Inyección percutánea de etanol

Inyecci ó n percut á nea de etanol
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:经皮乙醇注射(PEI)已被证明是甲状腺结节病理和转移性宫颈腺病的有价值的治疗方法。
    目的:为了评估有效性,安全,PEI在甲状腺结节病理和转移性宫颈腺病中的成本效益。
    方法:使用荟萃分析对PEI的有效性和安全性进行了系统评价(SR)。还进行了关于成本效益的SR。SRs是根据CochraneCollaboration制定的方法进行的,并根据PRISMA声明进行报告。使用决策树模型进行了成本最小化分析。假设两种微创技术(PEI和射频消融(RFA))的有效性相同,该模型从西班牙国家卫生系统的角度比较了六个月替代方案的成本。
    结果:搜索确定了三个RCT(n=157),用于评估诊断为良性甲状腺结节的患者的PEI和RFA:96例主要为囊性结节的患者和61例实性结节的患者。没有发现其他技术或甲状腺结节病理学的证据。PEI和RFA在体积减少(%)方面没有观察到统计学上的显著差异,症状评分,化妆品评分,治疗成功和主要并发症。没有确定经济评估。成本最小化分析估计PEI手术每位患者的成本为326欧元,而RFA为4781欧元。这意味着-4455欧元的增量差额。
    结论:PEI和RFA在安全性和有效性方面没有差异,但是经济评估确定前一种选择更便宜。
    BACKGROUND: Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) has been shown to be a valuable treatment for thyroid nodular pathology and metastatic cervical adenopathies.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of PEI in thyroid nodular pathology and metastatic cervical adenopathies.
    METHODS: A systematic review (SR) using meta-analysis was conducted on the effectiveness and safety of PEI. A SR on cost-effectiveness was also performed. The SRs were conducted according to the methodology developed by the Cochrane Collaboration with reporting in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A cost-minimization analysis was carried out using a decision tree model. Assuming equal effectiveness between two minimally invasive techniques (PEI and radiofrequency ablation (RFA)), the model compared the costs of the alternatives with a horizon of six months and from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System.
    RESULTS: The search identified three RCTs (n=157) that evaluated PEI versus RFA in patients diagnosed with benign thyroid nodules: ninety-six patients with predominantly cystic nodules and sixty-one patients with solid nodules. No evidence was found on other techniques or thyroid nodular pathology. No statistically significant differences were observed between PEI and RFA in volume reduction (%), symptom score, cosmetic score, therapeutic success and major complications. No economic evaluations were identified. The cost-minimization analysis estimated the cost per patient of the PEI procedure at €326 compared to €4781 for RFA, which means an incremental difference of -€4455.
    CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences between PEI and RFA regarding their safety and effectiveness, but the economic evaluation determined that the former option is cheaper.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估经皮无水乙醇注射治疗(PEIT)替代甲状腺手术治疗有症状的甲状腺囊肿的长期疗效。
    方法:有症状的甲状腺囊肿引流后复发的100名受试者(48±12岁;58%的女性)被前瞻性纳入。PEIT是使用既定程序进行的,和最初的囊肿体积,对患者感觉到的症状和疼痛进行了评估.在所有情况下,滴注的酒精体积≤2ml,无需重新提取。对患者进行3年以上的随访,并评估最终囊肿体积和症状改善情况。
    结果:引流前平均最大囊肿直径为3.1±1.2cm。在71%的患者中,需要2次PEIT会话。首次引流前的最大囊肿体积中位数为12.7(5.4-21.7)ml,从囊肿中提取的总体积中位数为13.0(6.2-37.0)ml。平均随访52±10个月后,98%的患者报告完全没有症状。整个组的最终中位体积为0.8(0.1-2.0)ml,中位体积减少94(81-99)%。在90%的病例中观察到大于65%的最终体积减少。76.4%的病例报告术中疼痛不存在或轻微。
    结论:PEIT是一种安全且耐受良好的一线治疗有症状的甲状腺囊肿的长期疗效。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of percutaneous ethanol injection treatment (PEIT) as an alternative to thyroid surgery in symptomatic thyroid cysts.
    METHODS: 100 subjects (48±12 years; 58% women) with symptomatic thyroid cysts relapsing after drainage were prospectively included. PEIT was conducted using an established procedure, and the initial cyst volume, symptoms and pain perceived by the patient were assessed. The volume of instilled alcohol was ≤2ml without re-extraction in all cases. Patients were followed-up for more than 3 years and final cyst volume and symptom improvement were assessed.
    RESULTS: Mean maximum cyst diameter before drainage was 3.1±1.2cm. In 71% of patients ≤2 PEIT sessions were required. Median maximum cyst volume was 12.7 (5.4-21.7)ml before the first drainage and median total volume extracted from the cysts was 13.0 (6.2-37.0)ml. After a mean follow-up period of 52±10 months, 98% of patients reported a complete absence of symptoms. The final median volume for the whole group was 0.8 (0.1-2.0)ml with a median volume reduction of 94 (81-99)%. A final volume reduction greater than 65% was observed in 90% of cases. Reported pain during the procedure was absent or mild in 76.4% of cases.
    CONCLUSIONS: PEIT is a safe and well-tolerated first-line treatment for symptomatic thyroid cysts with long-term effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估经皮无水乙醇注射治疗(PEIT)替代甲状腺手术治疗有症状的甲状腺囊肿的长期疗效。
    方法:有症状的甲状腺囊肿引流后复发的100名受试者(48±12岁;58%的女性)被前瞻性纳入。PEIT是使用既定程序进行的,和最初的囊肿体积,对患者感觉到的症状和疼痛进行了评估.在所有情况下,滴注的酒精体积≤2ml,无需重新提取。对患者进行3年以上的随访,并评估最终囊肿体积和症状改善情况。
    结果:引流前平均最大囊肿直径为3.1±1.2cm。在71%的患者中,需要2次PEIT会话。首次引流前的最大囊肿体积中位数为12.7(5.4-21.7)ml,从囊肿中提取的总体积中位数为13.0(6.2-37.0)ml。平均随访52±10个月后,98%的患者报告完全没有症状。整个组的最终中位体积为0.8(0.1-2.0)ml,中位体积减少94(81-99)%。在90%的病例中观察到大于65%的最终体积减少。76.4%的病例报告术中疼痛不存在或轻微。
    结论:PEIT是一种安全且耐受良好的一线治疗有症状的甲状腺囊肿的长期疗效。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of percutaneous ethanol injection treatment (PEIT) as an alternative to thyroid surgery in symptomatic thyroid cysts.
    METHODS: 100 subjects (48±12 years; 58% women) with symptomatic thyroid cysts relapsing after drainage were prospectively included. PEIT was conducted using an established procedure, and the initial cyst volume, symptoms and pain perceived by the patient were assessed. The volume of instilled alcohol was ≤2ml without re-extraction in all cases. Patients were followed-up for more than 3 years and final cyst volume and symptom improvement were assessed.
    RESULTS: Mean maximum cyst diameter before drainage was 3.1±1.2cm. In 71% of patients ≤2 PEIT sessions were required. Median maximum cyst volume was 12.7 (5.4-21.7)ml before the first drainage and median total volume extracted from the cysts was 13.0 (6.2-37.0)ml. After a mean follow-up period of 52±10 months, 98% of patients reported a complete absence of symptoms. The final median volume for the whole group was 0.8 (0.1-2.0)ml with a median volume reduction of 94 (81-99)%. A final volume reduction greater than 65% was observed in 90% of cases. Reported pain during the procedure was absent or mild in 76.4% of cases.
    CONCLUSIONS: PEIT is a safe and well-tolerated first-line treatment for symptomatic thyroid cysts with long-term effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号