{Reference Type}: Systematic Review
{Title}: Percutaneous ethanol injection in thyroid nodular pathology and metastatic cervical adenopathies: A systematic review, meta-analysis and economic evaluation.
{Author}: León-Salas B;Hernández-Yumar A;Infante-Ventura D;de Armas Castellano A;González Hernández Y;Linertová R;Téllez Santana T;de Pablos-Velasco P;Trujillo-Martín MM;
{Journal}: Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed)
{Volume}: 70
{Issue}: 9
{Year}: 2023 Nov
{Factor}: 1.833
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.endien.2023.08.007
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) has been shown to be a valuable treatment for thyroid nodular pathology and metastatic cervical adenopathies.<BR><B>OBJECTIVE: </B>To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of PEI in thyroid nodular pathology and metastatic cervical adenopathies.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>A systematic review (SR) using meta-analysis was conducted on the effectiveness and safety of PEI. A SR on cost-effectiveness was also performed. The SRs were conducted according to the methodology developed by the Cochrane Collaboration with reporting in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A cost-minimization analysis was carried out using a decision tree model. Assuming equal effectiveness between two minimally invasive techniques (PEI and radiofrequency ablation (RFA)), the model compared the costs of the alternatives with a horizon of six months and from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The search identified three RCTs (n=157) that evaluated PEI versus RFA in patients diagnosed with benign thyroid nodules: ninety-six patients with predominantly cystic nodules and sixty-one patients with solid nodules. No evidence was found on other techniques or thyroid nodular pathology. No statistically significant differences were observed between PEI and RFA in volume reduction (%), symptom score, cosmetic score, therapeutic success and major complications. No economic evaluations were identified. The cost-minimization analysis estimated the cost per patient of the PEI procedure at €326 compared to €4781 for RFA, which means an incremental difference of -€4455.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>There are no differences between PEI and RFA regarding their safety and effectiveness, but the economic evaluation determined that the former option is cheaper.