,表示更不一致的语言结构。语言特征与P2(概念混乱)之间的关系表明,P2阳性的患者表现出较低的SPR和较高的DF。使用组合的SPR和DF特征的二进制逻辑回归在分类P2时实现了84.5%的准确度,比传统特征的性能高出20.5%。此外,拟议的语言特征在区分FTD(形式思维障碍)方面优于传统的语言特征,如多元线性回归分析所示。
    This research presents two stable language metrics, namely Successful Prediction Rate (SPR) and Disfluency (DF), to objectively quantify the linguistic disturbances associated with schizophrenia. These novel language metrics can capture both off-topic responses and incoherence in patients\' speech by modeling speech information and fine-tuning techniques. Additionally, these metrics exhibit cultural sensitivity while providing a more comprehensive evaluation of linguistic abnormalities in schizophrenia. This research fine-tuned the ELECTRA Pretrained Language Model on a 750 MB text corpus obtained from major Chinese mental health forums. The effectiveness of the fine-tuned language model is verified on a group comprising 38 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and 25 meticulously matched healthy controls. The study explores the association between the fine-tuned language model and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) items. The results demonstrate that SPR is higher in healthy controls, indicating better language understanding by the pre-trained language model. Conversely, DF is higher in individuals with schizophrenia, indicating more inconsistent language structure. The relationship between linguistic features and P2 (conceptual disorganization) reveals that patients with positive P2 exhibit lower SPR and higher DF. Binary logistic regression using the combined SPR and DF features achieves 84.5 % accuracy in classifying P2, exceeding the performance of traditional features by 20.5 %. Moreover, the proposed linguistic features outperform traditional linguistic features in discriminating FTD (formal thought disorder), as demonstrated by multivariate linear regression analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    双语语言产生理论预测,患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)的双语者应表现出两种下降模式之一。两种语言的并行下降(如果下降反映了对两种语言访问的语义表示的损害),或者不对称下降,非显性语言的下降幅度更大(如果下降反映出随着疾病进展解决显性语言竞争的能力下降)。之前只有两项研究检查了纵向下降,其中一项显示平行,另一种是不对称的,下降。我们检查了西班牙语-英语双语者(N=23)在2-7年内的下降(平均3.9)。Logistic回归显示,与基线相比,一年后呈平行下降模式,但在较长的衰退期内是不对称的衰退期,非显性语言的下降幅度更大(当计算正确反应的预测概率时)。仅当模型中包含项目难度时,非显性语言的不对称下降模式才明显更大。跨优势群体的探索性分析着眼于相对于初始命名准确性的比例下降,进一步表明,如果该语言是在以后的生活中获得的,则非优势语言的下降可能会更加陡峭。但在逻辑回归分析中,支持这种可能性所需的关键交互作用并无统计学意义.这些结果表明,非显性语言的可及性最初可能在早期相对于更晚期的AD更具弹性。并且在执行控制下降到在单语言测试块中命名图片的能力被中断之前,AD会影响共享的语义表示。需要做更多的工作来确定不对称的衰退模式是否会因非主导语言的晚期习得而被放大,如果执行控制的细微损害是AD最早阶段(甚至临床前)发生的语言转换损害的基础。
    Theories of bilingual language production predict that bilinguals with Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) should exhibit one of two decline patterns. Either parallel decline of both languages (if decline reflects damage to semantic representations that are accessed by both languages), or asymmetrical decline, with greater decline of the nondominant language (if decline reflects reduced ability to resolve competition from the dominant language with disease progression). Only two previous studies examined decline longitudinally with one showing parallel, and the other asymmetrical, decline. We examined decline over 2-7 years (3.9 on average) in Spanish-English bilinguals (N = 23). Logistic regression revealed a parallel decline pattern at one year from baseline, but an asymmetrical decline pattern over the longer decline period, with greater decline of the nondominant language (when calculating predicted probabilities of a correct response). The asymmetrical decline pattern was significantly greater for the nondominant language only when including item-difficulty in the model. Exploratory analyses across dominance groups looking at proportional decline relative to initial naming accuracy further suggested that decline of the nondominant language may be more precipitous if that language was acquired later in life, but the critical interaction needed to support this possibility was not statistically significant in a logistic regression analysis. These results suggest that accessibility of the nondominant language may initially be more resilient in early versus more advanced AD, and that AD affects shared semantic representations before executive control declines to a point where the ability to name pictures in single-language testing block is disrupted. Additional work is needed to determine if asymmetrical decline patterns are magnified by late age of acquisition of the nondominant language, and if more subtle impairments to executive control underlie impairments to language switching that occur in the earliest stages of AD (even preclinically).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The S3 Guideline on the Treatment of Language Development Disorders: Summary of Recommendations Abstract: The German S3 Guidelines on the Treatment of Developmental Speech and Language Disorders (AWMF: No. 049-015) were published on the AWMF homepage at the end of 2022. The German Society for Phoniatrics and Paedaudiologie coordinated the work and developed the guideline text together with linguists and speech and language therapists. Many scientific medical societies consented to the respective recommendations. For the first time in the German-speaking area, the guideline group reviewed international research results on the treatment of various speech and language disorders and formulated evidence- or consensus-based recommendations for clinical care. The present article summarizes these recommendations and evaluates the guidelines from the perspective of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychotherapy.
    Zusammenfassung: Die S3-Leitlinie zur Therapie von Sprachentwicklungsstörungen (AWMF: Nr. 049-015), die Ende 2022 auf der Homepage der AWMF veröffentlich wurde, ist unter Federführung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie in Kooperation mit zahlreichen Sprachwissenschaftler_innen und Sprachtherapeut_innen entwickelt und von zahlreichen wissenschaftlichen medizinischen Fachgesellschaften konsentiert worden. Die Leitliniengruppe hat erstmalig für den deutschen Sprachraum versucht, die internationale Studienlage zur Therapie unterschiedlicher Sprach- und Sprechstörungen aufzuarbeiten und darauf basierend Evidenz- oder auch Konsensus-basierte Empfehlungen für die klinische Versorgung zu formulieren. In dem vorliegenden Artikel werden diese Empfehlungen zusammenfassend dargestellt, und es wird eine Wertung der Leitlinie aus Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrischer Sicht vorgenommen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:早期识别语言障碍可以帮助儿童获得改善发育结果和生活质量所需的支持。尽管持续的语言障碍的流行和影响,令人惊讶的是,没有强大的预测工具可用。这使得研究人员很难招募幼儿参加早期干预试验,这反过来又阻碍了向需要的儿童提供有效的早期干预措施的进展。
    目的:为了从外部验证先前确定的可预测11岁时语言的六个变量的预测集,使用澳大利亚儿童纵向研究(LSAC)出生队列的数据。此外,检查是否产生了其他LSAC变量来预测语言结果。
    方法:总共5107名儿童被招募到LSAC,收集了0至3岁的发育测量值。在11-12岁的时候,儿童完成了语言基础的临床评估,第4版,回顾句子子测试。我们使用SuperLearner来估计先前确定的来自2-3岁的父母报告的六个变量在预测11-12岁时的低语言(句子回忆得分比平均值低1.5SD)的准确性。随机森林用于识别预测语言结果的任何其他变量。
    结果:523名参与者(52.20%的女孩)获得了完整的数据,其中27人(5.16%)的语言得分较低。六个预测因子产生了相当的准确性:78%的灵敏度(95%置信区间(CI)=[58,91])和71%的特异性(95%CI=[67,75])。这些预测因素与句子复杂性有关,词汇和行为。随机森林分析确定了相似的预测因子。
    结论:我们确定了一组超短变量,可预测11-12年的语言结果,并具有“公平”的准确性。在该领域对这种规模的少数复制研究中,这些方法现在已经在两个基于人群的队列中进行,结果一致。这些发现的迫在眉睫的实际意义是使用这些预测因子来帮助招募早期语言干预研究。未来的研究可以继续完善早期预测因子的准确性,以在临床背景下进行早期识别。
    结论:关于该主题的已知因素尽管儿童语言障碍的患病率和深远的影响,但尚无可靠的预测集。先前的一项研究确定了在2-3岁时收集的六个变量,这些变量以75%的灵敏度和81%的特异性预测11-12岁的语言。这保证在单独的队列中复制。我们使用机器学习方法来识别一组2-3岁时提出的六个问题,其敏感性和特异性≥71%,用于预测11-12岁时的低语言结果。目前在两项基于人群的大规模队列研究中显示出一致的结果.这项工作的潜在或临床意义是什么?这个预测集比现有的可行方法更准确,可以转化为早期语言干预研究的低资源和时间效率的招募工具,从而改善为可能持续有语言障碍的幼儿提供的临床服务。
    BACKGROUND: Identifying language disorders earlier can help children receive the support needed to improve developmental outcomes and quality of life. Despite the prevalence and impacts of persistent language disorder, there are surprisingly no robust predictor tools available. This makes it difficult for researchers to recruit young children into early intervention trials, which in turn impedes advances in providing effective early interventions to children who need it.
    OBJECTIVE: To validate externally a predictor set of six variables previously identified to be predictive of language at 11 years of age, using data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) birth cohort. Also, to examine whether additional LSAC variables arose as predictive of language outcome.
    METHODS: A total of 5107 children were recruited to LSAC with developmental measures collected from 0 to 3 years. At 11-12 years, children completed the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, 4th Edition, Recalling Sentences subtest. We used SuperLearner to estimate the accuracy of six previously identified parent-reported variables from ages 2-3 years in predicting low language (sentence recall score ≥ 1.5 SD below the mean) at 11-12 years. Random forests were used to identify any additional variables predictive of language outcome.
    RESULTS: Complete data were available for 523 participants (52.20% girls), 27 (5.16%) of whom had a low language score. The six predictors yielded fair accuracy: 78% sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI) = [58, 91]) and 71% specificity (95% CI = [67, 75]). These predictors relate to sentence complexity, vocabulary and behaviour. The random forests analysis identified similar predictors.
    CONCLUSIONS: We identified an ultra-short set of variables that predicts 11-12-year language outcome with \'fair\' accuracy. In one of few replication studies of this scale in the field, these methods have now been conducted across two population-based cohorts, with consistent results. An imminent practical implication of these findings is using these predictors to aid recruitment into early language intervention studies. Future research can continue to refine the accuracy of early predictors to work towards earlier identification in a clinical context.
    CONCLUSIONS: What is already known on the subject There are no robust predictor sets of child language disorder despite its prevalence and far-reaching impacts. A previous study identified six variables collected at age 2-3 years that predicted 11-12-year language with 75% sensitivity and 81% specificity, which warranted replication in a separate cohort. What this study adds to the existing knowledge We used machine learning methods to identify a set of six questions asked at age 2-3 years with ≥ 71% sensitivity and specificity for predicting low language outcome at 11-12 years, now showing consistent results across two large-scale population-based cohort studies. What are the potential or clinical implications of this work? This predictor set is more accurate than existing feasible methods and can be translated into a low-resource and time-efficient recruitment tool for early language intervention studies, leading to improved clinical service provision for young children likely to have persisting language difficulties.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    语言障碍,它们仍然很难被检测到,经常出现在受虐待的儿童身上。虽然后果是众所周知的,而且是持久的,对这些孩子的发育和具体特征知之甚少,取决于它们被放置在哪里,他们遭受的虐待类型和他们所处的年龄。这一发现导致了对文献的回顾,旨在更好地定义关于该主题的知识状态,为了更好的检测和治疗。
    Language disorders, which are still very poorly detected, are often present in abused children. While the consequences are well known and long-lasting, little is known about the development and specific characteristics of these children, depending on where they were placed, the type of abuse they suffered and the age at which they were placed. This finding led to a review of the literature aimed at better defining the state of knowledge on the subject, for the benefit of better detection and treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:本教程讨论了语言病理学家(SLP)支持语言障碍患者理解他人的认知和情感状态(心理理论,ToM),特别考虑将这些建议应用于神经发散的个体。
    方法:我通过首先回顾与ToM和语言能力有关的各种语言困难人群的文献来激发本教程,强调需要明确针对语言相关技能,这些技能被认为是语言障碍患者的ToM基础。接下来,我将介绍如何通过基于扫盲的活动来支持ToM的具体示例。在此讨论之后,我通过具体的例子简要描述了如何将这些活动应用于神经发散的个体,例如,在故事书中加入神经发散的角色如何有助于教育孩子理解他人的观点。它进一步强调了讨论不同类型的心理和情绪状态的重要性,这些人分享和不同的神经类型。
    结论:语言技能是ToM能力不可或缺的一部分。SLP在支持客户学术方面发挥着重要作用,识字,和社会成果,并可以通过相关的语言/沟通技巧支持重要的观点接受技能。属于“心理理论”这一总称的各种技能可以适当地纳入干预和基于读写能力的任务中,以尊重神经类型的差异,同时仍为客户建立重要的语言和沟通技巧。
    OBJECTIVE: This tutorial discusses the importance of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) supporting individuals with language disorders in their understanding of others\' cognitive and affective states (theory of mind, ToM), with a special consideration given to applying these suggestions with individuals who are neurodivergent.
    METHODS: I motivate this tutorial by first reviewing the literature related to ToM and language abilities for various populations of individuals with language difficulties, highlighting the need for explicitly targeting the language-related skills that are thought to underlie ToM for individuals with language disorders. I next present concrete examples of how to support ToM through literacy-based activities. I follow this discussion with a short description of how these activities may be applied with individuals who are neurodivergent through concrete examples, such as how inclusion of neurodivergent characters in storybooks can aid in educating children about understanding others\' perspectives. It further emphasizes the importance of discussing various types of mental and emotional states for individuals who share as well as differ in their neurotypes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Language skills are an integral part of ToM abilities. SLPs play an important role in supporting clients\' academic, literacy, and social outcomes and can support important perspective-taking skills through associated language/communication skills. The various skills that fall under the umbrella term \'theory of mind\' can be appropriately incorporated into intervention and literacy-based tasks in a way that respects differences in neurotype while still building important language and communication skills for clients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:有新的研究表明,患有脑瘫(CP)的儿童和年轻人(CYAs)患注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的风险更高。然而,对这些共同发生的疾病的CYAs的临床和功能特征知之甚少。
    目的:评估CYAs与CP的ADHD诊断与临床和功能特征之间的关联。
    方法:本回顾性研究,横断面研究使用了CYAs(4-26岁)合并CP(n=1145)的电子健康记录数据.我们使用双变量和多变量分析来估计ADHD诊断之间的关联,CP类型,粗大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS)水平,言语或语言障碍,智力残疾。
    结果:18.1%的CYAs伴CP诊断为ADHD。痉挛-双侧CP的CYAs患ADHD的几率较低(调整后的优势比[AOR]=0.58;95%置信区间[CI],0.35-0.96)。对于GMFCS水平为III-V的患者,患有ADHD的几率显着降低(AOR=0.10;95%CI,0.06-0.15)。
    结论:我们的研究发现,与没有ADHD的人相比,在有CP的CYAs中诊断为ADHD与更大的临床和功能损害相关。研究结果强调,由于该人群的合并症率高,因此需要对这两种情况进行筛查。
    BACKGROUND: Emerging research shows that children and young adults (CYAs) with cerebral palsy (CP) are at higher risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, little is known about the clinical and functional characteristics of CYAs with these co-occurring disorders.
    OBJECTIVE: To estimate associations between a diagnosis of ADHD among CYAs with CP and clinical and functional characteristics.
    METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study used data from the electronic health records of CYAs (aged 4-26 years) with CP (n = 1145). We used bivariate and multivariable analyses to estimate associations between an ADHD diagnosis, CP type, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level, speech or language disorder, and intellectual disability.
    RESULTS: 18.1 % of CYAs with CP had a diagnosis of ADHD. CYAs with spastic-bilateral CP had lower odds of ADHD (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.58; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.96). Odds of having ADHD were significantly lower for those with GMFCS levels III-V (AOR = 0.10; 95 % CI, 0.06-0.15).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that a diagnosis of ADHD among CYAs with CP was associated with greater clinical and functional impairments compared to counterparts without ADHD. Findings highlight the need to screen for both conditions because of the high comorbidity rates in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号