OBJECTIVE: The off-label use in clinical practice of non-approved syringes for intravitreal drug administration has resulted in the detection of silicone oil drops in the vitreous of some patients. This situation derives from the lack of approved syringes for intraocular use in the Spanish market. The aim of this work is to review the use of syringes for intraocular administration, as well as to search for alternatives that meet the legal requirements for these unmet needs.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines by searching PubMed with the descriptors: (silicone) AND (syringes) AND ((intraocular) OR (intravitreal)) and filtering all existing publications from January 2006 to December 2023, including all those articles dealing with silicone oil release in intravitreal injections and analysing the possible consequences.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight results were found, 23 of which were excluded because they did not deal with the subject under study, leaving a total of 45 articles for the systematic review. These were classified according to the conclusions obtained in 4 groups: the adverse reactions produced by silicone; the administration technique; the physicochemical aspects of silicone release; and the characteristics of the medical device. After reviewing the current manufacturers and technical data sheets of commercialised syringes, the existing syringes for this use have been collected, finding 2 that will probably be commercialised in Spain at the beginning of 2024: Zero Residual™ 0.2 ml SiO-free and VitreJect® Ophthalmic.
CONCLUSIONS: From the results obtained, it can be interpreted that the use of syringes and needles with silicone for intravitreal use is a concern for health professionals due to the implications and consequences that may arise in patients, the most important being adverse reactions, so it is necessary to have silicone-free syringes on the market that are specific for intraocular use. Safety and legality in the use of intraocular syringes and needles is essential to guarantee ocular integrity and patient health.

OBJECTIVE: The off-label use in clinical practice of non-approved syringes for intravitreal drug administration has resulted in the detection of silicone oil drops in the vitreous of some patients. This situation derives from the lack of approved syringes for intraocular use in the Spanish market. The aim of this work is to review the use of syringes for intraocular administration, as well as to search for alternatives that meet the legal requirements for these unmet needs.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA 2020 Guidelines by searching PubMed with the descriptors: \"silicone\" AND \"syringes\" AND (\"intraocular\" OR \"intravitreal\") and filtering all existing publications from January 2006 to December 2023, including all those articles dealing with silicone oil release in intravitreal injections and analysing the possible consequences.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight results were found, 23 of which were excluded because they did not deal with the subject under study, leaving a total of 45 articles for the systematic review. These were classified according to the conclusions obtained in 4 groups: the adverse reactions produced by silicone, the administration technique, the physicochemical aspects of silicone release, and the characteristics of the medical device. After reviewing the current manufacturers and technical data sheets of commercialized syringes, the existing syringes for this use have been collected, finding two that will probably be commercialized in Spain at the beginning of 2024: Zero Residual™ 0.2 ml SiO-free and VitreJect® Ophthalmic.
CONCLUSIONS: From the results obtained, it can be interpreted that the use of syringes and needles with silicone for intravitreal use is a concern for health professionals due to the implications and consequences that may arise in patients, the most important being adverse reactions, so it is necessary to have silicone-free syringes on the market that are specific for intraocular use. Safety and legality in the use of intraocular syringes and needles is essential to guarantee ocular integrity and patient health.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the anatomical results in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, at least grade B of proliferative vitreoretinopathy, and with a trans-surgical dexamethasone implant vs the control group. We also assessed the diminution of proliferative vitreoretinopathy and the final visual acuity (VA).
METHODS: The patients were evaluated clinically and with optical coherence tomography for 10 months. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of the dexamethasone implant on retinal detachment. Correlational analyses were explored depending on the variables\' distribution, and an independent samples t-test was used to compare the VA in both groups.
RESULTS: The study included 38 eyes of patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy: 18 with the implant and 20 for the control group. The evaluation of the main objective showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in the anatomical success between the two groups (61.1% vs. 20%, treatment vs. control); odds ratio of 6.29; 95% confidence interval: 1.5- 26.8; p = 0.013; Nagelkerke\'s R2 = 0.225. The t-test showed a significant difference in the final VA of the patients (t = 2.047; df = 36; p = 0.048; Cohen\'s d = 0.66).
CONCLUSIONS: Retinal redetachment was less frequent, and better VA was observed, in patients with the dexamethasone implant in comparison with the control group.
OBJECTIVE: Comparar los resultados anatómicos en pacientes con desprendimiento de retina regmatógeno, vitreorretinopatía proliferativa a partir de grado B y aplicación de implante de dexametasona transquirúrgico frente a un grupo control. También se valoraron la disminución de la vitreorretinopatía proliferativa y la agudeza visual (AV) final.
UNASSIGNED: Los pacientes se evaluaron clínicamente y con tomografía de coherencia óptica por 10 meses. Se realizaron análisis de regresión logística para evaluar el efecto del implante en el redesprendimiento de retina. Se exploraron análisis correlacionales dependiendo de la distribución de variables y se aplicó la prueba t de muestras independientes para comparar la AV en ambos grupos.
RESULTS: Se incluyeron 38 ojos de pacientes con vitreorretinopatía proliferativa: 18 con el implante y 20 del grupo control. La evaluación del objetivo principal mostró diferencias significativas (p < 0.05) en el éxito anatómico entre ambos grupos (61.1% en los ojos con tratamiento frente a 20% en el grupo control); razón de momios de 6.29; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 1.5- 26.8; p = 0.013; R2 de Nagelkerke = 0.225. La prueba t mostró una diferencia significativa entre la AV final de los pacientes (t = 2.047; gl = 36; p = 0.048; d de Cohen = 0.66).
CONCLUSIONS: Se observó menor redesprendimiento, así como mejor AV, en los pacientes con el implante de dexametasona en comparación con el grupo control.

The recent release of brolucizumab and the development of new antiangiogenic molecules as abicipar pegol has increased the interest towards inflammatory complications after intravitreal drug injection. Those drugs are associated to a higher rate of inflammatory adverse events compared to classic drugs. In this context it is essential to differentiate between sterile and infectious cases for a fast and effective treatment. The clinical similarities between infectious and sterile cases, the high rate of culture negative patients and the heterogeneity in the terminology used are obstacles for a correct diagnosis and report of these complications. Sterile cases appear early after the injection, before 48 h; or 20 days after in brolucizumab-related vasculitis cases. Infectious cases show up around the third day after injection and up to a week after it. A severe visual impairment, severe pain, severe hyperemia, hypopyon and a more severe intraocular inflammatory process are signs of a likely infectious origin. If the cause of the inflammation is uncertain we must follow up the patient closely or \"tap and inject\" antimicrobial agents in order to prevent the eventual complications of an infectious endophthalmitis. On the other hand, sterile endophthalmitis might be observed in mild cases or treated with steroids according to the severity of the inflammation.

METHODS: 49-year-old man with diabetic macular edema refractory to antiangiogenics, it is decided to perform therapy with intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex; Allergan, California, United States of America). Seven days after treatment, he showed acute endophthalmitis suggestive signs. Despite the intravitreal injection of antibiotics, the patient got worse. Vitreous sampling was repeated for Gram and cultures, and vitrectomy was performed via pars plana. The culture suggested the development of Brevibacterium species. Through an additional test, the presence of Brevibacterium casei was confirmed. Despite the treatment adjusted by antibiogram, retinal ischemia and macular atrophy was evident.
CONCLUSIONS: Brevibacterium casei is a Gram-positive bacterium, barely pathogenic, that mainly affects immunodepressed patients. Only two cases of endophthalmitis are described, one endogenous and the other one secondary to vegetal trauma. This is the first case of endophthalmitis, secondary to an ophthalmological procedure.

METHODS: A 49-year-old man with diabetic macular edema refractory to antiangiogenics was treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex; Allergan, California, USA). Seven days after treatment, he showed acute endophthalmitis suggestive signs. Despite the intravitreal injection of antibiotics, the patient got worse. Vitreous sampling was repeated for Gram and cultures, and vitrectomy was performed via pars plana. The culture suggested the development of Brevibacterium species. Through an additional test, the presence of Brevibacterium casei was confirmed. Despite the treatment adjusted by antibiogram, retinal ischemia and macular atrophy was evident.
CONCLUSIONS: Brevibacterium casei is a Gram-positive bacterium, barely pathogenic, that mainly affects immunodepressed patients. Only two cases of endophthalmitis are described, one endogenous and the other one secondary to vegetal trauma. This is the first case of Brevibacterium casei endophthalmitis, secondary to an ophthalmological procedure.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate and compare the visual and morphological results of Pro re nata (PRN) and treat-and-extend (T&E) treatment regimens at 3 years in real world clinical practice.
METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with neovascular age macular degeneration (AMD) treated with anti-VEGF with 3 years of continuous follow-up and no previous anti-VEGF treatment. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT) and number of intravitreal injections outcomes were tested for statistical differences between the two groups at baseline and during follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 240 eyes were included in the study, 170 in the PRN group and 70 in the T&E group. At 12 months, mean BCVA (ETDRS letters) gain from baseline was at its highest point in the T&E group (+6.38±13.32; p=0.25). In the PRN group, BCVA peaked at 3 months and slowly decreased until end of follow-up. With both regimens, from baseline, CFT continued to decrease until the second year (PRN -138.81 [-846.7 to +162.77] and T&E -81 [-604 to +100] μm, p=0.06). After that, T&E group maintained this tendency, reaching the lowest CFT value at 36 months, whereas PRN group showed an increased in CFT values (PRN -104 [-807.7 to +297] μm and T&E -103 [-575 to +244], μm p=0.63). Patients treated with T&E regimen received a significantly higher number of injections (PRN 16.3±7.6 vs T&E 23.9 ±9.4, p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated a trend towards for T&E to achieve higher marks in BCVA, peaking at 12 months, and lower CFT thickness at the end of three years. Despite the higher number of injections performed in the T&E group the mean BCVA reverts to baseline values at 3 years.

Los desgarros del epitelio pigmentario de la retina (EPR) se asocian en la mayoría de los casos con los desprendimientos vascularizados del EPR debido a una degeneración macular asociada a la edad (DMAE), y normalmente implican una pérdida adversa de la agudeza visual. Estudios recientes indican que ha habido un aumento en la incidencia de desgarros del EPR desde la introducción de fármacos anti-factor de crecimiento del endotelio vascular (anti-VEGF) así como una asociación temporal entre el desgarro y la inyección intravítrea. Dado que el número de pacientes con DMAE y el número de inyecciones anti-VEGF va en aumento, tanto la dificultad de prevenir desgarros del EPR como el tratamiento tras la formación de los desgarros han adquirido una mayor relevancia. De forma paralela, la evolución de la imagenología de la retina ha contribuido de manera significativa a comprender mejor el desarrollo de los desgarros del EPR en los últimos años. Esta revisión resume los conocimientos que se poseen actualmente sobre el desarrollo, los factores pronósticos y las estrategias terapéuticas de los desgarros del EPR antes y después de que estos se formen.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection (IVI) in a «clean room» of a single health centre, following the guidelines of the Spanish Vitreo-Retinal Society (SERV). An analysis was performed on the culture specimens, response to treatment, and final outcomes (guidelines).
METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted on a consecutive case series of patients diagnosed with infectious endophthalmitis after IVI in a single health centre between 2010 and 2015. Intravitreal and systemic treatment was given following the SERV guidelines. The patients were followed up the case was resolved.
RESULTS: There were 5 cases of endophthalmitis out of 9467 IVI (incidence 0.053%). Positive cultures were obtained in aqueous and/or vitreous fluid in all cases, with Staphylococcus epidermidis being involved in 4 out of 5 cases. In 2 cases, final visual acuity was non-light perception due to intractable retinal detachments after resolution of the infectious process.
CONCLUSIONS: IVI performed in a «clean room» have a low incidence of endophthalmitis. The most common infectious agent was Staphylococcus species. In 2 cases the functional prognosis was poor.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse satisfaction and patient preferences on the location where they receive an intravitreal injection.
METHODS: A survey was conducted with the intention of analysing these patients who attended the macula clinic and have been intervened using an intravitreal injection at least once in the day hospital or in the theatre setting, comparing both locations.
RESULTS: The majority of the interviewed patients preferred the day hospital (50.0 versus 37.5%), mostly because of the comfort and the quick service. In patients with severe age-related macular degeneration (AMD) the option is reversed. The overall satisfaction level was positive in both cases (with 87.5% of patients satisfied or very satisfied in the day hospital and 91.1% in the theatre setting). Through the analysis of different aspects of clinical care the assessment was the same or superior for 75.0% of these patients, except in the waiting time. There were no cases of endophthalmitis.
CONCLUSIONS: In general, patients prefer the clinical intervention in the consulting room than in the theatre setting because of the quicker service. There are several characteristics that can influence this choice and should be taken into account.